[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference iosg::all-in-1_v30

Title:*OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference
Notice:Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1
Moderator:IOSG::PYE
Created:Thu Jan 30 1992
Last Modified:Tue Jan 23 1996
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4343
Total number of notes:18308

2839.0. "V2.4 v V3.0 Private File Cabinet Sizes" by FLEX7::ALLINGHAM_PD (Permenantly Peaking!) Thu Jun 10 1993 17:40

    I have a large customer site where consideration is being give to
    upgrading to V3 from 2.4.
    
    At present, the 5500 or so users tend to use the system for mail.  They
    are spread over three RA90's and occupy about 1045 blocks each - we
    don't have a lot of space!
    
    We are currently looking at a pre upgrade hardware upgrade, perhaps
    trying to spread the users over 5 spindles instead of three (3 X RA90 +
    2 X RA72).
    
    The low private area usage tells me that they are mostly using mail -
    fine we can cope with that - we have lots of other disks.  But
    something tells me that post V3.0 the user areas are going to occupy
    more space than they do now.  We don't have any documentation on site
    so I can't look it up.
    
    The question is:
    
    1.	Will the existing file cabs / private areas get larger post upgrade
    and if so by how much?
    
    2.	What will be the new 'default' size of a cabinet post upgrade when
    we start created new accounts?
    
    Thanks in advance!
    
    Peter.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
2839.1Why would v3.0 make a difference?AIMTEC::WICKS_AU.S.A 2 England 0 - I was there!Wed Jun 16 1993 02:419
    
    Peter,
    
    what makes you think that these files will be bigger under v3.0
    i'm bemused...
    
    regards,
    
    Andrew.D.wicks
2839.2Groping in the dark in BT-LANDFLEX7::ALLINGHAM_PDPermenantly Peaking!Wed Jun 16 1993 12:227
    Perhaps it's just an urban myth - unfortunately, I don't have a 3.0
    system to get onto nor do I have a doc set here - maybe there's no
    difference at all - only someone with access to a 3.0 can tell me!
    
    Regards,
    
    Peter.
2839.3Some observations....IOSG::PYEGraham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's ApprenticeWed Jun 16 1993 13:0116
    Each user will get the following new files, not necessarily all of
    them, it depends what features they use:
    
      ACCESS.DAT                0
      FILECAB.DAT             108
      OA$USERPRINTSTYLES.DAT   24
      OANICKNAMES.DAT          ??  (Converted from NICKNAMES - may increase)
      RESERVATIONS.DAT         62
      RESERVE_LIST.DAT         10
    
    The sizes come from the initial allocations in the FDLs. IMHO, the
    initial size of the FILECAB.DAT file could be drastically reduced by
    editing the FDL. Make sure the extent is still set to a reasonable
    number so that "power" users get it back to a sensible size quickly.
    
    Graham
2839.4Don't Forget "Drawers" ...ATLANA::SHERMANDebt Free!Wed Jun 16 1993 16:3210
   Hi &rew,

   Its not that the files get 'bigger' - its that there are more (.3) files
   in the directory.  In addition, the ALL-IN-1 sub-directory structure is 
   repeated for each additional drawer.  Over time, depending on the drawer 
   usage on Peter's system, this will also cause increased disk consumption ...

   Hthy,

	Ron
2839.5The Hardware Solution!FLEX7::ALLINGHAM_PDPermenantly Peaking!Wed Jun 16 1993 17:068
    Thanks for the help - I just heard this morning that we have 4 x RA72
    on order as of today so I'm a bit less worried that I was!
    
    Thanks for all the input.
    
    Cheers,
    
    Peter.
2839.6And OA$TEMP.DIRIOSG::NEWLANDRichard Newland, IOSG, REO2-G/L2Wed Jun 16 1993 20:118
Re: .3

Another new file is OA$TEMP.DIR, and any files in this directory.  However,
the new housekeeping option to clear the temporary file directories makes 
it much easier to delete any lost temporary files.


Richard