[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference turris::womannotes-v3

Title:Topics of Interest to Women
Notice:V3 is closed. TURRIS::WOMANNOTES-V5 is open.
Moderator:REGENT::BROOMHEAD
Created:Thu Jan 30 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 30 1995
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1078
Total number of notes:52352

259.0. "the perversity of inanimate objects (299 in v1)" by AV8OR::TATISTCHEFF (yes YOU) Fri Jul 27 1990 03:39

    while looking up a very old note in v1, i decided i'd like to restart
    this topic.  bonnie reinke dreamed it up originally.
    
    the perversity of inanimate objects refers to things like washing
    machines with wormholes (explaining the mysterious appearance of socks,
    someone else's underwear, etc) or chairs which despite their soft
    exterior will destroy new pantyhose in a femptosecond.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
259.1HEFTY::CHARBONNDain't no Prince CharmingFri Jul 27 1990 11:064
    That faulty headlight, that you thought you had fixed, will
    fail while you're having your car's annual safety inspection.
    
    Anybody lookin' for a good used pickup ?
259.2I took you pen; who took mine?ICS::WALKERBIENVENU CHEZ MOIFri Jul 27 1990 15:206
    Well, I want to know in what world the ballpoint graveyard is.  I steal
    my share, but I'm not taking them all.  And I still end up in a
    negative pen condition.  *I* think they're being used for some other
    purpose in an alternate universe.
    
    Briana
259.3on the subject....TLE::D_CARROLLAssume nothingFri Jul 27 1990 15:26156
Article 1913 of rec.humor.funny:
Path: shlump.nac.dec.com!bacchus.pa.dec.com!decwrl!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken!looking!funny-request
From: CWALTERS@ducvax.auburn.edu (Olias Of Sunhillow)
Newsgroups: rec.humor.funny
Subject: Where the hell are my socks?
Keywords: original, smirk
Message-ID: <S14d.10a3@looking.on.ca>
Date: 16 Jul 90 23:30:05 GMT
Lines: 143
Approved: funny@looking.on.ca

{ed A long, original piece}

    There is a peculiarity that runs through the human race. We tend to
    think of ourselves as advanced, scientific, thoughtful beings, but when
    something out of the ordinary springs up, we have a myriad of excuses
    to cover our backs with:
        "The wife must have moved it."
     	"God is punishing me for cheering for Notre Dame."
     	"I guess I've been drinking to much basin, tub, and tile cleaner."
     	"Damn kids.."
     	Etc., etc....

    Many are the events that we simply accept without question. For
    example: anyone who has had even the most basic training in physics
    knows that if you apply a force to an object, your change that objects
    velocity/motion/position. If you kick a sleeping cat, it flies in a
    parabolic course across the room until it comes in contact with
    something massive enough to absorb its inertia, right? If the cat hits
    a lamp, then inertia is transferred, and the lamp falls off the end
    table, and the cat hits the floor at a run, and ultimately strikes back
    by having a load of kittens on your pillow. (Trust me on that one.) If
    you trip and fall to the ground, your transfer inertia to the planet
    itself, and moves the earth infinitessimally. (Here's a thought - what
    would happen if we got everyone on one side of the earth, then got
    everyone to jump straight up at the same time?) Why then, in spite of
    all this, does a shower curtain float in to cling to your leg, even
    when faced with all the water power a showerhead can muster? This has
    happened to EVERYONE who has ever showered, but no one seems to care.
    At best, some people figure that SOMEBODY knows, and it all makes
    perfect sense, but no one has time to go look it up.

    Here we are, in the midst of the Scientific Revolution, remaining
    stubbornly apathetic about this shower curtain defying both gravity and
    the laws of motion to cling to our bare, soapy legs. Ben Franklin would
    have been furious.

    Before you get your hopes up, I must admit that I don't know what the
    shower curtain is up to, either. All the answers I come up with point
    to the presence of a non-human intelligence, and I don't want to think
    too much more about it. I feel vulnerable enough in the shower without
    worrying that a shower curtain- shaped invader is looking for a skin
    sample.

    No, there are other mysteries I want to ponder on. To wit, the erratic
    behavior of clothes hangers and of socks, and the possible
    relationships between the two. You see? All of you know already what
    I'm talking about, and you feel guilty for not wondering about it
    sooner. For shame.

    Where do all the extra hangers come from? Have you ever put two bare
    clothes hangers in the closet, and returned later to find just two bare
    coat hangers? Only if you've left the closet light on. Something about
    darkness causes hangers to replicate themselves at an alarming rate.

    Is it the absence of light itself? Reversed photosynthesis? God help us
    if we ever drop a coat hanger deep in a cave, if this is the case. The
    near- complete blackness possible underground would cause the hanger to
    pop off a copy of itself at whatever rate an asexual coat hanger could
    pop, and they soon break the cave apart and, in a worst-case scenario,
    eventually outweigh the earth. If we assume that the rate of
    reproduction increases as the amount of light decreases, it is
    interesting to imagine what would happen if a hanger were to find
    itself in a black hole. The gravity of the black hole would be crushing
    the hanger into nothingness, but the hanger would be reproducing
    exponentially at an infinite rate of speed. One coat hanger could
    battle a black hole to a standstill.

    For the moment, let us discard the above theory (if there is anyone who
    has not done so already). There is evidence against it: families have
    been away from their homes for months or years, and returned to not
    find there house reduced to a jungle-gym for hangers. Also, hangers
    never seem to get out of the closet on their own. Furthermore, this
    replicating of coat hangers has been most often documented when there
    is more than one hanger to start with, suggesting a mating is taking
    place. Perhaps the darkness is required to maintain hanger modesty,
    just as human beings prefer to "do it" with the lights out. Our limited
    human senses have been unable so far to distinguish male and female
    hangers, but maybe we all look the same to them, too. Perhaps coat
    hangers are hermaphroditic, and not built to be able to copulate with
    itself. This seems logical enough, especially when you consider that
    hangers which have clothes draped on them don't exhibit signs of
    replicating. It is possible that we humans, by using these hangers as
    we feel they are meant to be used, are forcing them to practice "safe
    sex". This theory only works if we assume that hangers are born already
    fully grown - or at least full-sized. There have been no reports of
    baby coat hangers mysteriously appearing.

    If we assume that the above theory is close to correct, we are given
    some insight into hanger morals. Have you noticed that hangers seem to
    be always tangled together, even when there were just two of them four
    feet apart the night before? You have just walked in on a hanger orgy.
    The little beasts have no scruples once the light goes out.

    Do you see the scope of what I'm trying to get at? We simply do *not*
    know what is going on. It doesn't just stop with coat hangers, either.
    If it did, then maybe we could just ignore it and continue our lives in
    blissful ignorance, but there is more. To wit:

    What happens to the other sock? You wear them at the same time, remove
    them at the same time, cast them into the same hamper, throw them in
    the wash together, and one of them disappears before you take them out
    of the dryer. As you may have feared, I have several theories
    explaining this, some of them tying in with the coat hanger mystery:

    1) the socks are afraid of the wash, so when they are all in there
    together, they choose one of their number to act as a sacrifice to some
    god in exchange for deliverance from the wet and sudsy hell. The
    sacrifice is slowly unraveled during the course of the wash, and is
    pulled away in the spin cycle. Or maybe it's the dryer that they don't
    like, and we are removing what's left of the unfortunate sock when we
    clean the lint filter. This theory shows a primitive and fearful sock
    society.

    2) one sock from each pair, at some point in time, retreats by whatever
    means into the pipes leading out of the washer. it hibernates deep in
    the bowels of the house until it receives some sort of signal, then it
    pupates into a coat hanger, and makes its way somehow into the closet.
    In effect, socks are the larval form of coat hangers.

    3) (really a variant of #2) during the wash, the socks participate in a
    bizzare mating dance, after which the female sock devours the male
    sock. Following a rapid gestation period, the female gives birth to a
    baby coat hanger, which slowly and stealthily creeps to the closet. By
    the time it is in the closet, it has matured to a full-grown hanger,
    ready to sow its oats.

    These are but a few examples of what can happen when the human mind is
    employed to learn, to probe, to question as opposed to merely keeping
    the ears from touching. The coat hanger/sock mystery is just one of
    thousands of questions that need to be examined, along with: "Why does
    the soulful allure of rap music continue to elude me?" "What is the
    opposite of sideways?" "How can you tell if yogurt goes bad?" "How
    hungry was the person who discovered escargo?" "Was disco as bad as
    everyone remembers it to be?" Etc., etc....

    I could go on, but it is time for my soap opera. Until next time....
--
    Christian
--
Edited by Brad Templeton.  MAIL your jokes (jokes ONLY) to funny@looking.ON.CA
Attribute the joke's source if at all possible.  A Daemon will auto-reply.

If you don't need a reply, submit to rhf@looking.on.ca instead.


259.4Hangers and socksCADSE::KHERFri Jul 27 1990 16:338
I guess, my socks and hangers are abnormal. My hangers disappear all the time.
Don't know what it is. My clothes definitely aren't multiplying, though that
would be knid of nice. And I once found a third sock in my wash. Got quite a
shock! They weren't good old white socks that look all the same either.
Thought I was definitely losing my mind.

Turned out I had come back from vacation with my friend's socks. So I had two
pairs of those socks
259.5CADSE::MACKINWe're still waiting for our dataFri Jul 27 1990 16:402
    And how is it I can have 4, count'em, 4, blue sock singlets and have
    none of the match exactly?
259.6the mystery is solvedHEFTY::CHARBONNDain't no Prince CharmingFri Jul 27 1990 16:463
    re .5 That's easy - washing machines don't really *eat* socks,
    they just remove different amounts of color from each individual
    sock 8-) 
259.8pair bondingCUPCSG::RUSSELLFri Jul 27 1990 21:0116
    I've discovered that if I put the singleton socks in a new pair they
    pair bond quite well.  Some socks like the new arrangement so much that
    I think they make their current mate sock disappear in the laundry
    (kinda like: change partners and spin cycle) so as to have an exciting
    new mate each week.  Sometimes the original  mate shows up again.
    
    This technique works equally well with mittens, except its more
    obvious.
    
    What I want to know is: how come the toilet only runs after flushing
    when I've gotten up at 3:00 AM to visit it.  Jiggling the handle
    doesn't work after midnight.
    
       Perplexed in Massachusetts
    
           Margaret  
259.9Easy. Ho-hum.REGENT::BROOMHEADDon't panic -- yet.Fri Jul 27 1990 21:1512
    Margaret,
    
    If you remove the cover to the toilet tank when the toilet is
    running, you will see and understand.  The toilet runs because
    the rubber cover on the pipe into the toilet hasn't closed.  It
    hasn't closed because its chain (connecting it to the outside
    handle) has gotten twisted or hung up somehow.  Jiggling the handle
    unkinks the chain, letting the cover drop and do its thing.
    
    After midnight, however, it's just yawning.
    
    						Ann B.
259.10WMOIS::B_REINKEtreasures....most of them dreamsSat Jul 28 1990 18:347
    Actually paper clips are the immature larval form of coat hangers,
    which is why coat hangers multiply and paper clips disappear.
    
    My current mystery is why my underwear disappears when I do a wash
    unless I put it all in one of those zipper bags.
    
    Bonnie
259.11STAR::BECK$LINK/SHAR SWORD.OBJ/EXE=PLOWSHR.EXESat Jul 28 1990 18:425
>    Actually paper clips are the immature larval form of coat hangers,
>    which is why coat hangers multiply and paper clips disappear.

Come now, credit where credit's due - who wrote the short story which
proposed this? (I don't remember, it was in a collection I read years ago.)
259.12:-)WMOIS::B_REINKEtreasures....most of them dreamsSat Jul 28 1990 23:575
    I believe that was from something Dave Barry wrote but it has
    entered the realm of my 'general information in my head file'
    and I can no longer recall where I first saw it.
    
    Bonnie
259.13RE paper clips and coathangersSTAR::BECK$LINK/SHAR SWORD.OBJ/EXE=PLOWSHR.EXESun Jul 29 1990 01:596
    It was a science fiction story. As the hero began to pick up on the
    details, things happened to him like he was thrown from his bicycle
    (Hmmmmm), and finally was found dead in a closet with a wire coathanger
    wrapped around his neck. Somebody must remember who wrote it (though it
    should probably be taken to the rathole topic at this point and
    continue here with the important work of explaining why nothing works).
259.14WMOIS::B_REINKEtreasures....most of them dreamsSun Jul 29 1990 02:089
    in re .13
    
    Then the idea has entered the popular culture :-) and I don't
    deserve to be tagged for plagerism... I've never read the story
    you mention that I recall.
    
    :-)
    
    Bonnie
259.15Accusation hereby withdrawnSTAR::BECK$LINK/SHAR SWORD.OBJ/EXE=PLOWSHR.EXESun Jul 29 1990 03:221
259.16in re .15 :-)WMOIS::B_REINKEtreasures....most of them dreamsSun Jul 29 1990 03:231
    
259.17OFFSHR::BOYAJIANA Legendary AdventurerSun Jul 29 1990 03:424
    The story it comes from is "Or All the Seas with Oysters" by
    Avram Davidson. The coathangers then grow up into bicycles.
    
    --- jerry
259.18But was it paper clips or safety pins?REGENT::BROOMHEADDon't panic -- yet.Mon Jul 30 1990 13:290
259.19Hanky-panky in the kitchen cabinetsNUTMEG::GODINSummertime an' the livin' is easyMon Jul 30 1990 16:349
    Well, baby paper clips may eventually grow into mature hangers, but how
    do you explain all of my eight-ounce tumblers disappearing at about the
    same rate the six-ounce juice glasses are multiplying?  Does glassware
    follow the same development cycle reported in another sci-fi story
    (don't ask me; I can't identify it) that had human beings come into
    life as elderly, decrepit individuals then "grow" into maturity as
    infants?   8-)
    
    Karen
259.20SPMFG1::CHARBONNDin the dark the innocent can't seeMon Jul 30 1990 16:371
    re .19 fission ?
259.23SSVAX2::KATZWhat's your damage?Mon Jul 30 1990 17:061
    bench brushes...the least stable object in any theatre's workshop
259.24Catalog in CaliforniaSWAM1::UCCI_SAMon Jul 30 1990 17:178
    Re:22
    
    Doctah:
    
    I have that catalog on my desk at this very moment.  I ordered the
    bow tiebacks 12 weeks ago and still waiting......
    
    Sandie
259.25;^)COBWEB::SWALKERlean, green, and at the screenThu Aug 02 1990 21:4724
>	Also, things like corkscrews, serving spoons, and carving knives
>    tend to disappear for months, from different drawers, and then pop up
>    in the silverware drawer at odd times (usually when you have just
>    returned with replacements).

	Inanimate objects can get very insecure.  They seem to get this
	complex about how they're just getting stuck in a drawer all the
	time, while you go out and do interesting things, taking other
	inanimate objects with you.  Corkscrews, serving spoons, etc.,
	are especially prone to this, because they also get jealous of
	the silverware, which gets used more often.

	So the corkscrews etc. respond by playing "hard to get", and hiding
	in illogical places you'll never think of just when they know you'll
	need them most.  Their plan is that they'll wait until you really
	feel the loss, then return to a warm welcome.  Of course, when you
	really feel the loss, you get replacements.

	For those of you who doubt the validity of this theory... have 
	you hugged a carving knife today?

	    Sharon