| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 356.3 | Official Response | VIKING::TARBET | Margaret Mairhi | Fri Jun 26 1987 19:10 | 4 |
| I have hidden the basenote based on a complaint by a member of our
community.
=maggie
|
| 356.4 | Authentic request | VIKING::SAWYER | Mark Sawyer by Tom Twain | Fri Jun 26 1987 20:13 | 16 |
| >< Note 356.3 by VIKING::TARBET "Margaret Mairhi" >
> -< Official Response >-
>
> I have hidden the basenote based on a complaint by a member of our
> community.
>
> =maggie
>
Well, here's a complaint about setting it hidden. :-(
I particularly enjoy reading Mr Manners mindless drivel.
So, do the complaints cancel ??? :-)
=mark
|
| 356.5 | mindless question... | PRESTO::MITCHELL | Lady | Fri Jun 26 1987 20:52 | 4 |
| re .4
and what do you consider mindless drivel ??? why would you
enjoy reading it ???
|
| 356.6 | Mindless answer... | VIKING::SAWYER | Mark Sawyer by Tom Twain | Fri Jun 26 1987 22:04 | 13 |
| >< Note 356.5 by PRESTO::MITCHELL "Lady" >
> -< mindless question... >-
>
> re .4
>
> and what do you consider mindless drivel ???
almost anyting Mr Manners writs
> why would you enjoy reading it ???
cuz reding hiz stuf maks me laff
|
| 356.7 | Official Response | VIKING::TARBET | Margaret Mairhi | Fri Jun 26 1987 23:20 | 3 |
| No Mark, they don't cancel.
=maggie
|
| 356.8 | enjoy mr. manners | NCVAX1::COOPER | studette in action | Sat Jun 27 1987 18:40 | 2 |
| that's what it's there for!!!!!
|
| 356.9 | | NISYSI::KING | Feb.5.1988 | Mon Jun 29 1987 16:50 | 11 |
| This is to the moderators of this and other files, Please answer
this question without the normal bullshit we (noters) hear from
standard excues,
Question-> Due to the resent basenotes hidden by a moderator in
this file, the following question I would like answered. If
1 (one,uno, whatever) person (read:human) complains about a base
note will it be set hidden? And what grounds does the moderators
base their reasons?
REK
|
| 356.10 | Official Response | VIKING::TARBET | Margaret Mairhi | Mon Jun 29 1987 17:22 | 19 |
| <--(.9)
In general, yes, a single objection is sufficient.
This presumes that the objection appears to be neither frivolous nor
mistaken. Whether or not any particular objection passes that test
depends entirely on the judgement of the moderator.
A clear violation of corporate policy requires no objection from
the community.
Personal insults, not attributable to "the heat of the moment" are
the usual reason for something to be hidden...and in fact that is
why the two basenotes you mention are no longer visible.
Does this information help?
=maggie
|
| 356.11 | | NISYSI::KING | Feb.5.1988 | Mon Jun 29 1987 17:37 | 19 |
| >In general, yes, a single objection is sufficient.<
Does this mean if I find something I object to you *will* set it
hidden?
The other parts are a little shady but understandable. The part
about personal attacks should not be allowed! I feel a person
can disagree and debate their point but not bring in personal
stuff. Remember what a famous person once said (me).
There is no such thing as a wrong opinion. If you believe its true
then that is your opinion.
REK
BTW I hope the moderators didn't take this personal, I meant this
as a part of the forum. But remember by setting the note hidden
we readers have to ponder what the note stated and draw our own
concluesions. Even if we know the writer...........
|
| 356.12 | Official Response | VIKING::TARBET | Margaret Mairhi | Mon Jun 29 1987 18:05 | 11 |
| <--(.11)
No, what I was actually trying to get at, Rick, is that it isn't
necessary to have more than one person object to something. If
the note/response seems like it should be hidden, one objection
will do it.
To keep notes like .0 from being even more irritating posthumously than
in life, I'm setting this string /nowrite.
=maggie
|