T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
514.1 | | ICTHUS::YUILLE | Thou God seest me | Fri Jul 01 1994 08:59 | 66 |
514.3 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Fri Jul 01 1994 12:25 | 10 |
| >This implies compromise with idolatry. The "particularity" of the gospel
>is not just that we meet God wholly in Jesus. The offense of the gospel is
>that God can be met in NO OTHER way. This means that all other worship is
>idolatry.
So Judaism is idolatry?
I always thought it was just incomplete.
/john
|
514.4 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Fri Jul 01 1994 13:46 | 13 |
| Acknowledging the truth amid profound errors in other religions, and speaking
against any compromise in the scandal of particularity, several of the
bishops of the Episcopal Church together with clergy and laity have issued
a call to Apostolic Mission. This is an extract from that statement:
While the world's religions and philosophies undoubtedly contain truths
amid their profound errors, we believe that Jesus is the full revelation
of God, that all persons need to come to know Him and to receive His
forgiveness and be conformed to His image. In and through the Gospel Jesus
both critiques, corrects, and supplements all of our partial views and
convictions. "There is no other name given under Heaven whereby men must
be saved." Therefore, we are to be His witnesses to all persons, locally,
regionally, nationally, and internationally.
|
514.5 | | ICTHUS::YUILLE | Thou God seest me | Fri Jul 01 1994 14:34 | 12 |
| Hi John,
I'm not quite sure what you meant in .3 - how do you equate my statement
to exclude Judaism?
The way of worship that God gave to Israel was by the sacrifices which
anticipated that of the LORD Jesus Christ. That was the way that God gave,
which applied their faith in advance, to offer worship via Jesus' sacrifice.
You could regard it as 'incomplete', just as a youth is an incomplete adult...
Andrew
|
514.6 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Fri Jul 01 1994 15:17 | 9 |
| re .5
And I think that's exactly what Cantuar is saying in .0. Other _higher_
religions (he doesn't list them; he certainly would exclude those that
deny the existence of the One God who created all things or those that
are explicitly evil) contain bits of truth, ways to begin to know God,
but that only through Jesus Christ can God be truly and fully known.
/john
|
514.7 | | ICTHUS::YUILLE | Thou God seest me | Fri Jul 01 1994 15:36 | 12 |
514.8 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Fri Jul 01 1994 15:45 | 16 |
| I would certainly include Islam.
Though full of error, they believe in the God of Abraham, believe that
Jesus was a prophet, and believe in submission to the will of God.
(Islam means submission.) They don't seem to be much different than
Jehovah's Witnesses.
Just like the Jews, they cannot fully know God unless they come to
know and believe in the particularity of Jesus.
Some Native American religions contain bits of truth about God.
But all except Christianity are partial and fraught with error. Christians
must evangelize all non-Christians and bring them to the fullness of Truth.
/john
|
514.9 | | NWD002::RANDALL_DO | | Fri Jul 01 1994 16:01 | 16 |
| Good topic, a key topic that we need to deal with in today's culture.
Framed differently, today diversity is embraced. This spills over in
the religious arena to read, "tolerance". So, how would Jesus respond?
Certainly not with some waffling answer - "there may be truth elsewhere,
etc." But also certainly not in an unloving way.
For example, with Islam, which explicitly denies Jesus' divinity. They
seem to worship the same God, but by denying that Jesus is God, how can
this be true? They are unable to worship Jesus as God.
I would try to respond as Jesus would, which was to proclaim the truth when
ever possible, not waffle, but usually in a loving way. His confrontations
were carefully chosen, usually confronting hypocrisy within His own
church. Also, He continuously worked hard to build up those who
believed in Him, equipping them to know Him more fully.
|
514.10 | | ICTHUS::YUILLE | Thou God seest me | Fri Jul 01 1994 16:06 | 12 |
| That's precisely the compromise GC implied. Bear in mind that although
Islam believes that Jesus is returning to judge the world, it does *not*
believe that He died on the cross. It teaches that Judas was substituted
instead. It denies Jesus' deity, and relegates him as the prophet of a
lesser revelation than Mohammed. In spite of the teaching of the Koran,
Christians are terribly persecuted in Islamic countries.
To imply that Islam is merely an incomplete revelation of Christianity
misses the point totally, and represents 'another gospel', as in Galatians
1:9.
Andrew
|
514.11 | | BIGQ::SILVA | Memories..... | Fri Jul 01 1994 16:07 | 5 |
|
Great note!!!!
|
514.12 | | JULIET::MORALES_NA | Sweet Spirit's Gentle Breeze | Fri Jul 01 1994 17:18 | 3 |
| .8
What is the difference between Islam and Muslim?
|
514.13 | | ICTHUS::YUILLE | Thou God seest me | Fri Jul 01 1994 17:35 | 7 |
514.14 | No Light At All In Other Religions??? | YIELD::BARBIERI | | Fri Jul 01 1994 21:42 | 22 |
| Hi,
I only read the first 5 replies, but if I understand correctly,
I have a different posture than you do Andrew.
No religion has all the light there is to have. No religion
is 100% devoid of idolatry in the way you seem to apply it.
That is some religion that has some error and thus to some degree
is not worshipping in truth.
To cut the chase...
ANY religion in which even the creative word of God can be
responded to by faith has some aspect of it (miniscule though it
may be) that is truth and is not idolatry.
Jesus Christ is the Creator and any faith response to the God
the Creator is a faith-response to Christ is a faith response to
truth.
Tony
|
514.15 | | ICTHUS::YUILLE | Thou God seest me | Mon Jul 04 1994 09:02 | 6 |
| Hi Tony,
We're trying to look at it from the Biblical perspective, rather than
just from personal opinions.
Andrew
|