[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference vmsnet::hunting$note:hunting

Title:The Hunting Notesfile
Notice:Registry #7, For Sale #15, Success #270
Moderator:SALEM::PAPPALARDO
Created:Wed Sep 02 1987
Last Modified:Tue Jun 03 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1561
Total number of notes:17784

1469.0. "Anti trapper's/bear hunters in MA" by LUDWIG::BING () Mon Oct 02 1995 11:41

    I read an article in the paper the other day about how there is
    a group of anti trappers in MA going around collecting signatures.
    They are trying to get an anti trapping question on the ballot for 96'.
    It would ban all leg hold traps (except for mice/rats) and it would
    ban the use of dogs for hunting bear and bobcat. What they are doing
    is this. ban hunting bear/bobcats with dogs then go after the
    bird/rabbit hunters. Dont think they won't? Believe me they will.
    Quiet a few years back I remember they tried to ban bird hunting
    with dogs and it failed. They will try again. keeps your eye's/ears
    open, do not sign their petition and vote against it. They are picking
    on the bear/bobcat hunters cause they are a minority in MA therefore
    are the easiest to target. You WILL be next if they win.

    Walt
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1469.1Prevention Best SISDA::DLORADITCHWed Oct 04 1995 12:4225
    
    
    We had a speaker from the Worcester County Sportsman league at our
    
    monthly Sportsman Club meeting, last night.
    
    He went into some detail about this and yes they are after ALL hunting
    
    eventually. These people are backed by big money from the Humane
    
    Society.
    
    Please speak to your local town clerk regarding monitoring of
    
    signature validation. If the address is different or the signature's
    
    don't match the petition signature is thrown out. They need 65000
    
    signatures and they are concentrating on college towns like Worcester
    
    and Amherst. Some town clerks are not very thorough about validating
    
    signatures, so if we make them do it right it will go along way towards
    
    stopping these people.
1469.2yUSCTR1::HAMELINMon Oct 09 1995 11:3815
    The Worcester Sunday Telegram had a good article regarding the spead of
    coyote's into the 'burbs..specifically Southborough, Holden, ect. and
    how they have the "cleaned" the neighborhoods of small game and pets.
    It then stated the concerns of the families for their pre-schoolers as
    the coyotes have been very visible. Despite the "naturalists" beliefs
    stated by these folks, hope was expressed to see the coyotes controlled
    via trapping during November given there is insufficient space to allow
    for shooting between the homes. The article went on to decscibe how 
    these folks have come to realize that relocation of these animals was out
    of the question. The article was interesting in that it offered trapping as
    the "best" remedy, without playing up the fear/ concern that neighborhood
    kids or pets might get caughtin the traps. All-in-all it seemed a very fair
    representation of the sports "value" in assisting with environmental
    "management" when the public expresses concern for the predator
    overstepping its' welcome in one's environment.
1469.3LUDWIG::BINGMon Oct 09 1995 11:476
    I read the same article and laughed my butt off. Here are a bunch
    of anti's who now because THEY are being affected by the coyotes,
    want them killed. What a bunch of hypocrites.
    
    Walt
1469.4more petitions going aroundLUDWIG::BINGFri Oct 13 1995 17:437
    
    I just read in the MASSACHUSETSS conf that area malls are going
    to be over run with people wanting petitons for ballots to be
    signed. If you see them be sure to ask what it is you're signing
    it may be anti hunting/trapping stuff too. 
    
    Walt
1469.5SNOFS1::HAGARTYDMein Leben als HundFri Oct 20 1995 00:214
1469.6POBOX::ROGERShard on the wind againFri Oct 20 1995 13:418
    are you running out of ducks or something?
    
    What's the motivation to do something like this? I guess the division
    of natural resources or whatever supports the wildlife will need to
    find new jobs now that their funding dissapears. Or will they (the
    state) just crank up another tax bill to get john Q public to support
    it?
    
1469.7Animal Liberation type thingSNOFS1::HAGARTYDMein Leben als HundFri Nov 17 1995 20:4414
    Ahhh Gi'day...
    
    We have huge rice crops in this state that feed millions of ducks.
    There is definitely no shortage of 'em. Don't worry, the National Parks
    and Wildlife people get loads of $$$ out of the public purse.
    
    Basically, it was pushed by an inner-city "green" politician who just
    felt that it wasn't "right". Problem is that the farmers who are
    allowed  permits to shoot the duck year around (for the rice crops) are
    now NOT allowed to have people shoot their ducks for them.
    
    Every year the "green" people used to bring some dead road kill etc in
    front of the cameras claiming that the Duck shooters were killing
    "endangered" species.