[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::space

Title:Space Exploration
Notice:Shuttle launch schedules, see Note 6
Moderator:PRAGMA::GRIFFIN
Created:Mon Feb 17 1986
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:974
Total number of notes:18843

946.0. "What did I see last week?" by RUSURE::MCCARTHY () Sat Aug 05 1995 06:07

Last week, my son and I were out sky-watching, and as is typical, spotted
an object moving in what appeared to be polar orbit (this is a pretty
frequent occurence).

What was different this time was that after tracking the object for a
few minutes, we noticed that there were actually three objects in near
similar orbits. Any clues as to what these were?

The obvious choice is KH type satellites. Why would there be more than
one in similar orbit? One answer woul be to get good coverage of an area,
the other would be, with two of the objects abreast (about a degree apart)
you might be able to produce stereograms. Opinions?

							-Brian

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
946.1PRAGMA::GRIFFINDave GriffinSat Aug 05 1995 20:2411
I'm sure the sat. watchers can fill in the details, but there is at
least one (and I thought 3) "constellation" satellites up there.

I've seen them on various elements lists, but never bothered to try
and watch them myself.

All are military in nature.  I thought the most well-known had over 5
parts.   I doubt they were KH's (unless the nature of KH's have changed).


- dave
946.2Navigation?skylab.zko.dec.com::FISHERHow may I be honest with you today?-TuvokTue Aug 08 1995 00:521
    GPS?
946.3LHOTSE::DAHLTue Aug 08 1995 13:206
RE: <<< Note 946.2 by skylab.zko.dec.com::FISHER "How may I be honest with you today?-Tuvok" >>>

>    GPS?

I'm almost positive that the DoD's GPS satellites orbit alone.
						-- Tom
946.4STAR::HUGHESCaptain SlogTue Aug 08 1995 16:0211
    re .3
    
    Correct, the GPS satellites orbit alone. The term constellation is used
    to describe any related group of satellites, not necessarily orbiting
    in close proximity.
    
    I do recall reading about some sigint satellites that were grouped
    together in orbit, perhaps to do some type of interferometry. It would
    take me a long time to track down the reference though.
    
    gary
946.5Cobe runs in polar & is supposed to be visible naked eye...NETCAD::BATTERSBYTue Aug 08 1995 16:466
    If .0 can supply the date and time along with his site location at
    the time of the observation, I'll take a shot at running it through
    my satellite tracking program I have on my PC at home. 
    I may be able to determine what it/they was/were.
    
    Bob
946.6skylab.zko.dec.com::FISHERHow may I be honest with you today?-TuvokWed Aug 09 1995 15:365
Re GPS:  Are you saying that no two GPS satellites are in the same orbit (except
for time)?  I somehow had the impression that there were two or 3 of them all in
the same orbit.  Or did you just mean that they are not close together?

Burns
946.7LHOTSE::DAHLWed Aug 09 1995 15:418
RE: <<< Note 946.6 by skylab.zko.dec.com::FISHER "How may I be honest with you today?-Tuvok" >>>

I wouldn't be surprised if there were one or two on-orbit GPS satellite spares.
I don't know what a likely orbit would be for them, since (assuming that they
exist) they would need to be able to maneuver substantially to replace an
in-operative satellite. In any case I doubt that they'd be parked very close to
one of the other satellites in the constellation.
						-- Tom
946.8STAR::HUGHESCaptain SlogWed Aug 09 1995 16:2117
    I didn't say that GPS birds are not in the same orbit, just that they
    do not orbit together (or at least that is what I was trying to say).
    
    There are several GPS orbits, basically the same but different orbital
    planes. Each orbit has several satellites, spaced equally around the
    orbit.
    
    I don't know what they do for spares. I suspect changing orbital planes
    requires more delta-V than the satellite propulsion system can provide.
    I'd be more inclined to design some redundancy into the system so that
    it can remain operational after point failures. I think a GPS receiver
    only needs to see 2 birds to fix location.
    
    If there are on orbit spares, there would be no reason to have them
    in close proximity to active satellites.
    
    gary
946.9More likely it was a spent COSMOS upper stage rocket/sNETCAD::BATTERSBYWed Aug 09 1995 17:2113
946.10Still awaiting Brian's observation site... :-)NETCAD::BATTERSBYWed Aug 09 1995 17:258
    I'll await Brian's posting of his observation site used when he
    made his observation, and then I should be able to narrow down
    what it was that he may have seen.
    That way I can enter his observing location along with the date
    & time into my satellite tracking program, and something should
    pop up.
    
    Bob
946.11AUSSIE::GARSONachtentachtig kacheltjesWed Aug 09 1995 23:033
    re .1
    
    I think you are thinking of the NOSS (Whitecloud) series. See 360.8 et seq.
946.12Visual Elements for trackingWONDER::SKRYPEKWed Aug 16 1995 16:4010
      FTP from archive.afit.af.mil/pub/space the file visual.tle for most 
    visual orbiting objects. Plug this into a satelite tracking 
    program(PCTRACK or WINORB) to calculate passes. Also try on the WWW 
    the following; http://ssl.berkeley.edu/isi_www/ 
    for the MIR, Shuttle(When it's up) and a few others.
    
    
    
    	Terry