[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::space

Title:Space Exploration
Notice:Shuttle launch schedules, see Note 6
Moderator:PRAGMA::GRIFFIN
Created:Mon Feb 17 1986
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:974
Total number of notes:18843

902.0. "NASA World Wide Web (WWW) servers" by VMSSPT::FRIEDRICHS (I'd rather be flying!) Fri Apr 22 1994 15:14

   Well, I can't find where the pointer is to the Digital Space Archives
   World Wide Web server, but as a followup, I have found the following
   space related server...
   
   	http://aviation.jsc.nasa.gov/nasa.html
   
   This page has pointers to KSC, Dryden, Goddard home pages and a master
   list of all NASA facilities...
   
   Enjoy!
   jeff
   
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
902.1DIgital www space pointerskylab.zko.dec.com::FISHERCarp Diem : Fish the DayFri Apr 22 1994 16:521
http://pragma.lkg.dec.com/space-archives.html
902.2PRAGMA::GRIFFINDave GriffinMon Apr 25 1994 13:067
Actually http://www-space.lkg.dec.com/space-archives.html

is a bit better.   I may move the archives off pragma someday.

There is already a pointer to NASA's Web.

- dave
902.3URL for Apollo transcriptsAUSSIE::GARSONachtentachtig kacheltjesTue Dec 05 1995 08:596
re "Good luck, Mr Gorsky"
    
    Readers can verify that the above remark was never made (unless it was
    editted out) by checking out annotated transcripts at

   http://ees-www.lanl.gov/APOLLO
902.4Re. -.1REPAIR::RICKETTSA pedestrian on the information superhighwayTue Dec 05 1995 10:443
      Trust someone to spoil a good story!
    
    8*)
902.5MPGS::REITHJim (MPGS::) Reith - DTN 237-3045 SHR3-1/U32Tue Dec 05 1995 11:072
Think of all the poor unlucky slobs that WEREN'T living next to Neil at the
time 8^)
902.6skylab.zko.dec.com::FISHERMinister of Acronyms, Holder of Past Knowledge, DNRCTue Dec 05 1995 15:265
re .4:

I asked the editor.  It was not edited out.

Burns
902.7A conspiracy against Mr Gorsky? (-:AUSSIE::GARSONachtentachtig kacheltjesWed Dec 06 1995 00:029
    re .6
    
    If "re .4" should really have been "re .3" then, yes, I know that the
    editor of those transcripts didn't edit it out - to the extent that he
    explicitly repudiates the story - but it could have been editted out
    previously. (I must admit to being somewhat wee at the time of the moon
    landing but I'm pretty sure they were broadcast live. I don't know
    whether they were broadcast in their entirety or whether there was the
    radio talk back style 8 second delay.)
902.8skylab.zko.dec.com::FISHERMinister of Acronyms, Holder of Past Knowledge, DNRCWed Dec 06 1995 15:437
Yes, it should have be re .3.  Sorry.

I listened to/watched the landing live.  There was no indication that it was on
a tape delay; in fact I seriously doubt that it was.  Besides, who would know
that that remark should be cut out?

Burns