[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::fddi

Title:FDDI - The Next Generation
Moderator:NETCAD::STEFANI
Created:Thu Apr 27 1989
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2259
Total number of notes:8590

953.0. "FDDI Server w/.3 & V2 Clients" by DPDMAI::DAVIES (Mark, SCA Area Network Consultant) Fri May 14 1993 14:25

    Most of my FDDI experience has been with using FDDI as a backbone
    transport, not as connecting systems directly yo it.  I am just looking
    for confirmation of my thoughts on the following configuration:
    
    1. Connected to the FDDI ring is a Server system.
    
    2. Connected to an attached Ethernet is a client system using Ethernet
       V2 packet format.
    
    3. Connected to another attached Ethernet is another client system
       which is using 802.3 packet format.
    
    My question is concerning the server receiving receiving packets from
    ethernet clients which are sending these packets in two different
    formats.  Does the Server have to manually be configured to have the
    awareness of the packet format of each system that communicates which
    it?
    
    Without putting down all of my thoughts on this, I believe the answer
    here is no, but I am not sure and would like some confirmation before
    talking again with this customer.
    
    The customer currently has some ethernets with Servers/Clients running
    in Ethernet V2 for mat and some ethernts with Servers/Clients running
    in 802.3 format.  They wish to begin migrating all their servers to the
    FDDI backbone.  They also do not want to have to modify half of the
    clients to support the "other" protocol format.
    
    Thanks,
    
    Mark
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
953.1Half the answerJUMP4::JOYPerception is realityFri May 14 1993 17:5018
    Mark,
       If memory serves me correctly, the DECbridge translates all packets
    to 802 SNAP format or in other words, does a 2 step translation on
    Ethernet V2.0 packets (Ethernet V2.0 -> 802.3 -> FDDI) and 1 step for
    802.3 format (802.3 -> FDDI). Somewhere in the FDDI frame, there is an
    indicator as to which format it was on the Ethernet side (type field
    imbedded somewhere in the data I believe). This was so it could get
    translated back into the correct format if it was destined for another
    Ethernet and just using the FDDI as a transport between Ethernets. So,
    in your case, when the server receives the packet, it will be
    translated just fine, although I'm not sure if the device drivers have
    any code to look into the packet to see what kind of frame it WAS and
    then send frames back in the proper format. I'm stuck on that part.
    
    Hey, I got you half the answer at least!
    
    Deb
    
953.2KONING::KONINGPaul Koning, A-13683Fri May 14 1993 19:2317
    Unless the bridge is specifically set up differently (e.g., for
    Appletalk) Ethernet V2 packets are translated to SNAP frames with
    Protocol ID of 00-00-00-xx-yy where xx-yy was the original Ethernet
    protocol type.
    
    What happens at the FDDI server end depends on the server.  If it's a
    VMS system, the device driver will essentially pretend to be a bridge:
    if it sees a packet of the form I mentioned, it tells the application
    that it saw an Ethernet packet.  So applications that work with
    Ethernet and 802.3 work unchanged.  Whatever configuration, if any, was
    needed on the orange hose applies when they run on FDDI.
    
    I don't remember if the Ultrix driver does the same thing.
    
    What sort of server, and what protocol on it, are you talking about? 
    
    	paul
953.3ThanksDPDMAI::DAVIESMark, SCA Area Network ConsultantSun May 16 1993 23:467
    The systems involved are running Novell Netware using IPX.  The network
    equipment is from Digital (DB620s and assorted Ethernet components).
    
    Thanks for help.
    
    Mark
    
953.4KONING::KONINGPaul Koning, A-13683Mon May 17 1993 13:386
I thought you might say that.   Try to avoid "raw 802.3" mode when using IPX.
If I remember right, suitably recent versions of the bridge firmware can
handle it, but it's best to stay away from it.  (A better name for that mode
would be "Novell ignorant about 802 standards mode".)

	paul