[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference thebay::joyoflex

Title:The Joy of Lex
Notice:A Notes File even your grammar could love
Moderator:THEBAY::SYSTEM
Created:Fri Feb 28 1986
Last Modified:Mon Jun 02 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1192
Total number of notes:42769

1117.0. "up down in on at to" by STAR::PRAETORIUS (what does the elephant need?) Wed Oct 19 1994 09:44

     How long have up & down been used to describe computers and their
earlier analogs?  One would certainly have said of the early phone
system or telegraph that the lines were down (even if that were not the
precise problem).  Did one say they were up when they started function-
ing again?  How long have people been described as up & down (to
indicate mood)?  Is there a connection?  (e.g., The cluster's not too
happy today.  My car's engine has been complaining.)

     Also, is there some geographic or cultural dividing line between
the use of in queue/line vs. on queue/line?  I hear on out here and it
sounds very strange to me - I spent most of my life out West, where it
was in, not on (at least for me it was).  I might've stood on a line (a
line on the ground), but if I were part of a line or queue, I was in it,
not on it.  And it was much more likely to be a line rather than a
queue (Is this an English thing, preserved in New England, but lost in
the American West?).

     Has anyone else marveled at the idiomatic nature of short, common
preposition/adverb/adjectives in various languages?  I've tried to study
German, Latin and Mandarin; in each case, I've been impressed that a
given preposition in language A may be used somewhat differently in
language B (in German, for example, one says zu Hause (to house,
literally) to mean at home).
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1117.1REGENT::BROOMHEADDon't panic -- yet.Wed Oct 19 1994 17:0511
    The term "[standing] on line" is one I associate with New York; I've
    only heard it from New Yorkers of various sorts.
    
    		*		*		*		*
    
    One way I've been able to spot non-native-English-speakers is by
    their non-standard choice of prepositions.  (This can be surprisingly
    relevant in the printing conferences.  "Are you using A4 paper?"
    is one of the basic questions.)
    
    							Ann B.
1117.2JRDV04::DIAMONDsegmentation fault (california dumped)Wed Oct 19 1994 20:4413
    Prepositions, verb tenses, idioms, etc., do not exactly map from
    language to language.  The cases which come rather close to matching
    seem to cause the most problems for some reason.
    
    Anyway, in Japanese, a device might be "in" or "cut."  (That's
    the setting of the power switch, not a status of working or not.
    Not working is "gone," in the sense of broken, as in "a part
    like that could go at any time.")
    
    In many languages, a device is "open" or "closed."  "Please open
    the light," yeah right, don't you know the vacuum will leak out?
    
    -- Norman Diamond
1117.3Eh?AIMHI::TINIUSIt's always something.Thu Oct 20 1994 08:029
>    In many languages, a device is "open" or "closed."  "Please open
>    the light," yeah right, don't you know the vacuum will leak out?

My wife, born and raised a Massachussettsian (Burlington, Lexington, Bellerica)
says "open the light" and "shut the light".  I had never heard that usage before
I met her two years ago. 

??
-stephen
1117.4Behind ofBARSTR::PCLX31::satowgavel::satow, dtn 223-2584Thu Oct 20 1994 08:254
My wife (grew up in northern Vermont) says "behind OF".  It sounds odd to 
me, yet there is logic to it, because it is symmetrical with "ahead of".

Clay
1117.5:-)WELSWS::HILLNIt's OK, it'll be dark by nightfallThu Oct 20 1994 09:039
    Do you mean 'behind of' in the context of, for example, "we cooked a steak
    cut from the behind of a cow"?
    
    Nothing wrong with this as a euphemism.
    
     
    Or is 'behind of' used as an adverb phrase?
    
    Which is not a phrase I have encountered.
1117.6... the count is now up to two ...CPDW::CIUFFINIGod must be a Gemini...Thu Oct 20 1994 09:196
     re: 1117.3  
     
     !! My grandmother ( arrived in the US from Italy in 1912 ) used the
        identical phrases of 'open/shut the light'. I had always thought
        it was her own interpretation of the Italian to English. 
     jc
1117.7VORTEX::SMURF::BINDERetsi capularis ego vita fruarThu Oct 20 1994 10:0313
    Re .4
    
    > "behind OF"
    
    An analog of this, one that grates every time I hear it, is "big of,"
    as in "It's not that big of a deal."  The "of" is patently wrong.  The
    sentence can be reformatted as "It's not a deal [that is] that big."
    Using the "of" makes "deal" semiotically into a possessive, which is
    clearly not intended.
    
    ARRRRGGGGHHHHH!!!  :-)
    
    -dick
1117.8Will that be coarse or fine?AIMHI::TINIUSIt's always something.Thu Oct 20 1994 11:4012
Re .7

I don't understand why this is wrong. I would have reformatted the
sentence as "It's not a deal that is one of the big deals". Does your
note mean that it's incorrect to ask "What kind of car do you drive?" or
"What kind of a car do you drive?

But I'll bet my grater is bigger than your grater when I say "I should
of called her".

-stephen

1117.9OKFINE::KENAHDo we have any peanut butter?Thu Oct 20 1994 11:465
>But I'll bet my grater is bigger than your grater when I say "I should
>of called her".
    
    Nothing wrong with "I should've called her."  It's only when it's
    typed as you have it above that it's incorrect.
1117.10OKFINE::KENAHDo we have any peanut butter?Thu Oct 20 1994 11:485
    "Big of a deal" is much like "much of a muchness."
    
    (Drat!  My Alice books are at home!)
    
    					andrew
1117.11Twinkle, twinkle, little bat,SLBLUZ::BROCKUSI'm the NRA!Thu Oct 20 1994 12:3427
      <<< Note 1117.10 by OKFINE::KENAH "Do we have any peanut butter?" >>>

    "Big of a deal" is much like "much of a muchness."
    
    (Drat!  My Alice books are at home!)

>> Mine are at work :-)

    "They were learning to draw," the Dormouse
went on, yawning and rubbing its eyes, for it was
getting very sleepy; " and they drew all manner of
things--everything that begins with an M---"
    "Why with an M?" said Alice.
    "Why not?" said the March Hare.
    Alice was silent.
    The Dormouse had closed its eyes by this time,
and was going off into a doze; but, on being pinched
by the Hatter, it woke up again with a little shriek,
and went on: "---that begins with an M, such as
mouse-traps, and the moon, and memory, and
muchness--you know you say things are 'much of a
muchness'--did you ever see such a thing as drawing
of a muchness!"
   "Realy, now you ask me," said Alice, very much
confused, "I don't think---"
    "Then you shouldn't talk," said the Hatter.

1117.12miscSTAR::PRAETORIUSwhat does the elephant need?Thu Oct 20 1994 13:2532
re .3 by Tinius:

> My wife, born and raised a Massachussettsian (Burlington, Lexington,
> Billerica) says "open the light" and "shut the light".  I had never
> heard that usage before I met her two years ago. 

     From the days of gas lamps, perhaps?

re .4 by Binder:

>    An analog of this, one that grates every time I hear it, is "big of,"
>    as in "It's not that big of a deal."

     Geez, didja hafta go 'n make such a big deal of it?:-)

re .10 by Kenah:

     I'd say "big of a deal" and "much of a muchness" are 2 of a kind.

re Alice:

     A little help from the Jumpstation (searching 

	http://www.stir.ac.uk/jsbin/js?search

for Gutenberg) yields:

	ftp://mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu/gutenberg/etext91/alice29.txt
	ftp://mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu/gutenberg/etext91/snark12.txt
	ftp://mrcnext.cso.uiuc.edu/gutenberg/etext91/glass16.txt

(what I've told you 3 times is true)
1117.13I've got no beef with youBARSTR::PCLX31::satowgavel::satow, dtn 223-2584Fri Oct 21 1994 09:4610
>    Do you mean 'behind of' in the context of, for example, "we cooked a 
>steak cut from the behind of a cow"?

If I thought you were serious, I would complain that "behind of" in that 
context is rare indeed, but since the title of your reply is a smiley face, I 
will congratulate you on a well-done play on words.

Clay


1117.14LJSRV2::KALIKOWNo Federal Tacks on the Info Hwy!Fri Oct 21 1994 13:052
    I thought it was a rare, rather than a well-done, play on words...
    
1117.15JRDV04::DIAMONDsegmentation fault (california dumped)Sun Oct 23 1994 19:581
    Or a weird play on rears...
1117.16It's just nothingKELVIN::MCKINLEYMon Oct 24 1994 12:279
RE: .2

>    In many languages, a device is "open" or "closed."  "Please open
>    the light," yeah right, don't you know the vacuum will leak out?

     Will the vacuum will leak out or will the air leak in?  Where does
     a vacuum go if it escapes?

     ---Phil
1117.17The vacuums *are* out to get you!PASTIS::MONAHANhumanity is a trojan horseMon Oct 24 1994 13:062
    	There's an awful lot of vacuum out there, and it's already got to
    the ozone layer. It's creeping in on you!
1117.18Who knows ... ? The shadow knows!BARSTR::PCLX31::satowgavel::satow, dtn 223-2584Mon Oct 24 1994 13:166
>     Will the vacuum will leak out or will the air leak in?  Where does
>     a vacuum go if it escapes?

Same place the darkness goes when you turn on the light.

Clay
1117.19AUSSIE::WHORLOWBushies do it for FREE!Mon Oct 24 1994 18:1916
    G'day,
    
    Ahh my son has a theory about lights... They are actually darkness
    vacuums... they suck in the darkons, leaving the photons to glow. The
    darkons travel back along the wires to appear outside power stations as
    heaps of a black substance that is then buried in big holes in the
    ground...
    
    Similarly, cut open a battery and you wil find it full of a black
    substance.....
    
    
    Darkness occurs only when darkons exceed photons!
    
    
    derek
1117.20negative moneyKALI::ROLKECircle with a line through it.Tue Nov 08 1994 15:034
If you find a negative-ten-dollar bill in the street then are you required
to pick it up?

Chuck