[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference thebay::joyoflex

Title:The Joy of Lex
Notice:A Notes File even your grammar could love
Moderator:THEBAY::SYSTEM
Created:Fri Feb 28 1986
Last Modified:Mon Jun 02 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1192
Total number of notes:42769

309.0. ""Leadership" as an adjective: Ugh!" by POTAK::LEVITIN (Sam Levitin) Sat Jan 24 1987 21:25

    In the past  few  weeks,  I  have  seen  the  word  "leadership"
    used  as  an  adjective  by DEC people and publications at least
    three times. A typical use is the following:
    
	We at XYZ strive to create a leadership organization
	in terms of ....
    
    My _Webster's New Twentieth Century Dictionary  of  the  English
    Language Unabridged_ (2nd edition) defines the word "leadership"
    as:
    
	n.  1. the position or guidance of a leader. 2. the ability
	to lead.
    
    I get the meaning of the XYZ group's  claim,  but  I  wonder  if
    others  are as distressed by this word as I am, or if anyone has
    a good word to substitute in this phrase.  Here I believe  there
    are  genuine  alternatives that convey the meaning equally well:
    "exceptional" and "outstanding" are two.

    Sam Levitin	    DTN 225-4135	HLO2-1/G11
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
309.1And if you think THAT'S bad...DELNI::OVIATTHigh BailiffWed Mar 18 1987 19:5114
    I can only agree with your gripe.  I got off the phone this afternoon
    with a woman who told me she was trying to "dialogue with" me. 
    This was after she told me she had "interfaced with" someone else.
    After I gave her some information, she said (honest!) "I would 
    project that onto..."  
    
    At that point, between silent guffaws, I thanked her for calling
    and could only think of the theme for the "Twilight Zone".
    
    How's this for an idea, taking them out back and shooting them.
    What do you think.  There HAS to be a law against such nonsense
    doesn't there?
    
    							-Steve
309.2I'm not alone after allCSC32::HAGERTYDave Hagerty, TSC, Colorado SpringsThu Mar 19 1987 03:4210
    I'm glad to hear somebody else say that.  I thought I was alone
    with my desire to call the local constabulatory and have somebody
    arrested for murder of the English language.
    
    In a similar vein, I have had several people call me saying that
    they were "resourcing".  I finally deterimined that the caller was
    looking for somebody to help with a problem of some sort.  Being
    called a resource makes one feel like non-paged pool...
    
    						Dave()
309.3warning: nit ahead!COOKIE::ZANEShattering RealityThu Mar 19 1987 15:4212
  
    >with my desire to call the local constabulatory and have somebody
  
  
  speaking of shooting someone, shouldn't that be constabulary???
  
  
  							
  							Terza
  
  
309.4networkVIDEO::OSMANEric, dtn 223-6664, weight 146Thu Mar 19 1987 18:527
After hearing them so much, we tend to forget they're wrong.  (and so
do the dictionaries!)

For instance, the word "network" as a verb.  Isn't that within the last
ten years ?

/Eric
309.5You're right, TerzaCSC32::HAGERTYDave Hagerty, TSC, Colorado SpringsFri Mar 20 1987 02:285
    re .3 : You are of course, correct, Terza.
    
    $ set face/red/perm
    
    						Dave()
309.6GENRAL::JHUGHESNOTE, learn, and inwardly digestWed Apr 08 1987 23:3410
 
    Re .2:
       
>   with my desire to call the local constabulatory ...


    Wait a minute, Dave -- I think I like it. You've created a compound
    word describing the British Bobbie:
    
    		"A member of the ambulatory constabulary!".
309.7Ahhh, but.......CSC32::HAGERTYDave Hagerty, TSC, Colorado SpringsThu Apr 09 1987 02:483
     does it have functionality?
    
    						Dave()
309.8The prosecution rests.REGENT::BROOMHEADDon't panic -- yet.Mon Sep 19 1994 12:0810
    PRESENT ASSESSMENT
      We are assessing these criteria relative to <x> as a means of focus,
      but are also looking more generally across ....


    VALUE OF ASSESSMENT
      Performing an assessment with the most current requirements available
      would surface any problematic requirements now.  The domains could work
      with you to prepare pushback on the criteria ....

309.9... But yer' honr', it was a slip o' the tongueCPDW::CIUFFINIGod must be a Gemini...Mon Sep 19 1994 12:588
    
    re: .-1 
    
    If the prosecution rests, I only hope that you have recommended the 
    death penality. I would hate to think that other prisoners might 
    have to listen to that dribble.
    
    jc
309.10JRDV04::DIAMONDsegmentation fault (california dumped)Mon Sep 19 1994 22:002
    Did I open the right conference?
    I was looking for JOY of lex....
309.11Read note 1.xRICKS::PHIPPSDTN 225.4959Tue Sep 20 1994 10:153
  This is not the conference to ask those questions.  ;^)

  	mikeP
309.12KOLFAX::GOODMANI see you shiver with antici.........pation!Wed Sep 21 1994 20:294
    Just received a note at a customer site that said that my new project
    schedule would not be "impactful" to something else.
    
    AUGH!
309.13Dribble/DrivelWHOS01::BOWERSDave Bowers @WHOThu Sep 22 1994 15:206
    re .9;
    
    While "dribble" has a certain peotic quality to it, I rather suspect
    the word you were lookin for is "drivel".
    
    \dave
309.14... written as intended ...CPDW::CIUFFINIGod must be a Gemini...Thu Sep 22 1994 16:105
     Nope \dave, 
    
     I did mean dribble. 
    
     jc
309.15PENUTS::DDESMAISONStoo many FABs in RABThu Sep 22 1994 16:445
    
>>     I did mean dribble. 

	so... it was kind of a slurping sound you were going for?

309.16Correct Sellping Frever.WHOS01::BOWERSDave Bowers @WHOFri Sep 23 1994 12:098
    I stand corrected. "Dribble" it is.  

    It's just that with creative spelling running wild, one occasionally
    feels the need to take up the cause of correctness.
    
    \dave
    
309.17lost, sorryPENUTS::DDESMAISONStoo many FABs in RABFri Sep 23 1994 12:266

 >>   I stand corrected. "Dribble" it is.  

	why?