T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
600.1 | "Bozo" | BLAS03::FORBES | Bill Forbes - LDP SysEng | Tue Dec 20 1988 02:55 | 1 |
|
|
600.2 | | HSSWS1::GREG | Malice Aforethought | Tue Dec 20 1988 03:25 | 7 |
|
A few more for the hell of it:
Centisentinel
Centinoter
Silly Sod
|
600.3 | a little ambiguity there | AITG::DERAMO | Daniel V. {AITG,ZFC}:: D'Eramo | Tue Dec 20 1988 03:32 | 8 |
| By the way, the title
Please invent a word for me.
meant to invent a word at my request as described in .0, not
to invent a word that describes me.
Dan
|
600.4 | two birds with one stone | EAGLE1::EGGERS | Tom, VAX & MIPS architecture | Tue Dec 20 1988 05:09 | 3 |
| Re: .3
I think .1 does a good job of both.
|
600.5 | centavnistic? | LAMHRA::WHORLOW | Prussiking up the rope of life! | Tue Dec 20 1988 05:34 | 18 |
| G'day,
I can hardly stop laughing..... bozo ..... great.
Some others..
Centaur
notessential = notecential
dublonoter
If the numers cannot be divided by 400 - leapnoter?
djw
bozo, ha ha ha :-)))))
|
600.6 | a deramist? | IJSAPL::ELSENAAR | Fractal of the universe | Tue Dec 20 1988 13:32 | 2 |
| >< Note 600.0 by AITG::DERAMO
|
600.7 | double the fun for your money | DOODAH::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Tue Dec 20 1988 17:25 | 7 |
| I rather like "centaur."
Then if, in his attempt to enter the 500th reply, he found
someone else's note entered ahead of him, leaving him as .501,
we could say he was slightly off centaur.
--bonnie
|
600.8 | bozo is better, but | LEZAH::BOBBITT | so wired I could broadcast... | Tue Dec 20 1988 19:09 | 9 |
| hectophfile?
hectoham?
replying in abcentia?
hecderamis?
|
600.9 | a hundredwrite | IJSAPL::ELSENAAR | Fractal of the universe | Tue Dec 20 1988 19:17 | 0 |
600.10 | "compulsive" is a possibility | DOODAH::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Tue Dec 20 1988 19:18 | 1 |
|
|
600.11 | try "egotist" | KAOFS::S_BROOK | Here today and here again tomorrow | Tue Dec 20 1988 19:20 | 0 |
600.12 | ... helpless against the centaurs ... | CSSE::CIUFFINI | God must be a Gemini... | Tue Dec 20 1988 20:27 | 7 |
| If they enter the 600th note I suppose we could say that
they had a
six cents of humor
or noter! dam, us
jc
|
600.13 | A fraction of the problem... | DECWET::GETSINGER | Eric Getsinger | Tue Dec 20 1988 20:52 | 1 |
| If they reply once every ten notes, are they decadent?
|
600.14 | we're all DECadent | DOODAH::RANDALL | Bonnie Randall Schutzman | Tue Dec 20 1988 20:54 | 1 |
|
|
600.15 | Centurion | CLOSET::T_PARMENTER | Tongue in cheek, fist in air! | Tue Dec 20 1988 21:12 | 1 |
| But will *this* note get to .100?
|
600.16 | With Little or No Thought | USIV02::CSR201 | Lost in a fog | Wed Jan 04 1989 08:17 | 7 |
| How about....
A Hunderling, or....
A Hunderful Noter?
>>DAVID<<
|
600.17 | Centipedantic? | INBLUE::HALDANE | Words is my Business | Sat Jan 07 1989 02:23 | 0 |
600.18 | | UNTADI::ODIJP | o.......now + here = nowhere.......o | Mon Jan 09 1989 18:13 | 4 |
|
Centsless ?
John J
|
600.19 | If the... whatever | ERASER::KALLIS | Anger's no replacement for reason | Mon Jan 09 1989 19:42 | 3 |
| Quintiscorenscripter. Why not?
Steve Kallis, Jr.
|
600.20 | | GAO::DKEATING | Shake Your Money Maker | Tue Jan 10 1989 18:33 | 2 |
| I'll let you know in 600.100...
|
600.21 | On second thoughts, it has to be... | UHAINA::HALDANE | Words is my Business | Tue Jan 10 1989 19:30 | 4 |
| Cent-degrader.
Delia
|
600.22 | | EAGLE1::EGGERS | Tom, VAX & MIPS architecture | Tue Jan 10 1989 20:20 | 4 |
| Re: .21
"Centdegrader"? I thought that was somebody who reported the
temperature using the Celsius scale.
|
600.23 | I deserve payment | KAOO01::LAPLANTE | THE INTERLOPER | Tue Jan 10 1989 21:32 | 5 |
| This should be worth something:
C-noter
Roger
|
600.24 | | UNTADI::ODIJP | o.......now + here = nowhere.......o | Tue Jan 10 1989 21:44 | 4 |
|
Centographically speaking .
John J
|
600.25 | ????? | USIV02::CSR201 | Lost in a fog | Fri Jan 13 1989 01:35 | 8 |
| RE: 600
Have any of us hit on a word that you like or find appropriate yet?
Just curious!
>>DAVID<<
|
600.26 | centimental | EAGLE1::EGGERS | Tom, VAX & MIPS architecture | Fri Jan 13 1989 04:50 | 1 |
|
|
600.27 | one hecto of a guy | AITG::DERAMO | Daniel V. {AITG,ZFC}:: D'Eramo | Sat Jan 14 1989 02:59 | 15 |
600.28 | | AITG::DERAMO | Daniel V. {AITG,ZFC}:: D'Eramo | Tue Jan 17 1989 06:10 | 3 |
| I like Arie's "a hundredwrite" in .9, too.
Dan
|
600.29 | Note well these | PAMOLA::RECKARD | Jon Reckard, 381-0878, ZKO3-2/T63 | Wed Jan 18 1989 16:46 | 12 |
| nota cente
hectophile
hectonotorious (sounds like a Saturday morning cartoon)
re: DECadent. Doesn't that suggest relative toothlessness?
I'm a repentant hecto-compulsive. Or, more accurately, pentehecto-compulsive.
A few kiloreplies ago in note 396, I "got" replies 500, 1000 and maybe 1500 or
2000 (I forget) - once only because I happened upon it, but once or twice
because I was waiting to get something in at the desired reply number.
I'm sorry.
|
600.30 | are we near 700 yet? | AITG::DERAMO | Daniel V. {AITG,ZFC}:: D'Eramo | Wed Jan 18 1989 21:20 | 3 |
| I'm not repentant at all.
Dan
|
600.31 | Do you need a license for this? | DDIF::CANTOR | Logout and hit break. | Wed Feb 22 1989 09:23 | 5 |
| If this person does this mostly to public conferences, then (s)he's a
HECTONOTARY PUBLIC
Dave C.
|
600.32 | No, just a ditto machine. | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Wed Feb 22 1989 20:58 | 0 |
600.33 | obviously not | ERICG::ERICG | Eric Goldstein | Tue Jun 06 1989 21:35 | 3 |
| .30> I'm not repentant at all.
If you were, you'd be trying to enter every fifth reply.
|
600.34 | | AITG::DERAMO | Daniel V. {AITG,ZFC}:: D'Eramo | Sun Jul 09 1989 08:07 | 3 |
| Oh, goody, less than ten topics to go! :-)
Dan
|
600.35 | No Cents in This One | BASCAS::RECEPTION | Neither Masters Nor Slaves | Fri Nov 08 1991 18:28 | 6 |
| what about "OO-phemistic"?
Daz
|
600.36 | suggested revision to 600.1: B0Z0 :-) | RDVAX::KALIKOW | Buddy, can youse paradigm? | Tue Sep 15 1992 23:34 | 1 |
|
|
600.37 | | CSC32::D_DERAMO | Dan D'Eramo, Customer Support Center | Sun Nov 01 1992 17:06 | 5 |
| Recently the verb "to snarf" has been commonly used
to describe this practice.
Dan
|
600.38 | | COOKIE::EGGERS | Anybody can fly with an engine. | Mon Nov 02 1992 01:31 | 5 |
| Re: .-1
"Snarf" has been around MIT for 30 years that I know of. It means to
acquire on sight. As applied to food, it has overtones of the German
fressen when used to describe the eating habits of humans.
|
600.39 | | JIT081::DIAMOND | It's been a lovely recession. | Mon Nov 02 1992 01:59 | 2 |
| Yeah, but it doesn't refer to eating any more. It's been
snarfed by noters.
|
600.40 | | MAST::FITZPATRICK | Me upon my pony on my boat. | Mon Nov 16 1992 16:11 | 5 |
| Actually, when I was at MIT (not too long ago), "snarf" meant "to pass
a not-yet-swallowed portion of food or drink back through one's nose."
-Tom
|
600.41 | | CSC32::D_DERAMO | Dan D'Eramo, Customer Support Center | Fri Nov 20 1992 20:25 | 3 |
| In which direction? :-)
Dan
|
600.42 | | SMURF::BINDER | Ultimus Mohicanorum | Mon Nov 23 1992 11:21 | 4 |
| "To pass back" implies in the return direction, methinks. The rules
under which my son plays role-playing games provide for 20,000
experience points to anyone who can induce anyone else to do this with
a soft drink.
|
600.43 | the science of taunts | GIDDAY::BURT | DPD (tm) | Wed May 10 1995 22:33 | 2 |
| Tauntology
|