| Title: | dec_mls_plus |
| Moderator: | SMURF::BAT |
| Created: | Mon Nov 29 1993 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 534 |
| Total number of notes: | 2544 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 366.1 | KAMLIA::mdm | Maria D. Maggio | Fri Jul 12 1996 16:00 | 49 | |
| 366.2 | Into more depth and an example | BRETTN::HEITER | CSS Realtime Systems Engineering | Mon Jul 15 1996 14:45 | 26 |
| 366.3 | KAMLIA::mdm | Maria D. Maggio | Tue Jul 16 1996 12:12 | 13 | |
| 366.4 | BRETTN::HEITER | CSS Realtime Systems Engineering | Wed Jul 17 1996 13:08 | 16 | |
| 366.5 | KAMLIA::mdm | Maria D. Maggio | Wed Jul 17 1996 13:31 | 11 | |
| 366.6 | Install kit the same for MLS+?? | ADISSW::FERRARA | Thu Apr 03 1997 17:21 | 11 | |
What about device driver kits...
If I make a Digital UNIX 4.0 device driver kit, say on a floppy,
and verify it by installing it on a UNIX machine, should that
very same kit install Ok under MLS+ 4.0A??
Thanks,
BobF
| |||||
| 366.7 | installation will probably go just fine | SMURF::BAT | Segui la tua beatitudine | Thu Apr 03 1997 21:30 | 8 |
I'm not sure what distinction you are trying to make here.
A device driver "kit" contains a device driver, which depending on
what system calls it makes, may need to be modified to run on MLS+
(as described in .1 and the Programmer's Guide).
The installation places/procedures, etc. are the same as DIGITAL UNIX,
so it will probably install just fine, but...
| |||||