[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference school::sports_memorabilia

Title:Sports Memorabilia
Notice:Wanted: 3.*; For_sale: 4.*; Traded: 5.*
Moderator:SCHOOL::KOPACKO
Created:Wed Aug 27 1986
Last Modified:Thu May 08 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:730
Total number of notes:8547

351.0. "Sorting Cards" by FUTURE::JST_ONGE (John St.Onge USDSL DTN 275-2715) Wed Nov 13 1991 22:22

    The latest issue of Baseball Cards Magazine has an interesting article
    on a way to sort  your  cards faster.  I don't know how you folks sort
    them, but I break them down  into  piles 1-99, 100-199 etc. and then I
    sort those piles  #01-#09,  #10-#19  and  so  forth. Next I sort those
    piles those individually to get to 1-9 (ie. 11,12,13,14 etc.) finally.
    Takes awhile and even longer if you're pulling a set at the same time.
    
    The article had a completely  different  way of sorting. I haven't had
    time to try it yet, but I figure I'll try it this weekend and enter in
    here if it made any difference and how it's done since it's a long ar-
    ticle.
    
    By the way, Baseball Cards Magazine is pretty good. Ads are old since
    they come out a month after they've been sent in, but it has some in-
    teresting articles and their replicards are decent  (this month's had
    cards of stars done in 1970 Topps style).
    
    John
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
351.2EBBV03::MONDALTOThu Nov 14 1991 08:436
    John I do them the same way,I've tried other ways of sorting,I find
    that this is the fastest way.Putting them in numerical order makes it
    very easy when your trying to pull certain cards.
    
    John M
    
351.3CERBUS::KARLSONOnly 41 shopping days until Xmas!Thu Nov 14 1991 09:4431
    
    I use a sorting tray.  It depends on the size of the set.  If the set
    is over 500 cards (I'll explain why 500 in a second), I first break
    down into 100's (1-99, 100-199, ...), then down into 10's (1-9, 10-19,
    ...).
    
    The sorting tray I use has 10 compartments.  If the set has less than
    500 cards, I divide the number by 10 (let's use the 300-card TSC
    set as an example).  This gives me 1-29, 30-59, ... the biggest
    number I do this for is 50's.  It's usually fairly easy to give each
    compartment a "value", and then "count up" (30, 60, 90, 120) until
    I reach a number greater than the number of the card I'm trying to
    place.  Let's say 57.  First compartment; 30.  Second compartment;
    60.  Goes in the second compartment.  This gives me smaller stacks
    to break down after the first pass.  If they're small enough (25-30
    cards), I don't need to break them down any further.  The stack of
    cards will be small enough for my weinie hands to handle.
    
    I usually then break out a set.  Take the first stack, and sift
    through, find a #1, then a #2, then a #3 ... this gives me my
    set.  Then I hand-sort the rest of the stack to begin my doubles.
    If the stacks are small enough, it doesn't take very long.
    
    Of course, if the stacks are greater than 50, I have to break them
    down into 10's first.
    
    And yes John.  Places like Scoreboard have a bunch of high school
    kids sitting around, sorting cards for minimum wage in the back
    room.  I think I'd rather do data entry ...
    
    -rjk
351.4One step furtherSTUDIO::GUTIERREZWho's on 1st.. What's on 2nd..Thu Nov 14 1991 09:5817
    
    	Basically, I do it the same way John mentioned, except that I break
    	down each pile into halves. For example, I'll take the 1-99 pile
    	and break it down into 2 piles, one pile has 1-59, and the other
    	half has 60-99.
    
    	Then I take each of those piles and break them down to 1-9, 10-19,
    	20-29, etc., that makes it much easier and faster to find the
    	card numbers you are looking for, because you are only dealing
    	with half a range of numbers (1-59) as opposed to a full range or 
    	numbers (1-99), and I also use the sorting tray.
    	
        The last pass, say the 1-9 pile, I also break down into 2 piles,
    	one pile has 1-5, the other 6-9.  Again, you deal with half a
    	range as opposed to a full range.  This may sound like it's more
    	work, but it's actually faster, and easier to locate the cards.
    	                                                               
351.5what would an italian do ? DONVAN::GIZMOP::R_PLOURDEThu Nov 14 1991 10:5717
    
        I take over the kitchen table and seperate into little piles of 10
        while opening a pack at a time. for example if the set has 300 cards 
        I do the piles always in the same order obvioulsy picture side down.
    
        1-9  10-19  20-29  30-39  40-49  50-59  60-69  70-79  80-89  90-99 
    
       100-109  etc.... 
    
        So I would have 3 rows of 10 piles and as I open the packs I could
        easily move from left to right or right to left. I then go through 
        and while sorting into number sequence I build my first set at the
        same time. 
    
    
                       Ron
         
351.6CERBUS::KARLSONOnly 41 shopping days until Xmas!Thu Nov 14 1991 11:3213
    
    Oh yeah.  The other way I've been sortng lately, is to ...
    
    	- sort each pack as I open it.
    
    	- after each subsequent wax pack is sorted, sort it together
          with the previously opened ones.  although, I usually
          sort three or four packs, then sort those into the bigger
          stack.
    
    This way has been working very fast for me lately ...
    
    -rjk
351.9Bird fires up a brickASDS::KELLYMon Nov 18 1991 15:315
    re 351.1
    Wholesalers don't sort.  They buy in pre sorted bricks from the
    manufacturer.  Bricks run 500-800 of one card in lots from 500-800
    to 100,000 cards.  For instance a local wholesaler just bought
    27 bricks of 500 of Larry Bird 89-90 Hoops.
351.10CERBUS::KARLSONOnly 37 shopping days until Xmas!Mon Nov 18 1991 15:338
    
    Geez, I guess that documentary on ESPN I saw, where they toured
    the ScoreBoard facilities and I saw all those peons sorting cards
    was all wrong then ...
    
    Silly me.
    
    
351.11CERBUS::KARLSONOnly 37 shopping days until Xmas!Mon Nov 18 1991 15:349
    
    Oh wait!  I know!
    
    They were creating those wonderful 150-card assortment sets you
    see offered on QVC and HSC.
    
    Silly me.  Sorry Mike.
    
    -rjk
351.13Big BucksASDS::KELLYTue Nov 19 1991 11:5721
    re. 12
    John,  the practice of printing regular cards in sheets to be cut and 
    sold as bricks stopped in 1984 after Topps sheets with rows of
    Mattingly and Straw were sold.  Obviously with promos and non regular
    issue cards sheets of one player are printed.  
    What do they do with the Michael Smiths?  They package them in
    blister packs with other non stars and flood the stores with them.
    If you were to look a a wholesalers product line you would see
    thousands of one player and nothing else.  It's intuitively
    obvious that the wholesaler didn't open packs.  Somewhere
    between manufacture and the wholesaler other business folks
    skim off the commons at one tenth of a cent apice and turn them
    into profit.
    The folks at scoreboard collate (not decolate) for resale.
    In many cases I wait until the season has ended and product is returned
    to the factory and buy cases by the truckload.  In this case it makes 
    sense to open and sort.  For instance would you buy 400 cases of
    1990-91 Pro set hockey (mixed series 1 and 2) for 3.50 a box?
    Thats 28,000 bucks.  Thats 432,000 cards.  Look in Becketts.  Thats
    600 of each card.
    Mike
351.15Have more kids :-)YAZ8::GUARINOWed Nov 20 1991 12:379
>    <<< Note 351.14 by FUTURE::JST_ONGE "John St.Onge USDSL DTN 275-2715" >>>
>
>    people to sort those 400 cases or do you make your kids do it ;-)
>    
>    John

    It goes much faster with Dad and 2 kids!  :-)

Vin
351.17CERBUS::KARLSONOnly 193 shopping days until Xmas!Mon Jun 15 1992 16:1416