T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
453.1 | WHERE ? | BOOKS::ANGELONE | Lean, green, and on the screen ! | Fri Apr 27 1990 16:03 | 6 |
| Where can this game be found ?
I am in the Boston more Worcester MASS area.
Seems like a good game even at $45.
Rick A
|
453.2 | | HYSTER::HITCHCOCK | | Fri Apr 27 1990 23:57 | 2 |
| I got it at the Chelmsford Child World, on route 110.
/chuck
|
453.3 | | CIARAN::FORTEN | Don't just stand there, let's get to it... | Mon Apr 30 1990 14:33 | 14 |
| My brother-in-law had this for his AMIGA and it was an awesome game!!
It sounds like the Nintendo version is true to it also.
The game is a lot like chess only you literally have to do battle
instead of landing on and capturing the opponent's piece. My favorite
piece is the sorceress and the dragon (I love the way the sorceress'
hair flys back when she running, its hysterical)
I plan on getting this game when I get some extra money
Scott
|
453.4 | Sounds good! | STRAIT::WALTON | kerjillions of stars. . . | Mon Apr 30 1990 20:24 | 13 |
|
A few questions. . .
How long, on average, does a game take?
Are there various levels of difficulty? (there usually are)
Is the computer a worthy opponent? Or does it tend to get predictable
once you're used to it?
The game's concept certainly sounds intriguing.
- Dave
|
453.5 | | LILAC::HITCHCOCK | | Tue May 01 1990 15:03 | 22 |
| > How long, on average, does a game take?
Playing against a near-equal human competitor can take up to an
hours and a half, mostly because each person is doing a lot of
thinking about what to do next. Against the computer, which I've
only played a couple of time, it's much shorter because the game is
much better in battle (so far, anyway!).
> Are there various levels of difficulty? (there usually are)
No.
> Is the computer a worthy opponent? Or does it tend to get predictable
once you're used to it?
The couple of times I've played against the game, I've been
surprised at how differently it's played each time. Can't speak to
whether it's preditable over the long haul. One other point: playing
against the computer *does* teach some good strategy, which you can
then use to pulverize your human opponent.
/chuck
|
453.6 | Much better for two... | DSKRUS::ALLEMANG | | Wed May 02 1990 22:06 | 14 |
|
In my (humble) opinion, this game is a much better buy if you will
be playing against a human most of the time. It is a very good game
to rent first... I rented it 5 times, the first 4 times I never
beat the computer (it isn't hard to obtain a draw, but where's the
fun in that?), the 5th time I won 5 games straight and haven't touched
it since.
Still, I was hooked by the strategy, variations of the weaponry used
by each piece, and visual/sound effects. I found that I really wished
I had the Advantage with this game as the computer can shoot from 45
degrees with noooo problem while I fumbled with the basic controller.
Greg
|
453.7 | Tips? | NYEM1::MCGOWAN | | Wed May 09 1990 14:31 | 9 |
|
RE:-1
I had trouble in the battles. The computer seems to be a much better
shooter/fighter. And even his "pawns" seem to fight better.
Any help you can give me on beating the computer during the battles?
James
|
453.8 | Good concept, but fighting was too tough! | BRAT::SMITH | Never say never, I always say. | Wed May 09 1990 15:21 | 16 |
| re: -.1
Yeah, I was usually hammered by the computer, too. Occasionally
my Michelin Man (I forget his actual name, I only played it for
a short while), the guy that had a strong defensive level, would
beat one of the punier opponents when I was on the shade that
was advantageous to my strength. Otherwise, I was always creamed!
In my case, the computer was *definitely* a much better shooter/
fighter. It rarely missed, and it always seemed to be able to
shoot more often than I could (but maybe that was just because of
the respective pieces we were fighting with). I really liked the
concept of the game, but didn't like the game overall because the
fighting was too one-sided. It never took more than 2 shoots for
the computer to kill me. Maybe I just needed to practice more...
Mike
|
453.9 | bob and weave | DSKRUS::ALLEMANG | | Wed May 09 1990 16:23 | 44 |
453.10 | Re .7 | LILAC::HITCHCOCK | I'm virtually everywhere. | Wed May 09 1990 16:29 | 22 |
| > I had trouble in the battles. The computer seems to be a much better
> shooter/fighter. And even his "pawns" seem to fight better.
Here's some tips, although like .8 I haven't won against the
computer either:
First and foremost, make sure you attack on your own square. If
you're dark, attack only light pieces only when they're on dark
squares. The computer's strategy is usually to get its pieces off
the wrong squares early on, which should be yours, as well.
Second, when the computer is on the lumina squares, attack when the
board is in your favor (do you know what's meant by that?).
Third, remember that whenever a particular piece has been in battle,
its lifeforce is lessened, perhaps just a little, but it's down,
nonetheless. Hence, the principle of, If at first you don't
succeed... applies here. You may have gotten killed, but you can
send in another piece to try again. (Try weakening with less
powerful pieces at first, then move in with more powerful ones.)
/chuck
|
453.11 | spoilor | MCIS2::DEW | | Wed May 16 1990 19:36 | 5 |
| If you are white let him go first and on your second turn use our
elimental against HIS DRAGON and on the next turn telaport a guy to
the shiftshapers spot and then go for his wizard. If your black I don't
know what I would do.
|
453.12 | Tons o' fun | STRAIT::WALTON | kerjillions of stars. . . | Wed May 30 1990 21:13 | 12 |
|
After reading the reviews in the previous notes I talked myself into
buying Archon, and I agree, it's GREAT. The lumina squares add a lot
the strategy by making the timing of your attacks critical.
At first I thought it might be too easy since on my third try I got
down to where I had 4 pieces and the computer had only 3. But then
I made a stupid move and eventually lost. End games were never my
stong point! But since then I haven't gotten close to winning.
Anyway I'd give this game a strong recommendation, strategy and slug
it out fighting in one game!
|
453.13 | | ROLL::KRAKAUER | I'm picking out a thermos for you... | Thu May 31 1990 15:08 | 17 |
|
Based on suggestions I rented Archon, and I have to agree with
everyone: it's an excellent game. I've been looking for good two
player games and this one fits the bill. It is a great combination of
strategy and dexterity.
The computer is, unfortunately, not great at strategy. It moves to the
Power Points and sits on them until the lumina squares go away. That
would seem to make the computer easy to defeat, but it is much better
at combat. I found no way to kill the Wizard/Sorceress so I had to
kill off all the other pieces to make the W/S move. That was not an
easy feat is not likely to happen often. Does anyone have any
strategies for playing against the computer and/or friends?
---krak
|
453.14 | Close-out | AKOV14::SALLOWAY | You'll See Perpetual Change | Mon Aug 13 1990 15:30 | 3
|