[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference rusure::math

Title:Mathematics at DEC
Moderator:RUSURE::EDP
Created:Mon Feb 03 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:2083
Total number of notes:14613

651.0. "stones" by VINO::JMUNZER () Fri Jan 16 1987 12:05

A problem, not for regular contributors, from an old Putnam competition:

	N stones are in a row.  Pick them up, one at a time,
	starting with any stone in the row, and then always
	picking up a stone adjacent to the one you just picked
	up.  If you've just picked up the end of the row, then
	you have only one choice of next stone, otherwise you
	have two choices (unless you're finished.)

	Problem:  (1)  given N, how many different ways are there
		       to pick up the stones (see below for N=4.)
		  (2)  give a short, clear argument why that
		       answer is true.

For N=4, there are 8 ways to pick up the stones, labeled ABCD:

	A,B,C,D		B,A,C,D		B,C,A,D		B,C,D,A
	C,B,A,D		C,B,D,A		C,D,B,A		D,C,B,A
	
[This problem was recently told to me by Dave Eklund.]	

John
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
651.1CLT::GILBERTeager like a childTue Jan 20 1987 01:3210
>For N=4, there are 8 ways to pick up the stones, labeled ABCD:
>
>	A,B,C,D		B,A,C,D		B,C,A,D		B,C,D,A
>	C,B,A,D		C,B,D,A		C,D,B,A		D,C,B,A

While the number of ways is correct, there are some errors in the list.
The following list corrects them:

	A,B,C,D		B,A,C,D		C,A,B,D		C,B,A,D
	D,A,B,C		D,B,A,C		D,C,A,B		D,C,B,A
651.2GNERIC::QUAYLETue Jan 20 1987 14:0629
Given N stones, the number of possible orders of picking up the stones 
beginning with the stone in the Mth position is (N-1 M-1) where (N-1 M-1) 
is shorthand for  / N-1 \        (N-1)!
		  |     |  = ------------------
		  \ M-1 /    (M-1)!(N-1-(M-1))!

Label the stones from the left as  ABCDEFG... as before.

Given any starting stone, the stones to the left of it must be picked up in 
reverse alphabetical order and the stones to the right of it must be picked 
up in forward alphabetical order since only adjacent stones are allowed to 
be removed.  That is, if the first stone I pick up is the stone labeled C, 
then I MUST pick up the stone labeled B BEFORE I pick up the stone labeled 
A.

So, if I start at the stone in the Mth position, there will be M-1 stones 
to the left of it and N-M stones to the right of it.  The total number of
possible orders in which to pick up the stones is the number of ways of
merging two ordered sequences. The first sequence has length M-1 and the
second sequence has length N-M, so the total number of possible orders
starting from the Mth position is
	(N-M+M-1 M-1) 
      = (N-1 M-1)
These are the coefficients in the binomial expansion of (1+x)^(N-1), 
therefore the sum the number of orderings from all possible starting positions
is 2^(N-1).

Given N stones, they may be picked up according to the rules in 2^(N-1) 
orders.
651.3rightVINO::JMUNZERTue Jan 20 1987 15:316
    Re .2:  very nice.  I think that the proof can be even shorter, though.
    
    Re .1:  looks like a difference in assumptions behind the notation.
            .2 certainly answered the problem the way I intended it.
    
    John
651.4A short proofMODEL::YARBROUGHTue Jan 20 1987 17:038
May I? Thank you.

There are the same number of ways of placing stones in the n-row as of 
removing them. When placing each stone before the last, there are two 
places available - at each end of the empty space in the middle. Thus there 
are n-1 2-way decisions to be made, and just 2^(n-1) ways of doing that.

Lynn
651.5How you look at problemsVINO::EKLUNDDave EklundThu Jan 22 1987 11:455
    	Yes, I believe that this was the intended approach - namely,
    consider picking up the stones in reverse order!  Always two
    choices except for the last stone.  It's all a matter of how you
    look at the problem...