T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
699.1 | | BGSDEV::POEGEL | | Thu May 29 1997 16:36 | 7 |
|
>> <<< Note 699.0 by NNTPD::"bjorn.fehrm@.soo.dec.com" "Bjorn Fehrm" >>>
>> -< Merced not that impressive >-
Anyone see a floating point estimate?
Garry
|
699.2 | | YIELD::HARRIS | | Thu May 29 1997 18:53 | 4 |
| > Anyone see a floating point estimate?
They keep getting floating point errors when the try an calculate it.
|
699.3 | | GLDX02::ALLBERY | Jim | Thu May 29 1997 19:15 | 3 |
| re: Anyone see a floating point estimate?
.0 had an indirect reference to 2500 MFLOPs.
|
699.4 | MFLOPS probably theoretical... | CERN::HOBBS | Congrats to the Ignoble Peace Prize winner! (http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/ig_nobel) | Fri May 30 1997 07:04 | 7 |
| > 900 mhz
> 2500 MIPS
> 2500 MFLOPS
Gee, 833 MHz with 3 integer units and 3 FP units would give 2500 MIPS/MFLOPS
SPECfp estimates would be more useful
|