[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference ranger::pwosf

Title:PATHWORKS for OSF/1
Notice:see also NOTED::PWDOSWINV5 (PW client) & TURRIS::DIGITAL_UNIX
Moderator:CPEEDY::LONG
Created:Thu Apr 22 1993
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1874
Total number of notes:6870

1830.0. "duplicate sessions with no username." by RANGER::BACHUS::DHAENS () Fri Apr 25 1997 12:28

    Windows NT4.0 clients are having multiple sessions open to a pw-osf
    V5.0geco2 server, resulting in a high number of sessions and access
    denied errors.
    
    For every disk map a session is created. But some of them have a
    blanco user name. This results in a access denied error on the client.
    
    I found a similar problem  description in the pwv50ift notes files.
    -note 4155 and 4198.
    and in two ipmt cases
    -cfs49378 and 49402.
    The story:
    
        NT sends a sesssetup smb with a NULL username. This means
        that when you do a net sessions you see a valid username
        and a null username.
    
        Unfortunately there was a slight problem that when the
        NULL session request came along, and the active session
        was the origional username session that the active user
        was marked as a NULL session. This meant that this user
        could get access problems on his already connected shares.
    
        So a possible bug in NT (the empty username session) caused
        a bug in PW. The fix now makes sure that we mark the
        correct session as a NULL session (= the new session).
    
        This fixes the access errors but still shows an empty
        username session (which is valid because NT sends us one).
    
        Adrie
    
    This is the PW-VMS solution. Is there a solution for Pw-OSF?
    
    /Geert Dhaens
                         
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1830.1Enter a CLD CPEEDY::GARDETue Apr 29 1997 17:586
    
    We do not have a fix for this, and have seen it on v6.1 as well. 
    Please log a CLD.  Thanks.
    
    						- Ces
    
1830.2CPEEDY::HORGANFri May 09 1997 17:534
The null (ghost) session established by NT 4.0 clients is Microsoft's problem.
The issue has been forwarded to Microsoft.

Julia
1830.3RANGER::BACHUS::DHAENSMon May 12 1997 12:347
    When can we expect to have a solution?
    
    Can we formally state that this problem is from Microsoft, and that
    the solution will be provided by them?
    
    /Geert