[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference quokka::non_custodial_parents

Title:Welcome to the Non-Custodial Parents Conference
Notice:Please read 1.* before writing anything
Moderator:MIASYS::HETRICK
Created:Sun Feb 25 1990
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:420
Total number of notes:4370

294.0. "Alimony/Support, TAX ?" by GIAMEM::HOVEY () Mon Jan 10 1994 12:16

    
    Last year the Judge changed the support payments from alimony/support
    to strictly child support. This was ordered in Oct..
    
    Question: Does the fact that this was ordered late in the year still
    count for the entire calendar year or does one get to still claim part
    of the year as alimony?
    
    thanks, 
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
294.1AIMHI::RAUHI survived the Cruel SpaMon Jan 10 1994 12:223
    -.1 who was the marital master/judge who ordered this?
    
    
294.2re-.1GIAMEM::HOVEYMon Jan 10 1994 13:092
    
    	Judge Walker in Mass.
294.3AIMHI::RAUHI survived the Cruel SpaMon Jan 10 1994 14:0512
    Wish we could compile a list of bad attornies and judges like there is
    a list of Deadbeat parents. Lawyers who have knownly corn-holed their
    clinets. And judges who knowingly do the same. I know a marrital
    master. Peter Borque, New Hampshire. Who gave a NCP mom, child
    support. And she doesnt feed, dress, or care for the children in any
    way shape or form. The ex is also married. I would normally term this
    as Alimony, but, she is getting a child support and felt that this is
    most unfair to the CP who is a male. 
    
    Such is life.
    
    
294.4Another TAX related questionNSTG::SHEEHANFri Jan 14 1994 10:5035
 In our divorce case the master awarded joint physical and legal custody
 which equates to 50% of our childrens time being spent with each parent.
 He also dictated that each parent will claim 1 child as a dependant on
 our respective Federal Tax Returns starting with Tax Year 1993. I am to
 pay for medical and life insurance for both children as well as pay child
 support of $250.00 per month. Prior to the final decision the child support
 was $100.00 per week as declared in the temp orders with joint physical
 custody.

 Last year I filed as Head of Household and claimed both children as dependants
 since I clearly qualified according to IRS regs as the Custodial Parent due
 to the fact that I paid greater than 50% of our childrens support and housed
 them for more than 1/2 the year. Although the ex tried to get the master to
 order me to refile and claim only one of our children as a dependant in our
 divorce hearing the master did not require me to refile apparently due to my
 obvious qualification as Head of Household and Custodial Parent according to
 IRS regulations.

 Now my question is, does the masters decision for both parents to claim 1 child
 as a dependant even though the IRS regulations clearly indicate that I am the
 qualified Custodial Parent due to the 50/50 physical custody and my paying of
 greater than 50% of our childrens support through child support and medical
 insurance have to be upheld? Also our childrens primary residence is with me
 and they attend school in the town where I live.
 
 I asked my lawyer about this and he says the masters decision must be followed.
 The IRS doesn't care about any decisions a Judge makes and only cares about
 the tax payer adhering to their regulations.

 Any help would be appreciated!

  Thanks!
 
    Neil....
294.5CSC32::HADDOCKDon't Tell My Achy-Breaky BackFri Jan 14 1994 11:119
    
    re .4    CONGRATULATIONS!!
    
    It's been my experience with the IRS that they will adhere pretty
    closely to the court orders unless  you have a _real good_ case
    not to.  You'd better have an even better case if you have to 
    go explain to the judge why you aren't following his orders.
    
    fred();