[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference quark::mennotes-v1

Title:Topics Pertaining to Men
Notice:Archived V1 - Current file is QUARK::MENNOTES
Moderator:QUARK::LIONEL
Created:Fri Nov 07 1986
Last Modified:Tue Jan 26 1993
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:867
Total number of notes:32923

333.0. "HOW DO I GET TEMPORARY CUSTODY CHANGE" by HYEND::CANDERSON () Tue Mar 28 1989 19:49

    I would like suggestions.  The courts have temporarily restrained my former
    wife from removing my son to Maine (we have joint legal custody).
    On April 7 we go back into court to tell our stories.  Has anybody
    had a experience like this?  What do I need to show to get a temporary
    change in custody through the end of the summer.  All thoughts and
    ideas appreciated.
    
    
    CIRCUMSTANCES   
    -------------
    
    	 In late September, 1988, my former wife quit her job as a Licensed 
    Registered Nurse with a Fitchburg Family Planning Clinic.
    After that event, her only means of financial support 
    known to me was the child support which I pay as stipulated in the 
    divorce decree.  Then on Friday, February 24, she told me that she 
    would be giving her landlord a 30 day notice that she would be vacating 
    her apartment as of March 31.  She said that she could not afford the 
    apartment.  She lead me to believe that she was looking for 
    another apartment in the Gardner area and a roommate to help defray 
    costs but that she might move to Maine and live with her mother.  I 
    expressed my opinion that an immediate move to Maine would not be in 
    my son's best interest because it would disrupt his education 
    (kindergarten) and interfere with my relationship with him.  
    On Tuesday, March 21, she stated that she would be moving some of her 
    personal affects to Maine while my spent the weekend with me.  I
    contacted my attorney, who recommended getting a temporary restraining
    order.  On Friday, March 24 the court in Worcester issued an "Ex
    Parte" order restraining her from taking my son out of the state
    until the judge could hear both parties on April 7.
    
    
    ATTEMPTS AT RESOLUTION AND COMMUNICATION
    ----------------------------------------
    
    	 When I first learned of the possibility that my ex might move 
    my son to Maine, I stated my disapproval and explained that it would 
    interfere with his education as well as the relationship that I have 
    with him.  She stated that she did not feel that removing him was
    a problem.
    
    	 On March 3, I offered her a proposal of my son staying with
    me making it possible for my son to complete the school year in 
    Gardner and then spend the summer with me, as is the usual practice.
    
    	 On March 5, I asked my ex if she had considered the proposal or 
    if she had any alternatives.  She said that she would meet me halfway 
    between Augusta and Leominster when my son visited me.  In my 
    opinion, 8 hours round trip travel time will tax a six year old and from a 
    practical perspective, limit the number and quality of visits.
    Again she stated that she did not feel that removing my son from 
    Kindergarten would disrupt his education.
    
    
    REQUESTED DISPOSITION
    ---------------------
    I ask the following:
    
    1.	 My son resides with me beginning now through the end of the 
         school year so that he can complete kindergarten with his current 
         class.
    
    2.	 My son continues kindergarten in Gardner with his current class.
    
    3.	 My son continues residing with me through the end of the summer 
         (August 15 or some other date) as is the usual and customary 
         practice.
    
    4.	 Discontinue child support for this period in recognition of the 
         increased expenses associated with:
    	 a.   Transportation to and from school
    	 b.   Daycare 
    	 c.   General living expenses
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
333.2PELKEY::PELKEYWed Mar 29 1989 17:3144
    This situation here is a bit different to one that I have had some
    contact with regarding my brother inlaw and his three children.
    
    Regarding custody, and who gets who and why..  I feel most
    courts/judges are changing their beliefs as to who is the better
    single parent to reside with.  Many women in your exwifes situation
    are basing many simialr decisions on "who the boss is" on an impression
    that he courts rule in "Moms" favor.  However, some of them are in for
    a rude awakening.                                                
    
    It could be very likely that the judge would side with you.  You
    have the permanent income, you have the stable homelife (eg. your
    not the one vacating your apartment and considering moving out of
    state to either run away from things or start fresh, find herself
     or what ever..)  
    
    Stability in the home life, and school are considered *very*
    important, more important then the so called "Nuturing Mother" theory, 
    which in many, many cases is nothing but a facade put on by the mother at
    opourtune times.
                                                            
    I can also tell you that this process is slow, and exhausting.  To be
    able to win custody easy, you'd have to have reasonable proof that
    she was unfit, or completly unstable.  Other than that, it's a
    beaurocratic battle with tons of red tape to change an initial decision.
    And another dig is the DSS (Department of Social Services) which
    exist to assist in these matters are completly ineffective and very
    biased on the mothers side.  So don't even bother with that route.
    
    The only advice I can offer comes out of my brother inlaws experience
    and that is to play it cool, write down your thoughts, document
    all incidents that can prove there's concern on your part.  Get
    your stuff together when court day comes.  That impresses the hell
    out of a lot of judges.  And above all, make sure your concerns
    are based on your sons behalf only.  DO NOT LOSE YOUR COOL, let
    your exwife try that tack and see how far it gets her.  I know in
    my brother in laws case, his exwife is a certifiable lunatic, and
    made sure she had a flawless performance on court day.  She not
    only impressed the judge that she was nuts, and was thrown out of
    court, her lawyer told her to seek other councel and George was
    awarded full custody.  
    
    Good luck, hope it goes your way Dad...
                                   
333.3some experienced suggestionsCOMET::HENNINGERThu Mar 30 1989 19:0236
    IMHO, you should add to your requests of the court:
    
    A review of the state of your son's life at the end of the summer
    in order to affirm where his best interests are served.
    
    THEN, stack the deck over the summer:
    a. get him involved with things in your town (little league, swim
    lessons, whatever interests him).
    b. get him involved with friends his age and looking forward to being in
    class with his new friends.
    c. get the 'goods' on your ex and her prospects in life and her
    ability to provide a stable environment for your son.
    
    Also, find out the ins and outs of child custody in Maine and the
    possibility of a slanted court system there.  If yur ex remains
    there long and with your son for about six months then Maine could
    assume jurisdiction and future decisions would then be based on
    Maine implementation of the Uniform Child Cusotdy Jurisdicition
    act.
    
    From the comments you have made and the suggestions of the prior
    noters, KEEP YOUR COOL and ensure you walk in a clean as possible
    around her rights to see your son.  The halfway comment leads me
    to believe she will not keep her own ducks in order and will step
    all over herself in court with a purely emotional plea.  As recommended
    keep a log to be available in the court room after you have discussed
    all these with your lawyer.
    
    Highly recommend your lawyer be the best family law practitioner
    in the area.
    
    Good luck,
    Don
    who won the first series of battles and may have lost the war to
    subversion and absence