[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference quark::human_relations-v1

Title:What's all this fuss about 'sax and violins'?
Notice:Archived V1 - Current conference is QUARK::HUMAN_RELATIONS
Moderator:ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI
Created:Fri May 09 1986
Last Modified:Wed Jun 26 1996
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1327
Total number of notes:28298

1056.0. "Communication paradox..." by WOODRO::SOULE (Pursuing Synergy...) Thu Aug 09 1990 19:17

Is it just me?

Our group was just notified that Voice mail is now available for us to use and
I got excited about the prospect of "better" communication.  Now, I have an
answering machine at home pretty much for the same reason someone would use
Voice mail.  When I am at home I have No problem about leaving a message on
someone else's machine...

Today I tried to call three people on business related issues and I got their 
Voice mail instead!  I didn't leave a message for I had wanted to talk to these
people without being "filtered" so I would call them back later when they were
available.  

Do you folks see my point?  In trying to enhance our communication methods we
may have unwittingly subverted them.  Interpersonal spontaneity is not helped
by this new business device.  I then got to brainstorming (and I hope others
will via replies to this note) about how we could better enhance communication
in Digital.  How about a rule which stated that "All employees would be at their
desks between xx:00 and yy:00 for the purpose of communication." or something
like that? 

Anyone else feel the same as I?
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1056.1VALKYR::RUSTThu Aug 09 1990 19:4729
    I'm afraid I don't see the problem. Unless there are other facts
    unstated, what I hear you saying is that you needed to talk to some
    people about business, you called and got the voicemail instead, and
    instead of assuming that the callees were unavailable and leaving a
    message, you declared the system to be bollixing up communication. (Or
    is the problem that you suspect the voicemail is being used as the
    default, so that people *never* answer their own phones? If so, and if
    that is not the decision of the individuals, I'd say there's a problem
    with the system.)
    
    I don't like phones myself, and I'm made especially nervous by
    answering machines of any type, but if I need to get in touch with
    someone (and can't use E-mail!), I have no objection to leaving a
    message on whatever answering service or device presents itself. This
    only works as well as the callee chooses it to, of course - someone who
    never screens their messages or doesn't respond in a timely fashion
    will make the whole system look bad.
    
    As for specifying a time when everyone should be available for
    phone-answering - well, perhaps, in some locales and in some
    businesses. But it would be tough to pick a single time that would work
    for an international company, without landing somebody on the graveyard
    shift... Besides, even if Fred *is* at his phone between 9 and 10, what
    if he's talking to Honcho Customer just when you need to speak with
    him? Or what if you _really_ need to speak with him at 10:15? Seems
    like leaving a message is the simplest thing to do - and if he hasn't
    gotten back to you soon enough, you can always call him again later.
    
    -b
1056.2QUARK::LIONELFree advice is worth every centThu Aug 09 1990 20:0812
I'd suggest discussing this in HUMAN::DIGITAL, which is where topics
relating to "working at Digital" are relevant.

I consider voice mail or answering machines (when they work) to be far
superior to trying to play "telephone tag".  Of course, I like electronic
mail even better.  I'd rather get a voice mail system or answering machine
than an endlessly ringing phone.

As I tell people who complain about my answering machine - if they leave
a message, I'll call them back on MY "nickel".

					Steve
1056.3WR1FOR::HOGGE_SKDragon Slaying...No Waiting!Thu Aug 09 1990 20:2014
    Well, we HAD a problem with people letting the phones roll over
    to voice mail instead of answering the phone.  Then after I talked
    to one of the companies reps (we use ASPEN) I learned that theres
    a way around that.  ON the system used here if you press *1 then
    dial the extension... the phone will not roll over to voice-mail
    regardless what the person at the other end has set on his phone.
    
    That ended the problem and as I hear people complain about "I know
    he/she's at their desk but just not answering the phone", I let
    them know about the *1 and tell them to "pass it on" you can check
    with your telecomm people to see if such a feature is included with
    your voicemail system.  
    
    Skip
1056.4A proponent of voice mail!NETMAN::HUTCHINSDid someone say ICE CREAM?Thu Aug 09 1990 20:4619
    Our group has had voice mail for about a month and it's working very
    well.  Everyone was required to go to a training session, and the
    Telecomm rep was very clear about what voice mail can and can't do (re
    becoming ineffective if calls aren't returned promptly, etc.)  Many
    people in the group travel extensively and voice mail is very
    convenient if they want to pick up messages or relay specific info in
    their message.  It has reduced the number of phone messages by about
    80% and eliminated lost and scribbled messages.
    
    There are some people who will let their phones roll over *no matter
    what system is in place*.  I've even seen some people hard forward
    their phones to the support person because they didn't feel like
    answering it! 
    
    If used properly, voice mail is a tremendously effective communications
    tool.
    
    Judi
    
1056.5Maybe they ARE communicatingIAMOK::GRAYFollow the hawk, when it circles, ...Mon Aug 13 1990 12:2411
       We have had voice mail (ASPEN) here in VRO for at least two
       years.  One of the nice features is that if you are on the phone
       with someone already, the caller can still leave a message for
       you.  Then when you hang up from the first caller, the little
       light starts winking and you can find out who else called.

       Maybe the person you called was already on the phone, and by not
       leaving a message, they didn't know you called.

       Richard       
1056.6ERIS::CALLASNevermore!Mon Aug 13 1990 18:418
    On all employees being available at some hours:
    
    Do you mean just the ones in the same time zone? What if your project
    is split between both coasts of the US, Europe, and the Far East?
    
    I'm afraid that that's what scheduling meetings are for.
    
    	Jon
1056.7would you ask an answering machine out on a date?HANNAH::OSMANsee HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240Thu Sep 06 1990 14:3913
    
    Often, when I call up someone to ask them out on a date, I get their
    machine.  I'm never quite sure whether to ask them out via the tape, or
    wait until I actually catch them at home!
    
    Sometimes the week is getting late, so although I want to wait until
    I get them in-person, I also want to extend my invitation before they
    already have other weekend plans.
    
    I think I'd welcome an invitation on my tape but I'm not sure other
    people feel that way.
    
    /Eric
1056.8QUIVER::STEFANITurn it on againThu Sep 06 1990 15:467
    re: .7
    
    Eric, leave a message on the tape, but make it something interesting. 
    Most answering machine owners (that I know of) *love* getting messages
    left for them.  And creative messages are usually remembered...
    
       - Larry
1056.9yes, I hate not knowing who hung upHANNAH::OSMANsee HANNAH::IGLOO$:[OSMAN]ERIC.VT240Fri Sep 07 1990 15:338
    
    Yes, I always leave a message, I just hesitate to extend an invitation
    on the tape.
    
    I hate getting hangups on my tape, I get *so* curious about who it was,
    so I try not to give other people hangups.
    
    /Eric