[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference quark::human_relations-v1

Title:What's all this fuss about 'sax and violins'?
Notice:Archived V1 - Current conference is QUARK::HUMAN_RELATIONS
Moderator:ELESYS::JASNIEWSKI
Created:Fri May 09 1986
Last Modified:Wed Jun 26 1996
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1327
Total number of notes:28298

441.0. "Must Love be a Problem?" by PSYCHE::WILSON (Degas) Mon Dec 14 1987 15:35

    (Stole the title of this topic from a _Depeche Mode_ song.)
    
    So many words have been written about love. How can I add something
    new? And yet, maybe I can.
    
    There are so many types of love; the simplest kind is probably
    expressed in a sentence such as ``I love movies.''
    
    It seems simple, yet a lover of movies has without doubt seen his
    or her share of bad movies. And yet the statement remains, ``I love
    movies.''
    
    The same is true for many people. Just about everyone has been
    heartbroken at one time or another, and often wished, ``Why can't
    this thing called love be easier?''. And, despite the hard times,
    people keep going back to the belief in love, so strong is our need
    to love and be loved in return.
    
    I've learned a lot about my personal approach to loving
    another; I've noticed a pattern. I'm trying to figure out if there's
    something self-destructive, or illogical, about some of my beliefs.
    
    I mean, right now I care for someone, all right, LOVE someone to
    a degree, whom, I'm sure, doesn't feel the same for me. I love her
    because she and I share common interests -- we're about the same
    age, have the same education level, have mutual respect for each
    other, enjoy each other's company. But, I know I feel stronger about
    her. 
    
    I think I may be expecting too much from what we have together.
    I can sense impatience on my part. I feel that my strong feelings
    for her should be reciprocated. 
    
    My questions (and I hope to open this up to other's experiences,
    of course) are:
    
    Is what I'm doing wrong? Am I expecting too much?
    
    What is the WORST thing about my feeling disproportionate affection
    toward her?
    
    What is the BEST thing about my feeling disproportionate affection
    toward her?
    
    I'm asking because at times I feel calm about my fate (sort of
    resigning myself to what happens). At other times I'm afraid of
    being trapped in a relationship that is totally one-sided (wasting
    time on someone who will leave).
    
    Why am I dissatisfied with her simply being with me? 

    
    WW
      
    
     
    
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
441.1More!PSYCHE::WILSONDegasMon Dec 14 1987 15:4215
    Two things...
    
    That last question. Maybe I should just be satisfied with her being
    with me. Maybe I'm wrong, and totally out of line, for expecting
    another person to be something I want them to be, and not loving
    them for what they are.
    
    
    An aside...I originally was going to call this topic ``The Meaning
    of Love.'' (From _Depeche Mode_'s *Broken Frame* record.) Just to
    keep the record straight...
    
    
    WW
    
441.2Be the right person.FLOWER::JASNIEWSKITue Dec 15 1987 13:4619
    
    	Try to change your "expectation" of how this person you feel so
    strongly for should behave or act. Surely, you can see no reason
    why this person does not reflect your outpouring of feelings, right?
    But despite all that, try to look at it in terms of a "preference"
    as in "Well, I'd prefer that she'd show me the same, but, hey, what's
    the worst that could happen to me if she doesnt?" In this way, you
    save yourself a lot of emotional energy should things happen to
    "not" go your way, which then can be applied to other areas of your
    life.
    
    	I imagine you are quite excited in the sense of "I've found
    the right person" to love. It's really more of a matter of being
    the "right person" for someone else. By following the suggestion
    I happened to pose above, you'll actually be progressing toward
    becoming that "right person". For someone.
    
    	Joe Jas
         
441.3A little story...somewhat sad.PSYCHE::WILSONDegasWed Dec 16 1987 11:3218
    RE: .2 Well stated...but I don't think it's all my problem.
    
    There are some people who act so cool; they don't think it's
    important to call, or send a thoughtful note, or make a compliment,
    or make the other person feel special.
    
    In short, they have a grand old time having all this attention lavished
    on them, without giving any in return, and one day when the person
    who was so attentive is gone, they feel ``sorry.''
    
    Just a few days ago I got a Xmas card from such a person (a real
    ``bolt from the blue'').
    
    It seems, sadly, that she ended up just where she was when I met
    her.
    
    
    Alone.
441.4In the long run...FLOWER::JASNIEWSKIWed Dec 16 1987 16:159
    
    	re -1,
    
    	Yeah, those who act "so cool" usually end up having to make
    *true* use of their supposed self-assurance. Fact is, what you give
    out, you get back - in the long run.
    
    	Joe Jas
    
441.5Been on receiving end...DISSRV::KOSKIIt's in the way that you use it...Fri Dec 18 1987 13:4712
    Having been on the receiving end of a relationship like yours, I
    can tell you how I felt. Although I was flattered by the attention
    of someone, I was also turned off by this persons willingness to
    do anything to win my love. He was unable to understand that there
    was no "list" of things he could do to make me love him as much
    as he loved me.  It is an empty feeling when you realize that
    no matter how hard you try you can't make some one care for you
    in the same way that you care for them. I'm sorry to sound negative
    but that's just the reality I've been through. 
    
    Gail
    
441.6My thoughtsAWARD2::HARMONFri Dec 18 1987 15:3312
    In a relationship, I think one person always cares a bit more than
    the other.  I've been on both sides.  I agree with Gail that there
    is no "list" that can make a person love you more or you love a
    person more.  You can try so hard that it ruins whatever feeling
    there was at the beginning or realize that no matter what you do
    it's not going to work, and part friends.....which isn't a bad thing.
    
    I once read and have always remembered..."I love him/her enough
    to let them go".
    
    Pat.
    
441.7Another point of viewRETORT::RONFri Dec 18 1987 17:5316
I will probably get beat-up-on for this, but the fact is that 
playing cool --even when feeling very insecure and vulnerable-- is 
very often the right beginning for a relationship.

People who act like door mats often get trodden on. And, that which 
comes cheaply is often underrated. And, playing cool with another
person may not be very loving, but can often lead to lovemaking.

Of course, it's not easy to do. One tends to overdo it, in which
case it just turns the other person off. Even so, totally open and 
honest behaviour can often be counter productive to a starting
relationship.

'Nuff said.

441.9It's so true....AXEL::FOLEYRebel without a ShrewSat Dec 19 1987 12:5011
RE: .6

	You can make money, you can make good friends
	You make mistakes and you can make amends
	You can make it easy when push comes to shove, but -
	You can't make love

	The first part of "You can't make love" from Don Henley's
	"Building the perfect beast"

							mike
441.10I *am* sorryFSLENG::HEFFERNTue Dec 22 1987 04:3023
    I had been seeing a man who fell in love with me.  He was so intense
    and wanted so much to please me.  I really tried to stay in the
    relationship hoping something would evolve.  I felt that perhaps
    no one would feel that way about me again, and I shouldn't be too
    hasty to leave.  But it just wasn't there for me, and his disappoint-
    ment was getting more and more apparent.
    
    When I tried to break it off, all he wanted to do was try again,
    and again.  He'd change anything for me, do anything I wanted,
    please give him a second (third, fourth...)chance.  All his frustration
    finally erupted in violence, afterwhich he could never face me or
    speak to me again out of shame.
    
    I suppose somehow I encouraged, and maybe brought about the final
    blow.  I had never told him I loved him, and ached when he would
    say it to me, and I couldn't reply.  I don't know how I could have
    prevented the end being so painful.  I'm much more cautious about
    other men's feelings now, and perhaps I too can be "cool", but I'll
    never stick around because I think I may be "missing" something
    again!
    
                                        cj
    
441.11Hmm is COMMITMENT involved ??BETA::EARLYBob_the_HikerWed Dec 23 1987 15:0629
    re: .0
    
    Degrees of 'Love' ? Ok, its  a fact of living. There are degrees
    of love. Given that one can have more fears about the relationship
    than the other one  does.
    
    Hmm test question: "Is your love strong enough so that your fears
    about the difference in degrees doesn't matter ?".
    
    Consider Sister Theresa. her love for people was so strong that
    time and time again she subjected herself to great personal risks
    ... yet ... she continued. True, its an extreme example, but it
    is also called "Love".
    
    Of course the test question is loaded ! I have the reverse 'problem',
    except that its not a problem. I know "perforce" that my wife loves
    me much more than I love her; and she is somewhat worried about
    what the future holds for us, and is concerned about 'other
    temptations' I might be subject to.
    
    The minimum ... I think .. of any 'romantic' relationship, is that
    "Are the people involved COMMITTED to making it work ?".
    
    If the answer is yes, whats the problem ? If the answer is no, then
    why continue ? 
    
    just my opinion while passing through .
    
    Bob+3
441.13PSYCHE::WILSONDegasMon Dec 28 1987 18:2143
    RE: .10
    
    That's an interesting situation.
    
    He probably would have had more success with you if he hadn't tried
    so hard. It's inevitable, as someone pointed out, that one person
    feels stronger than the other. But if they can both just _hang on
    and wait a bit_, it may even out.
    
    People get scared away by enthusiasm early on in a relationship.
    It's like Nietzsche said: ``The most dangerous member of the party
    is the person who, in his zealous enthusiasm, leads the others to
    apostasy.'' In other words, if you love a woman, tell her you'd
    like to have coffee with her at Joe's place instead of Veal Oscar
    at Zachary's. You'll have a better time.
    
    Some people go from person to person with an ``all or nothing''
    attitude (S(he's) gonna either love me infinitely, or I dump him
    (her).''
    
    The great thing about falling in love is when there's a _basis_
    for doing so, when you _gradually_ get to know a person, taking
    the time to decide if you really do _love_ the person two months
    later, maybe two years later... 
    
    Somehow it's occuring to me that the person who has to constantly
    demonstrate their love is probably fighting a losing battle. There's
    not much there.
    
    Regarding my situation in the base note, we have talked. We're not
    at the same level. She needs time, if something is to happen at all.
    Who knows? But I'm not an ``all or nothing'' thinker. She's still
    a good person. She doesn't have to love me for us to have a good
    time together. We're not committed to each other...
    
    It's adjusting, readjusting. It's worth it!
    
    
    WW
                                            
    
    The person who really wants to be with you doesn't want favors,
    flowers, etc., they want you.
441.14Love conquersWLDWST::WASHEnjoying the experienceTue Jan 05 1988 11:4532
    Love is never a problem.
    Lack of love is.
    Too often, people confuse lust with love - or matters relatively
    carnal with it.
    In a relationship, the best basis for love is Friendship. Friendship
    is a result of time and the benefits that issue forth as two people
    grow to know each other. If the relationship slips into a carnal
    one, the necessity to know one another (differences et al and
    similarities) is replaced by the illusion that the "intimacy" they
    share equals such knowledge. It is a commonplace problem in
    relationships. So a tyme arrives when the couple discover they are
    not as close as they once perceived - or one party is consummed
    by the involvement while the other is looking for something to relate
    to.
    
    Love is an all-encompassing existence. It isn't defined by conditions
    or social parameters. It isn't dependent on reactions or interpersonal
    relationships. It is a state of being that transcends all those
    considerations. The degree to which your love is manifested in your
    life depends on how much love there is within you. When the negative
    aspects of your psyche materialize, it only reflects that you are
    human. But it is for our individual and collective benefit that
    we strive to be as loving as we can - to achieve, if you will, the
    Christ-like persona that is our ideal. We all fall short, but if
    we sincerely venture to progress up this path we attain a loving
    nature ...... and by doing so we glimpse the knowldege of what it
    is to know love.
    
    If we then apply what we have learned to a relationship, there is
    a fair chance that love will prevail in it.
    
                                                  Marvin