[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference bookie::movies

Title:Movie Reviews and Discussion
Notice:Please do DIR/TITLE before starting a new topic on a movie!
Moderator:VAXCPU::michaudo.dec.com::tamara::eppes
Created:Thu Jan 28 1993
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1249
Total number of notes:16012

879.0. "Showgirls" by KOLFAX::WIEGLEB (Horses are fine, so are books) Wed Jul 12 1995 00:26

    
               <<< ORION::USER10:[NOTES$LIBRARY]MOVIES.NOTE;1 >>>
           -< Do DIR/TITLE before starting a new topic on a movie! >-
================================================================================
Note 878.0                     SHOWGIRLS & SMOKE                       2 replies
TOLKIN::DURKOP                                        9 lines  11-JUL-1995 15:37
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    	Does anyone out there know when the movie "Showgirls", is due to be
    released?  I have seen trailers on Entertainment Tonight and it looks
    somewhat interesting.
    
    					Good Day,
    
    								    H.D.
------    
    NOTE:
    
    This note was reposted by the moderator to focus it on the movie
    "Showgirls".
    
    A new topic has been opened on the second film discussed in the note,
    "Smoke".
    
    One film per topic please unless they are closely related.
    
    Thanks,
    
    - Dave Wiegleb, Movies co-moderator
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
879.1hot_hot_hot!MAL009::RAGUCCIWed Jul 12 1995 22:478
    
    Showgirls I think is still in the making, and your right it looks\
    good, hot & sexy!  yahhoooooooooooooooooo!
    
    
    
    
    BR
879.2WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Thu Jul 13 1995 01:215
    
    I'll probably see it, but it's gonna be tough seeing one of the cast of
    "Saved By The Bell" starring....  
    
    - Sean
879.3All woman:MAL009::RAGUCCIThu Jul 13 1995 03:087
    
    No it won't; have you seen her? That girl has blossomed into
    a women!   
    
    
    
    you'll enjoy it!
879.4BUSY::BUSY::SLABOUNTYTrouble with a capital 'T'Thu Jul 13 1995 13:254
    
    	"Saved by the Bell"?  Is she the same one from "90210" or "Melrose"
    	or whatever she ended up on?
    
879.5STRWRS::KOCH_PIt never hurts to ask...Thu Jul 13 1995 20:283
    
    No, the one from Saved from the Bell was Tiffany Amber Thiessen and she
    went to play a vamp on 90210.
879.6Premiere:MAL009::RAGUCCIThu Jul 13 1995 23:2310
    Her name is Elizabeth Berkley :from saved by the bell.
    
    
    
    She is featured in the recent issue of Premiere mag. August
    
    
    
    
    Bob
879.7BUSY::BUSY::SLABOUNTYTrouble with a capital 'T'Fri Jul 14 1995 13:286
    
    >She is featured in the recent issue of Premiere mag. August
    
    
    	I was hoping you'd say "Penthouse".  8^)
    
879.8next timeMAL009::RAGUCCIMon Jul 17 1995 19:592
    
    I know that will be next, keep watching.....
879.9stripper movieSWAM1::MEUSE_DAFri Jul 21 1995 17:466
    
    this flick just got an nc-17 rating.
    the article mentioned something about "raw sex".
    oh gee.
    
    
879.10WECARE::ROBERTSclimb a ladder to the starsFri Sep 22 1995 16:084
    so can anyone speak to the socially redeeming qualities of this
    movie??? 
    
    
879.11BUSY::BUSY::SLABOUNTYI'll kiss the dirt and walk awayFri Sep 22 1995 17:105
    
    	If it had any, I wouldn't bother going to see it.
    
    	8^)
    
879.12Am I over-reacting here?SHRCTR::SCHILTONPress any key..no,no,not that one!Fri Sep 22 1995 18:3216
    
    re .3 - The word is "woman", not women.
    
    re .10 - How many movies out there actually have redeeming
    social qualities?   All too few.
    
    This whole NC-17 thing cracks me up.  Violence is fine, blood,
    guts, whatever...heck, put it on the 6 o'clock news even, but
    nudity?!   Heaven forbid!!
    
    As to the film possibly containing graphic sex, that would be
    another story, but nudity alone - what's the big deal?!  If 
    folks don't want to see nudity, they obviously should stay away.
      
    Sue
              
879.13ShowgirlsSTRATA::GARRITYTue Sep 22 1992 09:541
     Ok, who has seen "Showgirls"??? I need to know how it is!!!
879.14SPSEG::COVINGTONand the situation is excellent.Mon Sep 25 1995 14:035
    I didn't see it, but a group of my friends (all male, all early 20's)
    saw it and universally panned it. They said it was abysmal and they
    were checking their watches to see how much longer they had to endure.
    
    I figure if it misses on its target audience that badly, I'll pass.
879.15BUSY::SLABOUNTYI'll kiss the dirt and walk awayMon Sep 25 1995 14:349
    
    	The "Showgirls" screenwriter said that he wishes high school kids
    	would sneak in to see the movie, because the message he was trying
    	to get across was that the "showgirl" life isn't all it's cracked
    	up to be.
    
    	I haven't seen it yet, but I do have the "Rolling Stone" ad on my
    	wall here.  Drool.  8^)
    
879.16Target audience may be too young to see it ...WRKSYS::COULTERIf this typewriter can't do it, ...Mon Sep 25 1995 14:5816
879.17Topics consolidated by moderatorKOLFAX::WIEGLEBHorses are fine, so are booksMon Sep 25 1995 16:1810
    The duplicate topic and its replies have been consolidated and moved
    from 945 to here.
    
    Please do a "DIR/TITLE=show" (or whatever) before creating a new topic. 
    The moderators would rather be spending their time on their real jobs.
    ;^)
    
    Thanks,
    
    - Dave Wiegleb, co-moderator
879.18two thumbs down by S&EHUMOR::EPPESI'm not making this up, you knowMon Sep 25 1995 16:334
For what it's worth, Siskel and Ebert both gave "Showgirls" a thumbs-down
rating, based on poor writing, mostly.  

-- Nina
879.19freeSWAM1::MEUSE_DAMon Sep 25 1995 20:579
    
    went to rent Pulp Fiction. they were handing out the 8 minutes
    promo video of this flick for no rental charge.
    
    if you want a good idea what this flick is about, catch the 8
    minutes. it just about sums up the movie based on what I have
    read.
    
    
879.20BUSY::SLABOUNTYI'll kiss the dirt and walk awayMon Sep 25 1995 21:056
    
    	Well, that's California.  Might not be available over here on
    	the right coast.
    
    	Which video store?
    
879.21WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Mon Sep 25 1995 23:0711
    
    Actually, this was a nationwide promotion.  Video stores everywhere had
    'em.  Howie Carr went and got a bunch to give out on his show.  The
    annoying thing was that these were free promo videos, but all the
    stores and rental places were only giveing them out if you
    purchases/rented something.
    
    I think they're wondering if this might be a new way to go for promos,
    and you may see it a few more times.
    
    - Sean
879.22right-on!MAL009::RAGUCCIWed Sep 27 1995 18:379
    
    I can't wait to see this movie; what is so wrong with women who
    are comfortable with their bodies and being nude. And in real
    life there are Showgirls in Vegas & stripclubs around America!
    So what's the big deal?
    
    
    
    Bob
879.23SLEEPR::MAIEWSKIWed Sep 27 1995 20:0911
  Joyce Kilhawick of Boston WBZ TV panned the film but I noticed that she
continued the trend I've seen with other critics. Almost no critic says one way
or the other if the movie was well made. They all seem so outraged by the
content that they either give a serious review panning the film from a moral
point of view or they talk about the subject matter in words reeking with
cynicism. 

  Some of the reviews here have been far more informative than anything I've
seen in the papers or on TV.

  George 
879.24SPSEG::COVINGTONand the situation is excellent.Wed Sep 27 1995 23:148
    My impression from my friends was that they were thrilled at the
    prospect of going to a film to stare at womanflesh (they're all male in
    their early 20's, remember?) but found it to be a horrible movie and a
    complete waste of their time.
    
    This is from guys who will watch bass fishing on ESPN for an hour
    because they left the remote on top of the TV and don't feel like
    moving to get it.
879.25Puleeez!WECARE::FERRIGNOThu Sep 28 1995 14:0610
    .22  Exactly!  But the movie wants us to feel "sorry" for the showgirls
    because its stated objective is to let the world know what the "real"
    showgirl life is like.  Terrific.  If a woman wants to take her clothes
    off and display her no-doubt great body, then she should anticipate
    the results of that.  As a woman, why should I feel sorry for these
    women.  They can get a job in a computer company, no? :>{
    
    
    
    
879.26unbelievable ...PCBUOA::DBROOKSThu Sep 28 1995 15:257
    So.
    
    How come there's not a 'Showboys'?
    
    Never mind,
    
    db
879.27still looking for a positive reviewSTUDIO::PALUSESBob Paluses @MROThu Sep 28 1995 16:4314
    
    
     According to an article in the paper the other day,
    even the real showgirls in Vegas thought the movie stunk. They laughed
    at it's untrue coverage. Without giving away any plot or surprises
    (is this possible ?) I guess the theory of the movie is the climb from
    stripper to showgirl and clawing your way to the top. Apparently, in
    real life, much the opposite happens because the girls interviewed
    said that many would be lured from showbiz to stripping because of
    the huge pay differential.
    
     They also mentioned how many showgirls have been dancing since they
    were children and have formal training in ballet, music, etc and are
    expected to choriograph some of their own stuff. 
879.28she got a great reaction from Liz at leastAPLVEW::DEBRIAEreflections from the Grotto...Thu Sep 28 1995 18:235
    re: Joyce K. on Ch 4
    
    	I loved the ending line of her review though, "wished they kept it
    	zipped up." Poor Liz almost fell off her chair in shock... :-)
    
879.29TROOA::BROOKSWed Feb 28 1996 15:446
    I doubt I'll ever see this film given a comment in a review I read
    stating something to the effect of "...the only character worth caring
    about is brutally gang-raped... "  Not something to entice me to spend
    time & money on.
    
    Doug
879.30DOG MAN GO WOOF!PGREEN::FLINTMThu Apr 18 1996 08:566
    I haven't seen Congo but i think Showgirls must be up there with the
    turkeys. Did anyone notice a story behind the nudity?
    
    
    mike
    
879.31KERNEL::PLANTCMmmmmmm Chocolate!!! Doop!!!Thu Apr 18 1996 08:576
    
    
    There was supposed to be a story??:))))
    
    Chris
    :)
879.32if you can't beat 'em.....WONDER::REILLYSean / Alpha Servers DTN:223-4375Thu Apr 18 1996 13:1411
    
    "Showgirls" is being re-marketed out in CA, and, if it works,
    probably the rest of the country.
    
    The studio is presenting it as a late-night cult film, trying
    to give it the "Rocky Horror" treatment, using the same ploys
    to get folks to go, i.e., going to trash the film is very 
    welcome.
    
    - Sean
    
879.33BSS::SMITH_SWed Apr 24 1996 05:033
    Who cares about the plot.  Ya gotta admit..whew, that Berkeley(sp)
    girl.
    -ss
879.34VNABRW::RHOTON_JJohn Rhoton @AUI - DTN 754-2345Sat May 04 1996 20:205
    Maybe it was just because I was expecting so little but I didn't think
    the movie was that bad.  Mind you, it definitely wasn't one of the year's
    best but I have seen worse.  I didn't fall asleep in it at least.
    
    John
879.35EVMS::MDNITE::RIVERSNo commentThu Nov 07 1996 14:4136
879.36worse movie I've seen in ages!SUBPAC::GOLDIEResident AlienThu Nov 07 1996 20:079
879.37BUSY::SLABSubtract A, substitute O, invert SThu Nov 07 1996 20:293
879.38SUBPAC::GOLDIEResident AlienThu Nov 07 1996 20:3910
879.39EVMS::MDNITE::RIVERSNo commentFri Nov 08 1996 13:4410
879.40BUSY::SLABSubtract A, substitute O, invert SMon Nov 11 1996 17:204
879.41SUBPAC::GOLDIEResident AlienWed Nov 13 1996 11:4611
879.41P.U. what a stinker!HOTLNE::SHIELDSThu Jan 16 1997 06:1712
879.42a dud for sure for all the hype it got...SUBSYS::MSOUCYMentalmETALMikeThu Jan 16 1997 14:508
879.43SNAX::NOONANsing the soul's bluesFri Jan 17 1997 03:194
879.44CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Jan 20 1997 13:418
879.45BUSY::SLABGreat baby! Delicious!!Mon Jan 20 1997 17:133
879.46CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsMon Jan 20 1997 17:4014
879.47BUSY::SLABch-ch-ch-ch-ha-ha-ha-haMon Jan 20 1997 18:234
879.48CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsTue Jan 21 1997 11:426
879.49SNAX::NOONANsing the soul's bluesWed Jan 22 1997 02:446
879.50CLUSTA::MAIEWSKIBraves, 1914 1957 1995 WS ChampsThu Jan 23 1997 19:146
879.51Don't forget the hot tub scene...QUARRY::reevesJon Reeves, UNIX compiler groupThu Jan 23 1997 19:583
879.52SNAX::NOONANsing the soul's bluesSun Jan 26 1997 03:1210
  >Rape is violence, not sex.
    
    
    Sorry.  *I* knew my thought process; I expected everyone else to, also.
    
    R, NC-17 and X ratings are based on sex *and* on violence.  It was from
    that that the comment about the rape scene came.
    
    
    E