| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 265.1 | Rubbish...\ | 42139::WILSOND1 | DAVE WILSON @WLC | Wed Jul 21 1993 11:55 | 8 |
|
Dont bother....its rubbish.
Its a nothing movie, just an excuse for Madonna to get her kit off, and
I like her.
Dave...
|
| 265.2 | | 3694::BELFORTI | Mrs. Frank N. Furter | Wed Jul 21 1993 12:47 | 2 |
| I agree.. don't waste your money! Madonna was playing Madonna.... but
being paid for it!
|
| 265.3 | | 5235::J_TOMAO | | Wed Jul 21 1993 13:05 | 10 |
| Ditto on .2
Madonna was playing Madonna but in a bad hair cut/style......
There are some interesting plot twists but other than that, well lets
just say I am real glad I didn't waste anevening at the movies and pay
theater prices for this one. Oh but the sceen in the parking garage
was my favorite !
Signed, Joyce another Madonna fan
|
| 265.4 | 1 out of 5 | ASDG::SCARBOROUGH | | Wed Jul 21 1993 15:11 | 13 |
|
Ditto on previous replies,
I'm a big fan of the old Madonna. Not anything like I expected.
Didn't Madonna direct this movie? If so, she should stay out of
directing and stick with her acting and video bits!
The movie could have used a few of her more recent songs to living it
up also. I can think of one from the Dick Tracy soundtrack, which I
won't mention here...
Carl S.
|
| 265.5 | It had its moment | VMSDEV::HALLYB | Fish have no concept of fire | Wed Jul 21 1993 16:22 | 7 |
| I liked the courtroom drama near the end. See if you can figure out
the Big Surprise before it's revealed.
Not worth going out of your way for, but if the alternative is watching
reruns of "Gilligan's Island" and the price is < $2, it's worth it.
John
|
| 265.6 | | VAXWRK::STHILAIRE | a period of transition | Wed Jul 21 1993 17:57 | 5 |
| Goodness. I shudder to imagine what those of us who are *not* Madonna
fans would think of this movie! :-)
Lorna (who finds her boring and annoying and hates her music)
|
| 265.7 | Not a Madonna fan, but... | 16821::POGAR | SLEEPLESS IN SEATTLE - THE CURE FOR INSOMNIACS | Wed Jul 21 1993 18:29 | 5 |
| I'm not a Madonna fan, but I do like both Willem DaFoe and Joe
Montegna, and neither one of them could save this movie.
Catherine
|
| 265.8 | Can't win them all. | 6882::HANLEY | | Wed Jul 21 1993 20:18 | 11 |
| re: .5
I'd rather watch Gilligan's Island.
<minor spoiler>
Apon seeing this movie, my first thought was,
They should of shot Madonna<sp> at the the begining of the project,
before they started filming.
|
| 265.9 | | 11770::HSCOTT | Lynn Hanley-Scott | Wed Jul 28 1993 19:58 | 8 |
| I thought the scripting was poor - I was just amazed at some of the
goofy lines that Dafoe had. And, that he agreed to be in the movie at
all.
Perhaps if they'd cast someone other than Madonna, the plot might have
had a chance. It seemed to lots of angle shots of her.
|
| 265.10 | waste of time | 5793::STARR | Who needs love? | Mon Aug 02 1993 17:59 | 16 |
| This movie was just awful - after about a half-hour of it I ended up
fast-forwarding through the rest of it to catch the major plot revelations,
and to see what all the stink was about (not much, since the sex scenes turned
out to be hardly erotic to me, and I ended up FF'ing over those also).
I couldn't believe how bad Madonna was in this movie, just beyond
comprehension! She seemed to just talk her way through her lines, not even
*trying* to act..... ugh! (I could probably do a better job acting! And I'll
bet most everyone else here could also!)
William Defoe and Joe Montegna are two good actors, but both aren't given
anything to work with here. What a waste of talent...
0 out of 10
alan
|
| 265.11 | corrections | 29067::A_PARRACO | I vent, therefore I am ... | Sat Aug 14 1993 19:37 | 6 |
|
Ahem - that's WILLEM Dafoe, and Joe MANTEGNA ...
FWIW.
- acp
|
| 265.12 | I'll never look at candles the same way...... | HOTLNE::SHIELDS | | Fri Dec 27 1996 09:18 | 9
|