T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
818.1 | Look at the classification! | UTROP1::BOSMAN_P | | Wed Sep 01 1993 06:27 | 16 |
| Linda,
Don't get the classification in ordes, groups, species and subspecies
mixed up.
A hybrid is any offspring of individuals not belonging to the same
subspecies.
Individuals not belonging to the same species will not produce fertile
offspring (this being one of the criteria for "species").
X-breeding between species under natural conditions is prevented by
behavioral patterns.
In my opinion hybrids should be frowned upon as it appearantly already
too difficult to preserve the species.
Peter
|
818.2 | Continuing the dialogue.... | RAGMOP::COMPTON | | Thu Sep 02 1993 17:36 | 12 |
| So....Peter...here's the question being debated locally:
Is a cross-breeding between a lesser sulphur crested
cockatoo (one of the subspecies with yellow in the
crest) and a citron cockatoo (a subspecies of the lesser,
but has orange instead of yellow in the crest) considered
hybridization? "Knowledgeable experts" here are in
disagreement. This would be like crossing an cockatua
eleaonora with a galerita galerita in the so-called
'greater' sulpher crested species.
Linda
|
818.3 | No issue! Just shows ignorance. | UTROP1::BOSMAN_P | | Fri Sep 03 1993 06:45 | 22 |
818.4 | Thanks for the clarification | RAGMOP::COMPTON | | Fri Sep 03 1993 19:47 | 10 |
| Hi Peter,
I will relay your answer to those concerned. This question has also
come up with regard to Eastern Rosellas and the cecelia subspecies,
also called here the Golden-Mantled Rosella. The names Eastern and
Golden-Mantled names are often used interchangeably, which seems very
incorrect to me. But then I am considered overly fussy about such
things ;')
Linda
|
818.5 | Give a pig a name, it's still a pig! | UTROP1::BOSMAN_P | | Wed Sep 08 1993 06:59 | 13 |
| Well Linda,
If there is a subspecies concerned it does not matter evry much how one
calls it, as long as it is recognised as being distict from other
subspecies and bred discriminately. There is no risc in being too
fussy, there is a big risc in mixing it up. So keep being as fussy as
you like, you'r very correct!
To avoid confusion about names, which is unavoideble when using local
language, I nearly always use the scientific nomenclature. One of my
teals p.e. has about half a dozen Dutch names and over twenty(!) English.
Peter
|
818.6 | Thanks for the encouragement | VAXUUM::COMPTON | | Wed Sep 08 1993 21:10 | 5 |
| Hi Peter,
I appreciate the encouragement. I'll keep being fussy!!
Linda
|
818.7 | taxonimy vs mutation | USHS05::VASAK | Sugar Magnolia | Thu Sep 09 1993 16:50 | 13 |
|
Thanks for the explanations, Peter. I think it is tricky for many
people to understand why it is ok (and not a hybrid) to breed a lutino
cockatiel to a grey 'tiel, or a blue Indian ringneck to a lutino Indian
ringneck, but not ok (ie; is a hybrid) to breed a green Indian ringneck
to a a green African ringneck, or an Elenora to a Citron Cockatoo, or a
Vosmari to a Soloman Island Eclectus. Understanding the difference
between colour mutation difference (like the first set of birds) and
subspecies (taxinomical) differences (as in the second set) is not
necessarily obvious!
/Rita
|
818.8 | reproduction? | ODIXIE::HAYS | | Thu Jan 13 1994 23:04 | 15 |
|
Well I'm confused now. I have a Harlequin macaw, a cross between a
Green Wing and a Blue and Gold and I can tell you that a hybrid does
not mature mentally as fast as a pure bred. But I had never given any
thought to the reproduction aspect of it. Do you mean to tell me that
a hybrid does not reproduce? If not that's fine with me, I just never
knew. Anyway my "Harley" is a beautiful bird. He has the most
spectacular coloring from both his parents and is quite large. He has
the gentle nature of the Blue and Gold and the playful but wilfull
antics of a Green Wing.
|
818.9 | what do you get when you cross... | NEWVAX::WHITMAN | gun control = 5% gun + 95% control | Mon Jul 08 1996 17:05 | 24 |
| This topic sure has been quiet for a long time...
We have been told that crossing a male Mollucan Cockatoo with a female
Umbrella Cockatoo produces a spectacular offspring (white body with the
rich pink crest), but crossing a female Mollucan with a male Umbrella produces
an ugly, muddy colored bird.
We know of a lady who bartered some handfeeding for what she was told was
an Umbrella baby. As the chick has started to get its feathers, it appears
as if someone with sooty hands wiped the birds feathers (i.e. the feather
colors are splotched with dark grey instead of pure white as is normal.) We're
wondering at this point if perhaps that chick is one of the "ugly" (I know
they are all so cute...) hybrids...
Can anyone confirm that crossing a female Mollucan Cockatoo with a male
Umbrella cockatoo produces a "muddy" colored, unattractive baby?
Thanks,
Al
|