[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference noted::sf

Title:Arcana Caelestia
Notice:Directory listings are in topic 2
Moderator:NETRIX::thomas
Created:Thu Dec 08 1983
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1300
Total number of notes:18728

776.0. "Trend? Unresolved endings?" by MCIS2::TKELLEHER (Need moral fiber? Try Zen Flakes) Mon Apr 17 1989 19:57

    
    A question regarding recent SF novel plots...
    
    What IS this tendency of modern SF writers to weave together
    dense, multi-level plots, and resolve only a few of them by the
    book's end?
    
    First example:  STARTIDE RISING, by David Brin.  Now, first off,
    I *loved* this book!  And I thought the ending was exciting,
    fantastic, thrilling, yowzah -- and I'd recommended the book
    to a fire hydrant, if I thought the hydrant would read it.
    A great book.  But as you know (ye who've read it), there are
    SO MANY implications from the drama around the Streaker (the
    dolphin-piloted starship) that are not resolved.
    
    In STARTIDE RISING, I *liked* that so much went unresolved.
    The primary plot was rousing enough, and resolved so deftly,
    I had no complaints.
    
    Not so with:  THE FORGE OF GOD, by Greg Bear.  Now, first off,
    I *hated* this book.  I mean, sure, it had it's fun.  A clever
    method for pulverizing a planet.  Some excellent descriptions
    of the pulverization itself (both from space, and from the surface).
    An interesting scenario of machine-intelligences in space, and
    their motives for seeking out life.  But in all, too much novelic
    wandering around, and only a modest resolution of the main plot.
    In fact, some of the sub-plots (the pyramid in the desert, the
    new rock by Ayers Rock) seemed just SF-author "gee-wow" showmanship,
    rather than anything pertinent to the story.  In the end, Bear seemed
    to say to the reader "Oh, I'm done with those pyrotechnics now.
    Ignore them, they were just diversions.  Back to our main theme."

    Bugged me, it did.  He had so much rumbling along at once, the ending
    promised to be truly climactic.  Naah.  He just dropped the interesting
    hot potatoes and concluded one of the luke-warm ones.
    
    Also, there's:  ACROSS A SEA OF SUNS, by Gregory Benford.  Now
    first off, I *did* like this book (and its precursor...which I loved,
    and am ashamed to say its title is "[blank] [blank] [blank] NIGHT"
    ...I think).  I liked it very much, and in a very general way,
    it has similarities to Bear's FORGE.  But the prose is a hundred
    times better, the characters are deeper and more rally-behind-able,
    and the plots both more comprehensible and more complex.  Again,
    the various plots are established, driven forward, developed wisely
    and grippingly...and in the end, only a few resolved.  I was actually
    stunned at Benford's ending in SEA OF SUNS.  Because so MUCH went
    unresolved, I thought something must have been wrong with my copy
    of the book.  (Note:  the last ten pages of the book are an excerpt
    from his NEXT book -- so as you come to the end, you may be caught
    off-guard thinking you had ten more pages of THIS book to go.)
    I love Benford's prose, and his deft pacing and skill as an author.
    I *didn't* like this guillotine-like ending.
    
    Okay, three unsolicited book-reviews, and a question...
    
    What is going on with SF nowadays?  Is there a name for this
    type of mostly-unresolved ending?  Worked well in STARTIDE RISING...
    but with Bear it felt like he got bored, so he stopped writing.
    
    (Also, any comments on these books...and the name of the prequel
    to ACROSS A SEA OF SUNS?)
    
    Didn't expect this to be so durned long!
    
    				Tom
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
776.1trilogy feverRESOLV::KOLBEThe dilettante debutanteTue Apr 18 1989 00:2010
      My first guess would be that you have to have something to talk
      about in the 2nd and 3rd books. Isn't everything a trilogy
      now days? On the other hand, real life has multiple sub-plots and
      many of them go unresolved so maybe they are just being realistic.

      I do agree that I hate a compelete cliff-hanger of an ending. Even
      though I loved the follow-up book, Mirror_of_her_Dreams annoyed me
      the way it ended in the middle of a paragraph. I think the
      authors owe us a complete book. liesl
776.2Charlie brown saysWMOIS::M_KOWALEWICZbarren of BrainsTue Apr 18 1989 10:5811
	I _thought_ Mirror of her Dreams was a single book.  In the
last two pages.......  eeeeyyyyaaauuuggghhh ....  I'm glad no one was
around when I finished it.  I waited over a year for the sequel (AMWT)




					Errrr  that's Baron.
							mk

776.3RICKS::REDFORDCo. Conspiratorial Infernal Use OnlyWed Apr 19 1989 03:2713
    "Startide Rising" does have a sequel, "The Uplift War", but it's 
    not a very satisfactory one.  Instead of following up on some of 
    the interesting alien races, Brin concentrates on a boringly 
    humanoid alien and a gang of intelligence-enhanced gorillas.
    
    Actually, I like it when the author leaves tantalizing hints of 
    further stories lying around.  It gives one a sense of a 
    vast and open-ended world just outside the window of the novel.
    It's one of the main appeals of "The Lord of the Rings".  I agree 
    that in "The Forge of God" it's just clumsy writing, but it can 
    add a lot to a book.
    
    /jlr
776.4RUBY::BOYAJIANStarfleet SecurityWed Apr 19 1989 03:4818
    re:.0
    
    In many cases, the author writes a book that it just too damn long
    for the publisher to be comfortable issuing as a single book, so
    the editor cuts it in two.
    
    But in others, it's just a tendency to leave a hook open for further
    novels in a series.
    
    And I think the other Benford title you're thinking of is IN THE
    OCEANS OF NIGHT.
    
    re:.3
    
    Actually, THE UPLIFT WAR isn't a sequel, as it occurs pretty much
    concurrently with STARTIDE.
    
    --- jerry
776.5general repliesMCIS2::TKELLEHERNeed moral fiber? Try Zen FlakesWed Apr 19 1989 14:0736
    
    re: .3, .4
    
    I agree.  It can add a LOT to have all sorts of hooks and tendrils
    reaching out from the main book, leading your imagination on and
    letting it fill in details.  Like in STARTIDE RISING, Brin introduces
    psi-bombs, and other "psi-" technology, in a totally taken-for-granted
    manner.  His characters accept psi-energies as blandly as we accept
    electricity...and so no explanation is offered for how it works,
    what it does, how it's produced.  In Brin's case, I loved it...

    But Bear...!  Have I mentioned that I didn't like THE FORGE OF
    GOD?  I think I did.  Just in case...I didn't much like THE
    FORGE OF GOD.
    
    
    And, yes, Benford's other book is IN THE OCEAN OF NIGHT.  By the
    way, despite the chop-stop ending to ACROSS THE SEA OF SUNS, I *do*
    recommend it.  It's a very solid, very good book.  Just brace yourself
    for the end.
    
    Benford wrote another book (don't know yet if it's the same universe,
    though), called GREAT SKY RIVER.
    
    	OCEAN OF NIGHT,
    	SEA OF SUNS,
    	and
    	GREAT SKY RIVER.      _I_ see a pattern developing!
    
    
    Stay tuned for Benford's next book,
    
    	POND OF PLANETS
    
    
    
776.6Future History != series...COFLUB::WRIGHTand miles to go before I sleep.Wed Apr 19 1989 19:1521
    
    Picking a nit -
    
    Startide Rising and The Uplift War are not part of a series.  They
    are part of a Future History.  That Future History was started in
    Brin's book Sundivers where a lot that is taken for granted in Startide
    and Uplifted is explained.  Sundivers also occurs many years before
    Startide and Uplift and fills in a lot of the background (like what
    uplift is, why the aliens don't like us, psi weapons, etc....)
    
    If you want to better your understanding, go read sundivers...
    
    Also, David Brin is currently working on several more books in this
    universe.  (at unicon '87, David Brin was the Guest of honor and
    he said that (if my memory recalls correctly) that there would be
    several more books in the series, with one currently under revision,
    one in first draft and one being planned....)
    
    Grins,
    
    clark.
776.7...or is it a Brin-and-Bear [it!] book?MCIS2::TKELLEHERNeed moral fiber? Try Zen FlakesWed Apr 19 1989 20:1512
    
    Yowzah!!
    
    Gimme some more Brin!
    
    
    As long as the topics collide, as anyone here read HEART OF THE
    COMET?  It's a Brin-Benford collaboration, isn't it?
    
    
    Tom
    
776.8Heart of the CometSQM::MCCAFFERTYThu Apr 20 1989 19:497
    RE: HEart of the Comet
    
     Yes it is a collaboration by the two authors and I found it excellent
    reading, good science, good adventure, good...good..well you get
    the point.
    
    					- John
776.9Oh yeah, thats the one where......CSCOA3::CONWAY_JMarietta CuisenartThu Apr 20 1989 19:564
    I have read both startide, and sundiver and found them both
    (apparently) eminently forgettable.  So much so that I can't really
    enter into this discussion since I cannot recall one thing about
    either of them.
776.10Starscape?CHEFS::BARKMon Apr 24 1989 12:3911
    I'm sure I read somewhere, some time ago that Benford was going
    to write a book called "Starscape" which would be a sequel to "Across
    the Sea of Suns".  Presumably, this is the book to which the ending
    of "...Sea of Suns" points rather than "Big Sky River".  
    
    Personally though I'm cherishing the hope that having stranded Nigel
    Walmsley on a godforsaken planet watched over by an automated
    Deathstar, he's going to leave the unbearable smartass there and
    go on to something new...