T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
155.1 | can you be more specific? | NAC::CHARNY | | Fri Jan 24 1992 14:01 | 27 |
155.2 | I've "mailed" an Ethernet trace. | STKHLM::TORGNY | | Mon Jan 27 1992 06:45 | 1 |
155.3 | I've asked for more info | NAC::CHARNY | | Mon Jan 27 1992 17:12 | 1 |
155.4 | what I believe is going on | NAC::CHARNY | | Wed Jan 29 1992 14:50 | 56 |
155.5 | | MARVIN::COBB | Graham R. Cobb (Wide Area Comms.), REO2-G/H9, 830-3917 | Thu Jan 30 1992 10:49 | 8 |
155.6 | Why is SEL used in routing? | STKHLM::TORGNY | | Thu Jan 30 1992 12:26 | 12 |
155.7 | Guess | TOOK::MICHAUD | Jeff Michaud, DECnet-ULTRIX | Thu Jan 30 1992 13:37 | 5 |
155.8 | may be that's why... | NAC::CHARNY | | Thu Jan 30 1992 17:56 | 11 |
155.9 | I'm not a member | STKHLM::TORGNY | | Fri Jan 31 1992 09:32 | 7 |
155.10 | I will put the info here as soon as I get it | NAC::CHARNY | | Fri Jan 31 1992 12:26 | 5 |
155.11 | a response from Radia Perlman | NAC::CHARNY | | Mon Feb 03 1992 12:37 | 18 |
155.12 | a response from the routing architect | NAC::CHARNY | | Tue Feb 04 1992 12:17 | 27 |
155.13 | Why is <oping> removed in T5.1-2 | STKHLM::TORGNY | | Mon Feb 10 1992 14:45 | 1 |
155.14 | Patch area where you can find oping | TOOK::BUXTON | | Wed Feb 12 1992 15:47 | 9 |
155.15 | Can't oping SUN | DC101::COLE | Govt DCC, Landover, Md | Thu Mar 12 1992 13:57 | 76 |
155.16 | they seem to implement the short-term solution of RFC 1139 | NAC::CHARNY | | Thu Mar 12 1992 17:29 | 39 |
155.17 | can oping SUN now ! | DC101::COLE | Govt DCC, Landover, Md | Thu Mar 12 1992 19:54 | 38 |
155.18 | can SUN osi_ping us, though? | NAC::CHARNY | | Fri Mar 13 1992 14:55 | 16 |
155.19 | yes, but complains about PDU | DC101::COLE | Govt DCC, Landover, Md | Fri Mar 13 1992 16:25 | 9 |
155.20 | support for interoperability with rfc 1139 | NAC::CHARNY | | Thu Mar 19 1992 19:16 | 12
|