T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1771.1 | Congratulations | IDEFIX::HEMMINGS | Lanterne Rouge | Fri Oct 26 1990 06:56 | 13 |
1771.2 | 1991 stages | ALLVAX::JROTH | It's a bush recording... | Fri Oct 26 1990 08:59 | 29 |
| The stages for the 1991 Tour de France cycling race as announced by
the organizers Tuesday:
Total distance -- 2,462 miles
July 6 -- Prologue at Lyon, 3.31 miles.
July 7 -- 1st Stage -- Lyon - Lyon, 75 miles, and
2nd stage -- Bryon - Chassieu (team time trial), 26.8 miles.
July 8 -- 3rd stage -- Villeurbanne - Dijon, 130 miles.
July 9 -- 4th stage -- Dijon - Reims, 180 miles.
July 10 -- 5th stage -- Reims - Valenciennes, 90 miles.
July 11 -- 6th stage -- Arra - Le Havre, 156 miles.
July 12 -- 7th stage -- Le Havre - Argentan, 103 miles.
July 13 -- 8th stage -- Argentan - Alencon (individual time trial), 45 miles.
July 14 -- 9th stage -- Alencon - Rennes, 102 miles.
July 15 -- 10th stage -- Rennes - Quimper, 125 miles.
July 16 -- 11th stage -- Quimper - Saint-Herblain, 155 miles.
July 17 -- Transfer by plane Nantes - Pau.
July 18 -- 12th stage -- Pau - Jaca, Spain, 138 miles.
July 19 -- 13th stage -- Jaca - Val Louron, 144 miles.
July 20 -- 14th stage -- Saint-Gaudens - Castres, 107 miles.
July 21 -- 15th stage -- Albi - Ales, 146 miles.
July 22 -- 16th stage -- Ales - Gap, 132 miles.
July 23 -- 17th stage -- Gap - L'Alpe d'Huez, 80 miles.
July 24 -- 18th stage -- Bourg d'Oisans - Morzine, 155 miles.
July 25 -- 19th stage -- Morzine - Aix les Bains, 120 miles.
July 26 -- 20th stage -- Aix les Bains - Macon, 100 miles.
July 27 -- 21st stage -- Lugny - Macon (individual time trial), 36.6 miles.
July 28 -- 22nd stage -- Melun - Paris (Champs-Elysees), 112.5 miles.
|
1771.3 | It should be a tour, not a French RAAM | CIMNET::MJOHNSON | Matt Johnson, DTN 291-7856 | Fri Oct 26 1990 12:50 | 10 |
| That's a tough tour -- maybe too tough? It seems to favor endurance
over anything else. So many things can go wrong in the course of
that many miles that several of the best are bound to abandon. It's
also likely to discourage people from participating in races both
before and afterwards. I'd prefer to see shorter stages, and two rest
days, but the same number of cols. (Many riders have called for
similar kinds of changes over the past couple of years.)
MATT
|
1771.4 | Sissies? | NOVA::FISHER | Oakland swept, so what | Fri Oct 26 1990 14:42 | 4 |
| re:.3: You mean everybody's crying for an easier tour? Wadda dey
want anyway? A charity tour?
ed
|
1771.5 | reputation to maintain... | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | IronFish Tamer. | Fri Oct 26 1990 15:23 | 8 |
| > re:.3: You mean everybody's crying for an easier tour? Wadda dey
> want anyway? A charity tour?
Yeah, make it too easy and next thing ya know, somebody will start thinking
that the World Serious or the Super Bowel is the world's ultimate
sporting event, and then there goes the neighborhood...... :-)
ken
|
1771.6 | TdF <> RAAM and RAAM <> TdF | BCSE::KLASMAN | ALL-IN-1 DESKtop for PCs. dtn 381-0731 | Fri Oct 26 1990 15:42 | 6 |
| re: It should be a tour, not a French RAAM
No matter how tough they make the TdF, it can't be compared to RAAM. They are 2
very different, nasty beasts!
Kevin
|
1771.7 | Get rid of the mindless miles | CIMNET::MJOHNSON | Matt Johnson, DTN 291-7856 | Fri Oct 26 1990 16:22 | 6 |
| I'm not saying "make it easier," but "make it sane." It doesn't
serve anybody to put in 180-mile flat stages that have no effect
on GC. Flat stages should be there, so the sprinters have a
reason to ride, but there's no need for them to be so long.
MATT
|
1771.8 | oops, "RAF" is already used | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Fri Oct 26 1990 17:04 | 14 |
1771.9 | 1990 had 302 km stage, transfer the next day | NOVA::FISHER | Oakland swept, so what | Fri Oct 26 1990 19:18 | 4 |
| 1990 and 1991 have a 180 mile marathon stage, but I think previously
the last one was in the early 80's.
ed
|
1771.10 | ex | BALMER::MUDGETT | One Lean, Mean Whining Machine | Sat Jul 06 1991 02:55 | 5 |
| Greetings,
Does anyone have the TV schedule for the Tdf, this year?
Fred M.
|
1771.11 | | FILMS::WIDDOWSON | | Sat Jul 06 1991 15:16 | 7 |
| CYCLE_RACING 353.17 has the US coverage.
UK coverage appears to be 18:30 to 19:00 M->Sa 17:30 to 18:30 Sun.
France, well better not mention French coverage....
rod
|
1771.12 | | LJOHUB::CRITZ | John Ellis to ride RAAM '91 | Mon Jul 08 1991 12:12 | 16 |
| Fred,
Basically:
ABC: Every Saturday, 10 minutes of 90 minutes dedicated
to Tour, Wide World of Sports, 4:30 PM EDT
Every Sunday, 1 hour, usually 5-6 PM EDT
ESPN: Every Wednesday evening, usually 7:30 PM EDT
As always, check local listings.
I know, I sound like a commercial.
Scott
|
1771.13 | thanks | BALMER::MUDGETT | One Lean, Mean Whining Machine | Tue Jul 09 1991 02:37 | 23 |
| re .l-2(inclusive)
Thanks for the pointers etc. you guys. Hey will we get that
ABC woman who followed the race last year on a motorcycle?
Her opinions on this world class race were just priceless.
My favorite one was when near the end of the race Greg had
made up something like 3 minutes and got within like 3 seconds
of the leader she asked Greg if he was upset that he still
hadn't won a stage. Maybe someone at ABC could invest a moment
or two of research and get someone who actually had DONE THE
RACE. What a concept!
By the way the other night I was watching the prolouge and
the 3 mile course was rdden generally in 6 mins and change.
The speed the showed was 52 kph which I have very little idea
of what the h>((( that is in mph's but I guess something like
40+. I wanted to watch the rest of the tdf so of course my daughter had
a meeting to go to so I loaded the bike and while she was busy learning
I went for a ride. On the course there is this monster hill and was
able to go 42 mph! So I can go as fast as the TDF even though its
almost over a cliff!
Fred Mudgett
|
1771.14 | 3 mi in 6 min = 30 mph, 52 kph = 32.3 mph, 40 mph = 64.4 kph | DECWET::BINGHAM | John Bingham | Tue Jul 09 1991 05:33 | 0 |
1771.15 | | FILMS::WIDDOWSON | | Tue Jul 09 1991 06:53 | 7 |
| re .14,.13
The UK time-trial record for 25 miles was broken a couple of weeks ago at
something like 31.3 mph (Graham will give the correct figures I'm sure).
Humbling, isn't it.
rod (who *still* can't spin his 52-16)
|
1771.16 | | RUTILE::MACFADYEN | No help available here | Tue Jul 09 1991 06:55 | 5 |
| Re .15: Who did it? What was the time?
Rod M
|
1771.17 | 48:06 | KIRKTN::GGOODMAN | Number 1 in a field of 1 | Tue Jul 09 1991 08:21 | 12 |
|
Re.15.16
Gary Dighton broke the record, 48-06. And of course, out came the
standard cycling answer. "Yes, I reckon I can go faster as I wasn't at
my best tonight". Sickening, isn't it. However, it must be said that
the riders in the Tour ride on traffic free roads, but the English (no,
not Scottish) riders are given more than a little help from the nice
traffic.
Graham.
|
1771.18 | What's happening to the 25 record? | RUTILE::MACFADYEN | No help available here | Tue Jul 09 1991 16:03 | 6 |
| The 25m stood for a few years until last season, but I think this is
the third time it's been lowered since last year. So what's happening?
Are people getting fitter or is it trick components?
Rod
|
1771.19 | Where's that wind tunnel? | PAKORA::GGOODMAN | Number 1 in a field of 1 | Tue Jul 09 1991 16:33 | 13 |
|
I think that it was always going to happen like this. When Alf Engers
record lasted so long, it became a legend, something all the older guys
in the club would tell the youngsters. This leaves the record held in
awe. Suddenly last year, Pete Longbottom broke the record. Everyone
knows him, and this means that they realise that they too can break the
record. Result? The record comes tumbling down fast...
Mind you, if you could see the bike that O'Bree rides 49 minute 25
miles, you'd realise that fancy equipment has nothing to do with it.
He always rides on a fixed wheel!
Graham.
|
1771.20 | | LJOHUB::CRITZ | John Ellis to ride RAAM '91 | Tue Jul 09 1991 18:02 | 6 |
| Kinda like the 4-minute mile. After Roger Bannister broke it,
others followed.
It's [mostly] in the head, son.
scott
|
1771.21 | | FILMS::WIDDOWSON | | Wed Jul 10 1991 07:57 | 6 |
| I think tri-bars might have a lot to do with the amount by which this
record is crumbling..
Someone told me this weekend that although O'Bree doesn't shave his
legs he does shave his nose to keep the air passage open. Also his
setup is sort-of like a tri-bar setup.
|
1771.22 | Please don't hang me | PAKORA::GGOODMAN | Number 1 in a field of 1 | Wed Jul 10 1991 08:16 | 14 |
|
Sorry, I was exaggerating Dighton's performance. He was a second
slower (48:07).
Rod,
Dighton and co all ride state of the art bikes. O'Bree has very
poor quality equipment, and most importantly, still rides on a fixed
(52x14, I think). Imagine spinning that gear for 25 miles at 30-odd
miles per hour (O'Bree broke the Scottish 25 record at the SCU 25
Champs this year with a 'slow' 49).
Graham.
|
1771.23 | :-) | NOVA::FISHER | Rdb/VMS Dinosaur | Wed Jul 10 1991 10:41 | 5 |
| And I thought it was because all the lorries slowed down to 32mph.
:-)
ed
|
1771.24 | poor equipment? more like 'secret weapon'! :-) | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | sushi: not just for breakfast! | Wed Jul 10 1991 11:54 | 4 |
| Gee, all things being equal, a fixed-gear bike otta be *faster* than a
multi-speed - less weight, less drive train / air friction, and plenty of extra
incentive not to stop pedaling......
ken
|
1771.25 | | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Uphill, Into the Wind | Wed Jul 10 1991 14:20 | 7 |
| We'll get a chance find out if gears help on the track. According
to Les Earnest, due to an ambiguous statement in the rules, the
US. Nationals will allow derailleurs in the pursuit and one other
track race (I forget which one). There doesn't seem to be a
consensus on whether using a derailleur will help or hurt.
--David
|
1771.26 | Derailleurs no advantage.
| ALEXI::MANDRACCIA | | Wed Jul 10 1991 14:38 | 10 |
|
re. -1
The rule you mention is ambiguous, however the official USCF
ruling for the Velodrome in Colorado Springs is:
Derailleurs may be used in Individual pursuit and kilo, BUT
the derailleur or shifters must be fixed to prevent shifting.
You figure it out.
|
1771.27 | there could be some advantages | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Wed Jul 10 1991 15:51 | 13 |
|
Interesting. The advantages of this include:
- Economy: you can use your road bike on the track.
(I don't know if economy is a consideration, but...)
- Choice of "fixed" gearing. You could theoretically choose
the fixed gear you'd like to use with a flick of the shift
lever before the event, then lock it down.
(I don't know if people in track events feel the need for
that much variety.)
-john
|
1771.28 | | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Uphill, Into the Wind | Wed Jul 10 1991 16:51 | 5 |
| I thought that Les Earnest (on the USCF board of governors) said
that you would be allowed to shift in the pursuit and kilo, but I
don't follow this sort of thing carefully.
--David
|
1771.29 | | RUTILE::MACFADYEN | The key word is survival | Wed Jul 10 1991 18:12 | 14 |
| Re .22: How poor quality is poor quality? There was an article in
Cycling Weekly this spring comparing Chris Boardman's and Graeme
Obree's (not O'Bree, Rod W, he's Scottish not Irish!) bikes. Boardman's
bike was unquestionably state of the art, a low-profile with narrow
tri-bars and baton wheels, but Obree's, while unconventional in its
riding position, was scarcely low quality. The frame was built to his
own spec and he was about to acquire baton wheels. Things like seatpost
and brakes were definitely cheapie, but the bike was very light.
I suppose the only way to find out would be to winkle him out of his
funny riding position and give him Thierry Marie's TdF prologue bike.
Rod
|
1771.30 | Re: .-2 on derailluers at the track | NEWOA::SOUTAR | UK Restart Technical Specialist | Wed Jul 10 1991 23:31 | 51 |
1771.31 | Rat hole apology ;-) | NEWOA::SOUTAR | UK Restart Technical Specialist | Wed Jul 10 1991 23:33 | 5 |
| re .30 - what did that have to do with the Tour?? Search me!
Sorry :-)
|
1771.32 | right, but flywheel? | SHALOT::ELLIS | John Lee Ellis - assembly required | Thu Jul 11 1991 14:17 | 20 |
| RE: .30
Steve, rathole or not, thanks for an absorbing explanation.
Clearly you are right in most respects: I can just see the
derailleur getting mangled if one forgets to spin. :-(
I'm not sure what advantage the flywheel effect has - it is
keeping up the momentum of your legs, but that's not forward
motion. There would be a loss of energy if you freewheel,
namely, when the ratchet mechanism idles (click,click,click),
which I guess you'd do if you're tired on the flats (but on a
descent, presumably you're going as as fast as you want to
if you let the freewheel idle).
Still, I'm amazed at what people can accomplish cross country
on a fixed gear - shows how derailleur/freewheel biassed we
have become in 50 years, that is seems hard to conceive of
conquering ornery terrain on a fixed gear.
-john
|
1771.33 | wanna go out for a SPIN? :-) | SUSHI::KMACDONALD | sushi: not just for breakfast! | Thu Jul 11 1991 14:39 | 11 |
| > Still, I'm amazed at what people can accomplish cross country
> on a fixed gear - shows how derailleur/freewheel biassed we
> have become in 50 years, that is seems hard to conceive of
> conquering ornery terrain on a fixed gear.
Art Longsjo, the bike racer from Fitchburg, MA, for whom the bike classic
there is named, used to go on daily training rides from Fitch over into the
mountains of Vermont, back down thru Keene, NH and back to Fitch. Daily
training runs of 180 miles, through the mountains, on a fixed gear bike.
Sounds like a bag o' fun! :-)
ken
|
1771.34 | SPECIAL LEGS REQUIRED | WMOIS::C_GIROUARD | | Thu Jul 11 1991 15:00 | 3 |
| Yeah, if you've got thighs Ivan Putzski :-)
Chip
|
1771.35 | Change Title | LANDO::OBRIEN | Give it a TRI | Thu Jul 11 1991 15:49 | 3 |
| Moderator - maybe you could change the title of this note. Its a waste
of time looking for(extra) TdF info here... Seems like CYCLE_RACING is
the only place to go.
|