| probably not TOO much, assuming (!) reasonable competence on the part of
all the frame builders. The joinery is modestly important - the less
solder used (properly) and the more attention to mitering the tubes the
stronger the frame will be, and more resilient at the joints. That's
either important, or not, as you please :-).
the lugwork can have an effect on the ride, too. Often custom builders
will agonize over the choice of short or long-point fork crowns, etc,
depending on how they want the bike to ride. Important to you? Beats me!
The volume frame builder may just say "Hey, we gotta great deal on
40,000 Frogmoid seat lugs, let's use these on all our bikes for the next
4 years!".
Don't forget, even a custom bike built for you can go wrong. A friend of
mine agonized for 2 years getting a Serotta (spent as much $ for phone
bill to Saratoga as for the bike) and hated it when it came. Sold it for
a big loss, went to Ned 'n' Fred's and bought a bike he loved..... oh
well!
ken
|
| I've often wondered the same thing. My guess (and it's only a guess) is that
there really CAN'T be too much difference. For instance I used to have a 1984
version of the Specialized Allez SE. That frame was Japanese, made with a good
deal of automation, but it was strong and straight as an arrow. I always
thought that if I wanted a "better" bike all I had to do was get it repainted
in a fancy two color fade. Now I know that that sounds stupid but think if
this line of "reasoning" applies to anyone of you or anyone you know.
I have a neighbor who has a Palo Alto bike. Palo Alto bike shop is a shop with
a mail order business much like Performance/Nashbar and they sell frames with
their name on them built in Italy with Columbus SL/SP/SLX/SPX and sells for
about $400. Since he's the same size as me I've been able to ride it and
really get a feel for it. I would say that it's a fine bike, handles real
well.
It just seems logical to me that if two frames are built with the same tubing
and with the same angles, the only diference is one is built by hand (by some
old guy in Italy) and the other is a production frame built partly, or even
mostly by machine that you would be very hard-pressed to tell the difference.
In fact I might even assume that the frame built using modern automation would
be of better (or at least more consistant) quality than a true hand built
frame.
People have asked me this type of question before, for instance is there really
a difference between a $1000 Eddy Merckx frame and a good production frame like
a Trek or a Miyata or a ...? That's a hard one to answer. I don't know,
Anyone else care to comment?
|
| The only way you know for sure is if you can x-ray the frames and
see if the tubes are perfectly mitred and butted. This is essential,
as is proper heating of tubes, and alignment, and proper frame design.
After building a few frames myself using silver solder, I get nervous
just watching a brass brazed frame heat up to red hot. Some damage
must happen with thin tubing such as SL.
Steve
|