[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference noted::bicycle

Title: Bicycling
Notice:Bicycling for Fun
Moderator:JAMIN::WASSER
Created:Mon Apr 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:3214
Total number of notes:31946

685.0. "biopace cranksets" by MEMV01::CHENEY () Tue May 24 1988 17:13

    I am looking at buying a new bike and have noticed that several
    of them now offer elliptical cranksets such as Shimano's biopace.
    I have heard mixed reviews about them....anyone want to give
    thier view?  I particular I want to know if anyone with knee 
    problems has found the biopace either helpful or hurtful. 
    
    Thanks for your input!
    
    Chris
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
685.1Wouldn't have a mountain bike without them...STAR::TEAGUEI'm not a doctor,but I play one on TV...Tue May 24 1988 17:3310
Shimano Biopace is the only way to go for low-rpm pedaling, that's why
they're almost standard equipment on mountain bikes.  Other copycat
semi-elliptical rings are NOT as good as Biopace.

I have ridden both round and Biopace chainrings on nearly identical
mountain bikes now.  There is no comparison.

.jim

685.2 ROUND CHAINRINGS USMRM5::MREIDTue May 24 1988 20:5816
    I hate Biopace chainrings. I had them on my racing bike, used them
    for a year, and then got some round Superbe Pro chainrings this
    year. I spin 90-100 RPM, and the round chainrings definitely make
    spinning smoother & easier.
    
    I have knee problems (chips in the joint), and find that the smooth
    feeling of round chainrings is easier on the knees. If I were going
    to climb Mt. Washington, hmmmm, I'd consider the Biopace, but for
    racing there's nothing like round chainrings. I really tried to
    like the Biopace too, because the ads said they were better on the
    knees ... 
    
    Mark
    
    PS - I'm selling my Biopace chainrings (42T & 52T) if anyone is
         still interested! ($10 for the set). I'm in Marlboro,MA.
685.3Only for slow pedallingLEROUF::WILSONJohn in Valbonne, FranceWed May 25 1988 06:1711
    I was thinking of getting a Biopace as well, and I asked a lot of
    questions about them. it seems that if you pedal at high rpms (around
    100rpm, which you should do most of the time on the road, training or
    racing) Bipopace is a bad idee. This is because the momentum of
    your feet is diverted by the eccentric shape of the chainrings. I
    don't think that serious road racers use Biopace. 
    
    However for touring with heavy loads, or mountain biking, there
    does seem to be an advantage.

    John
685.4round-and-roundMAMIE::HAMELWed May 25 1988 12:0812
Chris,

        A good friend (John Light from Burlington) found that the
    elliptical chain rings aggravated his knee problem.  As in <.1>,
    the smoother pattern of circular rotation seems to be the way to
    go for those with uncooperative mid-leg joints.  

        Give me a call to talk some "bike talk".


                                    Dean
685.5Spring Reruns...STAR::TEAGUEI'm not a doctor,but I play one on TV...Wed May 25 1988 12:467
Sigh...this is sounding all too familiar, but I'm guilty, too.

See note 441...

.jim

685.6worked for meNCVAX1::POPPWed May 25 1988 13:408
    I also have bad knees, I started bikeing again 3 years ago, but
    found my knees would not hold up to more than 10-15 miles of easy
    rideing on a  "normal" 12 speed raod bike. Last year on the advice
    of a doctor I bought a Mt. bike with Biopace rings, by the end of
    the riding season I found a 60 mi. day on the Mt bike to be not
    in the least stressfull. I belive the biopace helped me re-build
    knees (muscle problems). I also now find I can ride my normal road
    bike 100 mi plus with no pain
685.7 BIOPACE chainrings SOLDUSMRM5::MREIDWed May 25 1988 18:0910
    re .2
    
    I'm the one who hates Biopace, and wanted to sell my old BP chaindings;
    I guess I didn't discourage everyone from Biopace, because after
    I mentioned that I wanted to sell my Biopace chainrings, some people
    were interested immediately!
    
    The chainrings are sold ...
    
    Mark
685.8I like Bio-pace for low-rpm tooBRAT::SMITHNever say never, I always say.Wed May 25 1988 21:4911
    
    	I also think the Bio-pace are the way to go for low-rpm
    	pedaling, as they are shaped so as to increase your leverage
    	when the cranks are in a "poor leverage" position. But I
    	think the round ones are preferable for the faster stuff.
    	I've seen some mountain bikes where the inner and middle
    	chainrings were elliptical, and the outer (where you'd more
    	likely be doing your high-speed cranking) was round.
    
    								Mike
    
685.9Why not both?AIMHI::JSMITHBikes Spoke_n HereThu May 26 1988 00:3110
    I just converted my Cannondale to Bio Pace after holding out
    for nearly a year to see how they developed.  I'm now sorry
    I waited so long.  I'm a pretty heavy guy, whose always had
    a hard time on tough hills.  I still do, but with the Bio
    Pace Small Ring (42 T) I was able to climb Mt. Vernon hill,
    standing out of the saddle the entire time, which is something
    I was never able to do before.  As for those who like to spin
    in the big gears, why not opt for both , i.e., Bio Pace Inner
    for climbing and Round Outer for Spinning.
    						Jerry
685.10big round and small ovalCIMAMT::CHINNASWAMYbicycling in pixel space,',',',Thu May 26 1988 13:4214
RE -.1 :

	I too have thought of the same thing. I primarily ride for fun and 
sometime will attempt a citizens race. But when training I typically ovoid
a route with extremly big hills. If I had a small biopace ring and keep my
large 53T then I could cover both aspects. I usually don't use my small
ring expect for hills anyway. Does anyone know what biopace ring will fit
on a Sugino ALP crankset? The catalogues for the Shimano rings say that
they are for 600/Sante/Exage cranksets only. 

thanx and hoping to be able to get up those massive hills!!!

mano