T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
890.1 | | PUTTER::WARFIELD | Gone Golfing | Mon Mar 12 1990 20:42 | 12 |
|
Johnny Miller is a breath of fresh air. He really knows the game,
and isn't afraid to speak his mind. His tips where he helps the
other announcers are fun.
Now if we only could get someone other than Bryant Gumble in the
booth with him. Bryant may love the game, but so far the game
doesn't love his announcing style. It's almost enough to make
me yearn for the well rehearsed lines of Vin Scully.
Sigh,
Larry
|
890.2 | one liner | WFOV12::GUGLIELMO_T | | Tue Mar 13 1990 08:41 | 5 |
| He had the best line I have heard on golf coverage.Calcavecchia
was behind an NBC vehicle and Miller says "If he goes for the green
he is on some medication we can't mention on tv." I was rolling
Ted
|
890.3 | Was a great player, and is a very good announcer | SA1794::WELLSPEAK | Waiting for you to come along | Tue Mar 13 1990 11:02 | 20 |
| Johnny Miller has been one of my favorites for a long time.
He had one of the best years ever for a golfer. I think he won
7 different events that year and had numerous other top 10 finishes.
If he were to have a year like that with todays money, I could easily
see him winning $2,000,000.00 in a year!!!
As an announcer, Johnny simply tells it like it is. He knows
what he's talking about, and isn't afraid to say when someone chokes
or blows it. One time, and I forget who the golfer was, but a player
who was contending for the tournament on Sunday, pushed his tee
shot way right and into some trees. The guy ended up bogeying the
hole. Miller came right out and said he didn't know what the heck
was going thru that guys mind on that tee. It was a fairley short
par 4 and he should have been hitting 3 wood or a 1 iron off the
tee, giving him a full wedge into the green, but instead tryed to
ease up on a driver and never finished the swing. He has many times
questioned the course management of players, saying how they just
seem to hit it as far as they can off the tee, instead of playing
the hole smart, and setting up for a good approach shot.
Beak
|
890.4 | My Observations | BOGUSS::COOPER | WHAT SLICE, ITS A FADE !! | Tue Mar 13 1990 15:30 | 9 |
| What I really like about Bryant is how no matter how
far from the green or how tough a shot the player has, he
always pipes up with " he has that left for birdy" !
Miller usually responds with something like "He'll be really
lucky to get up and down from there Bryant, the rough is knee
deep, no green to work with, and he has the worst short game on
tour."
Mad Hacker
|
890.5 | The S word | PUGGS::DESROCHERS_P | SAVVY Good Band * Music * Time | Tue Mar 13 1990 16:29 | 23 |
|
Yeah, Beak, I remember Johnny's great years (two?) where he hit
EVERYTHING on the stick. He was winning with 65-62-63-65!!!
Jack "may" be the best ever but, to me, Johnny Miller played
the best golf EVER for a bit more than a year.
Then he took time from the tour to build his house and built
up his body (remember when you couldn't tell him from that
skinny guy, Larry Hinson??). His swing was never the same...
I'll never forget Johnny SH*NKING a shot (I'm almost positive
it was something like the 18th at Pebble in the U.S. Open).
Right during his domination of the tour. For the life of me,
I can't remember whether he won or not. Just remember that
sh*nk going dead into the gallery...
Yes, he tells it like it is too. But Marc McCumber really had
it together out there as the roving reporter... just finished
playing, knew the course/wind/undulations etc...
But Beak!!! What happened to my man Watson????
|
890.6 | Miller knows his stuff | KAOFS::C_HENRY | | Tue Mar 13 1990 21:24 | 2 |
| Almost anybody's better than Sculley and Trevino in the box...8^)
|
890.7 | Well, he's no Vin Scully, but... | DICKNS::F_MCGOWAN | Zoot who? | Tue Mar 13 1990 23:52 | 8 |
| I guess I'm probably in the minority, but I have no problem with
Bryant Gumble...oh, well, that's what makes horse races, eh? As
for Johnny Miller - yes, he is quite refreshing. My all-time
favorite on-course reporter is Gary McCord, but Mark McCumber got
off one real doozie, speaking about (I think) the 16th, as a hole
that will "pucker your backside."
Frank
|
890.8 | love the bird who picked up Calc's marker ! | FRAGLE::STUART | kiss my fahrfegneugen | Wed Mar 14 1990 15:22 | 16 |
|
I agree that Miller is real good and Gumble stinks but, is it me
or does the camera work on NBC really stink !! On CBS you can
usually tell when a good shot is hit and where it's going, or a
bad shot for that matter .... but the last two tourneys on NBC
I noticed that following the ball was difficult ....
especially Floyds putt on 17 I think, he told the camera man to
move, so he moved to where you could not see the hole and id the
putt went in or not.
and why did Calc have to hit around that tractor ????
the best camera work were the shots of Calc's "live in caddie" 8*)
I'll leave out the rude ball comments ;^)
ace_who_leaves_for_Florida_in_21_days !!
|
890.9 | The Miller Legend grows.. | USEM::VOUTSELAS | | Mon Mar 19 1990 11:50 | 8 |
| Did anyone see/hear the interview between Rocco Mediate
and Johnny Miller?
It was funnier than anything on Comedy Tonight!!
Miller was still laughing to himself after the commercial!
Ang
|
890.10 | He really knows his stuff!!! | SA1794::WELLSPEAK | Waiting for you to come along | Mon Mar 19 1990 15:39 | 13 |
| I missed it. But Johnny once again showed his golf knowlege
when he said on Sunday, that Jody Mudd would probably play his tee
shot safe on 17, and go for the center or right center of the green
instead of going for the pin, which was located right over the trap
on the far right of the green. Mudds shot ended up about 4 feet
from the pin. Later, Miller, when asked if the shot was intentional,
said, if he were a betting man, he'd bet Mudd was going 10 feet
left of where he ended up and just pushed the shot a bit. He was
proven correct in the post-tourny interview where Mudd said he got
lucky on 17 when he pushed his tee shot and ended up only 4 feet
from the pin, for what proved to be the winning birdie.
Beak
|
890.11 | Miller time.. | USEM::VOUTSELAS | | Tue Mar 20 1990 12:07 | 14 |
| "Beak",
yeah ,that was another great call on the push shot by Mudd
that Miller continues to call in advance!
I just hope he keeps this level up and doesn't
get sloppy with success.
How would you like to have Miller, McCord,Venturi
Trevino, and Zoeller doing a tournement!
..and Rocco Mediate for some good laughs!
Mudd took a big chance on a full swing , side hill
cut shot on 18 out of the rough with a tree in his line,
but he had the look or "zone" quality in hie eyes, so
I guess he felt confident.
Ang
|
890.12 | | SA1794::WELLSPEAK | Waiting for you to come along | Tue Mar 20 1990 13:52 | 12 |
| That was another time, that I would have agreed with Miller, who
said he thought Mudd should have just layed out in the fairway a
good 100 yards from the green. This way, if he threw in a good
wedge, he could still make par, but would be almost guaranteeing
himself of no worse than a bogey. since even IF Calcaveccia birdied
the hole, Mudd would have still been in a tie, that was the correct
play. But, Mudd came out looking great. If he had dumped that
ball into the water though, he could have easily become a goat.
Congrats to him, for making a great shot, but I think it was the
wrong decision.
Beak
|
890.13 | | HEFTY::TENEROWICZT | | Wed Mar 21 1990 11:05 | 14 |
|
As it turned out is was a great golf shot but a STUPID shot.
Being great is obvious because of the result but for what?
He still ended up boggying the hole. A safe lay up under the tree
would have yielded him the same net result. In this light the
shot was a stupid gamble that mudd was lucky enough to pull off.
If you look closely at the replay you can see that mudds' ball
come pretty close to the tree.
Tom
|
890.14 | unlucky nonbounce | GOLFEN::BLAISDELL | Bart or Homer for president | Wed Mar 21 1990 11:30 | 7 |
|
Mudd also got very unlucky with the shot. His low shot hit
30 yards in front of the green and all but plugged. A normal
bounce and he would have been on the green close to the pin,
making Calcavecchia's putt meaningless.
-rick
|
890.15 | Go For it ! | WALTA::LENEHAN | Drive for show, 2 putt for dough | Wed Mar 21 1990 12:27 | 8 |
|
After watching Zinger "go for it" out of the rough to a tough pin
position at the Doral, when the commentators all expected a lay-up
shot. Then seeing Mudd taking a similar chance... it appears the Pro's
like to take destiny in their own hands, and when given a chance for
winning it all , they take the chance.
Walt
|
890.16 | If It Were You | SKETCH::PIEL | | Wed Mar 21 1990 15:31 | 14 |
| Walt,
I think your right. Playing for a tie, at that level, may not
be the best idea. Too much could happen on the playoff holes.
Here is an interesting question to ponder......if you were Jodie what
would your decision be and why. Consider the course, your opposition,
a chance to win, the money, etc. Top it all off with the fact that you
have say 3-4 min to make up your mind.
Frightening, no ?
Ken
|
890.17 | I'd wimp out ... | PINGS::OGREN | | Wed Mar 21 1990 15:46 | 19 |
| Ken,
I agree that no-one leading a tournament wants to go into a playoff
where anything can happen (ask Greg Norman!).
But from Mudd's standpoint, he must place himself in a position
to win the tournament. Punching out to 100 yards or so seemed best
with a 2 shot lead. If Calcavechia makes birdie, then he still has
a makeable winning putt after a wedge approach. And no worse than
a playoff. He could easily have lost it all hitting the tree (ball
going OB, into water, into trees, hitting himself, ...).
He must have felt that Calcavecchia would have a likely bird after
his super drive (9 iron left to the stick) and that Mudd *had* to
make par. Do you play to win or play not to lose?
Frightening? Yes!
Eric
|
890.18 | I'll just answer Erics last question | SA1794::WELLSPEAK | Waiting for you to come along | Wed Mar 21 1990 16:45 | 8 |
| In that particular situation, I'd say you play not to lose.
He had a 2 shot lead. I could understand his play, had it been
tied or even if he had only a 1 shot lead, but with a 2 shot lead,
I would have layed up, and tried to get up and down for a par from
about 100 yards away. Then, * IF * I didn't, and * IF * Calcaveccia
made a birdie, I still wouldn't have lost, at least not yet.
Beak
|
890.19 | Miller - more filling | WALTA::LENEHAN | Drive for show, 2 putt for dough | Wed Mar 21 1990 16:47 | 10 |
| Hi Ang,
Miller's comments are like taking a lesson. He's constantly
providing "tips" rather than simply stating needs/results.
I've really enjoyed his addition to the booth... But Gumble!
If he says "On this Sunday" one more time .... GRrrrrrrrrr!
Walta
|
890.20 | JOHN JOHN | BTOVT::HOGANP | | Thu Mar 22 1990 15:17 | 5 |
| I like Johnny Miller because he seems so relaxed. It's like he's
sitting in his living room talking to his best friend. He adds humor to
the game and is a pleasure to listen to.
Pete
|
890.21 | | SKETCH::PIEL | | Thu Mar 22 1990 15:26 | 10 |
| yep,
another vote for Johnny ! Tells the truth, gets the point across
clearly, and understands the game.
Brian Gumbol..........Yech!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ken
|
890.22 | Maybe, huh, well, huh, could be | SKETCH::PIEL | | Thu Mar 22 1990 15:35 | 11 |
| Eric,
Going for it or not may be a personality trait. Among other
factors. I thought about this and while I am not fully sure, I think
I would have tried the same shot as Jodie. I would rather lose outright
than face Mark in a playoff. He would out drive me and has a excellent
short game. Remember the British Open and his second shot from the
rough on the final hole.
Ken
|
890.23 | what happened | SALEM::DIFRUSCIA | | Mon Mar 22 1993 16:00 | 6 |
| Does Johnny Miller play any more? If not what happened to him?
Did he just loose it one day?
thanks
tony
|
890.24 | he caught a bad case of the yips | DEVMKO::BLAISDELL | Rick, dtn 264-5414 | Mon Mar 22 1993 17:14 | 1 |
|
|
890.25 | ? | STAR::DANIELE | | Mon Mar 22 1993 17:21 | 6 |
| > <<< Note 890.24 by DEVMKO::BLAISDELL "Rick, dtn 264-5414" >>>
> -< he caught a bad case of the yips >-
Rick, what gives? You seem to know a lot about the yips?? :-)
|
890.26 | there's a market out there | DEVMKO::BLAISDELL | Rick, dtn 264-5414 | Tue Mar 23 1993 11:46 | 5 |
|
See 511.4 Mike. Think I've got a cure, will start working on
the patent, write a book, and make a million dollars. 8^)
-rick
|
890.27 | Johnny's 2 problems | CSOA1::RANKIN | | Tue Apr 13 1993 02:02 | 8 |
| I think Johnny had a bad attack of the back problems. That's what I
heard. Right now, he has a bad case of the Jim "B*t H%@d" Lamply
disease.
Hope he gets rid of the latter soon, then eventually the 1st.
<flame off>
jr
|
890.28 | | POWDML::VARLEY | | Tue Apr 13 1993 12:56 | 8 |
| Years ago, Miller bought a ranch in Utah. He did a ton of outdoor work,
and really built himself up - probably injuring his back in the
process. At the same time, his golf game and his touch went South.
Still, when he was in his prime, NOBODY ever hit it closer to the pin
or could put up a more devastating number. That 63 at Oakmont was a
monster!!
__Jack
|
890.29 | Swing key | USPMLO::DESROCHERS | Mine's made outta unobtainium! | Mon May 16 1994 14:32 | 11 |
|
Check out this month's Golf Digest! Miller's on the cover and
his lesson has somthing really great, imo. The picture of him
at impact is terrific and I pictured it as my swing key this
past weekend. He has such a visual swing and really goes after
the ball and his position at impact was fun to mimic.
Btw, he's the main interview in Golf magazine too.
Tom
|
890.30 | | KOALA::DEFELICE | | Tue May 17 1994 15:12 | 1 |
| Good article. IMO, Miller, as an instructor, is one of the best.
|