T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2462.1 | Finally! | PAULJ::HARRIMAN | Deb in Air | Mon Oct 01 1990 18:21 | 11 |
|
They were at the AES convention in NYC earlier this year. I have
a bunch of literature from them. I've been waiting for them to actually
market the stuff. I'll go home and see if I can dig it up. The 9002
was the only working prototype they had at the time, and it was
vaporware until you posted your note. There were some other rackmount
things they were planning on introducing, but I can't recall what they
were right now.
/pjh
|
2462.2 | | DNEAST::BOTTOM_DAVID | The sea refuses no river.... | Tue Oct 02 1990 13:36 | 12 |
| re: vaporware
My local dealer has had them over well over a month.
nice toy, expensive, a bit noisy but a nice toy. I couldn't imagine actually
using one on stage though...especially with their itty-bitty "finger switch"
rig.
their 4 seperate/independant digital processors in one box rig is nice
also...but pricy at $1700 list...
dbii
|
2462.3 | One Man's Band... | RANGER::ROBERT | | Tue Oct 02 1990 18:02 | 14 |
|
Hmm, I didn't find it "expensive" considering all it gives you in a
small convient package. In fact, the EM reivew commented on it's
cost effectiveness. But I suppose it's subjective. True, it is a
bit noisy on certain effects and could be clumsy on stage. I'll have
to see how that works out.
There is an add in Keyboard for their new rack-mount unit the last
reply mentioned, it's called the Zoom 9010. Nice concept of having
seperate independent FX processors in one unit, but to me $1700 IS
expensive!
-Tom
|
2462.4 | Zoom 9002 endorsement; question | MAIL::EATOND | | Sun Oct 28 1990 20:14 | 20 |
| I really like my Zoom 9002! I picked it up used (!) at a local
store and have found no more need for anything else for guitar (well, I
*am* saving a Rat pedal, just for backup). It is not as noisy as the
Rockman X100, and a lot more versatile. (I was never quite content
with the distortion sound on the X100, and you couldn't alter it beyond
limiting the level of the signal you drove into it).
Here's a general question for y'all (hey, I did move south,
y'know)... Using the Zoom 9002 to give my electric guitar distortion,
it sounds just fine straight into my PA system. But if I plug the Rat
pedal in line (minus the Zoom) into the board to handle distortion
(i.e., my backup system), I get what sounds like a blown speaker,
particularly in the hi-end (this is a bi-amped system). Now I know the
Zoom gizmo has a speaker emulator filter to make it sound like a guitar
amp is miked into the PA, but that shouldn't account for the Rat pedal
causing the PA to break up. There's no clipping going on on the board,
either. It seems that its just not a good combination. Any ideas?
Dan
|
2462.5 | You Really Got Me | KEYS::MOELLER | Silopsism's not for everyone | Mon Oct 29 1990 16:54 | 9 |
| Dan,
I'd think that the Rat pedal is further amplifying the signal, causing
breakup, but:
>causing the PA to break up. There's no clipping going on on the board,
>either.
I take it the Rat pedal is clean by itself..
|
2462.6 | Time to spend more money? | STLACT::EATON | | Fri Nov 02 1990 14:19 | 9 |
| Just getting back from beautiful Colorado....
I don't know what's up, either. At first I thought I was blowing
my high-frequency driver. But it seems to work fine on most other
signals. The other day I tried a distortion guitar patch on one of my
keyboards, and it seemed to do a similar thing with the high-freq
driver. Maybe it *is* on its way out?
Dan
|