T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2112.1 | Dump the Bigsby.... | STAR::DONOVAN | | Fri Feb 15 1991 18:04 | 23 |
|
Well, the first thing you want to do is get rid of the
Bigsby ad go to a Gibson stop-tailpiece. Not only will
this increase sustain, it will ease string tension and
make the guitar more playable.
I would go to a repair shop for this. There will be small holes
left behind, and they can fill them in a way that they will be
virtually unoticeable.
The Bigsby, in my book, is virtually unusable.
A Gibson guitar book should list the serial number and relevant
info.
Small favor: Please don't type your notes in all capital letters.
It makes it hard to read!
What color is it?
Brian
|
2112.2 | Neil's LP has a Bigsby... | RAVEN1::BLAIR | and that ain't too cool.. | Fri Feb 15 1991 19:39 | 2 |
|
|
2112.3 | sg | WLDWST::LOAYZA | | Sat Feb 16 1991 15:05 | 4 |
| Thanks for the info.
I found out that it's a 1969 sg standard. The color is brown but, you
can see the grain.
bye, mjl
|
2112.4 | Lookalike?? | 45862::FISHWICKJ | | Tue Feb 18 1997 08:52 | 14 |
| Just found this old note and I could do with some help.
I've had a guitar given to me on the weekend which sounds like this
one; Brown looks like an SG, 6 digit serial no.
Thing is I think its a fake. Its got 2 P90's, a black scratch plate
that isn't symetrical, it has 'made in USA' and the serial number on
the back of the headstock, the bell shaped truss rod cover. It only
says Gibson on the front of the headstock, and this inlay looks a bit
ragged. Its got the 2 x volume, 2 x tone knobs but it has a small
pointer on each knob to show you what each is set at.
I'm none too bothered if it is a fake but I would like to know if
its a Gibson or not. It does have whats left of a trem on it but it
doesnt really look like a Bygsby (it doesnt say Bigsby on it).
Anyone got any idea's as to its authenticity.
Any help much appreciated, J.
|
2112.5 | Sounds like a real SG to me! | MILKWY::JACQUES | | Tue Feb 18 1997 10:23 | 21 |
|
What makes you suspect this is not a Gibson? Is the neck bolted on or is
it glued on like a real SG? Are you expecting to see "Gibson" stamped on
the back of the headstock? Usually the back of the headstock has "Made
in USA" and the serial number. P90's were used on SG Specials. It sounds
like that's what you got. Pick-guards changed a few times on SGs. The ones
made in the late 60's had the big symmetrical design, but SG's from the
70's used a small gaurd below the treble side of the strings. The gaurd
should be multi-layer black/white/black. A lot of SG's came through with
Gibson's own tremelo bar known as a "Vibrola". I don't think Gibson ever
put Bigsbys on SG's. A lot of people added them on.
What do the fingerboard inlays look like?
Are the knobs black with white numbers?
Does the neck have a volute?
Is there an access cover on the back of the body?
Bring the guitar to a repuatable dealer and see what they have to
say.
Mark
|
2112.6 | Playaway!! | 45862::FISHWICKJ | | Wed Feb 19 1997 05:23 | 14 |
| Cheers for the info Mark, the main reason I wasn't sure about this
guitar is because it doesn't have the diamond shape logo on the front
of the headstock.
It does have an access plate on the back of the body.
The Scratch plate is smaller on the bass string side, not the
treble.
The 'vibrola' isn't complete and I'm wondering if it will be worth
getting it repaired, someone has retro fitted a wrapover bridge but
they have put it in the wrong place. They left the base plate of the
original trem on and put the new bridge in front of it.
I'll have to try and get a picture of an original, if it is one, so
that I can get it back to a playable state; I love the sound of deep
dirty and nasty P90's and this one sound nasty.
J.
|
2112.7 | | ASABET::pelkey.ogo.dec.com::pelkey | Professional Hombre | Wed Feb 19 1997 10:33 | 9 |
| Sounds like you got an SG,,, as far as fixing the bigbsy,
you'd probably want to 'restore' it to as close to original
as possible, don't replace it, or take it off if possible.
post the serial number here and we can look up the serial
number on Gibson's web site.
Not that the bigsby's are hot, but the more 'original' you can
keep it/get it,, the better for resale.
|
2112.8 | 60's Gibson SG "Special". | MILKWY::JACQUES | | Wed Feb 19 1997 12:59 | 14 |
| From the sounds of things, this is a late 60's SG special. The only
SG with a split-diamond inlay is the SG Custom. SG Standards have
a torch inlay on the headstock. I'm not sure what a Special has
for an inlay. The student model is known as the Melody Maker.
These have one P90 pickup and no headstock inlay.
I own a 1975 SG Standard. Mine has the original (Schaller) TOM
bridge and stop bar tailpiece. IMHO this is the best tailpiece
for an SG. It provides the maximum sustain and stays in tune.
A Bigsby or Gibson Vibrola will slip out of tune under agressive
playing. If originality is important, you might want to find an
original Gibson Vibrola bridge, but don't expect it to come cheap.
Mark
|
2112.9 | Bridging the gap. | 45862::FISHWICKJ | | Thu Feb 20 1997 05:24 | 12 |
| I feb the serial number through the Gibson search thingy and it says
that it was made between 1970-72. The serial number is 961700.
I'm none too bothered about the original trem, it's just that the new
wrapover bridge that someone has retro fitted is in the wrong place and
to rectify the whole thing I'm gonna have to remove this new bridge,
remove whats left of the original trem, then put on another bridge in
the correct position.
Thanks for all the info, got to get her up and running as a second
guitar behind my Fernandes LP super grade (gold top with P90's).
It's the best thing any girlfriend's dad has ever given me, its
usually a smack in the mouth.
J.
|
2112.10 | bridge vs. tailpiece. | MILKWY::JACQUES | | Thu Feb 20 1997 10:28 | 16 |
|
I think you may be confusing the bridge and the tailpiece. Most
Gibson electrics use the same TOM (tune-a-matic) bridge. What
varies from one model to the next is the tailpiece. Bigsbys,
Vibrolas, Stop-bars, etc. are all tailpieces. Placement varies
from one tailpiece to the next but bridge placement is determined
by neck scale length. So what you have is part of the original
vibrola tailpiece with a stop-bar tailpiece jury-rigged over it.
This should definately be reworked. Stop-bars sit against a pair
of large studs that thread into the body. You should be able to
crank the stop-bar down so it sits low for maximum string tension.
This provides the maximum sustain. I wouldn't be too concerned
about a couple of small unused holes from the original tailpiece.
Mark
|
2112.11 | don't touch that axe! | RICKS::CALCAGNI | thick slabs of dirt in a halo of airy twang | Thu Feb 20 1997 10:58 | 20 |
| Without seeing the guitar it's hard to be sure, but on SG Specials
and Firebird IIIs with the "short" Gibson vibrola the bridge is already
mounted on stop-tailpiece style studs. Is the wraparound bridge
supported by two large screws that screw into threaded inserts in the
body? If so, that's probably stock. The original bridge for that
guitar would have been a ladder style (with hard preset ridges instead
of the adjustable tune-a-matic saddles) that sat on those big studs.
Substituting a wraparound bridge for the original is a standard mod
on these; it improves the performance of the guitar. If you really
want to make it "original", you just have to find one of the ladder
style bridges (not too $$$ actually; nobody really wants em).
The guitar will have less sustain, but you will be able to use the
whammy.
Like I said, it's hard to say without seeing, but my guess is that your
guitar is already pretty much original, the bridge is already in the
right place, and I wouldn't plan on doing any major rework to it.
/rick
|
2112.12 | Pretty close, I think. | 45862::FISHWICKJ | | Thu Feb 20 1997 10:59 | 21 |
| Mark, what I've got is a wrap-over bridge without a stop tail-piece
that seems to be positioned in the wrong place on the guitar.
--------------------------- !!! =====
--------------------------- !!! =====
--------------------------- !!! =====
strings wrap-over vibrato
bridge with no strings attached.
I think that the wrapover bridge has replaced a tuneomatic style
bridge but has been positioned too far forward, ie too close to the
neck. I'm only assuming this cos the string length on my LP is longer
than on this SG.
The sketch is crap but I'm just tryin to show you whats happenin
with the axe. I could be wrong about the positioning of the bridge but
I don't think so.
I think what your saying is that I should add a stop tail-piece and
a bridge to get the best sound. ??
J.
|
2112.13 | Originally useable. | 45862::FISHWICKJ | | Thu Feb 20 1997 11:55 | 8 |
| Ignore the last entry, I think what Ricks saying is about right though
I'm still not sure if the bridge is in the right place because of the
string length, I'll check whether the posts are screwed into the body
tonight.
If I do decide to keep the wrapover bridge, d'ya think I should
remove the trem cos it does look abit strange with that redundant chunk
of metal on it. HHhhhhhmmmmmm, original or useable??
J.
|
2112.14 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | thick slabs of dirt in a halo of airy twang | Thu Feb 20 1997 12:18 | 6 |
| I once had a Firebird III with a wraparound (Badass) added. I left the
Vibrola mechanism in place cause I thought it looked cool.
Sonny Landreth removed the vibrola on his Firebird III but left the
three spacers and screws for the vibrola in place.
|
2112.15 | | ASABET::pelkey.ogo.dec.com::pelkey | Professional Hombre | Fri Feb 21 1997 12:04 | 14 |
| hey if you got it to use it, make it like you want...
Some folks are articulate about 'stock' condition,
and any mods, wether or not for the bettering of
the sound or playability will take away asthetic
value. For example, if I change the pickups on
my sheraton, make it sound 'better' with better pickups,
I devalue the actual resale becuse it's no longer
stock...
But if this a guitar you're going to use, then make
it useable...
|