T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1997.1 | | WEFXEM::COTE | Light, sweet, crude... | Mon Oct 15 1990 19:29 | 9 |
| There's a leather shop that sets up in a department store called
The Fair (Rt 20, Auburn/Worcester line) every year just about
this time. They look like they do lotsa custom leather engraving
and the like. (They aren't set up yet. Probably appear in a week
or two..)
A guitar strap seems like it would be relatively easy.
Edd
|
1997.2 | Pioneer Valley has gotta have a leather store! | ISLNDS::KELLY | | Tue Oct 16 1990 18:20 | 9 |
| Charlie, what about Northhampton and Amherst out in your neck of
the woods? Seems like either one of those towns would have a
leather crafter.
About one million years ago I bought some flanking leather from
Tandy and a couple of leather embossing tools (:== tiny hand powered
dies) and spent a couple of evenings making a strap for a friend.
Still in use, according to a recent report.
|
1997.3 | Thanks. | JUPITR::DIETZ | | Wed Oct 17 1990 13:54 | 10 |
| Thank, you all for your imputs.....I just happened to find
a strap last night that was classy (about $70). Now I'm going to find
someone to do a little engraving on it to make it more "personal"
Have a good day,
Charley d.
|
1997.4 | Umm...kind of a custom strap | GOES11::G_HOUSE | But this amp goes to 11 | Fri Nov 09 1990 18:46 | 14 |
| I couldn't find a better place to ask this, so here it is. If there's
a better note, someone please move it (or let me know).
I was down in Mexico at the start of the summer and many of the guitar
players in the mariachi(sic) bands there had these little straps that
looked really interesting. It was like a thin cord that you put around
your neck and it went under the guitar and had a clip (most of which
looked like a carved onyx hand) that attached on the bottom of the
sound hole of the guitar.
I thought these were pretty and wondered where one might find something
like this in the US.
Greg
|
1997.5 | there all over here | PNO::HEISER | stand in the gap | Fri Nov 09 1990 18:59 | 11 |
| > I thought these were pretty and wondered where one might find something
> like this in the US.
I know what you mean. I've seen the Mariachis around here using them.
I can check some of their shops for ya. I'm also going to Mexico in
the spring and I can check then.
Then there's always Nogales, and Tucson hosts the international
Mariachi festival every April.
Mike
|
1997.6 | | ICS::HALL | Whaddya mean, GOOD? I want RESULTS! | Fri Nov 09 1990 19:28 | 10 |
| They ARE neat straps, and they're handy for classical guitars or other
instruments without strap buttons. My only concern (and maybe
unfounded) is that if you let go of the guitar, doesn't it just flip
over and onto the floor?
Just called the local music joint; they didn't have them, but I think
you should be able to get them most places. I saw a local mandolin
player the other day who had one.
Charlie
|
1997.7 | Where'd ya git that big HOLE in that there gitar? | GOES11::G_HOUSE | But this amp goes to 11 | Fri Nov 09 1990 19:38 | 8 |
| > My only concern (and maybe unfounded) is that if you let go of the
> guitar, doesn't it just flip over and onto the floor?
I'd have to say it probably would (or worse, rip a hole in the top of
your guitar). It doesn't look like a very secure system, but I can see
how it could come in handy sometimes.
Greg
|
1997.8 | Just don't ever let go | ZYDECO::MCABEE | Learning the First Noble Truth | Tue Dec 04 1990 23:23 | 7 |
| Back in the 60's those things were widely available. Classicals as folk
guitars were more popular then. I had one, but soon got rid of it and
had an end button mounted on the butt of my guitar for a regular strap.
I nearly busted my guitar and my own neck when I tripped and lost my grip on
the guitar.
Bob
|
1997.10 | ;^) | SALEM::MARTIN_S | Perpetual Smile... | Thu Mar 30 1995 16:51 | 12 |
|
Dave,
American Musical Supply (catalog) p. 64
Thoroughbred Music (catalog) p. 71
These have plastic clip locks. No skin, no meat, no sweat...
Steve "Cheeseburger" Martin
|
1997.12 | | RANGER::WEBER | | Thu Mar 30 1995 18:35 | 4 |
| Be aware that many guitars have animal glues, bone nuts and saddles and
animal by products in their finishes.
Danny W.
|
1997.13 | | TAMRC::LAURENT | Hal Laurent @ COP | Thu Mar 30 1995 18:48 | 10 |
| re: .12
> Be aware that many guitars have animal glues, bone nuts and saddles and
> animal by products in their finishes.
I'd go as far as to say that *all* acoustic and hollowbody electric guitars
(except for real cheapies) are glued together with hide glue. A hide glue
joint can be disassembled without harming the parts that were glued together.
-Hal
|
1997.14 | Where's the Beef | MILKWY::JACQUES | Vintage taste, reissue budget | Fri Mar 31 1995 12:08 | 13 |
| I've seen straps that were made entirely of nylon pile and cordura
fabrics. I can't recall who made them, but it may have been Jim Dunlop,
Ernie Ball/Musicman or some such. The ones I've seen have been pretty
high-tech looking, with quick-release locking buckles made of plastic.
They are usually black. These are constructed using the same materials,
and technology as gig-bags. I've seen these in Daddy's, Mr. C's and
several other stores.
I would imagine you would still have to kill a few poli-esters to make
these, though!
Mark
|
1997.15 | a few days on a farm cures animal sensitivity | OUTSRC::HEISER | Hoshia Nah,Baruch Haba B'shem Adonai | Fri Mar 31 1995 12:45 | 1 |
| that's okay, they're just animals.
|
1997.16 | Why do I bother? | MILKWY::UTTLEY | These go to eleven! | Mon Apr 03 1995 09:29 | 9 |
| >>>that's okay, they're just animals.
Sad.
It's remarks like this that remind me why I don't participate much in
this conference. I post a note on *guitar straps* and my ethical
beliefs get slammed. This ranks up there with the Clapton sux notes.
Why the #@%! can't people have a little respect?
Dave
|
1997.17 | | USPMLO::DESROCHERS | Mine's made outta unobtainium! | Mon Apr 03 1995 09:39 | 26 |
|
re: -.1 "Why do I bother?"
Because there are many of us who are on the same wavelength
as you are and it would be a pity of the juvenile comments
of a couple drive you out too. Years of that crap and they
still think they're funny. What's weird is that they're
decent players and could actually offer something to this
conference but choose not to do anything but yank chains.
It's not that we don't have a sense of humor, it's that it
just isn't funny after 3 or 4 years, ya know?
Don't forget, people like Rick Calcagni, Danny Webber, Mark
Jacques, yourself, and others still offer great info in here.
Unfortunately, people like Steve Goodwin and Rick Busenbark
don't stop by often because of crap like .15 and the EC sux
comments and they're sorely missed, personally.
Tom
|
1997.18 | Conjunction for the humour-impaired ... | SPEZKO::FRASER | Mobius Loop; see other side | Mon Apr 03 1995 10:08 | 11 |
| .14
...
I would imagine you would still have to kill a few poli-esters to make
these, though!
.15
...
that's okay, they're just animals.
|
1997.19 | | MSBCS::EVANS | | Mon Apr 03 1995 10:37 | 12 |
|
You guys just don't get it. Slamming a guy on his view on killing animails
is not made O.K. by making the slam on in regard to "polyester animals".
It's like slamming ugly Elbonians only to later say "but everyone knows
there are no ugly Elbonians". What's worse is that I know what the response
and effect of such objections will be. I see it repeated on the net daily.
I expect that pretty soon several people (including me) will get slammed for
objecting. I just think that guy took more abuse than was called for in
getting a pointer on where to get a particular guitar strap.
Jim
|
1997.20 | | SPEZKO::FRASER | Mobius Loop; see other side | Mon Apr 03 1995 10:47 | 9 |
| Jim,
I just re-read this series, and nowhere did I see where "a guy
was slammed ...". All I saw was the traditional weak joke
around "killing polyesters", along the same lines as the naugas
who supply naugahide. What abuse are you talking about?
Andy
|
1997.21 | Tolerance is a two-way street | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | There can be only one | Mon Apr 03 1995 11:10 | 14 |
| re: .-1
Thanks Andy, I was beginning to wonder if I was the only one that
thought that.
Somehow I personally just can't equate "They're just animals" to
"slamming my ethical beliefs".
> Why the #@%! can't people have a little respect?
My belief is that this general problem in notes is a mix of "lack of
respect" and "people being overly sensitive".
db
|
1997.22 | | USPMLO::DESROCHERS | Mine's made outta unobtainium! | Mon Apr 03 1995 11:20 | 9 |
|
Gimme a break - how many noters have to say "enough" and then
finally leave this conference for you guys?
If there was something else offered other than a bunch of
one liners, that would be a different story.
Tom
|
1997.23 | DANGER: Eggshell field! Keep out! | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | There can be only one | Mon Apr 03 1995 15:14 | 31 |
| > Gimme a break - how many noters have to say "enough" and then
> finally leave this conference for you guys?
How many eggshells are you gonna avoid stepping on.
All he said was "they're just animals". Frankly, if that sends
someone off in a huff then I think IN THIS CASE, the fault is with
oversensitivity.
There was no malice intended, there was nothing personally directed,
Mike certainly didn't intend any harm. I mean c'mon???
> If there was something else offered other than a bunch of
> one liners, that would be a different story.
This I agree with but whether or not any one person is contributing
anything substantive is a different issue from whether or not someone
should get their dander up and leave in a huff over a little harmless
banter.
db
p.s. I think further substantiates my own personal theory which is that
you can divide people into two groups:
1) People who don't view disagreement as an insult
2) People who are insulted if you disagree with them.
It's like you've challenged their integrity or something
The comment about "reasonable men differing" applies ONLY to the first
group.
|
1997.24 | | USPMLO::DESROCHERS | Mine's made outta unobtainium! | Mon Apr 03 1995 15:20 | 3 |
|
re: -.1 Debates with you SUX !!
|
1997.25 | Hey... I'm easy... | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | There can be only one | Mon Apr 03 1995 15:30 | 5 |
| > re: -.1 Debates with you SUX !!
We agree on that too!
;-)
|
1997.26 | | MPGS::MARKEY | The bottom end of Liquid Sanctuary | Mon Apr 03 1995 16:32 | 11 |
| Maybe no one knows the answer to the bloody question.,.. I certainly
don't. (I, for one, couldn't care less what my straps are made of,
so I don't give it a second thought). Apparently, not knowing the
answer == no substantive input...
And I agree with db, people are being oversensitive. I mean, this
sort of thing has gone on since dawn of notes time... but, to me,
the value of notes far outweighs the trauma of an occasional
pissing contest. Basically, chin up and stop bitching about it.
-b
|
1997.28 | Time to lighten up | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | There can be only one | Tue Apr 04 1995 11:09 | 24 |
| Dave,
Disagreement isn't necessarily a bad thing. It can lead to
understanding (if not "adopting") alternate points of view, or at the
very least can just lead to conversation.
This topic DID get side-railed but the question is what side-railed
it: was it Mike Heiser's two line comment or your reaction to it?
My answer to that question would be "both".
Don't take everything you read in here so seriously. A guy says
"they're just animals" and you claim that your "personal beliefs"
have been "slammed"??? C'mon... isn't that going a bit overboard?
Bottom line is maybe it shouldn't have been posted but light-hearted
banter is part of what makes notes interesting and that if you hadn't
reacted to it (and thus brought UP the subject of "slamming" and all)
this note would NOT have gotten off track.
Lighten up a bit. This conference can be a lot of fun if you don't
look for insults in every wise-crack.
db
|
1997.29 | | RICKS::CALCAGNI | more zip stupid juice | Tue Apr 04 1995 11:51 | 13 |
| One person's light-hearted banter is another person's slam.
If the original questioner found some of the replies to his question
inappropriate, I suggest we take him at his word instead of trying
to continually point out how wrong he was for speaking up. Would it
have *KILLED* anyone to instead offer a simple "sorry about that",
if only as an acknowledgment of someone else's feelings or point
of view?
Yeah, notes should be fun, but people will sometimes differ re what's
fun and what isn't. How we deal with those cases will determine the
quality of life around here.
|
1997.30 | | KDX200::COOPER | Revolution calling! | Tue Apr 04 1995 12:17 | 6 |
| There is a lot to be said for the old saying "If you can't say
something nice, don't say anything"...But then again, I haven't seen
this much conference participation is a long time...
jc
|
1997.31 | | BUSY::BUSY::SLABOUNTY | Trouble with a capital 'T' | Tue Apr 04 1995 13:19 | 8 |
|
Dave U., for future reference:
It might have saved alot of time and more replies had you asked
"if anyone knows of a source for a guitar strap with no leather
in it" without revealing the reason, or at least "dance around"
the real reason with a lie ["I don't like leather"].
|
1997.32 | | AIAG::WISNER | Paul Wisner, TIMA/Stars V3.0 Development, Multivendor Customer Services | Tue Apr 04 1995 14:23 | 8 |
| I've seen a nylon strap with plastic connectors
at Wurlitzer, Guitar Center and Cambridge Music
in Porter Square.
The connectors stay on your guitar, you can
unclip the strap from the connectors- so you
can jump around a lot without strap locks.
|
1997.33 | | KDX200::COOPER | Revolution calling! | Tue Apr 04 1995 15:59 | 3 |
| Yes - I have these on all my guitars (don't know why I didn't think
of it before)... Nice straps/locks too!!
jc
|
1997.34 | When viewpoints collide | ROADKL::HALL | Euripides pants, Eumenides pants | Tue Apr 04 1995 17:55 | 46 |
| Folks,
Sorry for taking up disk space or your time with this; Jeff Cooper will
tell you that while I like to push a few buttons every once in a while,
I think ratholes are by and large a waste.
HOWEVER... I just can't blow off this sort of disagreement, because
it's indicative of a very fundamental problem these days. As Dave
Blickstein pointed out, it's not so much what's being said as it is how
people quite often these days (mis)interpret the most harmless
statement to have some major political or social content, when none was
intended.
I hardly think Mike Heiser meant anything hurtful by what he said. In
fact, there are several possible interpretations of what he said, and I
don't claim to know the answer. But, even if he HAD meant to say "Hey,
I think you're being a little overly sensitive to the plight of
animals", WHO IS TO SAY HE'S NOT SUPPOSED TO VOICE HIS OPINION AS WELL?
And since when does his voicing his opinion constitute a "slam"? In my
lexicon, just because we don't agree doesn't mean I'm "slamming" you.
If he'd said "Hey, idiot...", that would be a slam.
What I so often find is that people can joke about, and have differing
viewpoints, on any number of issues. However, if it's an issue that
means a lot to them, suddenly NOTHING is funny; any disagreement is
taken as offensive.
Years ago, when I didn't have kids, there were all sorts of jokes that
were funny, and hardly anything was outside the bounds of good taste.
Now, having been a parent for some time, there are a lot of things I
just don't find funny anymore. However, if some guy tells a "dead
baby" joke, do I deck him just because it violates my sense of taste?
Dave, you say you don't push your viewpoint on others; if someone said
"where can I get a version of Product X which isn't made of animal
byproducts?", he/she's just defining the parameters of what they want.
You can speculate about why those are their parameters, but it's your
own speculation. On the other hand, when someone uses phrases like
"murdered animals", does that sound devoid of viewpoint?
Actually, I don't mind if you express your views, even in the strongest
terms; I don't mind if you DO use terms like "murdered animals". Just
don't take it as a slam if I disagree.
Charlie
|
1997.35 | My opinion | NETCAD::HERTZBERG | History: Love it or Leave it! | Tue Apr 04 1995 18:49 | 12 |
| .29 had it right.
Nothing really wrong with comments intended as light banter, as in
"they're only animals." But when someone says they're offended by a
note, it should produce an quick reply of "sorry you were offended"
rather than an analysis of whether they were really offended or whether
they should have been offended. If someone takes the time to say they
were offended, that should be good enough to prove that they _were_
offended. And all that's necessary in the apology is to express regret
that someone was offended... not some deep admission of guilt.
Marc
|
1997.36 | The point is folks can and do get offended VERY easily | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | There can be only one | Tue Apr 04 1995 18:57 | 14 |
| > .29 had it right.
> Nothing really wrong with comments intended as light banter, as in
> "they're only animals." But when someone says they're offended by a
> note, it should produce an quick reply of "sorry you were offended"
> rather than an analysis of whether they were really offended or whether
> they should have been offended.
Let me prove the fallacy of this position:
Marc, I was greatly offended by the above paragraph. It makes me out to be
some insensitive clod.
db
|
1997.37 | | SPEZKO::FRASER | Mobius Loop; see other side | Tue Apr 04 1995 20:24 | 27 |
| Repeat post - _CONTEXT_!! No-one was "slammed" for their
beliefs. Here's a free clue - "poli-esters" are not real
animals; nor are the "naugas" which routinely sacrificed their
hides to cover furniture.
Fact is that the full post in .14 described helpfully a source
for all-plastic straps.
What a production!
=================================================================
<<< Note 1997.18 by SPEZKO::FRASER "Mobius Loop; see other side" >>>
-< Conjunction for the humour-impaired ... >-
.14
...
I would imagine you would still have to kill a few poli-esters to make
these, though!
.15
...
that's okay, they're just animals.
|
1997.38 | Peace, brothers | SPEZKO::FRASER | Mobius Loop; see other side | Tue Apr 04 1995 20:50 | 23 |
| Dave,
I honestly don't think anyone was aiming at you and I'm pretty
sure that your personal beliefs are and were respected by the
folks writing here, regardless of whether or not those beliefs
are shared. I saw no-one call you anything detrimental or call
your beliefs into question. That _would_ be a slam, no
question.
I read the EC sucks and the EC is god stuff with a smile - EC
is just another guy who has made a living playing a guitar
fairly well. I'd just as soon listen to Chet Atkins personally
- but be that as it may, the whole game is different strokes
for different folks and part of the fun of this file (for me!!)
are the differences of opinion, and as often as not, folks meet
up for a beer or three and find that there is no rancour - it's
mostly chain-yanking.
But, I'm just a newcomer to this file - what do I know :^)
Andy
|
1997.39 | More controversy than the MIDDLE_EAST notesfile ;-) | VARESE::TRNUX1::IDC_BSTR | Oh no! NOT Milan Kundera again! | Wed Apr 05 1995 06:18 | 32 |
|
>I read the EC sucks and the EC is god stuff with a smile - EC
>is just another guy who has made a living playing a guitar
>fairly well.
Fine...but what gets my goat are the people who hovver around in here
(in semi-read only mode) and just nail every argument of conversation
that comes up, be it Eric Clapton, Peavey gear, Neil Young, drummers,
Keith Richard, Jimmy Page, etc. Sure, you're entitled to views - but
spare us the same crap *every* time. I totally agree with the previous
noters who maintain that respect for individual views come before
anything - if a guy says he's offended, then that's the end of the
story. Have the decency to apologise.
Oh, and before people start preaching about folks taking comments too
seriously (very dodgy ground, that; I can think of at least two
instances in the past where those doing the preaching got well wound up
about something that was, IMO, pretty trivial - funny thing, human
nature), I'd just like to say that my initial take on the "X sux"
brigade is that they're the most humourless little creeps of the lot;
if anyone has the cheek to string more than three notes together on a
subject that doesn't wax lyrical about their own particular hero of the
moment, then they have to steam in and whinge about it!
Now, if you really want me to camp in the Dream Theater note (to name
but one!) and dedicate my life to taking the p*ss out of them, then
fine - there's ammunition a-plenty! I'd like to think I've got better
things to do. In fact, I know I've got better things to do...
Time for a new topic?
Dom
|
1997.40 | Vegamite | SALEM::DACUNHA | | Wed Apr 05 1995 09:48 | 10 |
|
Holy moly.....Talk about a RAT-HOLE....I'm offended by the fact
that fellow guitslingers don't have a heck of a lot to say about
custom guitar straps. You guys are so sensitive.
My sister does some nice embroidery.
|
1997.41 | you guys... | EZ2GET::STEWART | donorcycle dot-rider | Wed Apr 05 1995 12:14 | 8 |
|
awfully brave of you, laddie, to bring your sister into this?!?!
P.S.: this note composed without *any* animal by-products...
|
1997.42 | | BUSY::BUSY::SLABOUNTY | Trouble with a capital 'T' | Wed Apr 05 1995 12:27 | 6 |
|
> My sister does some nice embroidery.
I was gonna say "Your sister does ALOT of nice things" but I
didn't want to risk offending you. 8^)
|
1997.43 | IT's a JOKE, son! | SALEM::DACUNHA | | Wed Apr 05 1995 12:54 | 19 |
|
Your mama......8')
er....um....I meant to say my sister does some nice
embroidery on quitar straps. I've also seen a few "created" using
those home style sequin/stub injector type guns....not bad
My own straps are made primarily of nylon mesh with
some kind of leatherette/naugahide piece for the shoulder. The strap
for the Les Paul is two inches wide and quite heavy duty. But with
all 80 pounds of guitar it's goota be.....
I find all leather straps wear/stretch too easily and tend to take on
a certain air after a few sweaty gigs.
Oh yeah, no offense intended to you beafeaters/wearers
|
1997.45 | | NETCAD::HERTZBERG | History: Love it or Leave it! | Wed Apr 05 1995 13:48 | 14 |
| >>
>> Let me prove the fallacy of this position:
>>
>> Marc, I was greatly offended by the above paragraph. It makes me
>> out to be some insensitive clod.
>>
>> db
>>
Dave, I'm sorry you were offended by my note. It certainly was not my
intention to offend you or anybody else by my note. I don't think
you're an insensitive clod at all. Please accept my apology.
Marc
|
1997.46 | | USPMLO::DESROCHERS | Mine's made outta unobtainium! | Wed Apr 05 1995 13:51 | 9 |
|
I'm actually starting to see the humor in all of this.
I wasn't sure so I went down to the locker area and
weighed myself.
Sure enough, I've lightened up!
Tom
|
1997.47 | do-it-yourself | SALEM::DACUNHA | | Wed Apr 05 1995 14:04 | 22 |
|
Eehhhh.....Caan't sob'....we 'sniff' all sob'
just...sigh' sob' snif' get along???
-chris_beat_me_with_a_guitar_strap_dacunha
Seriously, My sister doesn't really take orders
She's in a more lucrative line of work (Government liason)
and besides, she lives in VA.
As an alternaitve, you could always find a nice piece of
material (embroidered or otherwise, and sew it to your strap.
Be creative! Any craft shop has a bunch stuff you could use.
|
1997.48 | ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;0) ;;-) ;-) ;-) | DREGS::BLICKSTEIN | There can be only one | Wed Apr 05 1995 14:44 | 6 |
| > Sure enough, I've lightened up!
Now if you got rid of the electric and went back to the ES-335 like
I've been telling you, you'll have lightened up even more.
db
|
1997.49 | | CSC32::D_PELTONEN | Rudyard Quipling | Wed Apr 05 1995 14:51 | 8 |
|
Not to change the subject or anything...but any tall folks out
there that have a hard time with most off-the-shelf straps
being too short? I'd sure love to get an extra-long strap as
I hate clutching me bass to me bosom......
DAP
|
1997.50 | | AKOCOA::MAY_B | | Wed Apr 05 1995 17:07 | 9 |
| Well since there have been a few serious replies about guitar straps
here,, I'll add my two cent. If you have a Martin guitar or other
fine instrument,,, you want to be carefull about allowing man-made
material come in contact with the finish of the guitar,,, It will
eat it!! Martin recommends leather straps,,, and for the price I
paid for my D28,,, thats the only kind that will get used on it.
Bruce May
|
1997.51 | | NETCAD::HERTZBERG | History: Love it or Leave it! | Wed Apr 05 1995 17:32 | 4 |
| I'm tall, pushing 6'4", but I haven't had the problem with
run-of-the-mill straps being too short yet, and I think I've stopped
growing. I admit they're pretty much adjusted out to the end, though.
|
1997.52 | :-) | GOES11::LAMBERT | Sam, Storage Mgmt. S/W @CXO | Wed Apr 05 1995 17:42 | 10 |
| Yeah, but Mr. Peltonen is tall *and* wide. :-) (In the shoulders, in the
shoulders... :-))
Sorry, DAP, but I don't know of any extra long straps. Try the Big and Tall
Men's Warehouse maybe? :-) Seriously though, you might check out one of
those adjustable nylon straps, and see if you can adjust it to be long
enough.
-- Sam
|
1997.53 | at the risk of offending non-militarists... | EZ2GET::STEWART | donorcycle dot-rider | Wed Apr 05 1995 18:01 | 7 |
|
or hook a couple army surplus web belts together -- get the length you
want, and an attitude besides! I did this when my ex-step-daughter
broke the handle off of her boom box. Turned out pretty cool, and the
new strap outlasted the boom box...
|
1997.54 | | CSC32::D_PELTONEN | Rudyard Quipling | Thu Apr 06 1995 19:36 | 14 |
|
Hey, I'm a growing boy, dont'cha know! Oh, you're not supposed
to still be growing at 42? :) Does this mean I can stop
drinking my milk now?
Seriously, I own about a dozen straps in the hopes of finding
one that is long enough so the bass hangs where I want it to,
wide enough to carry the weight comfortably (don't much care for
them skinny li'l nylon things unless they're undies), and at
midnight turns into a roast beef sandwich and a sixpack. Guess
it's time to head for a custom leather shop......
DAP
|