[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference govt02::basingstoke

Title: * BASINGSTOKE - Gateway to Wessex *
Notice:BASINGSTOKE - John Arlott lived here - then left, I wonder why
Moderator:COMICS::CORNEJ
Created:Wed Jul 27 1988
Last Modified:Thu Jun 05 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:925
Total number of notes:5875

490.0. "Hatchwarren and proposed tip and service station" by COMICS::RADBURN (OK. Let's get dangerous....) Tue Oct 01 1991 18:09

There are good things afoot for Hatchwarren residents (of which I am one) if 
they want their house prices to drop dramatically and then be treated as lepers
by the rest of Basingstoke - if we aren't already :-).


The council have proposed the corner of Woodbury Road and Beggarwood Lane to be
the site of a rubbish tip for public use. It will span 2 acres and will just be
an open site for accumulation of rubbish before being collected and burnt in the
incinerators.

Several points occur from this and involve the whole of Hatchwarren -

	o Increased traffic on Woodbury Road by lorries and cars - especially at
	  weekends

	o The prevailing wind is from North to South - basically blowing from
	  the tip over Hatchwarren. This will be lovely in Summer as the flies
	  and smell increase

	o Rats and other rodents will infest the site

	o Gypsies camping around the area to get any 'salvageable' rubbish

	o Fly tipping on the road when the tip is shut. After all it is easier 
	  to drop it off than take it back home again

	o The school in Danesbury Road is a good site. Imagine your child coming
	  home with the increased traffic on Woodbury Road!!


I wrote to the Director of Planning stating my views and I urge anybody else
living in Hatchwarren to also make their views known. I received a reply in the
post (I shall bring it in and give the general gist later on) but it basically
is thanks for your complaint, it has been noted. If enough people complain then
perhaps something may get done.

Incidentally, in the map that they kindly sent me, I noted that there is a
site proposed for a motorway service station just behind the Hatchwarren Estate.
Isn't that nice to know! Not only a rubbish tip but a motorway service station 
where you can pop in and get your breakfast! Just watch Hatchwarren house prices
tumble.


Anyone have any comments or points I have left out?

Gary
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
490.1R2ME2::HINXMANThere has to be a better wayTue Oct 01 1991 22:248
	re .0

> Anyone have any comments or points I have left out?

	If they don't put the tip at the currently proposed location,
	where should they put it?

	Tony
490.2echoing .1: NIMBYELIS::GARSONV+F = E+2Wed Oct 02 1991 10:290
490.3How about non-residential for a start.......COMICS::RADBURNOK. Let's get dangerous....Wed Oct 02 1991 11:0517
The disposal site at Wade Road is in the industrial estate and thus does not
affect any residents. The proposed tip in Hatchwarren will be approximately
100-200 yards from a new development of houses. There are also plans for more
houses behind the tip.

Now either the council are completely stupid (wouldn't be a surprise) or the 
housing developers are out of their box building a tip in this location. Surely
it poses a health risk at the minimum being so close to a residential area.
Stick it out where it does nobody any harm but is still useful to the community
not right on someones front doorstep. Next to Junction six of the M3 is a large
expanse of land, next to the golf course. There are no houses near there and it 
would make a much better site both access wise (M3 and A30) and location wise
(no nearby residents).


Gary
490.4a wind-upKERNEL::ROEThree Sixteen..Know what I mean John?Wed Oct 02 1991 11:236
    ...as far as a motorway service station is concerned, this must be a
    wind-up. It would be too close to the existing Fleet Services.
    Therefore, is the whole thing a wind-up? (My logic has always been
    inpeccable!)
    
    Mike
490.5Afraid it's trueCOMICS::RADBURNOK. Let's get dangerous....Wed Oct 02 1991 11:347
Unless the director of planning is into late April Fool jokes and has gone to
the expense of printing maps and sending letters with all the details on, then
this is no wind up. IT'S HAPPENING!


Gary
490.6VULCAN::SMITHP1Wed Oct 02 1991 13:2419
	I've known for a long time that the Basingstoke Council are 
	completely stupid, and the incomprehensible thinking of the
	planners is a complete amazement to me. I agree that no-one
	wants a rubbish tip on their doorstep, but the Hatch Warren
	site is so noticeably unsuitable I'm stunned that it was ever
	put on a short list.

	The site will be situated on the side of a hill. In fact this
	is the highest hill immediately	south west of Basingstoke.
	Therefore it is not beyond belief that the smells etc. will
	fan out over a much larger area than just Hatch Warren.

	With regard to the service station on the M3, this section
	already has slip roads, and there is a place for keeping
	cones and other 'works' equipment. Perhaps the map in question
	did not distinguish between; Works Service Area and Public
	Service Area. Just a thought.

		p1
490.7Glad to see someone else sees the stupidity....COMICS::RADBURNOK. Let's get dangerous....Wed Oct 02 1991 13:5525
At least I am not the only one who considers this to be the Grand-daddy of bad
ideas!

The map in question has the following words to describe the area for the service
station :-

'Land reserved for possible motorway service area'.


Yes, it sounds woolly but there is a possibility of the service area. To me it
does not sound like a place to store cones. Rather a place to stop, eat and
relieve your aching parts. From the plan I can't see whether there will be an
access road from the services into Hatchwarren but the way the planners are
going, nothing would surprise me.


Oh, as another aside, they are going to be closing Beggarwood Lane! Instead they
are opening the road on the new roundabout near it causing probably even more
traffic as this is a proper road rather than a single track road. Wonderful
people these planners. I would like to meet one to see if they really look as
dumb as they make out. Whey the hell don't they build a pub or something useful
like that?

Gary
490.8SUBURB::THOMASHThe Devon DumplingWed Oct 02 1991 15:0541
	If you are seriously prepared to fight for this, then:

	Hire a local hall, and call a public meeting, inviting the people
	who are proposing the tip, the local county, district, and parish
	councils, school governers, and all the people who you think might be 
	affected. (and your local MP).

	Are there any local environmental groups?

	Do a leaflet drop.

	Write to the local papers.

	Propose a site visit is required, and ensure otherpeople who are also
	opposed turn up at the site visit.

	Turn up at council metings where this is being discussed.

	You may find you have an ally with one of the political views on the
	council - enlist there support.

	Traffic/infrasturucture is a good point to "hit".

	Are there trees on the site, get the woodland trust invoved.
	Is there wildlife - badgers or bats?
	Are there footpaths,
	Is it near any water which will flow into a river?
	
	Put forward some alternatives.

	Be prepared to forever fight something on the site.

	We have successfully had a proposal for a 40-lane cinema, 2,000 person
	nightclub, petrol station, motel, and 12 screen cinema rejected in
	Theale.
	I expect something to turn up later, whether ammended/warehousing/
	offices.....etc.......and I'm ready and waiting.	 

	
	Heather.
490.9LARVAE::BEALESecurity is a Thumb and a Blanket...Wed Oct 02 1991 16:003
    Re -.1
    
    40-lane cinema.   mmmmm interesting!!
490.10Walking DeadLARVAE::MITCHELLDont Play COMPETEWed Oct 02 1991 16:2312
    re .8
    
    
    >>  We successfully stopped everything in Theale
    
    
    Geeesss and people complain about Basingstoke.
    
    Theale sounds like a happening sort of place. 
    
    
    Andy
490.11I'm sure there must be an unspoilt field somewhereCOMICS::BELLThe haunted, hunted kindThu Oct 03 1991 11:1019
  
  > Are there trees on the site, get the woodland trust invoved.
  > Is there wildlife - badgers or bats?                        
  
  I think they were all killed off when some genius put a housing estate
  there ...
  
  Gary, what was the date on the plan ? As others have mentioned, the slip
  roads on the motorway have been there for a while so I wouldn't be at all
  surprised if the dump + service area was slated for that area ages ago ...
  when it *was* out of town - ie., before Basingstoke sprawled it's way
  across to where you are now living - but the original plan was shelved
  due to lack of funds. Maybe someone's found a bit left over in the
  "Build something" budget and has gone through past ideas ... ?
  
  Frank
  
  [ who doesn't feel too sympathetic to NIMBYs because he lives a few
  minutes walk from the Wade Road dump :-) ]
490.12No date on plan....COMICS::RADBURNOK. Let's get dangerous....Fri Oct 04 1991 12:0319
There does not seem to be a date on the plan apart from a hint that the 
requirements for a tip were sited along with the Hatchwarren plans in the 
beginning (news to me) and that enquiries are going to be held in 1992 around
Springtime.


This also opens a new can of worms.


When I bought the house you pay a solicitor an extortionate amount of money to
perform a lnad search. What is the radius of this search? Should they inform
me of proposed developments or only the ones that are going ahead?

Concord Homes, the development that is across the road from the proposed site,
must be fuming. They have put up several good quality homes in the range of 
80-225,000 only to have a tip in their backgarden. Hardly a dez-rez!

Gary
490.13Searches are not neighbourhood trawlsJANUS::BARKERJeremy Barker - T&N/CBN Diag. Eng. - Reading, UKMon Oct 21 1991 14:0822
Re: .12

> When I bought the house you pay a solicitor an extortionate amount of money to
> perform a lnad search. What is the radius of this search? Should they inform
> me of proposed developments or only the ones that are going ahead?

From what I know, the purpose of the land search is as follows:

	To reveal proposals which might involve compulsory purchase of
	part or all of the property (by far and away most important).

	To reveal planning permission that has been granted for development
	immediately adjoining the property.


A proposal to have a dump 1/4 mile away would very likely not be considered
to be relevant.

If you really believe that your solicitor was negligent in his/her duty to
you perhaps you should consider action against them.

jb