| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 4684.1 | | ODIXIE::DWYERR | | Thu Jun 27 1996 13:03 | 3 |
| We don't have DVN, but we did order a copy of the tape. Although "due
to cost constraints" it will be sent "two day delivery." When it
arrives, I'll view and provide you a summary.
|
| 4684.2 | been there before... | DV780::LANGFELDT | Coloradical | Thu Jun 27 1996 16:56 | 8 |
|
What was most interesting is that the phones were *silent* following
the presentation. I think a few calls came in, but not many.
I'm sure that it was assumed that field people were out working
4th quarter issues, rather than wondering why the apathy...
|
| 4684.3 | | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | See http://atlant2.zko.dec.com/ | Thu Jun 27 1996 17:06 | 6 |
| > Missed the reorg DVN as I was at a customer site all day. Any
> observations, comments or opinions?
Don't worry, there'll be another one soon. :-)
Atlant
|
| 4684.4 | Notesfile created... | NEMAIL::MCDONALDJ | | Thu Jun 27 1996 20:52 | 4 |
| kacie::sbu
has the text of Harry's portion of the dvn. I saw it, and as I recall
this letter is what he said.
|
| 4684.5 | New Notes File | SWAM1::EBERT_VA | | Fri Jun 28 1996 15:12 | 6 |
| Harry has set up a notes file to answer questions as they relate to the
DVN/re-org -- KACIE::SBU
They may post the full text from the DVN.
V
|
| 4684.6 | | USAT02::HALLR | | Mon Jul 01 1996 19:32 | 1 |
| that notesfile is non-existant
|
| 4684.7 | KACIE::SBU exists, not much there as yet. | TRLIAN::baudr8.mko.dec.com::LAIL | Robert G. Lail | Mon Jul 01 1996 19:47 | 8 |
|
RE .6
It's there, I was just in it. Not much to look at yet!
\Bob
|
| 4684.8 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | ch-ch-ch-ch-ha-ha-ha-ha | Mon Jul 01 1996 19:51 | 19 |
| <<< KACIE::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SBU.NOTE;2 >>>
-< sbu >-
================================================================================
Note 3.2 Where's the rest of the replies 2 of 2
BUSY::SLABOUNTY "ch-ch-ch-ch-ha-ha-ha-ha" 13 lines 1-JUL-1996 15:49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looks like EVTAI1::BELLAN might have been the 1 to write this
new version of KACIE::SBU, due to a CREATE CONFERENCE command
that shouldn't have been done.
If someone would delete this new version, everything will be
just hunky dorey. But, in the meantime, type this:
MOD ENTRY SBU/FILE=KACIE::SBU;1
and it will work just as well now as it will when someone
deletes this version.
|
| 4684.9 | | BBPBV1::WALLACE | Unix is digital. Use Digital Unix. | Mon Jul 01 1996 20:18 | 6 |
| There's been a hiccup. Harry's folks are aware of it. Anyone want to
volunteer to help out - I think assistance from an experienced Notes
moderator could be welcome.
regards
john
|
| 4684.10 | | BUSY::SLABOUNTY | A Momentary Lapse of Reason | Mon Jul 01 1996 20:25 | 13 |
|
I've been moderating NOTES conferences for about 8-9 years now,
although moderating experience is less helpful than system man-
agement experience [which I don't have] in this case. However,
this does happen occasionally in NOTES and many of us have seen
it before.
I copied the KACIE system manager on my reply, so there's not
much that can be done for now since ::SYSTEM is the only moder-
ator listed for that conference.
The fix I mentioned does work.
|
| 4684.11 | | VMSBIZ::SANDER | OpenVMS Marketing | Tue Jul 02 1996 19:43 | 9 |
| It's fixed. I used to manage KACIE and somehow in the move a
couple of years ago from MLO to MRO some protections and file
ownerships got screwed up (I went to BXB). It allowed someone to
create a new conference instead of bouncing it. That's what
happens when you get a bunch of people who don't know notes trying
to get to a conference. and they do a Create conf kacie::sbu
instead of add ent kacie::sbu
|