T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
4506.1 | | TLE::REAGAN | All of this chaos makes perfect sense | Tue Mar 26 1996 11:42 | 4 |
| The SOC's email address is "decsoc@bxb.mts.dec.com". You can
ask them directly.
-John
|
4506.2 | that address may not work anymore | maze.zko.dec.com::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Tue Mar 26 1996 14:20 | 8 |
| re: .1
If that address doesn't work, you can use VMSBIZ::DECSOC.
(BXB has been closed for some time, and the domain forwarding may have
expired by now. The SOC's address should be "decsoc@pko.mts.dec.com".)
Ray
|
4506.3 | I got this reply off-line - unofficial | tennis.ivo.dec.com::KAM | Kam WWSE 714/261.4133 DTN/535.4133 IVO | Tue Mar 26 1996 15:03 | 1 |
| There will be a hard copy SOC early May at the Rawhide announcement.
|
4506.4 | out of stock | MSDOA::JUDD | aka beej | Tue Mar 26 1996 21:27 | 9 |
|
I ordered 25 copies of the DEC supplement but was told that only a
very limited number were printed because customers can get it off the
internet. Many of my customers don't have access to the web and
those that do tell me it's painful to download. If anybody ended
up with extra I'd love to have a few.
bj
|
4506.5 | don't you have access to a printer and a copier? | maze.zko.dec.com::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Tue Mar 26 1996 21:59 | 7 |
| re: .4
Rather than asking people to send you extras, why don't you download a copy
from the internet, print it, and make as many copies of it as you need
locally?
Ray
|
4506.6 | Next, you'll want us to burn our own CD-ROMs! | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | See http://atlant2.zko.dec.com/ | Tue Mar 26 1996 22:20 | 11 |
| > why don't you download a copy from the internet, print it,
> and make as many copies of it as you need locally?
Perhaps because that's about as expensive a way of getting
copies as can be devised? And that's even *BEFORE* you ac-
count for the noter's time.
Seriously, don't you suppose they have better things to do
than to publish the sales documentation that Digital should
be providing.
Atlant
|
4506.7 | ...maybe a frog's perpective... | VNABRW::SCHULZE | | Wed Mar 27 1996 05:37 | 19 |
| I do not understand the ideas behind the strategy how information shall
flow to customers:
Print everything locally - even to get SPD's via VTX IR in postscript
is a cumbersome task - our network is designed for ASCII and not the
fancy graphical stuff. Powerful printers - maybe we sell them but don't
use them ourselves.
Information you can give customers straight away - beware, everything
new is "confidential". As if I as a salesrep will buy the beautiful new
things - the customer needs this information asap ! And, believe me, it
takes a while until the new brouchures are on site !
Digital is distributing costs, but I believe that if you sum up these
distributed costs its more expensive than to do it centralized.
In October last year I attended an OEM E&RT sales meeting in US. The
question was raised, how many of the world wide sales rep's have an
Internet connection. Guess what, less than 10% raised their hands....
|
4506.8 | What happened to the SOC user survey ? | BBPBV1::WALLACE | Whatever it takes WHO? | Wed Mar 27 1996 10:47 | 36 |
| .-1 has me puzzled (and also has my sympathy in part).
What's so difficult about getting an SPD from VTX IR ? Do you *really*
want piles of hardcopy SPDs instead ? [There used to be an SPD on CD
service, but it seems to have died as part of the Balkanization]
The hardcopy SOC is a different, difficult problem. It is too big to
print locally and yet now changes much too often to print centrally
each time it changes. But we, and especially our customers, cannot be
without it. And although I would guess most office-based Digital
employees have reasonable access to decent printers, to print the odd
chapter, I don't know many customers who would bother even if they had
the equipment. And we definitely don't have easy access to Xerox-style
production printer facilities - otherwise life might be easier.
The SOC folks did a survey of some SOC users recently, soliciting
feedback on delivery methods and such for future use. Anyone seen any
official news of results, plans, etc ?
If you don't like PostScript, learn to love Adobe PDF. Adobe's Portable
Document Format addresses lots of problems that PS doesn't. It's
typically about a quarter of the size for the same document, and can
readily be viewed as well as printed (IF you have a PC or a supported
Unix workstation). There's PDF versions of most PS stuff in the IR,
including the SOC.
Re E+RT: I'm in E+RT (sales support, fae, whatever). I know how many of
my UK customers and prospects have Internet access. It's the vast
majority. Many of them use it (but sadly not for E+RT stuff). Those
folks in E+RT and elsewhere who are ignoring the Web where it is easily
available do so at their own peril. Similarly those parts of Digital
that are still limited to VT-style applications are heading for
trouble; the world has moved on since the VT100.
regards
john
|
4506.9 | PDF on OpenVMS as well | VIVIAN::RANCE | http://vivian.hhl.dec.com/rance/ | Wed Mar 27 1996 11:45 | 10 |
| .8 > If you don't like PostScript, learn to love Adobe PDF. Adobe's Portable
.8 > Document Format addresses lots of problems that PS doesn't. It's
.8 > typically about a quarter of the size for the same document, and can
.8 > readily be viewed as well as printed (IF you have a PC or a supported
.8 > Unix workstation).
There is now a pdf viewer for OpenVMS, see notesfile LJSRV2::INTERNET_TOOLS note
3211.* or wait patiently for the next OpenVMS Freeware CD.
SR
|
4506.10 | Product company needs product catalog | ACISS2::MARES | you get what you settle for | Wed Mar 27 1996 11:48 | 43 |
| The DEC SOC hardcopy process is BROKE. To expect a field person to
spend hours of time pulling, printing, xeroxing, and distributing basic
catalog information is absolutely hilarious!!!!!
Digital marketing has consistently been sub-average when compared to
our competitors. Look at IBM, HP, SUN, UNISYS -- they gladly provide
catalogs to distributors and customers. Why? so they can BUY!!!!
Internet access to this info is fine -- for the less than 10% of
distributors/customers who have this access. The world does not work
like Digital internal practices: network access is much reduced,
common sense (timely catalogs mailed to buying masses) is much
improved.
Just one more of the little things that we do wrong that continues to
limit our ability to sell.
Yeah, I use to spend time copying, printing, xeroxing, and
distributing. It reduced my ability (time) to do my basic job -- I am
measured by sales-$$$/hour. Marketing communication's failure to do
its job is deplorable -- they argue about who's going to pay for the
catalogs. Obviously this is more important that selling more product
and APPEARING to be be a company that has its product act together.
No matter how great our products are, if we can't present them in a
timely and regular manner to our customers and distributors, we may as
well not have them.
Once again -- fewer than 10% of the customers/distributors/vars that I
deal with have regular access to the WWW. If its now in a catalog or
publication, it may as well not exist.
I hate to sound like a treekiller (more paper), but I go crazy every
time I hear/see/deal with this issue.
Bottom line: we are a product company. We need product catalogs in a
timely fashion.
Randy
|
4506.11 | My vote, retain the SOC | ADOV01::MANUEL | Over the Horizon.... | Wed Mar 27 1996 12:05 | 21 |
|
The SOC is our bible, it has a few problems and the system config
detail is getting scantier with each release, BUT you can carry it
around in your car/briefcase/home office and reference the information
quickly and efficiently when holding discussions with customers.
I work with the defence customer base here in Australia and
many of them have closed secure networks and can only dream of an
internet access point, it is time consuming and cumbersome for me to
have to print the whole SOC and bind and distribute it.
You may say just print the items of interest, but you know as well as I
do that the one the customer has an interest in will not be the one you
printed...
I vote for two FULL SOC distributions per year and we can supplement new
releases between SOC's with the www information.
My .02c FWIW,
Steve.
|
4506.12 | "I Love IR, Man" | NCMAIL::YANUSC | | Wed Mar 27 1996 12:22 | 28 |
| Basically I agree with everyone's comments from .1 to .10. The process
is broke, and it should be fixed, starting with tearing down the
stovepipes that cause a single group or groups to shut down the process
because it may impact their small (in the overall scheme of things)
bottomline.
Having said that, what does one do until the system gets fixed, if
ever? Being a participant in the Home Office program, I have a PC and
a DEClaser 5100. To be honest, it is very easy to go into IR, bring up
the latest S&O pages on a product (e.g. the AS2100A), send it to my
account, and print it off. At that point I know I have the latest and
greatest pages available, unlike what we currently have with the
hardcopy S&O catalog. It probably is less costly in the long-run, too.
How many of us have seen boxes of never opened, dated S&O catalogs
being thrown out of offices since too many were ordered? Not a very
cost-effective way of doing things.
I am not advocating doing away completely with the S&O summaries in
hardcopy form. All of us in the field should continue to press for
them. Ideally there should be one major release a year, with
supplements sent out as the year progresses. Then you start over again
the following year. But if you think any company can print off the
catalog to always have you up-to-date, with the myriad of changes that
occur, you are mistaken. Learn to use the S&O pages in IR, if nothing
else to supplement your hardcopy S&O catalog. But again, keep pressing
for hardcopy catalogs, also.
Chuck
|
4506.13 | | PADC::KOLLING | Karen | Wed Mar 27 1996 15:42 | 5 |
| The hardcopy S&O is a Bible here for ordering purposes. The problem
with VTX, as mentioned a zillion times before, is that you can't find
what you're looking for unless you know the magic words to feed the
search facility, while with the hardcopy you can ruffle thru the pages.
|
4506.14 | it's a "local" issue | maze.zko.dec.com::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Wed Mar 27 1996 18:40 | 14 |
| re: .6 and a few others
Given that the cost of literature ordered centrally is going to be billed
back to the requester, making your own copies locally turns out to be a
cheaper alternative.
Someone's got to pay for printing literature. In the new Digital, this
expense is no longer budgeted centrally. (Stated another way:
Headquarters wasn't given any money to print and stock literature.)
If a more cost-effective way of getting copies needs to be devised, it's up
to the geographies to devise it. It's their money.
Ray
|
4506.15 | | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | See http://atlant2.zko.dec.com/ | Wed Mar 27 1996 19:11 | 15 |
| > Given that the cost of literature ordered centrally is going to be billed
> back to the requester, making your own copies locally turns out to be a
> cheaper alternative.
Prove it, please. Actual numbers will sway me.
And don't assume that the local copy-job is free. That big Xerox/
Kodak/Canon photoduplicator is costing somebody big bucks.
Oh, and Digital, if you walk in and hand me a ratty, unbound
Xerox photocopy and H/P hands me a glossy brochure, you won't
mind if I draw certain conclusions about what sort of quality
you'll offer me in the product, okay?
Atlant
|
4506.16 | | DYPSS1::COGHILL | Steve Coghill, Luke 14:28 | Wed Mar 27 1996 19:26 | 3 |
| Also, the last time I looked, copying the file, printing it off, and
making copies required people. The old saying is true, "Time is
money."
|
4506.17 | How could I forget the DECdirect UK catalogues ? | BBPBV1::WALLACE | Whatever it takes WHO? | Wed Mar 27 1996 19:52 | 51 |
| Actually, the UK used to have quite a neat answer for an SOC
substitute - the DECdirect catalogue(s).
DECdirect's UK catalogues were very different than the US ones I've
seen. A slim volume, some 100 or so pages, in colour on reasonable
paper. Mainstream + volume products only, covered in enough detail to
(a) interest a new prospect and/or (b) place an order for an
experienced DEC customer (and (c) answer 95% of incoming customer
queries to sales support). Workstations, servers, networking, storage,
printers, and supplies were all covered. (Terminals too...)
Updated 3 or 4 times a year, with supplements when necessary for major
announcements. In a good year they even had PRICES included - imagine!
There was a matching software catalogue too. Sent out to a circulation
list, so customers were always reasonably up to date.
I believe there were corresponding editions elsewhere in Europe. Maybe
there still are ? _These_ were the real tools (with the SOC as
backup).
The folks responsible used to say the catalogues paid for themselves
within hours of being on the shelf. And I believe them. Fantastic
tools.
So what about today? Well, "der management" wanted to focus on channels
so a logical consequence (in their view) was to shut the DECdirect
organisation (and its in-depth complement for CSOs, the CSO service
centre). Some of the people responsible for the catalogues now work
with Digital resellers but the catalogues no longer exist in the same
way (and nor does the DECdirect mailing list - thousands of customers
left with no direct contact with Digital).
One of the main h/w resellers does a hardware catalogue similar in
appearance to the last DECdirect, but it's not the same, because of our
own business unit balkanisations. And because it's associated with a
particular reseller it's not in wide circulation (competing resellers
won't touch it). And there was a joke of a software catalogue a year or
two ago - I did hear rumours of a better more recent one done by a
reseller, but haven't seen one and don't know any customers who have.
Should we call this progress ? Is it "focusing on the customer" ? Does
it help "re-engineering the customer value chain" ? Or what ?
that was a lot of words wasn't it ?
john
ps
I've seen the DECdirect interactive CD. It shows promise. But I can't
carry it around like the DECdirect catalogue, and it's not published
frequently enough (odd, considering that duplication costs must be
minimal). And its applicability outside the US is limited.
|
4506.18 | | KAOM25::WALL | DEC Is Digital | Wed Mar 27 1996 20:09 | 30 |
| At first I thought that some sort of desktop publishing might help,
where we produce a master on CD and let the regions have print copies
made. The, for the fun of it I called a place out of the yellow pages.
Sorry. Not a good idea.
Then I mentioned to someone else about this string and he showed me an
Allied Electronics catalog. Both hard copy (much thicker and finer font
pitch than our SOC) and on CD. It comes with a viewer and works pretty
well. Only complaint was that you couldn't double click on the page
number, but had to enter it. You could, however, "scribble in the
margins" via a page related note. Pretty slick. [Not being very
PC-Centric I may be easily impressed.]
Anyway, I thought we could be stamping out CD's for less than $2 a piece.
1-800-433-5700 for your copy of Allied E.
Well, then we looked at the ONYX DEC Direct catalog (or tried to).
First, unlike anything else I have seen you have to install via
"ICENTER" rather than "setup" or "install".
It wouldn't deal with NT. The WfW machine we tried, it didn't like the
video.
Oh well.
Rob Wall
|
4506.19 | wake up and be PROFESSIONAL | tennis.ivo.dec.com::KAM | Kam WWSE 714/261.4133 DTN/535.4133 IVO | Wed Mar 27 1996 20:21 | 11 |
| Are we a garage shop operation? It doesn't look very PROFESSIONAL to
expect the employees or Business Partners to print on demand a 500 page
document. Moreover, our competitors like HP, IBM, and Sun are
providing our Business Partners with the Product Document to
understand, configure and sell their product.
We may have the BEST but they don't have the materials to see it. I'm
em barrassed to give a 3-ring binder of the SOC to the Avnet's,
Pioneers, and Wyle Partners.
Corporate cheapness is costing us business opportunities.
|
4506.20 | place blame a bit more precisely | maze.zko.dec.com::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Wed Mar 27 1996 23:42 | 23 |
| re: .15
My point about the charge-back is that it will be based on development cost,
plus handling cost, plus production cost, plus shipping cost; while the
"local" copy will only cost production cost plus handling cost.
As far as the quality of that local copy -- well, isn't that again a local
decision? The master is available. If they want to print something in
four colors on glossy paper, they can.
Reproducing and stocking literature isn't free. The line item has to
appear in someone's budget. The corporation has decided that spending
decisions about this stuff get made closer to the consumers of this stuff.
If local salesreps can get only ratty photocopies, why do you want to flame
some nebulous "Digital"? Those salesreps will have the quality and
availability of literature their *own management* has decided they are
willing to buy.
And why should that self-same local management have to pay for literature
they *don't* use? The amount of literature that got thrown away under the
old rules was phenomenal.
Ray
|
4506.21 | | ODIXIE::MOREAU | Ken Moreau;Technical Support;Florida | Thu Mar 28 1996 00:37 | 84 |
| RE: SOC discussion
I think that .20 stated the reasoning used to kill the SOC very precisely:
>Reproducing and stocking literature isn't free. The line item has to
>appear in someone's budget.
Bingo. "someone's budget". The magic words which make a particular CC
look good for a few months while crippling Digital as a whole. The magic
words which cover all of the cost-shifting being done so that a few budgets
are reduced while costs for the rest of Digital go sky-high. The magic
words which mean that one group in Digital makes it's numbers while the
revenue and profit numbers of the entire corporation go down the tubes.
> The corporation has decided that spending
>decisions about this stuff get made closer to the consumers of this stuff.
But what you are missing here is that most of us do not have the physical
equipment to create those glossy handouts, or even to do a decent looking
SOC. For one thing, most of the printers in the field only do 1 sided
printing. To make a book look decent, we need to do the following:
1) Locate all of the information we wish to print (this is *much* tougher
and ***MUCH*** more time-consuming than you can imagine).
2) Down-load it to our systems (many of us work in the Home Alone program,
and copying down a 1MB file takes a long time).
3) Print it 1-sided. Keep in mind this is a throw-away copy, since we are
going to make it 2-sided in the next step, so this is environmentally
exceptionally unfriendly, as well as a waste of money.
4) Create a pretty cover for it.
5) Take it to a copy machine (if we are lucky to have a copy machine which
does double-sided copies) or to Kinko's (at $0.05+ per single-sided page).
6) Wait until the number of copies we need are done.
7) Hot-melt them into binders (at additional cost).
And when we are finished doing this, we have 300-dpi grey scale images,
which *look* like we printed them this morning. When the customer puts
them next to the very shiny glossy thick books from HP, IBM, Sun, etc,
Digital looks really shabby.
>If local salesreps can get only ratty photocopies, why do you want to flame
>some nebulous "Digital"? Those salesreps will have the quality and
>availability of literature their *own management* has decided they are
>willing to buy.
In this case "their *own management*" is as trapped by decisions which were
made elsewhere as the sales reps are. We *DO NOT HAVE* color printers in
any abundance in the field. We *DO NOT HAVE* exceptionally fast 1200-dpi
2-sided printers in any abundance in the field. We have creaky LN03s which
are running out of toner, and we can't get more.
The bottom line is that Digital, like every business throughout history and
all over the world, has to spend money to make money. We are spending money
on some things, but we have chosen to save money on other things. I and
others in this string, are pointing out that the micro-optimization that
occurred to save one CC money by not printing the SOC, is costing Digital
a huge amount of money in lost sales and higher expenses for the sales we get.
You want specifics? Ok, how about the 3 hours I spent today looking over
more than 5 notes files trying to find out how to configure the memory on
an AlphaStation 250? I **KNOW** that information is in the SOC supplement,
but I gave away my last copy to a customer, so I don't have one. And in
case you are suggesting that I order it from VTX IR, I did so, at 2:30 PM
today. Guess what? It still hasn't been delivered to my account...
And you know something else? I am doing this configuration because this
customer doesn't have an SOC either! I have been working with them for
over 6 years now, and in the past they always did their own configs, and
then called me with a list of part numbers for a quote. Occassionally I
would find they messed up a cable or something, but their configurations
were perfect 95%+ of the time. But now I am doing this for them, because
they (and I) don't have an SOC. They are frustrated, I am frustrated,
the cost of this sale will probably exceed the profit of it, but boy, does
the budget of the CC which prints the SOC look good...
-- Ken Moreau
P.S. But don't worry. I get to console myself by looking at the very glossy
full color poster which was just delivered to me, which announces that
DECathlon will be a Mediterannean cruise this year. I am not eligible
to go, not being in Sales, but I got a poster anyway. Digital chooses
to spend money on glossy posters and sends them to people for whom they
have no bearing or meaning, but they can't print SOCs which would help
me do my job. Very frustrating...
|
4506.22 | | tennis.ivo.dec.com::KAM | Kam WWSE 714/261.4133 DTN/535.4133 IVO | Thu Mar 28 1996 01:19 | 16 |
| Can someone tell me how much Digital is saving not printing the SOC?
Well I just finished our quarterly Business Partner Training - 7 cities
in the US and 6 cities in Asia. I bet we're loosing more in lost sales
due to the lack of literature to describe, understand, and configure
products. This was the major complaint, especially in Asia were there
already exist a language barrier and the delay to localize the
information. China has big demands but NO SOC's to configure the
or understand all the products.
I can only thank Matti Patari for providing the Golden Eggs in a timely
fashion as this appears to be the document that our customer base is
living off since it always has the most current product literature. I
wonder if he'll extend this to networks and storageworks????
|
4506.23 | Print em and sell em. | FSAEUR::ROE | | Thu Mar 28 1996 06:55 | 4 |
| I too have always found the printed SOC an invaluable tool. Why not
just print them but charge the local CC for any that they order,
production plus distribution costs? Then local management can decide
if they want them or not. It's their budget.
|
4506.24 | GOLDEN EGGS will Care Your business! | EEMELI::PATARI | | Thu Mar 28 1996 07:42 | 29 |
| Hi!
The new Rev22 of GOLDEN EGGS Visual Configuration has been
shipping since 8-Mar-96. Within these three weeks I have
been shipping this Flashing SELLING Tool over 18.000 hard
copies. A couple thousand hard copies are still available.
Shipping is by DHL. Average time from Order - Arrival on
your desk is FOUR (4) working days World-Wide!
Send your kind volume order to:
MATTI PATARI at FNO
Booklet order number: GOLDEN EGGS EC-R022B-36
Price $4/Copy
Include World-wide DHL-shipping to Digital office.
Minimum order 50 copies , One Box.
Please place your order with shipping details:
- Your CC
- Your CC managers name
- Number of copies ordered ( 50 is minimum)
- Accurate Digital shipping STREET address.
( No Box, include your Country name too)
Matti Patari, Mr. GOLDEN EGGS,
Sales Support in Helsinki, Finland
|
4506.25 | Simple solutions at 2am | SWAM1::BARNETTE_NE | TheBestThingsOn-lineAreFree | Thu Mar 28 1996 08:06 | 16 |
|
Just this week, I had to borrow a January '95 SOC BACK from a
customer, because the rare-and-out-of-print bookstore that used to be
our literature room didn't have any! Talk about embarrassing.
Maybe if we produced the SOCs on CD-ROM, and shipped them with the
condists? We could have copies in Bookreader (complete with SGML links),
Postscript and PDF, readable on your PC or a DECwindows station.
Home-aloners would be spared the agony of having to download the thing
(I have a 28.8 modem but my local DEC office has only 9600 baud), it
would be cheaper, more portable, and when a customer has questions you
simply pull it out of the ol' briefcase and pop it into the customer's
machine, whether it be a PC running Windows or an Alphastation. And for
those customers that are still using 8650s and VT220s, with nary a
CD-ROM reader in sight, well, you could still print out a hardcopy at
the office.
|
4506.26 | VTX IR - getting documents direct, no email | BBPBV1::WALLACE | Whatever it takes WHO? | Thu Mar 28 1996 10:01 | 30 |
| Here's a band-aid for when email from IR is deathly slow.
If you have access to DCL and DECnet there is a documented backdoor to
get you a copy without relying on email. On a bad day it's quicker to
use this (but if everyone does this it probably breaks something).
Find the document, note document id. E.g. SP 4461.
$ dir wwsmir""::sp$lib:sp4461*
.... See what there is, pick the format you want.
$ spool copy wwsmir""::sp$lib:sp4461p8.ps [] ! I chose PostScript
.... wait for copy to complete
$ print sp4461p8.ps
.... hand to customer
The sp$lib logical varies; it's the document category e.g SO is in
SO$LIB and so on.
I now return you to the scheduled discussion on the state of Digital,
and the state of the SOC and other literature delivery mechanisms.
Enjoy.
john
(IR user)
|
4506.27 | put the SOC on CD | DYPSS1::DIXON | Grant Dixon (513) 296-6860 x272 | Thu Mar 28 1996 13:12 | 18 |
| RE: .25
I like the idea of putting the SOC on CD in various formats so that
it could be read by anyone. This would be a good first step.
Another idea is to display the SOC on a "Newton-like" handheld display
device. Digital could issue several "Newton-like" devices to every
salesperson that could be loaned to customers on a temporary basis
during the configuration cycle. Updates could be either be downloadable
across the net or use some type on CD-ROM internal device. A small
handheld device is relatively inexpensive and readily updateable (new
word?).
The SOC on CD could be an inexpensive solution to a big problem caused
by the current lack of availabilty of the SOC. Give all customers a
copy of the SOC on CD and loan the "Newton-like" device to customers
that are currently configuring systems.
Grant
|
4506.28 | | ODIXIE::MOREAU | Ken Moreau;Technical Support;Florida | Thu Mar 28 1996 14:52 | 42 |
| RE: .27 (the Newton like hand-held device)
I also like the idea of putting the SOC on CD. For one thing, you could
put in color pictures and even short animation bits ( this may be a bit
much, but it is *possible*, and would represent a good use of technology).
Make the CD readable on MS-Windows/Windows-95 systems, with software that
doesn't need to be licensed because it is bound to the CD.
Making this CD with some self-executing software on board the CD which
would present the menu either as soon as it was inserted into the drive
(on Windows-95 this is very easy) or by running some very obvious file
at the top level of the CD, would allow many customers to use this without
having to depend on a Digital sales person. Think what our VARs would
be able to do with this!
But I am not in favor of a hand-held device which we loan to customers, for
the following reasons:
1) It is proprietary technology, as opposed to a Windows desktop which
virtually every one of my customers already has.
2) We would have to invest in the hardware to do this, which represents
an expense to Digital which we can ill afford right now.
3) It severely limits the number of people who can use the CD, as opposed
to the number of people who would use their current desktop technology.
This would prevent sophisticated customers (and there are many of them)
from doing their own configurations, forcing Digital people to spend
lots of time with every little sale, driving the cost of sales way up.
I have several customers who do their own configs, and I might get
involved if there is a question, but in many cases they send it straight
to Purchasing. We make multiple sales for the cost of an SOC, and let
Sales and Sales Support work on larger opportunities.
4) It forces the field people to keep track of who has the reader, which
is a time-consuming burden we don't need right now.
5) It prevents us from mailing the CDs out in a mass-marketing fashion.
For example, why not send 1 to every VAR? Why not automatically send
1 to every customer who is on CONDIST? Why not give them away free
at trade shows?
But I *really* like the idea of the SOC on CD.
-- Ken Moreau
|
4506.29 | what's wrong with this picture? | BBPBV1::WALLACE | Whatever it takes WHO? | Thu Mar 28 1996 15:18 | 25 |
| Make the CD ISO9660 - readable by PC, Unix, and VMS. Doable today.
Make the contents PDF - readable by free PC, Unix and VMS s/w today.
(and the SOC exists in PDF today).
Include an HTML browser as a front end. ( ... today ...)
Optionally add PDF glossies of hot new stuff. Doable today.
Optionally add AVI files (readable by PC, and suitably equipped Unix
and VMS). Doable today.
Now find a volunteer with funding whose metrics allow them to do this
and keep their jobs, to ensure it gets done properly, ensure it gets
distributed widely, ensure that feedback is taken, and follow it
through so it keeps on getting done properly. Hmmm. Could be tricky,
Bob.
Anybody got a PC and a CD writer ? If not I'll chip in $10 as a loan
towards a starter fund.
regards
john
|
4506.30 | I think you've got it. | RICKS::PHIPPS | DTN 225.4959 | Thu Mar 28 1996 16:35 | 4 |
| You have just described, more or less, the CD I received not too long ago
with DEC standards. HTML files and more.
mikeP
|
4506.31 | | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | See http://atlant2.zko.dec.com/ | Thu Mar 28 1996 17:11 | 16 |
| Dear .20:
> Oh, and Digital, if you walk in and hand me a ratty, unbound
> Xerox photocopy and H/P hands me a glossy brochure, you won't
> mind if I draw certain conclusions about what sort of quality
> you'll offer me in the product, okay?
That last paragraph of my .15 reply was meant to be read
using the voice of the customer. To them, we *ARE* a big
nebulous "Digital" and they honestly don't give a damn
which department made the @#^%@% decision that resulted
in their receiving a ratty Xerox photocopy. They will
judge the result appropriately.
Atlant
|
4506.32 | | RICKS::PHIPPS | DTN 225.4959 | Fri Mar 29 1996 00:09 | 8 |
| You are right.
We stopped being cute, in, precocious or whatever you want to call it a
long time ago.
Now we are expected to act our age.
mikeP
|
4506.33 | Notes is "Great" | JOKUR::BOICE | When in doubt, do it. | Fri Mar 29 1996 01:20 | 11 |
| > Anybody got a PC and a CD writer ? If not I'll chip in $10 as a loan
> towards a starter fund.
I put the Digital Standards on CD together (very simple process), and I'd
be happy to work with whomever on a SOC CD prototype. Bottom line CD-ROM
production price is peanuts (less that $1.00 per disc in quantity) compared
to lost sales. And I do have the CD-recorder, a PC, Acrobat Distiller to
create PDF files from any PS file(s), and a rudimentary understanding of
HTML to get going.
- Jim (On vacation tomorrow though, :^))
|
4506.34 | Here's a starter... | tennis.ivo.dec.com::KAM | Kam WWSE 714/261.4133 DTN/535.4133 IVO | Fri Mar 29 1996 03:58 | 114 |
| All the PDF file are already available in WWSMIR::SO$LIB:
Directory WWSMIR::IRLIB$01:[IR.IRLIB.SO]
SO0002PF.PDF;1 SO0003PF.PDF;1 SO0004PF.PDF;1 SO0006PF.PDF;1
SO0007PF.PDF;1 SO0008PF.PDF;2 SO0009PF.PDF;1 SO000LPF.PDF;4
SO000MPF.PDF;1 SO000OPF.PDF;1 SO000QPF.PDF;1 SO000RPF.PDF;1
SO000SPF.PDF;1 SO000TPF.PDF;2 SO000UPF.PDF;2 SO000ZPF.PDF;5
SO0010PF.PDF;1 SO0011PF.PDF;4 SO0012PF.PDF;1 SO0013PF.PDF;1
SO0014PF.PDF;1 SO0015PF.PDF;1 SO0016PF.PDF;1 SO0017PF.PDF;1
SO0018PF.PDF;1 SO0019PF.PDF;1 SO001APF.PDF;1 SO001BPF.PDF;1
SO001CPF.PDF;1 SO001DPF.PDF;1 SO001EPF.PDF;1 SO001FPF.PDF;1
SO001GPF.PDF;1 SO001LPF.PDF;1 SO001MPF.PDF;1 SO001OPF.PDF;2
SO001PPF.PDF;3 SO001QPF.PDF;1 SO001RPF.PDF;3 SO001SPF.PDF;3
SO001TPF.PDF;2 SO001UPF.PDF;2 SO001VPF.PDF;2 SO001WPF.PDF;1
SO001XPF.PDF;1 SO001YPF.PDF;1 SO001ZPF.PDF;1 SO0020PF.PDF;1
SO0021PF.PDF;9 SO0022PF.PDF;9 SO0024PF.PDF;7 SO0026PF.PDF;3
SO0029PF.PDF;2 SO002APF.PDF;5 SO002BPF.PDF;8 SO002CPF.PDF;6
SO002DPF.PDF;4 SO002EPF.PDF;4 SO002FPF.PDF;2 SO002GPF.PDF;1
SO002HPF.PDF;1 SO002IPF.PDF;1 SO002KPF.PDF;1 SO002LPF.PDF;1
SO002MPF.PDF;1 SO002NPF.PDF;1 SO002OPF.PDF;1 SO002PPF.PDF;4
SO002QPF.PDF;4 SO002RPF.PDF;4 SO002SPF.PDF;5 SO002TPF.PDF;4
SO002UPF.PDF;5 SO002VPF.PDF;9 SO002WPF.PDF;4 SO002XPF.PDF;9
SO002YPF.PDF;11 SO002ZPF.PDF;4 SO0030PF.PDF;4 SO0033PF.PDF;4
SO0034PF.PDF;3 SO0035PF.PDF;6 SO0036PF.PDF;3 SO0037PF.PDF;3
SO0038PF.PDF;2 SO0039PF.PDF;4 SO003APF.PDF;3 SO003CPF.PDF;1
SO003DPF.PDF;1 SO003EPF.PDF;4 SO003FPF.PDF;1 SO003GPF.PDF;3
SO003HPF.PDF;4 SO003IPF.PDF;2 SO003JPF.PDF;1 SO003KPF.PDF;2
SO003LPF.PDF;1 SO003MPF.PDF;3 SO003NPF.PDF;3 SO003OPF.PDF;3
Total of 100 files.
*
* Here the list of files. There appears to be a difference between the
* files listed in the IR (100) and a Directory Listing. We need to
* contact the IR to see if we can obtain an Index or Table of Contents.
From: WWSMIR::IR "26-Mar-1996 0653 -0500" 26-MAR-1996 05:47:58.96
To: TENNIS::KAM
CC:
Subj: Integrated Repository Document Listing
Integrated Repository Page 1
Document List
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
List Type : New/Revised
Run Date/Time : 26-Mar-96 06:53 AM
Categories : SYS/OPTION CATALOG
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Document
Posted Title/Description ID
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 25-Mar-96 AlphaStation 255/233 and 255/300 Ordering Menu V2.2 SO003N
2 21-Mar-96 AlphaStation 600 5/266 and 5/333 Ordering Menu V2.4 SO002V
3 21-Mar-96 AlphaStation Options V2.5 SO002Y
4 18-Mar-96 AlphaStation 500/266 and 500/333 Ordering Menu V2.1 SO003O
5 14-Mar-96 AlphaServer 8200 Systems V2.3 SO0021
6 14-Mar-96 AlphaServer 8400 Systems V2.3 SO0022
7 14-Mar-96 AlphaStation 200 4/166 V2.1 SO002Q
8 14-Mar-96 AlphaStation 200 4/233 V2.1 SO002R
9 12-Mar-96 StorageWorks Software V2.3 SO003E
10 11-Mar-96 AlphaStation 400 4/233 Ordering Menu V2.2 SO000L
11 11-Mar-96 AlphaServer 2100 Rackmount & Cabinet Systems V2.3 SO002B
12 08-Mar-96 AlphaStation 200 4/100 Ordering Menu V2.1 SO002P
13 04-Mar-96 AlphaServer 2100A Rackmount & Cabinet Systems V2.3 SO003H
14 27-Feb-96 AlphaServer 2100 Systems V2.3 SO0024
15 27-Feb-96 AlphaServer 2000 Systems V2.3 SO002X
16 27-Feb-96 AlphaServer 2100A Systems V2.2 SO003G
17 27-Feb-96 Web AlphaServer 1000 4/266 for Windows NT V2.1 SO003M
18 22-Feb-96 StorageWorks Controllers / Adapters V2.1 SO001R
19 22-Feb-96 StorageWorks Cabinets V2.1 SO001S
20 14-Feb-96 StorageWorks Shelves and Pedestals V2.1 SO001P
21 14-Feb-96 TradeIn '96 Program (Upgrades) V2.1 SO003I
22 09-Feb-96 Internet AlphaServer 400 Systems V2.2 SO0030
23 09-Feb-96 Internet AlphaServer 1000 4/266 Systems V2.2 SO0033
24 09-Feb-96 Web AlphaServer 400 4/233 for Windows V2.0 SO003L
25 05-Feb-96 AlphaServer 1000A Ordering Menu V2.0 SO003K
26 25-Jan-96 VAXstation 4000 Model 60 Ordering Menu, V2.2 SO000Z
27 25-Jan-96 VAXstation 4000 Model 96 Ordering Menu, V2.2 SO002D
28 15-Jan-96 AlphaServer 1000 4/266 Systems V2.2 SO0039
29 19-Dec-95 VAX 7000 Enterprise Servers, V2.1 SO0011
30 19-Dec-95 MicroVAX 3100 Models 40/85/96, V2.1 SO002E
31 18-Dec-95 Systems & Options - December, 1995 Supplement - Table SO0029
of Contents,V2.1
32 18-Dec-95 AlphaServer 1000 4/233 Rackmount and Cabinet V2.1 SO002A
33 18-Dec-95 StorageWorks FDDI Server V2.1 SO002W
34 18-Dec-95 Alpha VME 2100 Rackmount Systems V2.1 SO0034
35 18-Dec-95 AlphaServer 400 Family V2.1 SO003A
36 18-Dec-95 Digital AlphaServer 8200 Rackmount System SO003F
37 27-Nov-95 VAX 4000 Models 505A/705A V2.0 SO0008
38 27-Nov-95 OpenVMS Cluster Systems Config Details (Part 1) V2.0 SO000T
39 27-Nov-95 DECsafe Available Server V2.0 SO000U
40 27-Nov-95 StorageWorks Overview V2.0 SO001O
41 27-Nov-95 StorageWorks Disk Devices V2.0 SO001T
42 27-Nov-95 StorageWorks Tape Devices V2.0 SO001U
43 27-Nov-95 Digital NAS Packages V2.0 SO001V
44 27-Nov-95 AlphaStation 200 Family Product Description V2.0 SO0020
45 27-Nov-95 VAX 4000 Model 106 V2.0 SO002F
46 27-Nov-95 AlphaStation 200 Systems Diagram and Specifications SO002S
V2.0
47 27-Nov-95 AlphaStation 250 4/266 Ordering Menu V2.0 SO002T
48 27-Nov-95 Alpha XL and Celebris XL Workstation for Windows NT SO0036
V2.0
49 27-Nov-95 Alpha XL and Celebris XL Workstation for Windows NT SO0037
Options V2.0
50 27-Nov-95 VAX 4000 Rackmount V2.0 SO0038
51 27-Nov-95 AlphaStation Application Mapping Chart V2.0 SO003C
52 27-Nov-95 OpenVMS Cluster Systems Config Details (Part 2) V2.0 SO003D
53 01-May-95 Environmental Products: Prestige Models 3000/6000 SO002M
Office/Data Cente...
54 31-Jan-95 Environmental Products SO001X
|
4506.35 | cut it, paste it, mail it | MKTCRV::KMANNERINGS | | Fri Mar 29 1996 12:42 | 40 |
| This discussion is important. I spend my day providing information over
the phone to partners and Digital sales reps out selling our products.
I get a lot of satisfaction out of it as I feel if I do a good job they
will sell more and they are very grateful if you can help them. I guess
the cost to the company of my time is about a dollar a minute, if you
include all non-productive overhead (VP costs etc :-)), so I hate
having to waste my time searching for information or not finding the
right information quickly. We cover anything and everything digital
sells and the information can be from the trivial to the highly
complex. If there is information out there in the jungle, we have to
try and find it.
Someone back up this string wrote:
> I do not understand the ideas behind the strategy how information
> shall flow to customers:
Well I don't think we have one. What we have is chaos. The methods we
use to find information are at times about as sophisticated as Dr
Livingstone looking for Mr Stanley. It is out there somewhere and if
you search long enough you might bump into it, just like Livingstone
and Stanley. This is a pity 'cos at times we are brilliant at times,
eg Alta Vista which saves the company a fortune. On the other hand
there are two bad jokes going round: VTX and the SOC. We need
information in a form that you can search electronically, cut and paste
to file which you can e-mail to a customer on the internet. So postscript
is out for starters. Even netscape is too slow sometimes. I have a dcl
command procedure which pulls down spd's and other stuff from Paolo
Alto which I can then mail on directly to customers and sales reps. It
saves a lot of time, and time is money. It also gives the recievers a
buzz when they ring someone at Digital up and they have the stuff in
their pc 15 minutes later. We also need an infomation map and a
protocoll for dealing with product managers etc. Some are great, some
aren't.
I hope someone with the power to change things is listening to this.
It is about quality, which starts at the bottom.
Kevin
ESSC Galway
|
4506.36 | | SCUNER::S_GOUDIE | Dumbfoonnerd ! | Fri Mar 29 1996 14:14 | 27 |
|
This discussion certainly is important - and I'd like to add some
further information.
We in Manufacturing require to perform a Tech-Edit check on every
Systems Order received. This check is done using the very latest
Product SOC details.
There is a considerable effort goes into trying to manage and reduce
the level of 'problem orders' received into manf - and the cost impact
of this is significant. While the cost/quality impact of not doing it
is also significant.
It's therfore disturbing for me to read that so many Orders are being
taken refererenced against an OLD SOC, and sent on to Manf.
But I do believe that PM&D are currently looking at revamping the
SOC Process and I would imagine that they would welcome suggestions on
how better to distribute this information.
Contact NODEX::MCGINNESS (Hugh)
Regards,
STuart.
|
4506.37 | Anyone got the rest of this list? | VIVIAN::RANCE | http://vivian.hhl.dec.com/rance/ | Fri Mar 29 1996 20:12 | 13 |
| .34> *
.34> * Here the list of files. There appears to be a difference between the
.34> * files listed in the IR (100) and a Directory Listing. We need to
.34> * contact the IR to see if we can obtain an Index or Table of Contents.
Has anybody followed this up?
We have converted the list into a simple html file and placed it in a
single directory for copying to the UK WOW (on site engineer's)
workbench. It would be great if we could provide a table of contents
for all 100 chapters, rather than just 54!
StuartR
|
4506.38 | | tennis.ivo.dec.com::KAM | Kam WWSE 714/261.4133 DTN/535.4133 IVO | Sat Mar 30 1996 02:24 | 6 |
| I haven't really returned from Asia yet. I'm stuck in Hawaii. I'll be
back on Monday and I'll the IR a call and see if we can get the full
list and also a TOC from th creators.
Regards,
|
4506.39 | | tennis.ivo.dec.com::KAM | Kam WWSE 714/261.4133 DTN/535.4133 IVO | Mon Apr 01 1996 14:49 | 13 |
| I just got off the phone with the individual responsible for placement of the SOC
into the IR. They will be supplying the information on where we can get the
complete and lastest SOC. However, it's about the same as the IR.
I was told that April 15, 1996 they will be producing another hardcopy but
couldn't be guaranteed when they'd print after that.
Also, someone mentioned that all the files were available for you to download the
files locally and take all the information to a printshop to produce your own
SOC. Incorrect - there is NO Table of Contents file. I'm hoping that they
produce this document.
Regards,
|
4506.40 | distribution | SWAM1::BARNETTE_NE | TheBestThingsOn-lineAreFree | Mon Apr 01 1996 15:35 | 7 |
|
Now as to distribution - how about including it in the condists? That
would get it in the hands of most people, Digital and customer alike.
Don't forget to print a snazzy silk-screen graphic on the CD! You wan't
people to look at it, and say "hey, I wonder what this is? looks cool - I
think I'll check it out!"
|
4506.41 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Mon Apr 01 1996 15:54 | 6 |
| Re: .40
A snazzy graphic? No problem. That will be a $25 charge to your cost
center per disc.... :-) (*.5)
Steve
|
4506.42 | Latest update on SOC | TENNIS::KAM | Kam WWSE 714/261.4133 DTN/535.4133 IVO | Fri Apr 19 1996 14:53 | 5 |
| Just got off the phone with the SOC hardcopy publishers. They're
going to print next week, therefore, all the files should be available
next week - including a Table Of Contents.
We'll be providing these to our Business Partner's via a CD-ROM on a
quarterly basis (actually three times per year) with updates.
|
4506.43 | | ODIXIE::MOREAU | Ken Moreau;Technical Support;Florida | Fri Apr 19 1996 21:48 | 11 |
| RE: .-1
> We'll be providing these to our Business Partner's via a CD-ROM on a
> quarterly basis (actually three times per year) with updates.
Now *that* is the best news I've heard all week! :-)
Any way to get these into the hands of either customers or Digital Sales
and Sales Support?
-- Ken Moreau
|
4506.44 | Attend DUPS | TENNIS::KAM | Kam WWSE 714/261.4133 DTN/535.4133 IVO | Fri Apr 19 1996 23:54 | 126 |
| In Florida you can visit with Norm Bourgeois. I don't know where he
lives anymore with the re-org down there. However, those that attend
this seminar will be provided with a CD.
______________________________________ cut -----------------------------------
Note: This is being re-sent due to the following changes:
City Schedule Status
---------- ---------- ---------
*Charlotte Mon May 6 CANCELLED
*New York City Mon May 13 Date Change
*** SPECIAL NOTICE FOR Q4 FY96 Digital Update Product Seminar (DUPS) ***
During this quarter DUPS delivery to Business Partners will be
accomplished using a scaled-down format; i.e., sessions will be a
half day vs. full day, lunch will not be provided and, where
feasible, sessions will be delivered in a Digital facility.
In addition, on May 2nd we will deliver Rawhide SELNet broadcasts to
Europe and Americas for Business Partners and Digital Sales. Kits
containing a videotape of the broadcast and training materials will
be distributed to Asia/Pacific and others unable to participate.
**********************************************
* DUPS Registration *
* 800-332-5656 (US) Course # EY-H928E-S0 *
* 800-465-2226 (Canada) Course # EY-H828E-S0 *
**********************************************
* DUPS information can be received by *
* sending electronic mail to: *
* *
* Internet: info@dups.enet.dec.com *
* enet: dups::info *
* ALL-IN-1 info @dups @vmsmail *
**********************************************
Page 2 of 4
REGISTRATION: Phone: 1-800-332-5656 (US ONLY) Course No.: EY-H928E-S0
Phone: 1-800-465-2226 (Canada) Course No.: EY-H828E-S0
Please be sure that our partners, this includes Distributors, Master
Resellers, ISVs, tiered VARS, get the information as early as possible.
This will provide the information necessary to coordinate logistics at
the site of their choice, handouts, and refreshments. DUPS is provided
for Digital Sales & Support representatives and Digital's Business Partners.
About 5000, worldwide, Business Partners and Digital personnel attended DUPS.
With this level of attendance, it is extremely important that students
register by the Friday prior to the session that they will be attending.
Handouts, refreshments, and seating are based on the numbers which we have
on that day. Please help to ensure early registration by all prospective
attendees.
If you have any questions/concerns, please do not hesitate to call a member
of the team. We look forward to seeing you at DUPS and appreciate your
continued support.
Page 3 of 4
REGISTRATION: Phone: 1-800-332-5656 (US ONLY) Course No.: EY-H928E-S0
Phone: 1-800-465-2226 (Canada) Course No.: EY-H828E-S0
Q4 FY96 DUPS Agenda & Topics
08:00AM Registration/Coffee Service
08:15 Taking Care of Business
08:30 AlphaServers, AlphaStations/Personal Workstations
StorageWorks, Windows NT Clusters
12:30 End
* Indicates changes to schedule
US City Day Mon Date Time US City Day Mon Date Time
---------- --- --- ---- ----------- ------------- --- --- ---- ----------
Atlanta Wed May 8 8:30 - 12:30 Houston Thu May 9 8 - 1
Boston Fri May 3 8 - 12 Irvine Thu May 16 8 - 1
Boston Fri May 3 1 - 5 Los Angeles Wed May 22 8 - 1
*Charlotte Mon May 6 CANCELLED Milwaukee Thu May 23 12 - 5
Charlotte Tue May 7 8:30 - 12:30 Minneapolis Mon May 13 12 - 5
Chicago Fri May 17 8 - 1 Minneapolis Tue May 14 8 - 1
Chicago Mon May 20 8 - 1 *New York City Mon May 13 8 - 1
Cincinnati Mon May 6 12 - 5 Orlando Thu May 9 8:30 - 12:30
Cincinnati Tue May 7 8 - 1 Philadelphia Wed May 15 8 - 1
Cleveland Wed May 8 12 - 5 Phoenix Wed May 15 12 - 5
Cleveland Thu May 9 8 - 1 Phoenix Thu May 16 8 - 1
Dallas Tue May 7 8 - 1 Santa Clara Wed May 15 8 - 1
Deerfield Beach Tue May 14 8:30 - 4
Deerfield Beach Wed May 15 8:30 - 4
Denver Tue May 21 12 - 5 Seattle Tue May 14 8 - 1
Denver Wed May 22 8 - 1 San Diego Tue May 21 8 - 1
Detroit Fri May 10 8 - 12 St. Louis Wed May 8 8 - 1
Detroit Fri May 10 1 - 5 Washington DC Thu May 16 8 - 1
Canada Day Mon Date Time
---------- --- --- ---- -----------
Montreal Tue May-7
Ottawa Wed May-8
Toronto Thu May-9
Page 4 of 4
REGISTRATION: Phone: 1-800-332-5656 (US ONLY) Course No.: EY-H928E-S0
Phone: 1-800-465-2226 (Canada) Course No.: EY-H828E-S0
DUPS Contacts
Name Outside Phone DTN Location
-------------- ------------- -------- ------------------
Len Slosek (603)884-4699 264-4699 Merrimack, NH
Jeff Monasch (212)856-2227 352-2227 New York, NY
Norm Bourgeois (407)875-6319 353-6319 Orlando, FL
Tom Kull (708)505-2002 455-2002 Chicago, IL
Bill Kam (714)261-4133 535-4133 Irvine, CA
Linda Koh (65)290-4977 675-4977 Singapore
Tan Kong Ming (65)290-4935 675-4935 Singapore
Koh Chee Keong (65)290-2908 675-2908 Singapore
Stephen Elliott (61)-2-561 5252 Australia
Trevor Gregory (61)-2-561 7083 730-7083 Sidney, Australia
*****************************************************************************
|
4506.45 | | TENNIS::KAM | Kam WWSE 714/261.4133 DTN/535.4133 IVO | Mon Apr 29 1996 18:25 | 3 |
| got off the phone with Moore Business Systems and the SOC's won't be
available until the end of May, that's when they'll receive them from
Digital and I assume they mean the printers.
|
4506.46 | Hardcopy SOC Futures? | GUIDUK::MANN | | Thu May 02 1996 07:02 | 2 |
| Is there confirmation that the May edition of the SOC will be the last
printed edition? Are all future editions going to CD-ROM?
|
4506.47 | | TENNIS::KAM | Kam WWSE 714/261.4133 DTN/535.4133 IVO | Thu May 02 1996 12:08 | 6 |
| No that's not the intent of this thread. I believe hardcopy SOC's will
be published twice per year, the full book, and then supplemental inserts
when needed. You can contact the SOC publisher if you need further
details.
We're just placing the SOC on a CD-ROM for the business partners.
|
4506.48 | soft-copy | ASABET::DCLARK | SBU Technology Group | Thu May 02 1996 13:25 | 4 |
| Is there an electronic version of the SOC available for internal
use anywhere (e.g. Excel or Access?)
thanks - Dave
|
4506.49 | Will MS Word do ? | BBPBV1::WALLACE | Plan, Implement, Check, Act. | Thu May 02 1996 13:55 | 8 |
| Files in Word format are on msbcs""::disk$user38:[decsoc].
But be warned, the page numbering is kaput just now: the index and
contents don't match the chapters, and some page numbers appear in more
than one file.
regards
john
|
4506.50 | | TLE::REAGAN | All of this chaos makes perfect sense | Thu May 02 1996 14:28 | 7 |
| http://www.digital.com/info/SOC/
There you'll find Postscript, PDF, and Word files for each section
in the SOC. (Well, some sections seem not to have Word files, but
all seem to have Postscript and PDF files.)
-John
|
4506.51 | | TENNIS::KAM | Kam WWSE 714/261.4133 DTN/535.4133 IVO | Thu May 02 1996 15:01 | 6 |
| On the IR also. I don't believe that the May issue has been official
release. Once again check with the SOC folks.
wwsmir::so$lib:*.doc,*.pdf
Grand total of 1 directory, 199 files.
|
4506.52 | thanks | ASABET::DCLARK | SBU Technology Group | Thu May 02 1996 17:55 | 1 |
| re: last few .. thanks! - Dave
|
4506.53 | CD-ROM copies of SOC for internal "partners" | WHOS01::ELKIND | Steve Elkind, Digital Consulting @WHO | Thu May 02 1996 22:27 | 4 |
| How about CD-ROMs for internal use? Copying all of those files over
the net, then kermitting (I'm in the home alone program), then storing
them on my *personal* PC's hard disk is not very practical. Printing
.ps files on what I have at home is a joke in bad taste.
|
4506.54 | | TENNIS::KAM | Kam WWSE 714/261.4133 DTN/535.4133 IVO | Fri May 03 1996 00:29 | 13 |
| Here's my suggestion:
1] copy from WWSMIR:SO$LIB:*.PDF
DISK$USER:[KAM]>dls wwsmir::so$lib:*.pdf/size/grand
101 files, 15672 Blocks OR 8,024,064 MB
2] Go to www.adobe.com and retrieve the Acrobat FREE Reader
Now you can read the files on your PC and print to the printer of you
choice.
The .DOC files are also available but it requires 14,405,632 MB.
|
4506.55 | why not use the WEB page??? | SAYER::ELMORE | through the looking glass | Fri May 03 1996 17:27 | 7 |
| Bill,
If the SOC pdf/ps/doc file are on http://www.digital.com/info/SOC/ why
not just read/print/download from there? Am I missing something? Are
files at WWSMIR:SO$LIB:*.PDF different?
--Steve
|
4506.56 | | TENNIS::KAM | Kam WWSE 714/261.4133 DTN/535.4133 IVO | Fri May 03 1996 18:04 | 7 |
| Because I don't want to have netscape download 100+ individual files.
I can SPOOL wwsmir::so$lib:*.doc,*.pdf right to a tape and give that
to a vendor to make a CD. Why doesn't the customer go to the URL
provided? Don't ask me, they want the information centralized on a
CD-ROM.
Regards,
|
4506.57 | | TLE::REAGAN | All of this chaos makes perfect sense | Fri May 03 1996 18:47 | 3 |
| I found some SOC stuff via VTX IR that wasn't yet in the Web page.
-John
|