T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2737.1 | pointer to conference discussing Mill reuse ideas | CVG::THOMPSON | Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest? | Mon Oct 25 1993 13:20 | 6 |
| Note that the conference at LSTARK::MILL_MEMORIES is being used to
collect and discuss ideas for Mill reuse. It is followed by some of
the same people that .0 was forwarded to including a number of people
who are charged with actually implementing ideas regarding the Mill.
Alfred
|
2737.2 | Application centre | ANNECY::HOTCHKISS | | Mon Oct 25 1993 14:03 | 6 |
| Brilliant idea-what about a permanent demo centre afterwards or a
customer application porting centre with real industry specific gurus
and third parties hosted in it(and paying rent for the privilege of
access to our clients,our technology and our engineering consulting)
Go for it!
|
2737.3 | Oooh...I'm in one of *those* moods... | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Mon Oct 25 1993 14:45 | 7 |
| I don't think it's such a brilliant idea. We're going to bring in
marketing people and customers from around the world to impress them
with new Digital technology IN THE MILL??? The place, for the most
part, is a dump. If we're going to use it as a demo center and for this
and future DECworld events, I suggest that we level the place with a
wrecking ball first and build something more reasonable in its place.
Just lay off a few thousand engineers to pay for it.
|
2737.4 | Infrastructure been enhanced lately? | DYPSS2::COGHILL | Steve Coghill, Luke 14:28 | Mon Oct 25 1993 14:56 | 3 |
| It's been a few years since I've been to Maynard. Have they built
some new roads into the town? Have several hundreds of rooms in
hotels been built there lately?
|
2737.5 | Not much has changed | TEXAS1::SOBECKY | John Sobecky dtn 223-5557 | Mon Oct 25 1993 15:03 | 10 |
|
re -1
Nope...same old routes 62,27, and 117, same old (worse) traffic
jams. They did make Main St. partly one-way.
The closest hotels are in Marlboro or Boxboro.
John
|
2737.7 | | SNELL::ROBERTS | mother nature must be a vandal @heart | Wed Oct 27 1993 12:52 | 3 |
|
we have a Dunkin Donuts counter in the Mill. So one thing has changed.
|
2737.8 | still a big complex :-) | CVG::THOMPSON | Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest? | Wed Oct 27 1993 12:53 | 6 |
|
>we have a Dunkin Donuts counter in the Mill. So one thing has changed.
Where?
Alfred
|
2737.9 | | RDVAX::HABER | supercalifragilisticexpialidocious | Wed Oct 27 1993 13:23 | 1 |
| in the cafeteria. it's been there at least a year.
|
2737.10 | who cares about donuts!! facility is issue!! | PENUTS::DEFAZIO | | Fri Dec 17 1993 19:06 | 1 |
| Big Thrills!! Donuts are bad for you anyhow!! Too much fat and oils!!
|
2737.11 | No to donuts! | HERON::BLOMBERG | Trapped inside the universe | Sat Dec 18 1993 08:21 | 8 |
| (side track from the non-smoking note)
I think donuts should be banned from Digital offices. Donut-eaters
problably exhale more particles than others for several minutes
after the consumption. Probably applies to popcorn as well.
/passive donut&popcorn eater :-)
|
2737.12 | forget popcorn! | SDOS02::WALDO_IR | | Tue Dec 21 1993 14:48 | 5 |
| Absolutely, positively does not apply to popcorn. Don't even think
about it!
Irving (who goes into severe withdrawals if he doesn't get his daily
dose)
|
2737.13 | Only some kinds of donuts | AMCUCS::YOUNG | I'd like to be...under the sea... | Tue Dec 21 1993 19:26 | 17 |
|
re: .11
> I think donuts should be banned from Digital offices. Donut-eaters
> problably exhale more particles than others for several minutes
> after the consumption.
I don't think you've ever been around a world-class donut eater. They
don't exhale ANY particles. Of course this rebuttal doesn't count the
involuntary lung discharge immediately following the first bite of a
powdered sugar donut!
;^)
Chuck
|