T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2705.1 | | SMAUG::WATTUM | OSI Applications Engineering, West | Tue Oct 12 1993 11:25 | 7 |
| I read it - was posted on the wall at the Denver local office.
As I recall, basically the person was pretty pissed about Digital Sales
always getting blamed for the performance of the company - and had
some thoughts on where the blame really should be placed.
--Scott
|
2705.2 | which one? | 36417::CHERSON | the door goes on the right | Tue Oct 12 1993 15:18 | 8 |
| I haven't read that letter yet, but was the sales rep referring to the
article on Lucente and his restructuring of the sales force? I didn't
think it was such a bad article, especially given that it was Business
Week which used to fry Digital weekly. All they were saying was that
there is a new focus and emphasis on sales, whereas there was disdain
and neglect previously.
/d.c.
|
2705.3 | | QBUS::M_PARISE | Southern, but no comfort | Tue Oct 12 1993 15:27 | 4 |
|
I thought the letter in BW was sent to rebut the comments made about
sales at the Atlanta DECUS convention.
|
2705.4 | Get the whole story. | GRANPA::DMITCHELL | | Tue Oct 12 1993 17:16 | 35 |
| Maybe I am overly sensitive, but I see the Business Week(8/30) article
as a real slam against the sales force. Take the title "REVEILLE FOR
DEC'S SLEEPY SALES FORCE". In the article itself we are called
"notoriously weak" and "laid back". By inference we are:
* Not aggresive *Poorly trained *Inexperienced *Looking for a
sales recipe *responsible for Digitals dismal trend
In response to this article Peggy L. Hawkes(Sales Rep.) from
Virginia Beach VA. sent a letter that appeared in the READERS
REPORT section of the 9/20 BUSINESS WEEK.
As a member of Digital's sales force for th past 9 years,
I find it particularly offensive that we as a group continue to
be blamed for the problems facing this company. I have not
withessed and Digital salespeople sleeping in my office. What
I do see is a group of extremely dedicated, committed, and
professional individuals trying to adjust to some major organ-
izational changes.
The sales force did not decide on the technologies, did
not develop the products, or even get to design the marketing
campaigns. Our senior management is out of touch with the
field. How does one sell "IMAGINE" the current marketing
theme for all of our advertising? We don't need a recipe, but
we need solid products for our customers to buy. And after
it's sold, we need systems and people in place that let us
get back in the field to sell instaed of handholding every
single order.
We deserve to be treated with dignity and respect. I'm
disappointed that mangemnet doesn't understand the psychology
of badgering the team. I was taught you can get a horse to
race a lot faster with some sugar than you can by beating
him with a stick.
'Nuff said.
|
2705.5 | Not a question of energy | 36417::CHERSON | the door goes on the right | Wed Oct 13 1993 15:02 | 24 |
| re: .4
Perhaps "sleepy" and "laid back" are the wrong terms to use, and that's
BW's fault. I have worked with all manner of sales reps during the
past several years, and one thing that I can not fault them on is
energy. But if energy alone could generate revenue than I'd be
a millionaire.
What the sales force has lacked over the years is a lack of technique
and application of that technique. It is well documented that IBM's
concentration had been on sales, and ours on technology. Tom Watson
thought that all you needed were well-trained blue suits, and KO
thought that all we needed was the best technology (and he had a
distinct dislike for sales). Well look where both companies are these
days.
The letter to BW does correctly point to a disconnect between marketing
and sales. Perhaps Lucente being a VP of Sales AND Marketing is the
first step in the right direction. What we also desparately need is
for this company to do REAL marketing (strategy/research, etc.) instead
of product pushing whatever exits an engineering group's door or
whomever's pet 3rd party application.
/d.c.
|
2705.6 | No title! | GLDOA::DBOSAK | The Street Peddler | Fri Oct 15 1993 16:20 | 40 |
|
It seems to me that the DEC Sales force was never held in high
esteem by KO. This feeling, I believe, was conveyed all the way to our
customers. The base line was that ..."if you build it, the customers
will buy it." With that as an entry point, who needs a sales force?
Ergo, we could staff the sales force with wannabes who thought they
could go out and sell when in fact they were never more than order takers.
They used the phrase: "Strategic Investment" as a cover for "Gimme an
allowance."
Times change.
As we have discovered (Corporately) there is a litle saying that is
painfully true: "nothing happens until somebody sells something."
Note the two key words: Somebody and Something -- I believe the sales
force, as currently constituted, can sell. I believe the current
products are the Something. The trick is to get everyone in the
corporation to understand that the terms "Something and Somebody" have
to be in concert.
I believe that with Palmer and Lucente we are getting the
corporation going in one direction. IMHO, I believe that the sales
force needs to get an attitude. In my office, I see lotsa sales folks
busting their buts chasing deals using a good amount of creativeness.
I see them getting Pissed off because the competition is out there
trying to take away their deals. I hope that other offices are
experiencing the same attitude readjustment.
Regarding exhuberence and high energy. I had a customer tell me one
time that he doesn't pay for productivity, he pays for results -- he
pays for the paper on the table (as he said.) Sooooo, U can bounce
around the office like ricochet rabbit and not get any deals -- All
that energy only matters if U put paper on the table.
My .02
Dennis
|
2705.7 | Billions of dollars in sales. | CSC32::D_ROYER | Chi beve birra campa cent'anni. | Mon Oct 25 1993 18:08 | 19 |
| I sent a message to John Rando, about a opening of the government
regualations.
No IRS purchase of computer hardware or software now is required to
come from a GSA catalogue. This means that if they move quickly
Digital can bring the U.S. Treasury department up into the modern age.
They want to make 3 or 4 new central hubs, and tye all of the computer
equipment together so they can use workstations, laser printers, and
electronic mail. This sale if done could make Digital one of the
largest suppliers of equipment in this former IBM fortress.
Have I had a reply? NO!
I asked him to forward the mail if he was not the proper person to send
the message to, but I have heard nothing.
So much for SALES LEADS.
Dave
|
2705.8 | | THEBAY::CHABANED | Spasticus Dyslexicus | Mon Oct 25 1993 18:33 | 11 |
|
Dave,
Rest assured that someone has taken the information you so freely
offered and is keeping it a secret so that it can be used later to
parlay into a big raise.
Credit will not be given where it is due.
-Ed
|
2705.9 | Resend | ICS::DONNELLAN | | Tue Oct 26 1993 00:40 | 7 |
| re .7:
Resend your original memo. It may have gotten lost in the shuffle.
Some of these folks receive over a hundred memos a day and
understandably cannot get it all done. I suspect you'll get a response
the second time.
|
2705.10 | What happened to TMAC? | NEWVAX::MZARUDZKI | I AXPed it, and it is thinking... | Tue Oct 26 1993 09:59 | 14 |
|
re .7
I work in the Treasury, could you forward me the memo. If the IRS
bypasses GSA you can rest assured other departments will follow. This
is politics, ya'know.
Mike Zarudzki @cop
Tony Celeste @cop
NEWVAX::MZARUDZKI
GRANMA::TCELESTE
Thanks in advance.
-Mike Z.
|