T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2427.1 | Heard about a 7 and 7 | LACGID::BIAZZO | How low can we go? | Tue Mar 23 1993 12:49 | 7 |
| A fairly high level manager at my site commented that he expected another early
retirement incentive package similar to the last except that this one
would be based on 7 and 7. ie add 7 years to your age and 7 years to your
years of service.
I guess that would entitle 48 year olds with 3 years of service to retire.
|
2427.2 | Seagrams 7 and 7? | ZENDIA::TBOYLE | | Tue Mar 23 1993 15:38 | 4 |
| Seagrams 7 and 7?
Tom
|
2427.3 | | REGENT::BLOCHER | | Wed Mar 24 1993 03:04 | 8 |
| I'll drink to that!
(sorry, I couldn't help myself)
Marie
|
2427.4 | I'll believe it when I see it... | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Wed Mar 24 1993 16:34 | 4 |
| I doubt that the company could afford to provide an early
retirement package that would be much of an incentive for people to
leave...especially after the last fiasco. So I have a hard time
believing that any such plan exists.
|
2427.5 | Aloha | XLIB::SCHAFER | Mark Schafer, ISV Tech. Support | Wed Mar 24 1993 17:54 | 3 |
| I also have trouble believing that they could go 7-7, but it's kinda
fun to think about the possibilities... moving someplace where "sleet"
and "freezing rain" is unknown...
|
2427.6 | | CVG::THOMPSON | Radical Centralist | Wed Mar 24 1993 18:09 | 11 |
| Going to 7-7 would probably not go over will with people who took the
last SERP. If there is an other SERP it's likely that the offer will
be the same or less then the last one.
The last one had more people take it then they expected from what I've
heard. I've also heard a couple of people who could have taken the last
one express regrets that they didn't. With the passing of time and more
people being able to take a 5-5 as well as others who wished they had
taken the last one a 5-5 SERP might just work.
Alfred
|
2427.7 | | MAYES::FRETTS | at the turning point... | Wed Mar 24 1993 18:55 | 5 |
|
Well, if a 7-7 is being considered, why not just make it a 10-5....that
way *I* could take it too! :^)
Carole
|
2427.8 | Sure would be nice. | ODIXIE::SMITHJ | | Wed Mar 24 1993 19:47 | 5 |
| I keep hearing the same thing, "7 + 7". The original date was supposed
to be early march. My distric manager was the last source I have heard.
Heres hopeing!!!!!!
Jim
|
2427.9 | One can dream 8^) | DYPSS1::COGHILL | Steve Coghill, Luke 14:28 | Wed Mar 24 1993 22:14 | 2 |
| NO! Not March. It has to wait until July. If I waits until July
then I'm eligible.
|
2427.10 | Wishful thinking | ICS::DONNELLAN | | Thu Mar 25 1993 03:28 | 4 |
| I've checked on this rumor and could find nothing. Is this one just
wishful thinking? It's no trivial matter to accomplish this as filings
are required with the federal government well in advance of the actual
offer. Retirement funds are apparently closely regulated.
|
2427.11 | Clarification.... | GRANPA::MLOUGHERY | | Thu Mar 25 1993 12:56 | 21 |
| What do you need to qualify for early retirement if there is one?
7-7 is a benefit of the package. The last package, which was 5-5,
meant that they would add 5 years to your age and 5 years to your
length of service. In no way did it mean that the five years would
be added to your age to qualify for the package. If you were 55,
and had 4 years with the company, you could not qualify for the
package, because you only had 4 years. If you had 5 years with the
company, you would go out as though you were 60 with 10 years with
the company. That is the 5-5. 7-7 does not tell us what the youngest
requirement age or the least time with the company. If it is like the
last one, 7 years will be added to your age and 7 years will be added
to your length of service, after you qualify. The question is how
old do you have to be and how long with the
company
before you can qualify for the 7-7?
|
2427.12 | | THATS::FULTI | | Thu Mar 25 1993 13:13 | 16 |
| <<< Note 2427.11 by GRANPA::MLOUGHERY >>>
-< Clarification.... >-
> What do you need to qualify for early retirement if there is one?
> 7-7 is a benefit of the package. The last package, which was 5-5,
> meant that they would add 5 years to your age and 5 years to your
> length of service. In no way did it mean that the five years would
> be added to your age to qualify for the package. If you were 55,
Thats not my understanding, the 5 & 5 meant that if I was 50 with 5 years
service then I could retire with the benefits of someone 55 years old with
10 years of service (the bare minimum).
So, 7 & 7 would mean that you need to be at least 53 years of age with 3 years
of service.
- George
|
2427.13 | Minimum age 53 or 48? | ICS::SOBECKY | Cabin fever | Thu Mar 25 1993 13:57 | 7 |
|
re -1
I'm a bit confused...is the minimum age for retirement 55 or 60?
If 55, then minimum age for a 7&7 package would be 48, correct?
John
|
2427.14 | 48 is it | 10744::DMILLER | | Thu Mar 25 1993 14:51 | 4 |
| Correct - the minimum age to retire from DEC is 55. The years they
give with the package, when added to your real age, has to come to 55
or more for you to be eligible to retire. For 7-7, 48 years old would
be the youngest eligible.
|
2427.15 | Vested Benefits prior to Retirement | ELMAGO::JMORALES | | Thu Mar 25 1993 16:17 | 10 |
| Vested Benefits - this is the legal term the companies are using
which supports the minimum length of service in
a company to have the right to collect retirement
funds. This has been re-defined by law in 1986/87
to be five (5) years of service.
However, vested benefits, assumes that you are 62 years that is the
legal retirement age. If the company (in this case DEC) wants to
improve on this with any SERP package, my guess is that at minimum, the
employees will have to be 'vested' or have five years of service.
|
2427.16 | | SANFAN::ALSTON_JO | | Thu Mar 25 1993 16:25 | 8 |
| Re .15
I believe that this is correct and was the criteria used for the
SERP. The author of .11 has confused the issue of being vested with
the criteria for retirement of those that are vested.
It is true that if a person only has 4 years with the company that
SERP did not apply, but if a person was vested, the last package
added 5 years to ones age for the purpose of eligibility.
|
2427.17 | | THEBAY::CHABANED | SBS is a crime against mankind | Thu Mar 25 1993 16:42 | 14 |
|
Personally, I don't care what happens as long as there is something
left in the fund for the Gen-X folks when our time comes.
What I fear is that the young (who are being laid off in inordinate
numbers BTW!) will be left holding the bag again.
To some, I may sound like a crybaby, but between Prop 13 in
California, a screwed up Social Security System and *HUGE* severence
plans paid out to folks who were fortunate enough to be born in the
boom, things are pretty lousy for me and my littermates.
-Ed_born_in_the_1960's_and_was_too_young_for_Woodstock
|
2427.18 | 55+5 = 60, 22+5 = 27 ...67% of a 27yr retirement | SAHQ::BEAZLEY | | Thu Mar 25 1993 16:51 | 10 |
| At 55(actual or 'contrived by equation') you are eligible to 50% of
your normal retirement, at 60... 67%, and at 65... 100%.
In addition you must have at least ten years(actual or 'contrived by
equation') to be eligible for ANY retirement benefits.
Notice the % amounts don't accumulate linearly between ages 55 and 65.
Bob[SERPer, who wouldn't be disgruntled with whatever a new SERP
package would involve]
|
2427.19 | Before we too excited, remember that retirement ... | YUPPIE::COLE | Follow your elected leadership .... Baaaaaaaaaaa! | Fri Mar 26 1993 03:31 | 1 |
| ... is a LONG-TERM liability to DEC, TFSO, isn't.
|
2427.20 | It doesn't get them off the hook, tho.. | ICS::SOBECKY | Cabin fever | Fri Mar 26 1993 13:01 | 7 |
|
re -1
Regardless. We are still entitled to retirement benefits that we
have accrued whether our departure is voluntary or not.
John
|
2427.21 | terminology | SOFBAS::SHERMAN | | Fri Mar 26 1993 13:12 | 2 |
| What does "7-7" refer to? Years to add to (what?) to arrive at (what?)
Minimum age to retire early?
|
2427.22 | | SANFAN::ALSTON_JO | | Fri Mar 26 1993 15:07 | 11 |
| Re .19
Retirement is a long term liability, but there is a liability there
even if the employee is TFSO'd. The costs that are incurred are
only the sweetner(if any) and the increased payments caused by the
added years of eligibility. I'm sure that the financials are
closely examined before early retirement is offered.
Re .21
7-7, seven years added to one's age for the purpose of
eligibility - seven years added to one's seniority for the purposes of
computing the pension benefits.
|
2427.23 | One can only hope | EARRTH::MBUCKMAN | | Fri Mar 26 1993 16:29 | 8 |
| I wish the base noter had attached a copy of the March 16 article
in VOGON news that mentioned another SERP. Does anybody have a copy ?
I for one would take it this time if offered. I am sure I'm not
alone !
Bucky
|
2427.24 | No SERPs during layoffs ??? | KYOA::SOZZLE::boyle | Dirty Jobs Done Dirt Cheap | Fri Mar 26 1993 17:01 | 4 |
| I don't know if this is true. However, I understand that SERPs can not be offered at the
same time as layoffs. I'm not sure if it is true or why, but some food for thought...
Jack B.
|
2427.27 | re .23: Aren't rumors fun? | PTPM06::TALCOTT | | Sat Mar 27 1993 18:11 | 9 |
| The reason you haven't seen the article from VNS that mentioned another SERP is
that the article *did not* say there was such a beast. It said,
(paraphrasing because I no longer have that day's input hanging around):
Employment will drop through a combination of layoffs, attrition and early
retirement.
No program announcement there, no 7-7, no anything else.
Trace
|
2427.28 | Vestment = benefit qualification? | GLDOA::MORRISON | Dave | Sat Mar 27 1993 23:58 | 2 |
| re: .18 - What then does being vested at 5 years mean if it requires 10
years service to get any retirement benefits? Thanks.
|
2427.29 | | WHEEL::WTHOMPSON | | Mon Mar 29 1993 12:12 | 5 |
| You are vested at 5 years and can draw a retirement benefit at age 65.
To draw an early retirement you must be an ACTIVE employee 55 years old
or older with 10 years of service.
|
2427.30 | | SAHQ::BEAZLEY | | Mon Mar 29 1993 14:29 | 19 |
| As I understand it if you are not vested you will receive your
contribution in cash upon leaving. If you are invested your
contribution and Digital's is kept in a fund until you reach
retirement.
If you choose to retire(either early, normal, working for DEC or not)
you are eligible for your retirement based on your age(50% at 55, 67%
at 60, 100% at 65). This can either be in lump sum payout, IRA
rollover, or a company pension of which the payment is based on
spouse survivor benefits.
When you leave the company and you are vested you must "let it ride"
until you retire. If you retire you may do the same or take some form
of payout. Wherever you work after DEC and there is a pension plan you
will get the sum of all pension plans when you retire.
Thats the way I understand it,
Bob[retired.....well sorta]
|
2427.31 | | GSFSYS::MACDONALD | | Mon Mar 29 1993 14:46 | 31 |
|
Re: .30
>As I understand it if you are not vested you will receive your
>contribution in cash upon leaving.
Whether or not you receive it in cash depends upon the cash value
of it at that time not upon whether you are vested or not. The cutoff
was $3500 a few years ago. You received it in cash if it was less
than that and if more then it stayed with the plan until you retired.
>contribution and Digital's is kept in a fund until you reach
>retirement.
We make no contribution's to the retirement plan. All contributions
are made by the company.
>If you choose to retire(either early, normal, working for DEC or not)
>you are eligible for your retirement based on your age(50% at 55, 67%
>at 60, 100% at 65). This can either be in lump sum payout, IRA
>rollover, or a company pension of which the payment is based on
>spouse survivor benefits.
You can only get the lump sum payment if you are a Digital employee
when you retire. If you leave DEC before retirement that option
will not be available to you when you do retire.
Steve
|
2427.32 | does every have access to vtx benefits? | RUNAWY::RESYNC::THOMPSON | Notes from a native son | Mon Mar 29 1993 15:39 | 80 |
|
Digital U.S. Employee Benefits Book-1992 Edition
8.5 Basics: How the Pension Plan from Digital works . . .
8.5.1 When you have a right to your pension benefit even if you
leave Digital before retiring
If you leave Digital before working for five years, you will not
receive a pension benefit from the company unless you are age 65
or older when you leave. That is because you are not "vested" in
the plan. Vesting means that you have a nonforfeitable right to
receive a pension benefit when you reach retirement age, even if
you leave Digital before then.
When you have worked at Digital for five years, you are 100%
vested. This means that you have a right to receive 100% of your
accrued pension benefit at retirement, as the accompanying chart
shows. One exception: If you are age 65 or older with at least
one full year of vesting service, you are automatically 100%
vested.
Years of vesting Nonforfeitable portion of your pension
service benefit
1 year 0%
2 years 0%
3 years 0%
4 years 0%
5 years 100%*
*At age 65 with one year of vesting service, you automatically
are 100% vested.
8.5.2 How your years of vesting service are counted
Your time for vesting purposes starts on your hire date. The way
vesting service is counted depends on when you started working
for Digital. More specifically:
o If you were hired on or before June 30, 1979, you have one
year of vesting service as of July 1 following your date of
hire. You earn one year of vesting service every July 1 after
that. For example, if you were hired on October 1, 1969,
your first year of vesting service was credited as of July 1,
1970, your second year as of July 1, 1971, and so on.
o If you were hired after June 30, 1979, you earn one year of
vesting service on each anniversary of your hire date. For
example, if you were hired on October 1, 1984, you earned
one year of vesting service on October 1, 1985, two years on
October 1, 1986, and so on.
8.5.3 When you can begin receiving your pension benefit
You can actually receive pension benefits when you leave Digital
if you are:
o Vested and your vested pension benefit has a present value
of $3,500 or less. (If the present value of your pension is
more than $3,500 when you leave, you must wait until you are
age 55 or older to begin receiving it.) See page 8.37 for an
explanation of "present value."
o At least age 55 with five or more years of vesting service.
o At least age 65 with one or more years of vesting service.
Refer to the section "If you stop working at Digital" on page
8.11 for more information on how you can collect your vested
pension if you leave Digital before retiring.
|
2427.33 | | POBOX::RILEY | I *am* the D.J. | Mon Mar 29 1993 17:33 | 12 |
| hope this isn't too far off the subject...
If you die before you reach retirement age (which I probably will),
are pension benefits paid to your benefeciary or are they retained by
the company/trust/whatever?
"jackin' the house", Bob (who's 16-year DEC anniversary is next week,
but is STILL waiting for his 15-year award
despite repeated requests to management for
the past YEAR!!!!)
|
2427.34 | You get to pick | STAR::DIPIRRO | | Tue Mar 30 1993 12:25 | 5 |
| There are two "modes" of payment if I understand it correctly, one
where the benefit is paid only to you and the other, a lesser amount,
which will be paid to you or to your spouse if you die before
retirement age. The default is the latter method, but you can select
the former with Personnel if you want.
|
2427.35 | If you die... | 11SRUS::POITRAS | | Tue Mar 30 1993 22:40 | 25 |
| From 1991 Benefits book:
"If you are married and die before retiring, federal law has given your
current spouse (unless otherwise required by a Qualified Domestic
Relations Order, see page 8.37) the right to a portion of your vested
pension benefit. For more information, see page 8.13.
If you are married and die after retiring but before receiving your
pension, your spouse is entitled to half the benefit you would have
received if you had elected a Joint with 50% Survivor Income Option.
This is true even if you had previously selected another option.
If you are single and die before retiring, you pension benefit will be
forfeited.
If you are single and die after retiring but before receiving your
pension, your pension benefit will be forfeited.
If you are married or single and die after retiring and after your
payment(s) have begun, only a named beneficiary of a Joint with Survivor
Benefit will continue to receive your pension benefit. If you had taken
your benefit as a lump sum or a life income, no further benefits will
be paid. See pages 8.21 through 8.26 for more details."
Mac
|