T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2414.1 | ontogony recapitulates philogony | SOFBAS::SHERMAN | | Fri Mar 12 1993 12:01 | 16 |
| Language is cheapened for many reasons. One reason is to confuse, which
is maddening since the only way we have to communicate is through
language. Another reason is to create a false sense of increased
professionalism or competence. The prime guilty party here is
education. Thus, "classroom" becomes "positive enhanced learning
environment," and "rotten kid" becomes "student experiencing negative
peer-self actualization."
Organizational name changes that serve no discernable purpose commonly
occur during times of uncertainty, when people who are worrying about
their jobs hope that a change in appearance will somehow be mistaken
for a change in performance.
kbs
|
2414.2 | What's in a name | CSC32::N_WALLACE | | Fri Mar 12 1993 12:35 | 12 |
|
Reminds me of a book I read about 10 years back. "Winning Images" was
the title. The premise of it was " What's in a name?....Everything!".
Corporations spend millions on names in the hope it will improve an
image. Groups do the same, but on a smaller scale.
In the end, it's all smoke 'n mirrors. They can run but they can't
hide.
Neil
|
2414.3 | an appropiate quote for this note discussion | STAR::ABBASI | i think iam psychic | Fri Mar 12 1993 12:56 | 10 |
|
"a name by any other rose just smell as good"
by shakspehere.
i always wanted the chance to use that quote .
\bye
\nasser
|
2414.4 | | ECADSR::SHERMAN | Steve ECADSR::Sherman DTN 223-3326 MLO5-2/26a | Fri Mar 12 1993 13:09 | 5 |
| Here, now. No need to get upset. Part of reorganization (which
nowadays is A Good Thing To Do) is to rename the organizations. In
fact, sometimes that's ALL you need to do to reorganize ... ;^)
Steve
|
2414.5 | nothing changes | POCUS::BOESCHEN | | Fri Mar 12 1993 13:29 | 1 |
| We change the name to protect the guilty.
|
2414.6 | HRO versus Personnel | BEAGLE::BREICHNER | | Fri Mar 12 1993 13:51 | 16 |
| My favorite discussion topic with "HRO" people:
The change from "Personnel" Rep, Dept.. to "HRO" isn't that innocent:
"Personnel" kind a contained "Person, personality"......
(usually something you can't manage)
"Human Resources" sounds like "Another resource that incidently
(unfortunately ?) happens to be human.
(resources are easy to mange)
This is why I am happy that there still are a few "HRO" reps left who
forgot or ignore the change...
As our U.S collegues use to say:"Your milage may vary"
/fred
|
2414.7 | How's that in the Army ? | BEAGLE::BREICHNER | | Fri Mar 12 1993 13:57 | 6 |
| BTW:
Can someone update me on military terminology ?
Do anti-personnel mines, etc still exist or have they changed as
well to anti-human resources mines, etc.
Just curious,
Fred
|
2414.8 | | MU::PORTER | savage pencil | Fri Mar 12 1993 14:16 | 8 |
| re .-1
I expect so. The military crowd are one of the major exponents
of confusing nomenclature ("collateral damage", etc).
Although to pick up on your actual example, no, they wouldn't
have "anti-human-resource-mines". That makes it far too
obvious that someone's getting killed by them!
|
2414.9 | What Would They Like To Be Called TOMORROW? | MSDOA::JENNINGS | | Fri Mar 12 1993 15:21 | 12 |
| This is indeed a maddening subject. As if we don't have enough
to do just to keep up with the latest and greatest new product
acronyms, every time a new bozo takes over an organization he/she
almost feels compelled to change the organization's name/acronym.
My favorite is the Field order management group... Only a short
time back they were CAS (Customer Administrative Services). Then
someone got the brainstorm that they should be called OMS (order
management services). NOW they've changed to Logistics (whatever)
just to keep us further confused. Not only did they manage to
change their name again, but it's now redundant with the Customer
Services (formerly Field Service!!!!) parts organization. Don't
ya just wish Bob Palmer would say "STOP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"?
|
2414.10 | pretty good! | BOOKS::HAMILTON | All models are false; some are useful - Dr. G. Box | Fri Mar 12 1993 15:32 | 6 |
|
I saw a name recently that I *really* liked. No BS, straightforward.
The company is called 'Phil's Pretty Good Software'.
Glenn
|
2414.11 | | GLDOA::PENFROY | Just Do It or Just Say No? | Fri Mar 12 1993 15:49 | 14 |
|
> <<< Note 2414.9 by MSDOA::JENNINGS >>>
> -< What Would They Like To Be Called TOMORROW? >-
> change their name again, but it's now redundant with the Customer
> Services (formerly Field Service!!!!) parts organization. Don't
Tsk, tsk, tsk. Everyone knows it's called "MULTI-VENDOR Customer
Services!"
At least that's what they're calling it today.
-=- Paul
|
2414.12 | my hopefully humorous two cents | FASDER::HHOLMES | | Fri Mar 12 1993 16:07 | 11 |
| re:.11
Let's get the name right.......Multivendor (small v no hyphen) Customer
Service........ . .
\ /
( as told too me by the MCS Business manager last week when I also
made the same mistake)
FWIW (smile)
|
2414.13 | | ICS::CROUCH | Subterranean Dharma Bum | Fri Mar 12 1993 16:43 | 6 |
| I've called that group Field Service for years and will continue to.
When I do people know what group I'm talking about. MCS? I doubt it,
and when they do someone will change it again.
Jim C.
|
2414.14 | ;-) | SA1794::CHARBONND | self is in mutiny | Fri Mar 12 1993 18:01 | 2 |
| Used to be a 'Warehouser.' Now a 'Logistics Associate.' Still have
to drive a forklift every day. Go figure.
|
2414.15 | Customer driven? | RANGER::BRADLEY | Chuck Bradley | Fri Mar 12 1993 20:17 | 8 |
|
How do these name changes cause increased customer satisfaction?
What customers asked for them?
Who has committed to how much extra profit because of them?
Is this what "The New Digital" means?
ditto for the new logo.
|
2414.16 | Customers laugh | FUNYET::ANDERSON | Cut spending first | Fri Mar 12 1993 20:27 | 9 |
| Customers laugh when they hear that Digital has renamed something so simple and
honest as "Field Service" to a term that no-one will remember or understand and
is as meaningless as "Customer Services" or "Multivendor Customer Services".
For a while, I tried to refer to Field Service as Customer Services but I got
blank stares until I said Field Service.
These stupid names hurt our credibility with customers.
Paul
|
2414.17 | sylables... | HIBOB::KRANTZ | Next window please. | Fri Mar 12 1993 21:52 | 8 |
| George Carlin did a routine about names of things changing.
He pointed out that the new names usually had more sylables that
the old name, and that this was to REMOVE meaning from the words...
He had an example that I can't remember most of that started
with WWI soldiers being 'shell shocked', I've forgotten
what it was in WWII and Korea, but by the time Vietnam rolled
around, it wa Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome...
|
2414.18 | PRODUCT NAMING | GLDOA::SEVIC | | Sat Mar 13 1993 01:04 | 6 |
| Speaking of names, who names the systems that us in
field/customer/mult*ender service have to determine what the
product are. Example PM36B = a decstation 5000/240 a PCW10 is a
PC433 workstation and so on. This does make things a little
confusing for us and the customer. Like someone said earlier
call it what it is.
|
2414.19 | | CSOADM::ROTH | ELVIS:: is alive... and reachable!! | Sat Mar 13 1993 02:15 | 2 |
| Another chameleon (sp) product.... this week it is called PathWorks, before
that it was 1 or two other names... LANworks...?!?!
|
2414.20 | Only the names have changed! | SUBWAY::CATANIA | | Sat Mar 13 1993 12:55 | 9 |
| Whats worse is when someone give a presentation or meeting using the
accronyms for theses new names, and never bothers to tell us (who don't
carry the latest version of the digital dictionary in our head) what
the heck they are talking about. It seems as it is just another way
that they think they are superior to us!
The names have changed only to protect the incompetant! :-)
- Mike
|
2414.21 | | MU::PORTER | pledge week - send me some money | Sat Mar 13 1993 17:24 | 19 |
| >Example PM36B = a decstation 5000/240 a PCW10 is a
>PC433 workstation and so on. This does make things a little
>confusing for us and the customer
I think the problem there is that a 'thing' needs a name of sorts
almost as soon as you start working on it - that's when the
'part name' or 'part number' (the PM36B one) gets assigned.
Much later on, product management or marketing figure out where
they want to position it in the product set, and come up
with the name by which it's known to the real world.
Also, consider that 'things' as manufactured are not the
same as 'things' that are sold. Example, you could
have a mythical FOO32 system unit being sold in
the "DEC 1234567/12345" configuration and the "DEC 1234567/12346"
configurations. Manufacturing still only builds
one sort of FOO32 box.
|
2414.22 | For once, | NEWVAX::SGRIFFIN | DTN 339-5391 | Sat Mar 13 1993 21:02 | 7 |
| > <<< Note 2414.19 by CSOADM::ROTH "ELVIS:: is alive... and reachable!!" >>>
>
>Another chameleon (sp) product.... this week it is called PathWorks, before
>that it was 1 or two other names... LANworks...?!?!
This change was legitimate. There is a company in Maryland that already had
LANworks as a trademark.
|
2414.23 | | DPDMAI::DAWSON | t/hs+ws=Formula for the future | Sun Mar 14 1993 21:56 | 6 |
|
A simple "fan" is no longer just a fan...its an "air moving
device" and if you call it anything else your not gonna get what you
need. Go figure!
Dave
|
2414.24 | some thought on the big picture that led to this prblem | STAR::ABBASI | i think iam psychic | Mon Mar 15 1993 00:55 | 30 |
| i really think the world is getting too complicated, we dont need to
complicate it any more, i been deeply thinking in this matter and i
have decided that computers, yes, computers, is the sole source of all
these problems the world is facing whether it be in the business levels
which is what DEC is about or the socio-political-ebvironmental-emotional
platforms, any level you look at you can see the world is getting more
complicated, and this renaming of products and entities within the DEC
managements structures is only a flicker of symptoms of the main problems
that faces as for now and beyond and for all to see as the world turns
around for our future generations and beyond in the distance horizons.
i dont know what is the solutions, but many of us old timers remember
the good old days where simple life was the pre dominant and no
computers where around and you never heard of these complications of
life as we see now and around any corner we uncover.
i think it is worth while it for every DECeee to set down and reflect and
ponder on this and postulate on the impact of computers and
take it as face value for whatever it is, and always remember
that computers are here to help us live a happy and
long life and not to make our lives more complicated as the leaves of
the winter passes over all of us on the long road across the river
of living.
thank you for listening and giving me the opportunity to express my
thought on this subject which iam sure might vibrate deep emotional
feeling among every DECeee since computers after all is our bread
and better for all of us and our loved ones for all and all.
\nasser
|
2414.25 | ;-) | ARCANA::CONNELLY | it's Cards-on-the-Table Time! | Mon Mar 15 1993 02:03 | 7 |
|
re: .23
Hey, like i always say, no point worrying til the fecal waste by-product
impacts the rotary air circulator!
paul
|
2414.26 | | TRUCKS::QUANTRILL_C | | Mon Mar 15 1993 07:17 | 11 |
| Re: .3
Actually : "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet"
(Though whether anyone would be as pleased to say "my boyfriend
sent me 2 dozen red stinkworts", no matter how well they
smelt I don't know.
Re: .10
Apparently there is a company out there somewhere called
"Two guys and a VAX"
Cathy
|
2414.27 | | AXEL::FOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Mon Mar 15 1993 12:06 | 6 |
| RE: .26
It's now called TGV. They make a very good VMS based TCP/IP
from what I understand.
mike
|
2414.28 | re: .17 | SOFBAS::SHERMAN | | Mon Mar 15 1993 13:30 | 19 |
| Carlin's routine goes like this:
Language has become more complicated in order to obscure. Also to
create an image of greater professionalism for those involved with the
subject.
In World War I we had "shell shock." Two syllables. Clear. Right to
the point.
In WWII, this had become "com.bat fa.tigue." Four syllables. Less
clear.
In Vietnam we got "post trau.mat.ic stress dis.or.der." Eight syllables.
Completely unclear. Don't have a clue what it means without an
explanation from a "professional."
kbs
|
2414.29 | TGV nit rathole | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Mon Mar 15 1993 15:04 | 5 |
| Nit - "TGV" never officially meant "two guys and a VAX" - it's an
abbreviation of some French phrase (makes sense for a Santa Cruz based
outfit?) that I can't remember, but "two guys and a VAX" became sort of
a joke colloquialism for the company. Or so I understand. These days
they have a bunch more than two employees.
|
2414.30 | some thoughts on names and their power as related to company name | STAR::ABBASI | i think iam psychic | Mon Mar 15 1993 15:49 | 15 |
| isn't "two guys and a VAx" not a PC name? should that not be instead
"two persons and a VAX" ?
i think a company name should be selected to be a PC name.
i think too that names are important because they give a feeling to
what is behind the name. a trade name is also very important. allot of
people buy based on names and the reflection they get from it after
many years of seeing it. that is why i think too that we should make
our company name more popular than it is , many people outside
masshshsusshshstes and new Hamshire dont know what DEC is or where it
is and that should be changed.
\bye
\nasser
|
2414.31 | | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Mon Mar 15 1993 16:41 | 2 |
| Since VAXes aren't PCs, it shouldn't be a requirement for them to pick a
PC name...
|
2414.32 | | MARX::GRIER | mjg's holistic computing agency | Mon Mar 15 1993 16:47 | 9 |
| RE: .29:
Paul, are you sure? Isn't TGV also the name of the very fast French
railway?
I had always understood that the company TGV did in fact stand for
Two Guys and a VAX.
-mjg
|
2414.33 | | GUIDUK::FARLEE | Insufficient Virtual...um...er... | Mon Mar 15 1993 17:31 | 4 |
| My understanding is that TGV stands for the same French phrase that
the TGV train is named for, and which roughly translates
(I'm sure that I will be corrected here) as "Very Very Fast".
|
2414.34 | not so TGV Mr Carlin.... | SMURF::WALTERS | | Mon Mar 15 1993 18:01 | 26 |
2414.35 | | THEBAY::CHABANED | SBS is a crime against mankind | Mon Mar 15 1993 18:29 | 4 |
|
Trop Grande Vitesse?
|
2414.36 | you're a WHAT? | ROBOAT::HEBERT | Captain Bligh | Mon Mar 15 1993 18:34 | 13 |
| Well, the majority of the tech writers in Digital used to be in Corporate
User Publications. That was unacceptable. It was changed to Corporate
User Information Products. *That* was unacceptable. Now we're Information
Design and Consulting (IDC for short).
We used to be writers and course developers. Now we're Information
Providers.
We used to have Managers and Supervisors. Now we'll have Performance
Design Leaders and Coaches. There are Resource Coaches and Business
Coaches.
It'll all go in a management text book some day...
|
2414.37 | | THEBAY::CHABANED | SBS is a crime against mankind | Mon Mar 15 1993 19:03 | 7 |
|
Reminds me of an episode of the Flintstones where Fred takes a
job as a "Resident Stationary Engineer"
That's "Janitor" folks!
-Ed
|
2414.38 | | TOPDOC::AHERN | Dennis the Menace | Mon Mar 15 1993 19:46 | 10 |
| RE: .36 by ROBOAT::HEBERT
>Well, the majority of the tech writers in Digital used to be in
>Corporate User Publications. That was unacceptable. It was changed to
>Corporate User Information Products. *That* was unacceptable. Now we're
>Information Design and Consulting (IDC for short).
Look on the bright side. At least we talked them out of calling it
"Knowledge Solutions".
|
2414.39 | For the linguistically challenged. | A1VAX::GUNN | I couldn't possibly comment | Mon Mar 15 1993 19:48 | 8 |
2414.40 | | STAR::BECK | Paul Beck | Mon Mar 15 1993 20:00 | 9 |
| re .32 re .29 (am I sure?) -
No, just passing along something I'd read, which doesn't equate with
certainty.
(Spreading rumors is another was of putting it, I suppose...)
Tres Grand Vitesse does ring a bell as sounding like what I'd read
(what's French for "mixed metaphors"?).
|
2414.41 | TGV rathole continued... | SUSANJ::FUSCI | DEC has it (on backorder) NOW! | Mon Mar 15 1993 21:18 | 6 |
| re: TGV
The way I hear it, it used to be "Two Guys and a VAX", but now that they've
grown, it's "Ten Guys and a VAXcluster".
Ray
|
2414.42 | | RT128::BATES | NAS-ty Boy | Mon Mar 15 1993 22:48 | 21 |
|
Actually at last count it was Twenty Five Guys/Gals and a VAX.
BTW, this is one slick outfit with some GREAT software.
Developer software engineers answer the support phones - this gives the
engineers a clear, direct and strong incentive to make their releases
as bug free as possible, their software as easy to use as possible and
their documentation as clear as possible. As a result they wind up with
far fewer calls and much happier customers.
They keep a FULLY stocked gourmet kitchen which is available to all
employees 24 hours a day. This includes a fridge full of soda, juice,
fruit, etc. and a freezer full of milky ways. :-) They also do special
things on different days of the week - one day is bagel and cream
cheese day with all sorts of fancy flavors of cream cheese, etc. The
reasoning is that their employees will probably spend long hours at
work and they want to make them as comfortable as possible.
-Joe
|
2414.43 | What's in a name, indeed! | TRUCKS::QUANTRILL_C | | Tue Mar 16 1993 09:10 | 12 |
| Re " .37
"Resident Stationary Engineer"
^
or
"Resident Stationery Engineer"?
^
Could get a guy a bad name!!! :-)
Cathy
|
2414.44 | We do know TGV... | BEAGLE::BREICHNER | | Tue Mar 16 1993 11:19 | 10 |
| re: "TGV"
A few folks here in VBO would agree that "TGV" stands for
"Two Guys and a VAX":
There used to be a European Support Model called TGV
(which stood for "Three Geography Version" of the original "TCM,
Three Center Model....)
The results (in VBO) are just about two guys and a VAX left...
:-)
fred
|
2414.45 | TLA combinations | 42702::WELSH | Think it through | Wed Mar 17 1993 06:51 | 13 |
| And for $64K from here in Reading, England...
Compare and contrast:
PSS, SPS, PSG, SPG, SSO, CAS, CSO, ISV, EIS, EIC, ARC, SRS, ESE, SCC...
Candidates should under no circumstances attempt to write on both
sides of the paper at once.
(These are just the ones that immediately spring to mind - we have
hundreds more).
/Tom
|
2414.46 | inquiry on statment by earlier caller | STAR::ABBASI | i am therfore i think | Wed Mar 17 1993 11:38 | 12 |
| > Candidates should under no circumstances attempt to write on both
> sides of the paper at once.
hi Tom, what does the means really means? is it a say? why should one
not write on both sides of the paper? isn't this more cost effective
to do and it saves trees too?
i know you must mean something by it other than the literal sense, but
iam not sure what it is.
\bye
\nasser
|
2414.47 | re .-2 -- I know one of them ! | MU::PORTER | pledge week - send me some money | Wed Mar 17 1993 14:57 | 3 |
| ESE is "European Software Engineering" - back from when Reading engineering
was in Fountain House. I have my ESE poster (featuring I.K.Brunel
and some heavy-duty anchor chains) hung outside my cube in LKG.
|
2414.48 | Dual issue? | 42702::WELSH | Think it through | Thu Mar 18 1993 09:43 | 18 |
| re .46:
>> Candidates should under no circumstances attempt to write on both
>> sides of the paper at once.
>
> hi Tom, what does the means really means? is it a say? why should one
> not write on both sides of the paper? isn't this more cost effective
> to do and it saves trees too?
This is an English in-joke. It's a rough quote from a book
called "1066 and All That", which is a spoof on English history
text books (e.g. "Compare the Dauphin with the Great Seal", etc).
The quote is poking fun at exam paper directions, which often
used to tell you to write on one side of the paper only. In any
event, it's very hard to write on both sides of the paper *at once*.
/Tom
|
2414.49 | Pedant power | YUPPY::PARRYD | | Thu Mar 18 1993 13:04 | 7 |
| re .48
> This is an English in-joke.
Surely you mean a British in-joke, Tom?
dave_P
|
2414.50 | | MU::PORTER | pledge week - send me some money | Thu Mar 18 1993 14:02 | 3 |
| >Surely you mean a British in-joke, Tom?
Depends on whether Mr. Welsh is Welsh, I suppose.
|
2414.51 | Who's British? | SMURF::WALTERS | | Thu Mar 18 1993 15:17 | 12 |
|
> Depends on whether Mr. Welsh is Welsh, I suppose.
If Mr Welsh were Welsh he'd be Mr Cymraeg
as his "Welsh" name is English
However, if he were Welsh, then he *would*
be a Briton (Brython) and not a Saxon (Saesneg)
so his humour *would* be British, not English.
My head hurts now, I'm going to lie down.....
Colin
|
2414.52 | | ROCKS::C_MACKAY | Chris - MCS E&SD @REO 830-4356 | Fri Mar 19 1993 07:58 | 5 |
| No, I think he meant "English" as opposed to "American". After all,
over here, amongst ourselves and those non-native English speakers, we
speak English (or one of it's many dialects!). But, when dealing with
you, i.e. those in the USA, since you don't speak it, we have to fall
back on talking American (yes, even the spellings when writing!).
|
2414.53 | Not English, or Welsh | 42702::WELSH | Think it through | Fri Mar 19 1993 10:55 | 11 |
| Mr Welsh is Scots-Irish (no English blood I'm afraid, and no
Welsh either). "Welsh" is a form of "Wallace", a common Scots
name.
"1066 and All That" is definitely English. You should see the
contemptuous references to the Scots and Irish etc. "running
around in their bogs and pales". Shocking. A disgrace to the
Scottish Empire, in fact... but enough of this, before we
become enmired in national enmity, or even open up a rathole.
/Tom
|
2414.54 | and another name change | ANGLIN::SULLIVAN | Take this job and LOVE it | Tue Mar 23 1993 20:25 | 17 |
|
> I have worked for Field Service, Customer Service, Multi-vendor
> Customer Service (MCS), and probably a few others I can't remember.
and we have a new name in the works for Field Service
WIFE
We Install and Fix Everything
:^)
|