T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2089.1 | | CAFEIN::PFAU | just me and my hammer... | Wed Sep 02 1992 19:15 | 9 |
2089.2 | | CVG::THOMPSON | Radical Centralist | Wed Sep 02 1992 19:17 | 16 |
| > Is there any interest in recycling used magnetic media,
> that is, Magtapes, TK50Ks or 3.5" floppies internally?
I don't know about the tapes but I bet we have a lot of employees
who'd buy the extra 3.5" floppies for use with home PCs. I suspect
that running them through a quick eracing would take care of any
security concerns. The company could probably give employees a real
bargin and still recover most if not all of the origional media cost.
One wouldn't want to sell used media to external customers for a lot
of reasons (quality control, re-labeling, etc) but for employees it
might be ok. I'd buy some.
Suggest the idea through DELTA.
Alfred
|
2089.3 | Are You Kiddin' | WHOS01::BOWERS | Dave Bowers @WHO | Wed Sep 02 1992 19:32 | 8 |
| Considering the perennial scarcity of TK50s and 70s in the field, I
expect if you made the availability of these items known, and allowed
ordering through DIAL, you could get rids of large numbers.
9-track tapes are much less interesting, but 3.5" floppies could, as
noted, find an enthusiastic employee purchase marjet.
\dave
|
2089.4 | DELTA's been Tried | HEAT::BOLD | That is a definite maybe | Wed Sep 02 1992 20:11 | 10 |
| I made the suggestion to DELTA as I have boxes of tapes that only take
up room. I assumed it was studied, but I don't think anything came of
it. I was never given any indication of the final disposition of the
suggestion. This was right after DELTA started, so I assume nothing
was put into place.
The good news is that I don't get anything on mag tape anymore, so the
boxes aren't filling up. I even use one occaisionly to send a customer
some data. I figure at the rate I am going, I have enough tapes to
last until 2010.
|
2089.5 | large numbers | WMOIS::RAINVILLE | Tape engineers get reel wound up! | Wed Sep 02 1992 20:18 | 6 |
| Just for sizing the problem, we are talking about some
20,000 TK50Ks
90,000 MagTapes
Uncounted floppies
mwr
|
2089.6 | We'll take some | XLIB::BRUNELL | Used to be BJ6000::DAVE | Wed Sep 02 1992 21:12 | 5 |
| Our organization regularly makes tapes for third parties. Send me mail
and perhaps we can take some of these off your hands.
Dave Brunell
Independent Software Vendor Group
|
2089.7 | TK50Ks are SCARCE in the field! | GUIDUK::FARLEE | Insufficient Virtual...um...er... | Wed Sep 02 1992 22:23 | 6 |
| Last time we backed up our district DS5000, we had to scrounge TK50s
from the four corners of the earth. We would be GLAD to take some off your
hands!
Please send me mail.
Kevin
|
2089.8 | | WMOIS::RAINVILLE | Tape engineers get reel wound up! | Wed Sep 02 1992 23:29 | 6 |
| Thanks for the response so far. I have forwarded this string and
MAIL> recieved on the subject to the person who has the media.
It would seem there may be some merit in pursuing this. Of course,
the media will have to be de-labeled, degaussed & shipped, and
the cost of shipping will have to be less than local acquisition
of media to be practical. Please continue to respond. mwr
|
2089.9 | I thought we'd given up on recycling 1/2" magtape | 16BITS::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Thu Sep 03 1992 01:12 | 24 |
| A brief history of my personal experiences with 1/2" magtape over the past 15
years in S/W Eng. -
1977-1981 -
Magtape was almost as valuable as hard disks. A lot of what we used as
"scratch media" were tapes we'd gotten from customers. DEC-issue
certified tapes were used only rarely. Tapes were only discarded if
they were physically damaged, fell on the floor, etc.
1981-1987 -
We had a scratch media store available for tapes to be used for
"incidentals", project use, or basically anything not being submitted to
the SDC. "Used once" DEC-issue tapes (e.g. old kits) were used to make
Field test (customer) kits. New DEC-issue certified tapes were used for
anything being submitted to the SDC.
1987-present -
No scratch media is generally available unless you've saved it as such
yourself. If you don't have any "scratch", you get new DEC-issue certified
media for any purpose. Most media is discarded after any use. The ZKO
labs all have D-containers which accumulate viable media for destruction
on a regular basis.
-Jack
|
2089.10 | Our skids runneth over | TLE::AMARTIN | Alan H. Martin | Thu Sep 03 1992 04:42 | 7 |
| >The ZKO labs all have D-containers which accumulate viable media for
>destruction on a regular basis.
In ZK2-3 alone, we're talking a few cubic yards of TK50's, DECtape-II's, 8",
5.25", 9-track (all lengths), various disk packs & cassettes - just about
anything from the past decade but 3.5" floppy and 4mm tape.
/AHM
|
2089.11 | We'll take some! | ETGSYS::RSOMERVILLE | Competitive Teardown & Analysis Ayr | Thu Sep 03 1992 09:46 | 11 |
| We in the Ayr Technology Group would be very grateful for some free
3.5" floppies.
If possible could you send me the E net node of person who has such
spare media.
Robin Somerville
ARRAN::RSOMERVILLE
DTN 823 3277
Is it really Christmas time? :^)
|
2089.12 | PDC STORE | SOLVIT::DESMARAIS | | Thu Sep 03 1992 11:37 | 9 |
| You might want to try using the Property Disposition Center.
DOOVAX::PDCSTORE
DTN 267-2225
267-2315
It can also be found in VTX VTX PDCSTORE
The PDC Store sells used equipment/tools/supplies/etc. to DEC
Employees.
|
2089.13 | We could use about 100 tk50's | MCIS2::COLLETON | THE THIEF OF BADGAGS | Thu Sep 03 1992 12:20 | 10 |
| We can use some tk50's in our group as well...
If you can ship us 100 tk50's that would be great.
send to:
MR02 - LA data center
att:Bill Colleton
Thanks.
|
2089.14 | ...Get in touch... | DVLP00::ABERT | Carl Abert WFO/C8 DTN:242-2521 | Thu Sep 03 1992 12:38 | 6 |
2089.15 | Can always use them in the field...
| OMDEMO::HICKS | Chas Hicks @OMO, WB0LJP | Thu Sep 03 1992 15:47 | 11 |
|
We order TK50's from DECdirect for use in the field all the time
(at a very high price...)
We could easily use 100-200 TK50's and dozens/hundreds of 3.5" floppies.
Is there something we can do to get them?
Thanks..
--chas hicks
OMO
|
2089.16 | | AIMHI::BOWLES | | Thu Sep 03 1992 18:43 | 6 |
| This note seems to have touched a nerve (and a real need). I wonder if
any of the DELTA who read this note could tell us why the original
suggestion was never pursued and, perhaps, how they intent to help with
implementing the plan at this point?
Chet
|
2089.17 | | ESD93::BROWER | | Thu Sep 03 1992 19:20 | 6 |
| Re:-1 It certainly did strike a nerve. Ironically there're probably
hundreds of depts. that throw away stuff that other groups are paying
full price for. I hope the storage media mentioned in re:0 isn't just the
tip of an iceberg of potential cost savings for DEC.
Bob
|
2089.18 | feedback forwarded | WMOIS::RAINVILLE | Tape engineers get reel wound up! | Thu Sep 03 1992 21:02 | 17 |
| The media in question is currently being held at PDC pending
disposition, which will be an incinerator unless an alternative
is found. I entered this note to help those folks asses the internal
'market', if any, for this material. Here at the SSB, we only recycle
media which has not left our control (out-of-rev-on-shelf), as the
small savings we might realize could be overshadowed by any risk of
production or customer problems. I believe the note has served its'
purpose, and i conclude, and will pass on, the following;
Magtapes: No large internal use for this material.
TK50K: Make available internally for some reasonable price.
3.5" RX Make avail. internally & thru PDC store.
There is still the matter of degaussing, delabeling, inspecting,
distributing the material, and setting a reasonable price.
Thanks for the replies and the mail...mwr
|
2089.19 | Why bother with all that process? | MU::PORTER | \0 | Thu Sep 03 1992 21:45 | 11 |
| > There is still the matter of degaussing, delabeling, inspecting,
> distributing the material, and setting a reasonable price.
Given you were going to burn it, which presumably costs money,
what's wrong with simply piling it all in a tub and putting
a notice on it saying "come and get it, it's free". Don't
delabel it, don't degauss it. It's DEC software and this
is DEC, so you're not giving anything away (it's obsolete anyway,
right?). Your bank balance is now zero instead of negative,
so you're ahead, anyway.
|
2089.20 | I agree with .19
| OMDEMO::HICKS | Chas Hicks @OMO, WB0LJP | Thu Sep 03 1992 22:21 | 26 |
|
I agree with .19. We use whatever tapes we can get our hands on
now. We end up using old product distribution tapes now, write
over them and re-label them for our own use.
If you end up pooring additional manpower into this "surplus"
to to enable us to use it then I question it's overall value.
(Although it might save some souls job???!)
Why not just charge $x per 100 tapes for handling/shipping and let us
get at them. If you have thousands, bundle them in quantities of 50
or a hundred. Simple, easy and cheap. One price, almost no handling.
Maybe even make a statement to the effect that we can expect only
80% of them to be useable, or something like that. (No deposit, No
Return)
Make sure everyone knows that they are for internal use only, not
to be re-sold, etc.
--chas
|
2089.21 | Keep it simple!! | GUIDUK::FARLEE | Insufficient Virtual...um...er... | Thu Sep 03 1992 22:34 | 18 |
| I strongly agree.
Set whatever policies need to be set surrounding the use of the media:
* You must de-label it
* You must de-gauss before it goes outside Digital's control
* etc.
Then just make the tapes available for the cost of boxing, shipping, and
handling.
This is all internal to Digital. It should be no different than us
re-using a distribution tape for backups (which we do all the time, since
that's about the only way to get tapes around here...)
Why take on the additional expense if there is not a clear need to do so?
Is there a liability issue that we are missing?
Kevin
|
2089.22 | | OXNARD::KOLLING | Karen/Sweetie/Holly/Little Bit Ca. | Thu Sep 03 1992 23:50 | 12 |
| There are methods in place for making "semi-useless" (i.e., not free)
and "useless" (free. except maybe for shipping charges) material
available to the rest of the corporation.
At least, I remember one of the ordering gurus at DEC src once
mentioning this to me when I was looking at automating their property
info. It probably gets put on some VTX list, but my memory has dimmed.
I can believe that the "original" owners of the magtapes would be
responsible for full erasure before it goes out of their hands, since
that eliminates the possibility of a slipup further down the line.
|
2089.23 | | WMOIS::RAINVILLE | Tape engineers get reel wound up! | Fri Sep 04 1992 00:10 | 12 |
| Yes, there are liability and copyright issues which require degaussing
media and strongly suggest delabeling. No, the employee who sent it
to the disposal center is not required to degauss it, probably does
not have the means, and such a policy would be impossible to enforce.
Some of the tapes could be backups of files which may be sensitive,
some may be 3rd party software, not DECs, and some may be proprietary
and reasonable steps must be take to insure copyright. Also, magnetic
media is less prone to a host of overwrite and file termination
problems i will not boar you with reciting, and is more suitable for
reuse on unknown machines if degaussed before dispersion.
trust me ... 8^) mwr
|
2089.24 | | WIDGET::KLEIN | | Fri Sep 04 1992 14:10 | 6 |
| >> <<< Note 2089.23 by WMOIS::RAINVILLE "Tape engineers get reel wound up!" >>>
>> trust me ... 8^) mwr
To do what?
-steve-
|
2089.25 | Send them here | TELGAR::WAKEMANLA | You Bloated Sack of Protoplasm | Fri Sep 04 1992 15:20 | 10 |
2089.26 | reduce, reuse, recycle ... | HACMAN::HACK | Don Hack, NIS Consultant, DTN: 471.5365 | Fri Sep 04 1992 16:30 | 8 |
| Who do we have to memo in order to "save Digital money" by reducing what we
internally need to order and reuse what we've paid for already??
In times like now, burning tapes makes zero sense. Internal usage by any
division is still internal usage.
-Don
(who needs some old tapes to go with his old VS II assembled from parts)
|
2089.27 | Do you know what's in your dumpster? | MARX::BAIRD | SIS - Stow, MA dtn 276-9711 | Fri Sep 04 1992 19:05 | 22 |
|
It's even worse than 'just' burning, we pay big bucks to dispose of not
only media but, many items that can be yanked out of the waste stream.
It's a major effort to get folks attention to the costs involved but
the dollars really add up.
Besides your normal, wage type activity, pick an area and a product and
make a difference in the overall structure.
"reduce, reuse, recycle" and my particular "hobby" - redirection.
Reduction is the greatest cost savings and least overhead. (internal)
Reuse is the solution to consumption gone unchecked. (internal)
Recycling has both cost and social responsibilty implications.
(internal/external)
Redirection of the waste stream is the last chance for savings.
(external - but, not disposal)
Plenty of room for lots of players and real impact.
John B.
|
2089.28 | Some reasons why this idea is popular now | TOOK::MORRISON | Bob M. LKG2-2/BB9 226-7570 | Mon Sep 07 1992 20:13 | 21 |
| A few replies back, someone asked why the idea of recycling media apparently
didn't go anywhere when it was submitted to Delta, but posting it in this file
has generated lots of interest.
Delta has been available company-wide for about two years, and this idea was
submitted to Delta shortly after it started. Two years ago, we were just be-
ginning to think about waste reduction, and most people thought it was too much
trouble to do it. Today, waste reduction is being driven from the top (Bob Pal-
mer) and at several other levels. The PDC, which formerly threw away millions
of dollars worth of stuff, is seriously trying to reduce waste, and tighter re-
strictions on purchasing have created an internal "market" for second-hand
materials. One more change is that DIAL, which was formerly almost useless as
a means of giving away used materials such as media, is now on VTX and is much
more effective. So now it's worth the trouble for people who have stockpiles of
used materials such as media to find "takers" instead of destroying the stuff
or just letting it sit there.
A few years ago I thought I would save the company some money and use a sec-
ond-hand mag tape instead of a new one. I spent half a day trying to use it be-
fore I figured out that it's very difficult to overwrite a mag tape that was
previously recorded on an incompatible system. At that time we didn't have the
use of a bulk eraser (degausser). Degaussing is definitely right thing to do
when reusing old tapes.
|
2089.29 | DELTA says this costs too much $$ | OURGNG::HEDRICK | Working harder than ever! | Wed Sep 09 1992 16:53 | 20 |
| ref -ALL.
I submitted this the day I first received word of DELTA. I had told off
all the magtapes, TK50's, and all to the DELTA group. After a lengthy
wait I received mail and a follow-up on the phone from someone in
DELTA.
Basically what they said, that to implement this into Digital, erasing,
distribution, part #'s, etc... that this would be too costly. The
return phone call to see if I was satisfied, was no but what can I do!
I am sure with all the media laying around, we could ship it all to a
central repository with a BIG magnetnetic filed and ZAP! Now
redistribute!!
I will look for my response from DELTA on this issue and post it here
if I find it!
Later,
Glenn
|
2089.30 | | ECADSR::SHERMAN | ECADSR::Sherman DTN 223-3326 | Wed Sep 09 1992 17:39 | 10 |
| Hmm. How come it has to be erased and needs a part number? Sounds to
me like the classic situation where it is ass-u-med that the overhead
is necessary to make the project successful. Aren't there situations
where nobody cares about whether the media is erased? Is it really
necessary to have part numbers assigned? Is it really necessary to
have ANY involvement from third parties? Why can't, for example, a
special note file be created where folks can self-manage used media
transactions on a voluntary basis?
Steve
|
2089.31 | much ado about nuttin' | CSOADM::ROTH | Hold on now- | Wed Sep 09 1992 18:47 | 7 |
|
I find it interesting that worries arise about sending old, outdated
software media for internal use without 'erasure'... meanwhile, any
of our customers can purchase from DEC a set CDroms with nearly all
of our VMS or Ultrix software offerings on them.
Lee
|
2089.32 | DELTA reply . . . | CAPNET::CROWTHER | Maxine 276-8226 | Mon Sep 14 1992 14:32 | 15 |
| From DELTA - (sorry to be so late - I was on vacation)
re.4 Steve Bold - your idea was responded within a week back in 1990.
We tried to contact you for followup and got no respnse. I will
re-send the response to you.
re . 4 and .29 Hedrick - both responses say approximately the same
thing and that is that the PDC has control over these issues and should
be the point of contact for folks who have media that can be
re-used/recycled.
I would like to put forth an idea - DELTA would be more than happy to
sponsor a "swap shop" conference to put people who have BUSINESS
oriented media etc they would like to get rid of that others would
be willing to take AS IS. What do you think??
|
2089.33 | YES! | SCAACT::AINSLEY | Less than 150 kts is TOO slow | Mon Sep 14 1992 15:45 | 10 |
| re: .32
YES! DO IT!
I was going to offer to host such a conference, but we are already
having trouble stuffing 10 lbs of stuff into a 5 lb bag as it is.
Thanks for the offer.
Bob
|
2089.34 | ANNOUNCING THE DELTA SWAPSHOP CONFERENCE | CAPNET::CROWTHER | Maxine 276-8226 | Fri Sep 18 1992 17:49 | 27 |
| <<< TURRIS::TURRIS$DUA18:[NOTES$LIBRARY]EASYNET_CONFERENCES.NOTE;2 >>>
-< EasyNet Conference Directory >-
================================================================================
Note 3704.0* Announcing the DELTA SWAPSHOP No replies
CAPNET::CROWTHER "Maxine 276-8226" 21 lines 18-SEP-1992 13:23
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DELTA is proud to sponsor a new notesfile in support of Employee
Involvement.
Welcome to the SWAP SHOP. The purpose of this conference is give
Digital employees the ability to list excess expendable product that
others in the company may need. This conference does NOT take the
place of either the DIAL process or the Property Disposition Center
process. This conference is NOT for personal items or use or for
profit.
So if you have 100 magtapes that you don't need, list them here!
Those 4000 slash folders in mint green that you have left over
from your last really big meeting - list them here!
Want 50 spiral binders - ask here!
This conference is really intended as a bulletin board - the deals you
make are your own responsiblity!
Use KP7 or ADD ENTRY CAPNET::DELTA_SWAPSHOP to add this entry.
|
2089.35 | NEED TAPES FOR PATCHES | CSC32::HADDOCK | Don't Tell My Achy-Breaky Back | Fri Oct 16 1992 17:06 | 8 |
|
Here at Customer Support Center in Colorado Springs, we send out
a lot of patches to customers. We can use a lot of tapes. Especially
the tk50 and tk70's. Contact Lyvonne Simpkins at DTN 592-5459,
CSC32::VON, Mail Stop CX03-2/J3.
|
2089.36 | You may have missed a reply . . | CAPNET::CROWTHER | Maxine 276-8226 | Fri Oct 16 1992 18:20 | 8 |
| <<< Note 2089.35 by CSC32::HADDOCK "Don't Tell My Achy-Breaky Back" >>>
-< NEED TAPES FOR PATCHES >-
SEE NOTE 2089.34!!
|