T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
451.1 | | DPDMAI::RESENDEP | following the yellow brick road... | Wed Jan 27 1988 18:13 | 11 |
| I too feel that it is a legitimate business expense.
Digital apparently does not. I believe Digital's guidelines are
largely defined by IRS rules.
As an aside, I've spent literally thousands of dollars over the
years putting my dogs in a kennel when I'm out of town on business.
That money is neither reimbursable nor tax-deductable as a business
expense.
Pat
|
451.2 | little help | NHISWS::WILSON | | Wed Jan 27 1988 20:17 | 8 |
| I don't believe the company will pay forthe babysitter. However,
the expense of the sitter, when you are away earning money is deducible
(was last year anyway) for income tax purposes. As a matter of fact
I really believe it was a tax credit (many times better than a
deduction) on my return. I know there is a special form to fill
out and your accountant or IRS office can expalin it to you.
Finding a good sitter is still the hardest part.
|
451.3 | According to the manual... | TIXEL::ARNOLD | Life is fragile, handle with care | Wed Jan 27 1988 20:44 | 8 |
| According to the manual (section 5.11, page 9 of 11, last update
10-Aug-87), it specifically says that babysitting fees are not
reimburseable. But like anything else, I would assume that this
could be negotiated to a certain extent with your manager and/or
the cost center manager.
Good luck
Jon
|
451.4 | | BIGMAC::JAROSS | | Thu Jan 28 1988 16:50 | 11 |
| re .2 If you're referring to the child care credit, you can use
that up in 3 months!
Digital really should consider the cost of child care where travel
is involved. It's hard enough to get (especially on week nights)
and the expense can be tremendous.
Who is the appropriate audience for this? Employee Relations?
/Maryan
|
451.5 | A couple of suggestions | TIXEL::ARNOLD | Life is fragile, handle with care | Thu Jan 28 1988 19:38 | 14 |
| re .4
The first "appropriate audience" would be your manager. If there's
going to be an exception made prior to an official change to the
corporate policy, your manager is the one who would OK it.
After that (or in parallel with it), I would suggest BOTH Employee
Relations, and maybe also Corporate Travel. I'm not sure if CT
would be able to do or suggest anything, but it might be worth while
to bring it up to them, since this aspect of the "traveling Digital
employee" seems to be becoming more & more visible.
Good luck, & please post any findings here.
Jon
|
451.6 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Fri Jan 29 1988 12:34 | 15 |
|
> However, the expense of the sitter, when you are away earning money
> is deducible (was last year anyway) for income tax purposes.
> ....
> Finding a good sitter is still the hardest part.
Yes, and finding a sitter who is willing to report babysitting income
on an income tax form and submit to Social Security withholding
makes the job all the harder!
If you employ someone in your home for more than some trivial amount
of money per quarter ($50?) means you have to treat them as an employee
and report wages, withhold taxes, and such.
The tax credit is really only useful for day care or similarly "business
oriented" situations.
|
451.7 | absurd! | REGENT::MERRILL | Glyph it up! | Fri Jan 29 1988 14:27 | 13 |
| DIGITAL should NOT consider babysitting, nor kennel, nor pool cleaning
expenses because those are lifestyle choices that in your case become
EXPLICIT costs but for other people whose wife doesn't work or whose
dog is fed by the neighbors or who don't have a pool such things
are IMPLICIT costs.
Do you feel that someone who drives their Mercedes to the Airport
should be reimbursed more than someone who drives their Pinto to
the same Airport from the same town?
Rick
Merrill
|
451.8 | not everyone can afford to pick up DEC expenses | CADSYS::RICHARDSON | | Fri Jan 29 1988 15:37 | 11 |
| I don't have either children, a Mercedes, or a pool, but I think
that it would be much more equitable to reimburse employees who
are travelling on DEC business for the expenses that the travel
causes them. Not too many years ago, I worked with a woman who
was a single parent of two small children, with no family in the
immediate area (and I don't think she was the one who moved; I think
that like my family, hers moved away from 'greater Maynard' years
ago). She couldn't AFFORD to get sent to DECUS, etc., because she
had to find and pay for a full-time babysitter, which is prohibitive
for what we were making in those jobs in that time. I'm sure this
impacted her career, but she and her children had to eat.
|
451.9 | Children are different | ULTRA::HERBISON | Less functionality, more features | Mon Feb 01 1988 13:24 | 16 |
| Re: .7
> DIGITAL should NOT consider babysitting, nor kennel, nor pool cleaning
> expenses because those are lifestyle choices that in your case become
Children and a pool are both lifestyle choices, but it is
not clear that all lifestyle choices should be treated the
same. In particular, DIGITAL already treats children specially
(for example, the recently added parental leave benefit).
I think that children are treated differently from other
lifestyle choices because 1) almost everyone has children,
and 2) children are considered a general benefit to society
(without children society would slowly grind to a halt).
B.J.
|
451.10 | FWIW | IOSG::KAPPLER | | Mon Feb 01 1988 13:42 | 16 |
|
Interestingly enough, the UK Subsidiary has just announced the
establishment of a Creche for employees in the Reading area.
Given that those facilities that don't have a Cafeteria, give luncheon
vouchers to their employees, I wonder if employees outside the Reading
area will get babysitting vouchers..............8-) (I know, Cafeteria
are subsidised, Creche won't be, etc, etc.)
I understand one of the reasons for establishing the facility follows
on from a project to find untapped resources (people) in the area,
one of the conclusions of which, was that women with young children,
whilst often having the appropriate skills and background, find
it difficult to return to employment due to lack of child-minding
facilities.
|
451.11 | | ATLANT::SCHMIDT | | Mon Feb 01 1988 16:23 | 14 |
| Hmm...
> Interestingly enough, the UK Subsidiary has just announced the
> establishment of a Creche for employees in the Reading area.
My American dictionary of the English language defines
Creche as: n. A representation of the Nativity scene.
I assume that you're using the term in a more general sense,
as in "Child Care Centre" or "Day Care Centre". If so, it
sounds like a revolutionary idea to us American DECcies!
May we have more details, please?
Atlant
|
451.12 | Creche Facilities in Reading, England | GOOGLY::KERRELL | I'm not a passenger... | Tue Feb 02 1988 12:19 | 79 |
| re .11:
> I assume that you're using the term in a more general sense,
> as in "Child Care Centre" or "Day Care Centre".
Correct!
> May we have more details, please?
<<< GOOGLY::DJA0:[NOTES$LIBRARY]UK_DIGITAL.NOTE;2 >>>
-< UK employees discussion forum >-
================================================================================
Note 125.64 Working mothers in DEC 64 of 68
GOOGLY::KERRELL "I'm not a passenger..." 61 lines 22-JAN-1988 13:00
-< Announcement - Creche Facilities in Reading >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
************************
**
* ANNOUNCEMENT *
**
************************
CRECHE FACILITIES IN READING
As announced at Geoff Shingles recent Quarterly Talk, the provision of
creche facilities in Reading has been agreed to in principal.
The need for more childcare facilities has become evident over recent
years because of increasing numbers of women returning to work earlier
after having their families, an increase in single-parent families and
the general changing patterns of family and working lives in society as
a whole.
Digital has recognised the need to both attract and retain highly
skilled employees of both sexes, and providing creche facilities is one
way in which we can encourage this. It has been brought to our
attention that the provision of childcare facilities in the Reading
area is very limited, and therefore Digital will be able to provide a
valuable additional source of childcare for employees.
The details of the creche facility have yet to be agreed, but it is
intended to site the facility so that it will be accessible to as many
Reading locations as possible (not easy, I know!) Places in the
creche would be open to the children of all permanent Digital employees
in Reading - subject to availability.
To help us provide the facility which will best meet our employees'
needs, we are carrying out a survey by means of a questionnaire to
gather your inputs on the setting up of the creche and to determine the
current and future demand for places.
The questionnaire can be obtained from your local personnel
administrator, the reception areas and in the restaurant (if your
location has one - except for Shire Hall and Highfield)
The will be your one chance to have your say on the setting up of the
creche, so PLEASE COLLECT AND FILL IN A QUESTIONNAIRE AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE. Return envelopes are provided, or you can return it to
Margaret Packham, REO F/1-4.
If you should experience any difficulty in obtaining a questionnaire,
please ring Paul Dinwiddy 7899-5154 and he will send you one.
Yours sincerely,
Carolyn Northmore
Reading Regional Personnel Manager
|
451.13 | i like the direction of this | MERIDN::FERNALD | | Thu Feb 04 1988 02:43 | 4 |
| Great!!! However...I'm a field employee (CT SWS) and feel I'm entitled
to an equal benefit. Certainly the logistics of implementing this
at corporate are much simpler than in the field locations.. Suggestion:
how about $$ for daycare instead?
|
451.14 | | PARITY::GALLAGHER | | Thu Feb 04 1988 11:21 | 6 |
|
>RE : how about $$ for daycare instead?
Why not -- this is a *very legitimate benefit -- and is one having
payback to both parties. Furthermore, our competition has been
doing it for years.
|
451.15 | CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL PROGRAM | ULTRA::HERBISON | Less functionality, more features | Tue Feb 09 1988 19:06 | 54 |
| This isn't a daycare benefit, but it is useful to those that
need to get daycare.
[Forwarding headers omitted.]
From: UCOUNT::GRAVELLE "LEE GRAVELLE "Personnel" ZK3-3/S01 1-0607 09-Feb-1988 0943" 9-FEB-1988 09:45
To: @SEC.DIS
Subj: FYI -- PLEASE FORWARD THIS INFORMATION TO MEMBERS OF YOUR GROUP.
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|d|i|g|i|t|a|l| I N T E R O F F I C E M E M O R A N D U M
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
TO: Distribution DATE: 09 February 1988
FROM: Lee Gravelle
DEPT: Compensation/Benefits
Specialist
MAIL: ZKO3-3/S01
EXT: 381-0607
NET: UCOUNT::GRAVELLE
SUBJ: CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL PROGRAM
At the end of January, a new Child Care Resource and Referral Program
became available to all U.S. Digital employees.
The program will provide assistance to employees in locating, evaluating
and securing child care services.
Some highlights of the program are:
* Depending on location, employees will call a local or regional
telephone number to directly access a trained child care expert
who is familiar with local resources and able to advise employees
on all aspects of a child care search.
* Written and verbal information on types of child care available
and criteria for selection of quality care.
* Three (3) referrals, where possible, to available care that
matches parent need.
* Written confirmation of all contacts.
* Systematic follow-up with employees.
For more information on the Child Care Resource and Referral Program,
please contact your Personnel Services Administrator, brochures outlining
the program are available.
|
451.16 | Digital taking a pro-active stance here | REGENT::EPSTEIN | Bruce Epstein | Wed Feb 10 1988 11:44 | 7 |
| There's an article in _Digital This Week_, February 8, which goes
on to say,
"If an area lacks sufficient child care providers, resources *will
be created* where possible [emphasis mine]. Work/Family directions
will assist local resource and referral agencies in making every
effort to recruit new providers."
|
451.17 | Don't be overly optimistic | PVAX::THOMPSON | | Thu Mar 24 1988 17:12 | 23 |
| I asked the daycare office if they could offer me an alternative to my
daycare if/when my present daycare is no longer available. They
informed me, in no uncertain terms, that the office does NOT provide
day care nor would it in the future. It would also not help in the
search, only provide a company to give me a list of licensed daycare
providers (big deal, I already paid for 2 of those last year - total
expense $55). They would not make phone calls, etc. for me. I
explained that both my husband and I work for DEC and that DEC would
suffer if one or both had to take time out from work to find suitable
daycare. They said they could not help in ways other than the stated
charter of the daycare referral.
Question, if DEC is so against providing daycare centers in the
US, why are they providing it in the UK? Isn't this unfair to
the US employees? Don't more US employees have 2 members working?
I think that the DEC policy of no daycare is saying to employees with
children that DEC doesn't really care if you work at DEC or not.
I think whoever posted that DEC is pro-active is being overly
optimistic. It takes a LONG time to find daycare for an infant.
I looked for 5 months before I found 1 opening! And I have no
backup.
|
451.18 | There are several sides to the issue (and the pond) | CVG::THOMPSON | Question reality | Thu Mar 24 1988 17:46 | 28 |
| > Question, if DEC is so against providing daycare centers in the
> US, why are they providing it in the UK? Isn't this unfair to
> the US employees? Don't more US employees have 2 members working?
Not meaning to sound too sarcastic but are you aware that the US
and the UK are separate countries with separate laws, restrictions,
and cultures? DECs legal risk in providing day care in the US is
very very high. I doubt it's as high in the UK.
There are lots of other differences between US policy and policy
elsewhere in the world. European employees get more vacation time,
they can have alcohol in the work place, and don't have to limit
smoking to assigned smoking areas (at least not everywhere). US
employees tend to get paid more though so there are trade offs.
Asking DEC to have the same policies all over the world ignores
the reality of cultural and legal differences.
> I think that the DEC policy of no daycare is saying to employees with
> children that DEC doesn't really care if you work at DEC or not.
I disagree. The flexibility given to me when I've had to take time
to care for my son has always said clearly to me that DEC *does*
care if I work here or somewhere else.
Alfred
PS: Please sign your name next time. There are a lot of THOMPSONs
around here. :-)
|
451.19 | daycare is now a priority for COMPANY? | RADVAX::THOMPSON | | Wed Mar 30 1988 14:28 | 10 |
| I have heard that the Reading plant is being phased out. Is this
true? If so, why create a day care?
I have been told for a LONG time that daycare is not recognised
as a priority to the COMPANY regardless of which COUNTRY the plant
is in. I am just curious why day care is now being provided BY
THE COMPANY at the UK plant but not elsewhere.
Patti (of which there are at least 4 others with my name in DEC)
|
451.20 | | GOOGLY::KERRELL | I'm not a passenger... | Thu Mar 31 1988 09:02 | 20 |
| re .19:
> I have heard that the Reading plant is being phased out. Is this
> true? If so, why create a day care?
Great rumour! Why not post it in GOOGLY::UK_DIGITAL for the benefit of the
(nearly) 3000 employees in Reading? There are, in fact, some major changes
going on right now in the UK. CSS are moving to Fareham on the south coast,
several other large groups are moving to Basingstoke but last and most
importantly Digital has bought 33 acres of land to build a new campus style
complex *in Reading*.
> I am just curious why day care is now being provided BY
> THE COMPANY at the UK plant but not elsewhere.
Competition. Reading is in a very high growth area of the UK. It is
becoming increasingly difficult to attract employees, this benefit is
offered by other companies in the area.
Dave.
|