[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference smaug::ibm_requests

Title:IBM System Work Requests
Notice:PLEASE READ ALL OF NOTE 1.* and 2.1 BEFORE PARTICIPATING HERE !)
Moderator:FREE::WOOO
Created:Mon Sep 25 1989
Last Modified:Tue Jun 03 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:931
Total number of notes:3385

903.0. "Need dependent and independent LU's bound from mainframe" by DELNI::BARBER_MINGO (Let me DANCE for you) Mon Mar 24 1997 16:15

    Hi,
    	I'm attempting to get dependent and independent outbound
    allocations through IBMNT, LINKB, and IBMTST.  I need this
    from CICS41B, CICS41, and most importantly MVS0101. This does
    not involve logmodes or mode names on the gateway side.
    This requires definitions on the IBM side to allow the IBM
    to route the attaches to the appropriate LU's.
    	
    	Please define the LU's set asside for this purpose to
    the required MVS and where not self installing, CICS regions.
    I can't get a bind to flow from the mainframe to the adapter.
    This afternoon is the latest time frame I would like confirmation
    that it's all set.
    
    	At the moment, my IBM gen is gating my Maple adapter testing.
    This is deadline week. 
    
    	This is the HIGHEST priority action I have.
    
    Thanks,
    Cindi
                          
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
903.1Sysid's?DELNI::BARBER_MINGOLet me DANCE for youMon Mar 24 1997 17:346
    I need the 4 character sysid from the IBM side that translates
    to the independent and dependent LU names for the CICS regions.
    
    Thanks,
    Cindi
    
903.2Lus addedFREE::MCCUSKERTue Mar 25 1997 15:5437
From:	FREE::MCCUSKER     25-MAR-1997 12:33:40.41
To:	DELNI::BARBER_MINGO
CC:	MCCUSKER
Subj:	CICS41B independent & dependent LUs


Cindi,

  If you have any problems please connact me.

Kevin


Map of dependent and independent LU's on CICS41B(aka CICS17B)



	Connection	LU Name		Connection	LU name
	----------	--------	----------	--------

Independent LUs:

	IIBA		IIBNT100	IIB1		IIBTS100
	IIBB		IIBNT200	IIB2		IIBTS200
	IIBC		IIBNT300	IIB3		IIBTS300
	IIBD		IIBNT400	IIB4		IIBTS400
	IIBE		IIBNT500	IIB5		IIBTS500
	IIBF		IIBNT600	IIB6		IIBTS600
	IIBG		IIBNT700	IIB7		IIBTS700
	IIBH		IIBNT800	IIB8		IIBTS800

Dpendent LUs:

	TIBA		TIBNT101	TIB1		TIBTS101

		

903.3more lus addedFREE::MCCUSKERTue Mar 25 1997 18:42101

	IDNUM:  96014

          Independent                          Dependent
	------------------		-----------------------

	conn       lu                   conn         lu
	----    --------                ----      --------
	c0i0	ibmcb000		c0d1	  ibmcb001
					c0d2      ibmcb002


        IDNUM:  96015

          Independent                          Dependent
        ------------------              -----------------------

        conn       lu                   conn         lu
        ----    --------                ----      --------
        c1i0    ibmcb100                c1d1      ibmcb101
					c1d2      ibmcb102


        IDNUM:  96016

          Independent                          Dependent
        ------------------              -----------------------

        conn       lu                   conn         lu
        ----    --------                ----      --------
        c2i0    ibmcb200                c2d1      ibmcb201
                                        c2d2      ibmcb202
        

        IDNUM:  96017

          Independent                          Dependent
        ------------------              -----------------------

        conn       lu                   conn         lu
        ----    --------                ----      --------
        c3i0    ibmcb300                c3d1      ibmcb301
                                        c3d2      ibmcb302
                 


        IDNUM:  96018

          Independent                          Dependent
        ------------------              -----------------------

        conn       lu                   conn         lu
        ----    --------                ----      --------
        c4i0    ibmcb400                c4d1      ibmcb401
                                        c4d2      ibmcb402
        

        IDNUM:  96019

          Independent                          Dependent
        ------------------              -----------------------

        conn       lu                   conn         lu
        ----    --------                ----      --------
        c5i0    ibmcb500                c5d1      ibmcb501
                                        c5d2      ibmcb502
        

        IDNUM:  96020

          Independent                          Dependent
        ------------------              -----------------------

        conn       lu                   conn         lu
        ----    --------                ----      --------
        c6i0    ibmcb600                c6d1      ibmcb601
                                        c6d2      ibmcb602
        

        IDNUM:  96021

          Independent                          Dependent
        ------------------              -----------------------

        conn       lu                   conn         lu
        ----    --------                ----      --------
        c7i0    ibmcb700                c7d1      ibmcb701
                                        c7d2      ibmcb702
        

        IDNUM:  96022

          Independent                          Dependent
        ------------------              -----------------------

        conn       lu                   conn         lu
        ----    --------                ----      --------
        c8i0    ibmcb800                c8d1      ibmcb801
                                        c8d2      ibmcb802
        
903.4SYSIDERRFREE::BARBER_MINGOTue Mar 25 1997 21:3642
    Hi I tried both:
    c0i0 and c1i0 with my outbound allocation program.
    I got a SYSID error.
    
    TRANSACTION: CBM4 PROGRAM: CBM4     TASK: 0000881 APPLID: CICS41B 
    DISPLAY:  00
      STATUS:  AN ABEND HAS OCCURRED
    
         EIBTIME      = 182446
         EIBDATE      = 97084
         EIBTRNID     = 'CBM4'
         EIBTASKN     = 881
         EIBTRMID     = 'A025'
    
         EIBCPOSN     = 4
         EIBCALEN     = 0
         EIBAID       = X'7D'                                         AT
    X'001C00EA'
         EIBFN        = X'0420'  ALLOCATE                             AT
    X'001C00EB'
         EIBRCODE     = X'D00800000000'                               AT
    X'001C00ED'
         EIBDS        = '........'
     +   EIBREQID     = '........'
    
      ABEND :   AEYQ
    
     ENTER:  CONTINUE
     PF1 : UNDEFINED           PF2 : SWITCH HEX/CHAR     PF3 : END EDF
    SESSION
     PF4 : SUPPRESS DISPLAYS   PF5 : WORKING STORAGE     PF6 : USER DISPLAY
     PF7 : SCROLL BACK         PF8 : SCROLL FORWARD      PF9 : STOP
    CONDITIONS
     PF10: PREVIOUS DISPLAY    PF11: UNDEFINED           PF12: UNDEFINED
    
    
    The microsoft traces are not indicating the LU6.2 layer got anything.
    Could we please track this down tommorow?
    
    Thanks,
    Cindi
    
903.5Allow me to ellaborate.DELNI::BARBER_MINGOLet me DANCE for youWed Mar 26 1997 13:0127
    Hi,
    	To clarify, I used cedf to run the program.  This allows
    you to modify the sysid field and insert a field other than
    the default.  It's cool because you don't have to recompile
    or modify the program within the cics region to get to your
    desired connections.
    	When I say I tried both c0i0 and c1i0 as is listed in the last
    note, I mean I ran the program trying both connection ids
    in the sysid field.
    	I had issued passive connects on the LU6.2 adapters on the
    vms side.  
    	Microsoft tracing on the expected links didn't appear
    to show ANY attemt to acquire bind the LU, or start the
    transaction.
    
    	So you tell me, does something else have to be done to
    allow the connection id to receive the request from the list
    of names?
    
    	With the ST's and CT's, and even peer servers, I never
    had to do anything BUT get the right sysid in CEDF and initiate
    a passive request from the IBM. 
    
    	Come on by, I'll show you what I mean.
    
    Thanks,
    Cindi
903.6Problem solvedFREE::MCCUSKERFri Mar 28 1997 16:344
Cindi used two logmodes XL620256 and XL6X4096.  The CICS definitions have to
match the logmodes on defined on her NT server.  She was able to connect and
allocate after the logmodes were changed on the CICS side.