| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
I have recently installed mccbms t1.3.1.
When I start mcc I get an XToolkit Error:
$ man/ent/int=decw
X Toolkit Warning:
Name:
Class: XmList
XmNitems and XmNitemCount mismatch!
But the iconic map comes up as usual and there are no
noticeable problems as of yet.
I was wondering if this was a known error or is there
something on my part that I have done to cause this??
And what does it mean???
Rob Sawyer
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4441.1 | Motif? | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz | Mon Jan 25 1993 18:15 | 1 |
What version of Motif is installed on your system? | |||||
| 4441.2 | 1.1 | SPANKY::SAWYER | Wed Jan 27 1993 13:53 | 1 | |
Motif Version 1.1 is installed. | |||||
| 4441.3 | VERNA::V_GILBERT | Fri Jan 29 1993 10:54 | 11 | ||
Rob, When you start mcc, do you have a default domain, AND if so, does it have a map file associated with it. If both are true, AND there is a mismatch between the entities actually in the domain and those in the map file, The Iconic Map displays a "Map File and Domain Mismatch" box. My guess is that this might be what is causing the above message. Any additional information you can provide us with will help to track this problem. Thanks, Verna | |||||
| 4441.4 | Do have Map File, but No ERROR | SPANKY::SAWYER | Fri Jan 29 1993 18:43 | 6 | |
Verna,
Yes I do have a default domain and a map file associated with it
but I do NOT get the "Map File and Domain Mismatch" Error.
Rob
| |||||
| 4441.5 | Help??? | SPANKY::SAWYER | Tue Feb 02 1993 19:04 | 2 | |
Can Anyone think of any reasons why I would be getting this
X-Toolkit Error???
| |||||
| 4441.6 | similar problem/different product | GOSTE::CALLANDER | Wed Feb 10 1993 14:11 | 13 | |
recently I had a similar problem with another product. What had
happened in that:
version 1 installed *.uid where one of the files was .uid;4
version 2 came along and replaced these with .uid;1
Well what happened is that the ;4 version was still hanging around,
while the code was expecting the format in the ;1 file.
You might just want to give a quick look and see if something like
that might have happened to you.
| |||||