| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 2658.1 | Need more information... | CHRISB::BRIENEN | DECmcc LAN and SNMP Stuff... | Tue Mar 31 1992 12:40 | 17 |
| Please enter the following pieces of information:
1. Command entered to do the register (IMPM or FCL?). What type of
Station is it (i.e., DECserver 200? DECbridge 500? Cisco Router?)?
2. Output of SHOW MCC 0 ETHERNET_AM AVAILABLE PORTS
3. Type of system you're using. Does it have a FDDI port?
4. Has a SHOW command been tried from FCL given the address as the
identifier? Does the same error result?
If so, can you try using VIA PORT with the SHOW command?
5. Has the REGISTER command been tried with the VIA PORT qualifier?
Thanks,
Chris Brienen
|
| 2658.2 | we try ... | LFOIS1::ALIE | | Wed Apr 08 1992 13:36 | 18 |
| I am sorry but i could not answer your qustion until today...
Well,
1/the station we try to register is a Decsystem 5240
2/when we try :"show mcc 0 ethernet_am available ports", we have:
----------> cannot communicate wih target
3/ we don't have FDDI port
I hope it will help you to help us .......
Thanx
|
| 2658.3 | Does it happen with T1.2.7? | CHRISB::BRIENEN | DECmcc LAN and SNMP Stuff... | Mon May 11 1992 20:06 | 14 |
| Thanks for the additional information.
There were some problems with the MCC_EA Routines in the area of device
string handling that were discovered after T1.2.4 went to External
Field Test.
We believe that these were fixed in the T1.2.7 (External Field Test Update)
kit.
Could you verify that T1.2.7 actually fixed the problem for you (if not,
PLEASE let us know).
Thanks,
Chris Brienen
|
| 2658.4 | Always the same thing | LFOIS1::ALIE | | Tue Jun 09 1992 09:51 | 7 |
| Unfortunally, i get th same pb with the DECMCC version 1.2-7 ..
It is really a bad things for us ....
Help me ....... Thanks
|
| 2658.5 | QAR 3129 | TOOK::MINTZ | Erik Mintz, dtn 226-5033 | Tue Jun 09 1992 11:36 | 2 |
| Entered as QAR 3129
|
| 2658.6 | Update. | CHRISB::BRIENEN | DECmcc LAN and SNMP Stuff... | Mon Jun 15 1992 15:31 | 9 |
| This potential problem is still being worked via MAIL.
Still to be answered (from note 2658.1):
> 4. Has a SHOW command been tried from FCL given the address as the
> identifier? Does the same error result?
> If so, can you try using VIA PORT with the SHOW command?
>
> 5. Has the REGISTER command been tried with the VIA PORT qualifier?
|