T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
956.1 | A guess ... | AIMTEC::VOLLER_I | Gordon (T) Gopher for President | Mon Jun 29 1992 21:40 | 24 |
| Suzanne,
The error is telling you to check the RMS STS and STV error
messages that 'should' be returned. Unfortunately, ALL-IN-1 and
FCS between them fail to pass this information to the caller (I
have SPRed this).
Have you checked the file protections etc on the user's account.
The File Cabinet Server uses SYSPRV to access the user's ALL-IN-1
sub-directory during partition seeding. Therefore if the A1.DIR
doesn't allow SYSTEM access you will see the error.
Seems likely to me that the error is occuring at the 'WRITE ADD
PART$MAINT ..." in the .SCP. You can confirm this with trace or
by manually doing the WRITE ADD. The PART$MAINT DSAB does some
checks to ensure that the account has a DOCDB and DAF and that
they are accessable before adding the record.
Failing that use SET WATCH etc to check for the RMS error codes.
Cheers,
Iain.
|
956.2 | Check GBLPAGES and GBLPAGFIL | AIMTEC::DONOHUE_F | | Mon Jun 29 1992 23:38 | 17 |
|
What timing! Just a minute ago I loaded an article into STARS with
this error. It came from Richard Davies. They saw this problem on
their system. It was a 2 node cluster. And they had problems with
cross drawer operations intermittently. It turned out that the
problem was on one node, the system parameters GBLPAGES and GBLPAGFIL
were too low and caused the FCS to fail. They set them to be the
same as the other node that the FCS was working on and that solved
the problem.
Are you having the problem on a cluster? Check these parameters and
try increasing them too see if this is the problem.
Let me know of the outcome,
Faith
|
956.3 | | KERNEL::COOPER | Suzanne Cooper UK Customer Support (833)3502 | Tue Jun 30 1992 14:49 | 11 |
| Iain, Faith
The problem is indeed with the Write add, The error occurs just
after this. Set watch files shows nothing useful at all, it doesn't
even show access to partition.dat. The account this is run from
(allin1) has sysprv and you can access the users docdb.dat and daf.dat
(the mfc mp add does somechecking at this point as well). Tried this
on another node in the cluster and get exactly the same error.
I'm not sure what else to check.
Suzanne
|
956.4 | Trace for RMS status code | IOSG::TALLETT | Arranging bits for a living... | Tue Jun 30 1992 15:54 | 8 |
|
PART$MAINT always calls the file cab server for its data file
access which is why SET WATCH doesn't show you anything.
Try turning on a File Cab server trace to get the extended status.
Regards,
Paul
|
956.5 | docdb.dat security?? | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Tue Jun 30 1992 17:44 | 10 |
|
Can you put in the output of the following VMS command:
$ dir/security [user.a1]*.dat
I have a feeling that the docdb.dat or some other file has no system
protection on it which is keeping the FCS from getting to the file.
--Bob
|
956.6 | fixed | KERNEL::COOPER | Suzanne Cooper UK Customer Support (833)3502 | Tue Jun 30 1992 18:08 | 13 |
| Bob, Iain, Faith,
I've cracked it, it was either an empty filecab.dat, once it was deleted it,
the write add appeared to work. Or the directory had the wrong
protection, (I suspect not of the named data on the MP ADD option could
access DOCDB.DAT ok.)
Thanks everyone for your help
Suzanne
|
956.7 | | GIDDAY::SETHI | Man from Downunder | Wed Jan 20 1993 09:04 | 31 |
| Hi All,
I have a customer who get's the same error message as reported in the
base note and it is followed by Insufficient priv. file protection
violation.
This only occurs when the customer is trying to copy a document from a
shared drawer to their personal drawer.
I have asked the customer to check the users ALL-IN-1 directory and the
files to ensure it's have s:rwe in particular DOCDB.DAT. Also I have
asked the customer to ensure that the ALL-IN-1 files and directories
have the correct prot. and ownership. The reason why I have asked
them to this extensive audit is because they are a trouble some
customer. I have also asked them to do an ALL-IN-1 trace and walked
them through how to do a trace and they still cannot get it right !!
Basically it's a government department that sends out upgrade kits and
customisations to the various states. Some of these states do not have
basic ALL-IN-1 or VMS skills let alone the skill to set-up a modem.
Hence I am asking you all if there is anything else I should look for.
By the way the customer has told me that they feel that auditing is a
waste of time 8^(.
I would be grateful for any input I am sure it's incorrect file
protection or ownerships, but on the other hand you may know something
more.
Thanks in advance,
Sunil
|
956.8 | Check both drawers and content files | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Wed Jan 20 1993 15:54 | 10 |
|
My guess is that the protection on the actual document file, the
one with the really big ugly name, is the problem. Have the
user log into the SYSTEM account and try to copy that file some place.
The problem also could be on the personal drawer, make sure that
system has RWED access to the drawer they are trying to copy to.
--Bob
|
956.9 | RESERVATIONS.DAT did not have system access | GIDDAY::SETHI | Man from Downunder | Thu Jan 21 1993 02:53 | 9 |
| Hi Bob,
Thanks for your input the problem was with file protection the
reservations.dat did not have system access this has been changed to
s:rwe.
Regards,
Sunil
|