T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1322.1 | | 33972::SHADDIX | | Wed Nov 17 1993 15:58 | 29 |
| If this is incorrect someone please advise.
Scoring.
Measure with a piece of string.
Make a pencil mark on the beam as if the tines were not there. That is
where the tines will be measured to. (tip to the line.)
Measurements
1. inside spread
2. beam length
3. eye guards (browe tines)
4. g1 tines
5. g2 tines
6. etc (if you have that many)
7. diameter of beams :
at the base
between the browe tines and g1
between the g1 and g2
etc.
note: on a typical 8pt, you do not measure the diameter between the g2
and the tip of the main beam.
add them all up and you have a green score.
Good hunting.
Earl
|
1322.2 | | 33972::RHARRIS | Gun Control is a steady hand! | Wed Nov 17 1993 18:33 | 13 |
| I have the new B&C book, and will check for charts, and copy and fax
if possible.
bob
I'll do this after the 29th, as I'm getting ready for a weekend in
Vegas, and then the big South Georgia hunt.
Earl has already committed to having the monster buck in the deer
cooler when I get there Monday morning. I sincerely hope so. Because
my head would explode if I shot the big one before Earl did.
|
1322.3 | 50%-ish | 8817::HELMREICH | Steve | Thu Nov 18 1993 16:34 | 13 |
|
> 1) How much meat should you get from a deer? I recall seeing a
> discussion on this someplace, but can't find it.
I had heard ~60+% of the downed weight (with entrails, I assume), but later
read 50%, which matches my experience more. It depends a bit on the size
of the deer, as on some smaller deer, it may not be worth trying to cut out
neck meat, etc.
What has anyone else experienced?
Steve
|
1322.4 | TAKE HOME PAY | 57298::LAFOSSE | THE FRA, 226-5328 | Thu Nov 18 1993 18:00 | 8 |
| I've been getting anywhere between 55-65% of the dressed weight, depending on
amount of loss due to bullet damage, or blood soaked from an arrow hit.
As a rule I've had much more loss from blood soaking with arrow hit deer, even
when the arrow entered and exited the chest, in other words a perfect broadside
lung shot than I have from bullet damage.
FWIW, Fra
|
1322.5 | Technical process | 33803::NEWSHAM | James Newsham @ALF | Thu Nov 18 1993 18:48 | 28 |
|
White-Tailed Deer Weight Formula
--------------------------------
Take measurement of chest around heart, just below foreleg.
Chest measurement x 5.6037 - 94.0982 = Live Weight
Live Weight x .78 - Field Weight
Field Weight divided by 2 = Edible Meat
eg.
CHEST LIVE WEIGHT FIELD WEIGHT MEAT
---- ---------- ------------ ----
48 175 136 68
50 186 145 73
52 197 154 77
etc., etc., etc.
Red
|
1322.6 | Speaking of weight | 40107::TOWLE | Corky | Wed Nov 24 1993 11:32 | 15 |
| Not sure if this is the proper note so moderator move if necessary.
I located a butcher that will come to your house to cut up a deer.
He charges $25.00 and does the whole thing while you watch. In other words,
you don't lose any meat. :-) He's not a venison eater.
Took him less than 2 hours to cut up mine.
For you Southern New Hampshire, Eastern Mass folks that would like to give
this a try either this year or next, call;
Peter Kapsimalis
Home # 603-664-9230
Work # 603-895-0010
|
1322.7 | | 33972::SHADDIX | | Tue Nov 30 1993 18:26 | 6 |
| Red,
Where did you get that formula from. I know you didnt pull that out of
your head.
Earl
|
1322.8 | Keeps you thinking don't it. | 33803::NEWSHAM | James Newsham @ALF | Tue Nov 30 1993 20:59 | 21 |
| <<< Note 1322.7 by 33972::SHADDIX >>>
> Red,
> Where did you get that formula from. I know you didnt pull that out of
> your head.
> Earl
Earl,
I thought everyone carried a tape measure and calculator
in their fanny/day pack :-) Hell, were high-tech people, I think
I'll pack my LapTop for the next visit to camp..........
Anyhow, it was a formula that is published in one of
the books I have in my library.
Red
|
1322.9 | which way is north? | 33972::RHARRIS | Gun Control is a steady hand! | Wed Dec 01 1993 11:45 | 4 |
| DON'T MAKE ME PUKE!
Bob
|
1322.10 | minimum score? | 20024::HUSTON | | Wed Dec 01 1993 13:02 | 15 |
|
re high tech stuff?
I go hunting to get away from computers :-)
Anyone know what the minimum scoring is to make B&C for whitetails?
My 9-point won't make it, but my cousin just got an 11-point with
very large mass to the antlers (big circumference) that may squeak
in. (My family is having a good year, for the last 8 years, we have
been pretty much dry, 2 deer, lots seen though. This year, out of
6 people, we have 3-- 11 point 199lb, 9 point 171 lb (my first) and
4 point, 125 lb, guess what we are having for Christmas dinner?)
--Bob
|
1322.11 | 170 typical/195 non-typical | 33972::RHARRIS | Gun Control is a steady hand! | Wed Dec 01 1993 13:58 | 39 |
| I just got off the phone with B&C (406-542-1888) and spoke with a nice
lady that said, "170 points typical, and 195 non-typical".
I have the 10th edition at home, and recall that those were the
numbers, however I wanted to confirm valid points for you.
If anyone needs any other B&C info, leave it here and I will check the
book (which is on my nightstand.)
"Sorry honey, not tonight! I am reading my B&C book!
NOT!
Bob
|
1322.12 | | 33972::SHADDIX | | Wed Dec 01 1993 14:00 | 8 |
| Minimum score.
170 typical
195 non-typical
Earl
|
1322.13 | What? What? | 27748::BUTCH | No Shortcut Too Short | Wed Dec 01 1993 14:36 | 5 |
| 170 typical, 195 non-typical.
Sorry, couldn't resist...
Butch
|
1322.14 | What about bow kills? | 35186::VANDENBARK | Makes me happy! | Wed Dec 01 1993 15:05 | 8 |
| Hey Harris,
Don't forget to put the score in for Bow kills too. I think it is
around 125. Of course I may be wrong.
By the way Bob, congrats on the rifle kill.
Wess
|
1322.15 | | 33972::RHARRIS | Gun Control is a steady hand! | Wed Dec 01 1993 15:53 | 6 |
| Now those scores are to make the all time record book. In order to
make the awards banquet, it has to be 160 typical, and 185 non-typical.
The awards banquet will be held December 1994.
bob
|
1322.16 | | 33972::RHARRIS | Gun Control is a steady hand! | Wed Dec 01 1993 15:56 | 7 |
| I just saw the bowkill score, Wess. That would be under a different
topic, Pope and Young. Silly wascally wabbit!
Thanks for the congrats.
bob
|
1322.17 | EXIT | CSOA1::VANDENBARK | Makes me happy! | Thu Dec 02 1993 13:51 | 6 |
| ELMER_THE_GEORGIA_OUTDOORS_PUMPKIN_HEAD,
SORRY BOB, BUT SINCE I DIDN'T KILL A DECENT BUCK WITH A GUN AND GOT 2
NICE ONES WITH MY BOW, I HAD TO ASK.
WESS_WHO_IS_GETTING_READY_FOR_BLACKPOWDER
|
1322.18 | Not a trophy, but it is to me! | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Fri Dec 03 1993 12:46 | 57 |
|
Well, I got the scoring sheet as well as basic instructions (thanks
Jerry) and did a trial score on my 9 pointer, no place near a record,
but who cares, it is a nice rack. I have a question though:
On the form, you measure certain things that are on both left and
right antlers, then you subtract to get a difference. What about
an odd numbered point? For instance, my rack has 9 points, he is a
5x4. Do I basically ignore that 9th point? Or do I add it in fully?
Just as an example for people (like me) to go by to see what a
record whitetail would look like (mine is no where close), here is
what mine came out to:
Supplementary
Data Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column4
A. Number of points R-5 L-4 Spread cr Right Left Diff
B. Tip-tip spread 9
C. Greatest spread 19
D. Inside spread
of main beam 17 Spread Cr 17
E. Ttl len abnormal pts 0
F. Length of main beams 20 20 6/8 6/8
G1 Length of first point 4 6/8 3 4/8 1 2/8
G2 length of 2nd point 6 3/8 5 7/8 4/8
G3 length of 3rd point 4 6/8 5 6/8 1
G4 length of 4th point 1 2/8 0 1 2/8
H1 Circum burr-1st point 4 4/8 4 4/8 0
H2 Circum 1st-2nd point 3 6/8 3 6/8 0
H3 Circum 2nd-3rd point 3 5/8 3 6/8 1/8
H4 Circum 3rd-4th point 3 4/8 0 3 4/8
Totals 17 52 4/8 44 7/8 6 5/8
Add Column 1, 2 and 3 == 114 3/8
Subtract column 4 == 107 6/8
Since it takes 170 to make B&C, he is no place close, but I still
consider him big!
Things that hurt his score, seemed to be the length of tines and mass
of the beams. Also the odd numbered tine seems to be basically ignored
in the scoring. If this is not so, then he comes out to 112 2/8.
So I guess to make B&C, it pays to have LONG tines, lots of them, and
massive beams in terms of circumference. My cousin got an 11-ptr that
is bigger antlered than alot of people that saw it have seen. A B&C
scorer who happened by said he should get it scored, my guess is that
it will go around 140-150. The tines are long and the circum is big.
The 11th point is an abnormal that is about 2 inches long, shooting off
the brow tine (sort of, hard to describe), so it is really a symetrical
10 ptr, with a blemish :-). They need to figure a way to put weight in
here, that would equal us northerners out with the huge racks of the
south :-)
--Bob
|
1322.19 | don't count the non-matching tines | CSC32::G_ROBERTS | when the bullet hits the bone | Fri Dec 03 1993 15:54 | 6 |
| RE: <<< Note 1322.18 by CHRLIE::HUSTON >>>
> an odd numbered point? For instance, my rack has 9 points, he is a
> 5x4. Do I basically ignore that 9th point? Or do I add it in fully?
Best to ignore it. I don't seem to have my copy handy, but I think
the form lets you add it and then has you subtract it back out.
|
1322.20 | over the 100 mark! | CSOA1::VANDENBARK | Makes me happy! | Sun Dec 05 1993 13:47 | 7 |
| re.18
I know yours didn't make the book, but it sounds like a nice one none-
the-less.
Congrats
Wess
|
1322.21 | Unoffical | ODIXIE::SHADDIX | | Tue Dec 07 1993 13:24 | 6 |
| When scoring a rack add all measurements then deduct points that dont
have a match on the other side. Also deduct the difference between
matching points: ex: 10 in tine on right, 9 1/2 in tine on left, deduct
1/2 in.
Earl
|
1322.22 | | ODIXIE::RHARRIS | Proud to be in the NRA | Tue Dec 07 1993 16:06 | 6 |
| Or you can deduct the 10", 9 1/2", and 1/2". I am up to page 86 in the
book, and it is just now getting to scores. The history of B&C is very
interesting. If no one bought the book, I suggest getting it.
Bob
|