T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
850.1 | piece of cake! | CSMET2::WOOD | | Fri Nov 09 1990 18:18 | 23 |
| Tracking a deer always seems to go well for the first couple
hours, then you either get
1. The deer that loops around in 500yd radius circle, and you can't
find where it jumped off the track.
2. The track leads into a 1000 acre swap.
or
3. The deer started to fly. The track just vanished, no matter how
wide you expand a circle from where you lost it.
Of course it's always fun when the deer you just jumped, is tracked
for a mile, and then runs into a spot that 10 other deer have been
in over the last 24 hours and you can't pick out which one is the
one you RECENTLY jumped. Even tracking on snow can become confusing
when there's been alot of activity in the area and your on a fresh
set....
Marty (who can't wait for tomorrow morning!)
|
850.2 | I can do it-in fresh mud! | EUCLID::PETERSON | The End is in sight | Fri Nov 09 1990 18:33 | 5 |
|
This months F-F-G has a good story on tracking. The little that
I've done out behind the house has taken me over hill and dale, only to
be left standing in the middle of a field-feeling very stupid/blind.
It is a lot of fun tho.
|
850.3 | I can relate to that. | WJOUSM::PAPPALARDO | A Pure Hunter | Fri Nov 09 1990 19:01 | 14 |
|
RE:1&2
I Can relate to what you're saying for sure...ha,ha....Is'nt it fun
though with a fresh snow early in the morning.
Anyone else care to share experience or tips?
Rick
P.S. Peterson, I have the F.F.G., that's where I got the idea for this
note.
|
850.4 | | XCUSME::NEWSHAM | I'm the NRA | Fri Nov 09 1990 19:53 | 20 |
| Re: Tracking
This is a science in itself. There are probably as many articles
and books on tracking as there are on balistics. Do we talk straight
tracking as crossing a good size Buck track ? Do we discuss tracking
as following a wounded Deer ? Then we get into the different types
of blood drops ( colors ) which will indicate whether it was a lung
shot, a paunch shot etc. Do we get into the different types of tracks
made by a Buck just walking, or the dragging track made by a Buck in
Rut sniffing out a Doe in heat ?
Gee, I like this topic, we could easily hit the 500 reply mark
in no time. Don't get me wrong, this is one " VALID " subject that
confuses and scares many hunters. As time permits I'll entry usefull
information, but I leave for Vt. in a few days, so folks, go to it
and lets make this interesting and a valid learning center for those
who get confussed.
Red_With_Buck_Fever
|
850.5 | Serious entries only | OASS::SOBCZYNSKI_L | | Sun Nov 11 1990 21:37 | 7 |
|
No wise crack stuff, like the time I tracked a deer for miles and found
out it was being hauled into camp by another hunter????
Cheers
Leonard
|
850.6 | Blood and rain ??? | CSMET2::WOOD | | Mon Nov 12 1990 14:23 | 26 |
| Here's a question for everyone...
Saturday morning I shot at two deer near my folks house
in Bow NH. It was pouring rain, and the area had been
well covered by deer. Fresh tracks and droppings everywhere.
I thought I hit the one I aimed at. It didn't go down, but
sort of flinched in a strange way when I shot (12 gauge, about
50 yds into the hardwoods). I waited a few minutes, but then
made the decision to go after it because I was fearful the
blood trail would wash away. Well, I couldn't find a blood
trail, but did pick up the tracks which I thought belonged to
the deer I shot at. Within 50 ft these came into an area completely
trampled, tracks going in to and out of this spot in about 4 different
places, but quickly turned to solid ground up the side of some
granite knolls and the tracks became almost impossible to pick up
on. I spent a long time circling out from this area trying to
find blood or hopefully the deer, but never found anything.
So, my question is, should I have waited longer, hoping the deer
would lie down near by and die (assuming I hit it....), or should
I have gone immediately after it due to the rain ? I haven't tracked
a deer in heavy rain before, and am not sure how fast blood washes
away from the leaves that generally cover the ground here in New
England now.
Marty
|
850.7 | Go NOW, don't wait. | WFOV11::DRUMM | | Mon Nov 12 1990 14:55 | 22 |
| Wow, this is a tough one, not being there and all.
When gun hunting I go right after the critter. I let no time laps.
This is more importaint when it's raining out. I took a 8 pointer
a couple years ago that left next to no blood trail at all. If it had
been raining I would have never found him. I did know I hit him hard
because at the spot where he was when I shot there was a lot of hair
and then one bound later a lot of blood. But the blood stopped in 5
yards. It was a paunch shot and the contents of the gut had plugged the
hole. No blood for many yards and then only specks now and then for the
next 100 yards. I tracked on my hands and knees for the first 100yds.
I finally jumped him and could track him on my feet untill he dropped
some 400-500 yards later.
The method I use when blood is very light to almost none: as I find each
spot I mark it with a stick. As you go you can look back and tell the line
the deer is taking keeping yourself on track. Wounded deer don't usually
make radical turns. When you look back at the line you can be fairly
sure the next spot of blood will be within a few degrees of center
line.
Steve
|
850.8 | | WJOUSM::PAPPALARDO | A Pure Hunter | Mon Nov 12 1990 15:23 | 5 |
|
Because of the weather conditions I agree with Steve.
RAP
|
850.9 | Is tracking related to stalking? | BRABAM::PHILPOTT | Col I F 'Tsingtao Dhum' Philpott | Tue Nov 13 1990 10:33 | 11 |
|
re .0
what woods?
Apart from the roebuck I took recently my previous deer haven't been
within miles of a tree, let alone woods...
:-)
/. Ian .\
|
850.10 | Woodless Deer | WJOUSM::PAPPALARDO | A Pure Hunter | Tue Nov 13 1990 19:25 | 15 |
|
WHAT! No woods?
Hey Everyone. Ian shot a Woodless Deer. Wonder what they rub their
antlers on?
Ian you using a rifle? Here in New Hampshire the average visibility is
30-35 yards. How long of a shot did you make?
Make sure you enter into note 270.
Congrats!
Rick
|
850.11 | In the rain | GNOCLU::PORELL_S | | Tue Nov 13 1990 20:48 | 6 |
|
Last years buck was shot in pembroke ,nh also in the pouring rain.
The only way I was able to find it was to zig zag down through the
woods until I was able to find a solid blood trail.
Sid
|
850.12 | | BRABAM::PHILPOTT | Col I F 'Tsingtao Dhum' Philpott | Wed Nov 14 1990 08:35 | 16 |
|
re .-2 (?) In northern Scotland where I've done my deer hunting the Red Deer are
creatures of the high moorland. Hunter and guide stalk as close as they can then
take the nominated deer. Shortest shot I've had was 300 yards, longest was 550.
They tend to rub their antlers on boulders...
Incidentally it is usual to take along pack horses to bring the carcase out, and
some stalkers have the practice of letting the horses wander freely so that any
slight noise the deer hears will be assumed by the deer to be caused by the
horse they can see, not the hunter, they hopefully can't see. Hence the
expression "a stalking horse".
I'll write up a proper entry for #270 some time.
/. Ian .\
|
850.13 | Spray Tracking Aid | WEDOIT::ISBELL | | Fri Nov 16 1990 13:14 | 5 |
| Speaking of tracking, has anyone used the spray tracking aid that
turns blood florecent orange when sprayed on it? Does anyone know
what this stuff is made of?
Dennis
|
850.14 | | JANVAX::NERL | John Nerl - ESB Design Assurance | Fri Nov 16 1990 14:59 | 5 |
| Dennis - Make sure you get a good shot off the first time and you
won't need artificial tracking aids!
Just kidding.... j
|
850.15 | same thing | DNEAST::VORHIS_AL | | Mon Nov 19 1990 16:58 | 3 |
| try hydrogen peroxide, it willo foam when contacting blood and is a lot
cheaper , color it if you like.....
|
850.16 | One experience | BPOV06::J_AMBERSON | | Tue Nov 27 1990 14:47 | 42 |
| A week ago I shot my first deer with a bow. I've shot my share with a
rifle and shotgun and thought I was about average on tracking skills.
The deer last week was hit dead center through the liver. The arrow
also managed to hit the stomach. The initial blood trail was thin.,
then non-existant. I found my arrow about ten yards from where the
deer was when I shot. It was covered with green stomach contents. The
initial blood was very dark. The blood stopped after about 75 yds.
From there it was done on hands and knees. The ground was frozen (16
deg.out). We were able to pick up the tracks by noticing the slight
depressions in the leaves. Every time we found any blood or hair we
marked the spot with surveyors tape. By looking back along the line of
tapes we could figure out the line of travel. We spen about 90 minutes
tracking this deer 150 yds to a stream. We marked the spot with more
tape and then walked down stream to a place where we could cross and
then back up stream to the markers. We found the deer less then 20 yds
from the stream, dead. He probably lived less the ten minutes after
being shot. Total time from begining to track and recovery was about 2
hours.
Things learned:
- Be persistant. Stay with it. The deer could be just around the
corner.
- Have a plan. Don't just start walking. You risk destroying
additional sign that may help you.
- Don't let other folks mess you up. Keep them from destroying sign.
- Mark your progress with tape. It helps to esablish a line of travel.
- Physical signs are great, but they don't always tell the truth. My
deer was hit dead center through the liver, but the arrow indicated a
paunch hit. The absence of blood was due to his tomach contents
blocking both the entry and exit holes.
_ Watch for blood on brush as well as on the ground. You can get a
good idea of where you hit them. It's also easier to see sometimes.
_ TAKE YOUR TIME!
Jeff
|
850.17 | Snow tracking is Exciting | SKIVT::WENER | | Thu Jan 03 1991 10:43 | 44 |
|
Well, seeing as how there's not too much regarding "snow tracking"
here, I'll put my experiences here. I've read a few articles and books
and have done some tracking. By no means an expert yet, but I'll get
there. My spike of last fall was shot while I was on a track...
Ways to tell which sex the deer is:
It is sometimes difficult to tell what the sex of a deer is
solely from the track without following it for a ways. This is
especially true if it is a small or medium-sized buck. When I
cut a track and the deer has a large track, long stride, wide
space between the left and right tracks, is set into the ground
very deeply, and the toes are somewhat splayed outward, it's
a big buck. You'll know this for sure when you follow him.
An obvious sign is dribbling in the track while the deer is walking
or hopping along. During the rut a buck can't control his bladder
when he gets excited. If the track you're on crosses another deer
track and there's dribbling there, you're onto a buck!! There should
be no question at that point. In addition, I look for the othere
obvious signs such as a scrape or a rub that the deer made while
you were tracking him (peelings on the snow, fresh dirt pawed on
top of the snow). Also, a buck tends to cruise in more or less of
a straight line while looking for does. He's out there testing the
wind and looking for a hot doe. Does meander along and dilly dally
with no obvious purpose to their movements. A buck can cover LOTS
of ground in a night while looking for does.
The dragging of feet in a track to me is not an absolute indicator
of a buck, nor is the presence of dewclaw marks. This sign can
help confirm a buck track though, when you look at all the signs
together. The most important things for me are the attitude
of the deer, and the dribbling sign. The dewclaws will appear more
and more in an excited buck track because he's walking differently,
more flat-footed and stiff-leffed. He's horned-up and maybe he's
even ready for a fight..... All he cares about is a hot doe and
this attitude should be obvious in his track, especially if he's
found one!
More later, anyone else care to join in??
- Rob
|
850.18 | The only way to hunt | BTOVT::MOULTROUP | | Fri Jan 04 1991 10:56 | 13 |
| Rob the dragging of the feet is a good indicator of a buck if the snow
isn't very deep(0 to 2 inches). But it's not a reliable indicator if
the snow is deep. Bucks don't pick their feet up as high when they walk
as does do, but when the snow is deeper all deer will drag their feet.
One other point to bring up if you want to try tracking is to spend
very little time looking at the tracks and a lot of time looking all
around you as your tracking. Plus pick a spot to hunt where the hunting
pressure is light so you don't chase the deer into another hunter.
This is the greatest way to hunt. Your interest is always high because
you know their is a deer not to far ahead of you and when you become
good at it you know your following a buck almost all the time.
Bruce
|
850.19 | when you get close | SKIVT::WENER | | Fri Jan 04 1991 11:22 | 56 |
|
Part 2... The "End-Around" or Straight in?
"End-Around" is a technique some people use when tracking a deer and
they're getting close. To me this technique is somewhat controversial,
but maybe effective if you know your hunting area very well. That is,
if you know it well enough to know where the likely bedding spots are.
The problem is that you really don't know where that deer is going to
bed down, so you may end up wasting time to find out that the deer
really didn't bed down where you thought he would.
It goes like this... when you're on a track and the signs are
telling you that the deer is ready to be down, you leave the track and
loop around to come in at the deer from the side. Almost always, a
deer will lay facing his backtrail when he beds down, and most likely
in a tough spot to see him if you go straight in on his track.
I know people who hunt this way but who are rarely successful...
The tough part is figuring out excactly where to expect the deer to
lay.
Straight-in:
If you listen to the Benoits, they'll tell you they crawl on
their bellies when they get close. Leaning over to scan under the
trees helps here, but I'm not so sure about crawling, unless you're
going under some brush or something. My current theory is that it
won't be movement totally that'll scare the wits out of the deer,
but it will be how you move when you're getting close. An extremely
slow motion movement seems to be the best bet, that includes when you
pick your feet up as well as put them down. Shuffling your feet helps,
taking very short steps. Eliminate all upper body movement and use
your eyes only - no swaying to the side, and twisting your head in all
directions! quick, jerky movements and you'll be going home empty
handed. There's a noter in here (Bruce Moultroup) that moves this
way through the woods - like a cat. When he creeps up on you, he'll
see you before you see him, and you'll jump out of your skin cause
he'll be so close. You have to take your time...
Times to move fast, times to pusyfoot:
If you're on a track that appears to be a deer ranging, you'll
have to move on him to catch him. You'll be able to tell this from
the tracks. He won't be stopping, he'll be straight-lining it for the
next mountain, and it'll probably be on the next mountain when you
catch him if you do. I learned this year that a buck can cover
an incredible amount of ground in a night, and the tracks you'll be
following in the morning are going to be most likely made the night
before or early in the morning. Of course, you'll have to be able
to tell how old the track is, but if you really start following deer
tracks, this will come to you. Pussyfoot when close, go straight-in
or do the "end-around", whichever you prefer.
- Be ready to shoot fast, if you're really lucky, you'll see him
before he sees you - then you won!
- Rob
|
850.20 | | SKIVT::WENER | | Fri Jan 04 1991 11:27 | 4 |
|
Gee Bruce, you were in here at the same time, hope you don't mind
me mentioning your name? have a good day - Rob
|
850.21 | and yet even more | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Fri Jan 04 1991 12:56 | 15 |
| another good indicator that your following a buck in a dusting of sonw
in that when a buck is walking his gait is different than a does.
A doe walks with a straight gait, meaning that if you drew an
imaginary line directly under the middle of her body her left hooves
would stay on the left side and the right hooves would stay on the
right side of this imaginary line.
A buck however wild cross this imaginary line with all four hooves.
almost like he's strutting his stuff... ;^)
it's worked everytime for me when i've been fortunate enough to be
tracking in snow.
Fra
|
850.22 | They run down hill and to water | CSCOAC::HUFFSTETLER | | Wed Jan 30 1991 23:17 | 14 |
| One thing that I'd heard and didn't really think about 'til now is that
a wounded deer will usually run downhill. Another point is that
gut-shot deer will generally run to water. My brother shot a deer
quartering away from him, so the bullet entered in front of the left
rear leg and exited right under the skin behind the front right leg.
Since the bullet really churned up the insides and the entry wound got
clogged, the blood trail just stopped after a little while. We found
the deer in a creek downhill from where the trail stopped.
It makes sense that they'd run downhill when wounded, but why they run
to water beats me.
Scott
|
850.23 | they have more tricks than a magician | USRCV1::GEIBELL | NOTHIN LIKE FISH ON ! | Thu Jan 31 1991 11:59 | 38 |
|
Well through my many experiences of tracking the thing I found out
with why a deer will run to water when gut shot is they will lay in the
cool water to try and stop the bleeding, I saw a doe that a freind of
mine shot in archery season do this, I actually caught her in the water
then she run 100 yrds up hill into a cut over and 10.5 hrs later we
finally got her.
On this perticular tracking excursion it was in daylight the whole
time, she never went over 300 yrds from the place she was shot but she
stood on stumps walked down logs and crawled under brush piles, and she
was a yearling deer!
This last bow season the same freind shot a 160 lb doe low through
the stomach and first thing she did was run up hill to the water then
stopped layed in the water the continued up hill, 5 hrs later with a
sprained ankle sore ribs and blood all over me we finally got her.
As I was tracking her I was crawling along and the next thing I new
I didnt have any breath, you cant imagine how it feels to be kicked in
the ribs by a deer, I never saw her laying in the briars, of course the
blood trail was very poor it was 11:30 pm had been hunting all day and
this deer came to quite a suprise to me, she really got frantic when I
grabbed her hind feet. I figured it was all I could do to help protect
my face from the hooves, shortly afterwords we were able to put her
down for good.
I for one will not give up on a deer, I have tracked alot of deer
in the 15 yrs I have been hunting and I havent lost one yet. but I am
by no means the best tracker in the woods but I sure can hold my
ground. I hate to find deer dead when Im out walking in the woods.
Did anyone ever try peroxide for tracking purposes? it doesnt turn
yellow like that other product on the market but it does fizz when it
comes in contact with blood and it only costs about 80 cents a bottle.
Just my .02 worth
Lee
|
850.24 | Gut Shot | CX3PST::WSC151::J_PEDERSEN | A Bad Day at Work is BAD | Thu Jan 31 1991 12:39 | 4 |
| It has been my understanding that a gut shot animal heads for water due
to the burning pain that a gut shot inflicts. They will drink water to ease the
pain, but it only makes it worse. Not a pretty picture.
Jim (who regrets having made a few of this hits)
|
850.25 | | EXPRES::RINELLA | | Mon Oct 28 1991 09:29 | 45 |
|
Well Sundays muzzle loading hunting has brought up some questions
for me which I hope you all can answer.
AT about 8:00 am I had a deer come walking buy at a quick rate. I was
in a tree stand right near some rubs and have been watching this deer
for a couple of weeks with the bow but havent been able to get a shot
off.. Here it was, I lead it slightly and shot...It turned and went
back the way it came into some pines but I never saw it leave the
pines.. I was sure I hit it.. I got down and searched for three hours
looking for blood, but couldnt find any..
Question: When a deer is hit with a bullet, I was using a 50
caliber, should there be blood right in the spot of the shot?? I have
only gotten one deer with a bow and was fortunate enough not having to
track it because I seen were it dropped..I thought I have read that
sometimes th eblood trail may start several yard away from were it was
hit..
While looking for blood, two deer came running in, one was
the buck I was hoping to see, and it was a big one. The other deer was
a doe, maybe the one I shot at. Well I couldnt get any shot off because it
was too thick so I watched them leave.. Soon after I heard three slow
shots...Curious to see if they hit the buck, I headed towards the shots.
Four guys were following a blood trail and said that they hit a big
buck...One guy said they had found were it bedded down and there was a
big pool of blood.. Well I went back to my stand to take it down and
wanted to see this deer...When I got back to the truck I noticed that
they were gone..I headed into some thick stuff were I had jumped deer
before, which was across the road from were they hit the buck, and
found a blood trail which I followed until dark. I believe those guys
left without ever finding the deer.
Question: If a deer thats been hit dies during the night and you go
back for it the next day, will the meat be ruined??
I dont like the idea of a wounded deer and believe that it may have
died during the night.. The blood was bright red, and may have been a
lung shot...I couldnt sleep all night thinking about that buck and
would like to continue my search, what do you guys think???
Sorry about the length of the note but I wanted to set the stage...
Gus
|
850.26 | | GIAMEM::J_AMBERSON | | Mon Oct 28 1991 10:23 | 16 |
| To try and answer some of your questions:
Blood trails don't always start imediately. I've seen deer go for a
while and then start to bleed. If the wound is high in the chest
cavity, You may have to wait for the chest to fill with blood before
the deer start leaving much sign. One thing you will almost always
have is hair. Try looking for hair to indicate a hit, rather then
blood.
Whether a deer left in the woods all night is edible depends on alot
of factors. One is the weather. Is it warm out, or did the temp drop
into the 30's? The colder it is the better your chances are. Another
factor is where the deer was hit. A paunch shot deer will wreck meat
alot faster then one hit in the neck.
Jeff
|
850.27 | Hope you get another chance | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Mon Oct 28 1991 10:26 | 46 |
|
> Question: When a deer is hit with a bullet, I was using a 50
>caliber, should there be blood right in the spot of the shot?? I have
>only gotten one deer with a bow and was fortunate enough not having to
>track it because I seen were it dropped..I thought I have read that
>sometimes th eblood trail may start several yard away from were it was
>hit..
Nope, there may be no blood trail for quite some time. Especially from
your situation. You shot from above the animal. There probably would
not be a blood trail right away unless the bullet came out the other
side of the deer. Since I don't know anything about muzzleloader power
I can't say how likely this is. If there is no exit wound there
probably won't be a blood trail until the deer bleeds enough to
fill up the body cavity to the point of the entry wound.
Since you thought you hit the deer, i would suggest the following
action (not sure if you did this from your note):
1) Check out the shot sight for blood, hair, bone etc. Hair will be
there if you hit it, but it would be very VERY hard to see without
snow since a good hit will produce short clippings, while a
grazing hit may pull chunks off.
2) Wait for some time (some recommend 30 - 45 minutes.
3) Start tracking. Keep on the track until you find it, it gets dark
or you convince yourself you missed. Look for drops of blood,
without an exit wound there may not be a big blood trail.
>Question: If a deer thats been hit dies during the night and you go
>back for it the next day, will the meat be ruined??
Nope the meat should be fine. I am not sure where you are but
air temp would be the key. The colder the better. Once the animal
dies he will start to cool off, a night in the woods would not
severly hurt the meat, just dress it and cool it as fast as you can.
From what the other guys said someone hit it. I can't tell if they
jumped it out of its bed then shot it, or shot it then later found
the bed. I hope they went back and found it. I believe in NH you are
suppose to notify a warden if you leave a shot animal in the woods over
night.
--Bob
|
850.28 | | EXPRES::RINELLA | | Mon Oct 28 1991 10:39 | 14 |
|
Thanks for the reply...
I did try to find hair where I thought I hit the deer, but I
could'nt find any. Last night was down in the forties..Now how could I
tell if the meat was spoiled or not??? I don't believe I hit that deer
and not having been able to see were she ran to makes matters more
difficult.. When I was following the blood trail, from what I think was
the buck that was hit, I did find some doe droppings that seemed to
have been from that morning...Could the doe be running with this buck,
or am I totally of the wall here...
Gus
|
850.29 | | EXPRES::RINELLA | | Mon Oct 28 1991 10:44 | 10 |
|
re:27
From what he told me they were tracking it after it was shot and
then found were it had laid down...I can't see how they could have
dressed it out and dragged before I got back to the truck...By the way,
this did happen in N.H.
|
850.30 | Not everyone field dresses | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Mon Oct 28 1991 11:03 | 22 |
|
re .29
That's what I thought you said :-)
As for not dressing and dragging, (I know you didn't say it, but...)
Not all people believe in Field dressing deer. I went to a lodge in
N. carolina a couple of years ago and they didn't believe in the need
to field dress deer. They said all it did was put gut piles in the
woods. THey brought the deer out, guts and all and skinned/dress and
halfed it when they got home, then hung the meat to cool.
Personally I was taught to gut all deer (and rabbits) as soon as
possible, this means in the woods. They may have figured they were
leaving anyway, so why not just toss it in the truck and home we go.
To each his own...
--Bob
|
850.31 | Better find it today! | WMOIS::TESTAGROSSAB | | Mon Oct 28 1991 12:43 | 10 |
| I wouldn't be concerned about the meat spoiling as I have been involved
in many hunts where deer were shot in the evening, and not located til
the next day. The only exception was one deer that coyotes got to
before we found it!
Why aren't you out there now? It sounds like you did finally find a
blood trail, on the other side of the road before you left. Did I
misinterpret something?
Barry
|
850.32 | | EXPRES::RINELLA | | Tue Oct 29 1991 09:01 | 27 |
|
Well I left work yeterday at 10:00am grabbed my stuff at home, the wife
thought I was nuts :'), and headed out with the hopes of finding this deer.
To my surprise, as I was driving down the road, there was the man who
shot the buck with his wife trying to find the blood trail...He said
that it did cross the road. I explained to him what I found and took
him to the spot were I had lost the blood trail myself..He told me that
he had hit the buck in the head because that was the only shot that it
offered him.
He was sorry that he didnt wait a half hour to an hour after the first
bed that he had found, but he said he did that to a deer he shot
in Vermont and when he finally started tracking it , another hunter
was already on it..Needless to say he lost that deer..
We searched for hours at the last spot of blood, but couldnt find
anymore. We decided to split up and try to circle the area, nothing!
I told him it seemed to be heading in a west south/west direction, so he
went to were he has seen them bed down before (west), I kept zig zagging
back and forth in a south/westerly direction...I'm sorry to say that we
couldnt find and other sign..I was totally exhausted with the search...
As far as the deer I shot at, I'm confident that I did not hit it.
Thanks for the replies...Maybe I'll have better luck next time...:')
Gus
|
850.33 | You did the right thing- going back | SKIVT::WENER | | Tue Oct 29 1991 09:27 | 50 |
|
Gus,
I just picked up a new book from OUtdoor Life Book club -
It's called "Trailing Whitetails" by John Trout Jr. I've read about
half of it and it's good. It answers all the questins you were asking
earlier; I recommend it for everyone who deer hunts. A whole book
on tracking wounded whitetails - both from a rifle and bow hunters
perspective.
As for the authors response to your questions. He says on Rifle
hit deer you should trail immediately, and that deer only stiffen up
AFTER they die (rigor-mortise). He also says that it's very rare
to find blood at the impact site. Usually hair, but no blood. He
says to really pay attention to the deer's reaction when/if hit.
Lot's of times a deer will hunch up and tuck it's tail, or blast out
of there at warp II, splitting off from any other deer that may be in
the group.
I gotta tell ya a story.... When I was 15 years old I was hunting
with my dad and uncle. I shot at a buck that was perhaps 100-120 yards
away down in the hardwoods with a .243. I clearly missed the
first shot because the deer just jumped once and stopped. On the 2nd
shot, the deer seemed to disappear. The doe ran directly up the hill
toward me, but I couldn't see what happened to the buck... The two
were just on the edge of my vision when I shot, so I figured he ran the
other way - away from me.
I went to the site, found some scuff marks from where he ran, but
no blood or hair - I figured that I'd just missed again on the second
shot. I didn't even try to follow his tracks for a ways. I went up
on the side hill and sat for a half hour (just before dark) and headed
back to the truck - wondering how the heck I could've missed!
Well, my dad never gave up on me! He asked me a ton of questions!!
Asked me what the deer did when I shot - I told him it "just
disappeared, ran off the other way". he asked about the tracks, I told
him there were marks where the deer jumped, but no blood or hair!!!
He told me that I had hit the deer and that it was dead, laying up
there on the side hill!!! I was shocked at how convinced he was,
almost to the point on non-believing (yeah dad, you're crazy). The
next day was a school day, and he said we were going back up to find
the deer, that he'd write me a note when we got back, and that he'd
"give me a good swift kick in the butt" when we found it!
To make a long story short, about 200 feet uphill from where I shot
lay a 160# 6-pt buck, heart shot, wrapped around a tree in a small
depression!! I flipped, and yes, my dad did give me a swift kick in the
butt - more of a symbolic thing than anything else -didn't hurt. Boy did
I learn a lesson that day. So far, it's the largest deer I've ever
gotton!! Thanks Dad.
- Rob
|
850.34 | | EXPRES::RINELLA | | Tue Oct 29 1991 11:20 | 28 |
|
Hi Bob,
Thanks for the info. I'll try and find that book or something
similar to it.. I hope my notes were to confusing! The blood trail we
followed I'm sure was the bucks and not the doe...When I shot at the
doe, it didnt hunch up or bolt out of there..It just turned around and
went back..I'm sure I didnt lead it enough. I made a good hundred yard
half circle sweep of the area that I shot it in. Another thing that
leads me to believe that it wasnt hit is that when I was bow hunting
the area I would see the doe but not the buck. I only got to see a rump
once that was pretty big running off.. When I saw the two deer while
looking for blood,"sunday" ,one was the buck and the other was the doe,
which didnt appear to be hurt at all. The guy who shot the buck said it
was leading the doe, they were running together...
I cant understand it, every year I get at least one shot in N.H. with a
bow or a gun, max of two shots, and every year something goes wrong..I
can go down the range and put four inch groups at 50 yards with the
muzzle loader or the shot gun, and I go to the 3d shoots and score in
the 190's to 200's but when I shoot at deer, I always miss..Is there a
book or class that helps you get rid of buck fever? :')
Gus
p.s. This was the first time that I wasnt sure that I missed, all the
other times I was positive...
|
850.35 | Maybe you shot in front of the deer | SMURF::PUSHEE | | Tue Oct 29 1991 14:33 | 31 |
| RE: .25, .34
> AT about 8:00 am I had a deer come walking buy at a quick rate. I was
> ...
> off.. Here it was, I lead it slightly and shot...It turned and went
> back the way it came into some pines but I never saw it leave the
> went back..I'm sure I didnt lead it enough. I made a good hundred yard
> half circle sweep of the area that I shot it in. Another thing that
How far away was the deer? What kind of load were you using in the .50
muzzle loader? How fast is a quick rate? Let's try a little math and
some assumptions:
1. If you were using a roundball and about 100 gr FFg then your
bullet should have an initial velocity close to 2000 feet per second.
2. If the deer was 50 yards (150 ft) away then it should take less
than 0.1 second for the bullet to reach the deer.
3. A man has to hike right along to exceed 4 mph. I'm guessing that a
deer walking quickly would be around 6 mph (about 9 feet per second).
4. The deer in this case would travel 0.9 feet in the time it takes for
the bullet to get there. Even if you were holding on the heart, you
should have still hit the deer in the gut. If you had daylight between
your sight and the deer, you probably shot in front of it.
These are all rough approximations and my assumptions may be way off.
Does anyone else have thoughts on how much to lead a deer?
|
850.36 | Trailing whitetails... | TROOA::KING | | Tue Oct 29 1991 14:41 | 22 |
|
re: -2
I'll second that book your reading Rob! I've read it cover to cover
myself and I'd recommend it to anyone who hunts deer. It is of course
one mans opinion, but this guy has based his *facts* on years of
experience and scientific data. Puts a few of those arguments you
have among friends to rest!
In fact, it seems like the type of book you'd want to keep around and
read once a year to refresh the memory. Somewhat embaressing was a
couple of weeks back, I was reading the book down on my honeymoon in
the bahamas...getting pumped up for deer season this weekend. Anyhow
this guy starts walking around the pool with a micerophone looking for
volunteers for pool games. I tried to look buried in my book but
he came over anyway and announced to all "..and what's this book you're
reading....Hmmm 'Trailing Whitetails'... Red faced I joined the games-;)
Good reading anyway!
5 days, 4 hours but whos counting!! / Andrew /
|
850.37 | | EXPRES::RINELLA | | Tue Oct 29 1991 15:06 | 17 |
|
re:35
I'm using about 90gr. of FF and I remember putting the bead in front of
the deer by a foot???? I remember the muzzle going up on me, so I think
during the excitement of seeing the deer I held the gun to loosely,
also causing it to kick up...What I hated to say is that the deer was
about 25 yards away and I was shooting from a tree stand... Yesterday I
took a couple of shots at a tree stump at @30 yards away and I'll be
damned, I hit @ 4 inches to the left on the first shot but the second
was dead on at what I was aiming..I probably did lead it to much and
I'm sure not holding the gun tightly did'nt help any...Oh well thanks
for the replies...I'll get one yet in N.H. I hope...:')
Gus
|
850.38 | Now you know why she turned around - the bullet went by her nose. | SMURF::PUSHEE | | Tue Oct 29 1991 17:44 | 22 |
| Gus,
Given what I know now, you probably only needed a 4 inch lead (maybe 6 inches
if you were using the slower and much heavier maxi-ball). If you had put the
bead right on her shoulder, she would be in the pot.
I think the lead you used would have been more appropriate if she had been
in a flat out run.
At least you got off the shot. Sunday AM, I was sitting with my back against
a tree with my muzzle loader leaning against another tree handy by. I heard
steps, looked, and saw a hunter walking up the deer trail about 30 yards out.
We acknowledged each other and I watched/listened as he moved on out of sight.
When I turned to face front I said to myself "If I didn't know better I'd say
that looked like a ... oh oh". Sure enough, a fork horn was sniffing that
hunter's tracks. I started to reach for my gun but he caught the movement
and looked up. I played statue while he acted nervous. Finally he bolted
and the bigger buck behind him took off too. Since I don't like to shoot at
running deer with a M/L, I hoped one of them would stop where I could get a
shot - no such luck. Maybe next week.
- Dave
|
850.39 | | EXPRES::RINELLA | | Wed Oct 30 1991 09:11 | 11 |
|
Dave,
One thing I never did practice before was at a running deer shoot.
I have shot trap before, but that and duck hunting is the only leading
that I have done.. :')...Oh yea I forgot to mention that I am using the
maxi-ball. Well now I know not to lead it that much anymore and maybe
next time I will have better luck...Good luck to all....
Gus
|
850.40 | What to do | SKIVT::WENER | | Fri Nov 01 1991 14:52 | 55 |
|
Information from "Trailing Whitetails" by John Trout Jr. :
I've been through the book on all the hits you could make on a
deer and here's the scoop: (BTW, there's an earlier note on the
subject of a gut shot 8-pointer in here somewhere...couple of years
back - some of the recommendations made were absolutely wrong)
Area Hit Blood What to do:
----------- -------- -------------------------------------
Heart Crimson red Trail immediately
Lungs Frothy pink "" "
Kidney dark red Deer will bleed out within 80 yds
with massive blood trail, often
better than heart shot. Kidneys
are small and usually hit by
chance.
Liver Med to dark red, Deer will live 2-4 hours, should
wait at least 2 hrs before trailing.
Deer will not stop bleeding until
it dies. usually beds quickly.
Paunch very Dark red Deer will live 4-8 hours - wait
(includes at least 4 hours to trail. the deer
intestines) will bed within 200 yds of being hit
and will eventually die. leave
quietly and return later. trail
slowly and quietly (max of 2 people)
very little blood trail if any.
one person trail, one person watch.
do not push.
neck medium red If the cartoid arterie is hit, deer
will die within 80-100 yds. If
muscle hit, the deer will be very
difficult to find. most heal and
completely recover.
loin,brisket medium red chances of recovery are slim to
none. deer will heal and recover.
a good blood trail at first but slims
to none after about 200-300 yds.
If aortic arterie (just under back-
bone) is hit, the deer will bleed
out within seconds.
rear leg,hip medium red deer will usually bed soon and
lose rear leg muscle control. usually
a high loss of blood, even if femoral
arterie is not hit. a 2nd shot is
sometimes required, recovery is good.
|
850.41 | | ZEKE::HOLLEN | | Mon Nov 18 1991 09:41 | 20 |
| re .40
Hmmm, that explains why the deer that I got with the bow this year
bled so profusely, and why I was able to recover it so quickly... I
shot the deer in the backbone just above the gut (sorta between the
chest cavity and the hindquarters). I was aiming for the chest. The
deer was about 25 yards away, and wouldn't you know the arrow hit a
branch and deflected (#$%&**&^#% !!!)...
Anyway, I noticed after the hit that her hindquarters were nearly
useless and that she basically dragged them down the hill. That was
encouraging enough, but when I started to track the deer I couldn't
believe the blood trail. It was astounding how much that deer was
bleeding! Now I know why. I hit the aortic artery that runs along the
backbone area !!!
Sounds like that book is good reading!
Joe
|
850.42 | more thoughts on tracking | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Tue Dec 10 1991 14:24 | 41 |
| I'd just like to make a little comment regarding tracking and sign or
lack there-of after a shot has been made.
I shot a 7 pointer in VT this year during the rifle season, hit it in
the chest with a .270 from approx 25-35 yds... it ran approx 10 yards.
I backtracked from where the deer lay dead to where it was standing and
found absolutely no blood or flesh or hair between where it was hit and
where it died. There was however a large amount of white hair at the
site of the hit... To most people this would have indicated a really low
hit, and probably not a mortal wound, at least from everything I hear
and read thats what it means... I'll think twice now before I pass it
off as such.
Now I realize that 10 yards dosn't give the deer a whole
lot of time to bleed, but there was no blood under the body where it
lay for 5-10 minutes or down the hill to where i dragged it before
gutting it out (40 yard drag down hill).
Had this deer not dropped dead in front of me it would have been a
horific tracking job... unless of course it would have eventually
started to drop blood. As an aside, not one vital was hit on this
deer, the bullet entered and exited the chest without touching the heart
liver or lungs, it did however break the shoulder upon exiting, It died
of hydrostatic shock in a matter of seconds.
Sooo whats the point, your asking... Just a reminder that lack of sign
does not necessarily mean a non-mortal wound, and that every situation
is different. Lack of flesh or bone chips or blood or hair or the wrong
color hair, may or may not prove anything... so, check it out
carefully before passing off any animal as lost or "will recover".
FWIW, Fra
PS, I heard that a guy in Leominster this past weekend shot at 2 bucks,
missed one (who knows though???) and shot the leg out from under the
other at 11:00 AM, tracked it for an hour and passed it off as lost...
come on now, the thing is bleeding and theres snow on the ground, the
deer is leaving a very distinctive track and this guy didn't stick it
out and continue on the track??? unbelievable!! It's disgusting.
|
850.43 | exit wounds - necessity | DECALP::HOHWY | Just another Programmer | Wed Dec 11 1991 06:15 | 10 |
|
Fra's comments make me think about: I have also seen exit
wounds directly from bone which bled very little or not
at all. In general to get a good blood trail, exit wounds
are required (IMHO), but obviously they don't always
work as perfect as that. No exit wound => almost surely
a poor bloodtrail (I know there are exceptions).
- Mike
|
850.44 | | SA1794::CHARBONND | and straight on 'til morning. | Wed Dec 11 1991 09:46 | 5 |
| Lack of blood is bad, but other things can help tracking. A friend
of mine hit a deer too far back, the arrow luckily hit the femoral,
or leg artery, but there was no blood trail. The deer lost use of
his rear leg, causing him to drag it and scuff the leaves heavily.
He was not hard to follow.
|
850.45 | Severed arteries=bleeding! | WMOIS::TESTAGROSSAB | | Wed Dec 11 1991 16:28 | 9 |
| How do you hit a main artery, and not have any blood? I believe
this could occur in the body cavity where holes could become blocked
with fat, or intestines, and such....therefore keeping all bleeding
internal.
Where does the blood from a severed artery go if it's hit in the leg?
Maybe he severed tendons, bone, or ligaments to lead the deer to losing
the use of his leg.....or maybe the deer was wearing rubber boots.
|
850.46 | Femoral arteris shots are usually very easy to follow | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Wed Dec 11 1991 17:59 | 23 |
| I was wondering that myself... I hit a spikehorn in VT a few years ago
in the femoral arterie and had a hellacious amount of blood... The deer
was at such a severe quartering away angle to me that if I missed the
chest cavity, the arrow was either going hit it in the rear femoral
arterie area and continue on into the chest cavity, or totally miss.
fortunately things worked out and the arrow hit a little further back
and severed the arterie before continuing on into the liver...
The blood streaming out of the leg area was just incredible. that deer
died in minutes. Two years later another guy shot a deer in the
femoral arterie, and all through the tracking you would have thought it
had had it's heart shot out. Blood was just everywhere.
Personally I think arrow shot deer are much easier to track... IMHO
I realize that one other way to track deer is by watching for scuffed up
leaves and dirt... but in some area where the ground is so hard packed
or theres been some heavy traffic, locating it by this way alone could
be fruitless. I does help whenever you lose the blood trail... and by
following the turned over leaves, i've picked up the blood trail again
many times.
FWIW, Fra
|
850.47 | clarification | SA1794::CHARBONND | and straight on 'til morning. | Wed Dec 11 1991 18:05 | 5 |
| Well, the deer had the arrow in him while he ran, so the femoral may
have been cut as he ran and the arrow worked in deeper. Also, there's
a lot of hair there so much of the blood may have been absorbed.
As I said, the unique 'drag' marks in the leaves were easy to follow,
so looking for blood wasn't a high priority at the time.
|
850.48 | moral, femoral, male, female... | CSCOA1::HUFFSTETLER | | Wed Dec 18 1991 21:55 | 9 |
| > I hit a spikehorn in VT a few years ago in the femoral arterie
> and had a hellacious amount of blood... ^^^^^^^
Do bucks have FEmoral arteries? I'd think they'd have just plain
moral arteries 8^). Does, on the other hand, should have the femoral
arteries...
Scott
|
850.49 | nawwww, thats not it... | KNGBUD::LAFOSSE | | Thu Dec 19 1991 16:24 | 5 |
| Scott,
didn't you know... bucks have no morals whatsoever... ;^)
Fra
|