T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
496.1 | music to my eyes... | BTOVT::REMILLARD_K | | Wed Oct 04 1989 09:50 | 7 |
|
sounds familiar...right down to the Savage Semi-auto, female dog (lab
of course), and the shore blind.....
couldn't of said it better myself.
Kevin
|
496.2 | A1 sporting scoop | WMOIS::ROBERTSON | | Thu Oct 05 1989 10:31 | 6 |
| and the song remains the same.....yep, it's one of the greatest feeling
i've ever had....and Mark you say it "Well". Now to get my kids
involved !!!! I also used a Savage semi-auto, Wienmanier(sp) and
shore blind (ten minutes form my home).
Signed: Maine bound over the next SIX WEEKS....KEN
|
496.3 | awaiting opening day | EXPRES::UFHEIL | | Thu Oct 05 1989 13:34 | 6 |
| This all sounds familiar except I have a male black lab and a remington
1100. Great story it makes me anxious for opening day. Just the cool
air in the morning makes your heart go pitter patter. It's only a
matter of days for the best time of the year.
John
|
496.4 | | HAZEL::LEFEBVRE | Boycott Columbus Day | Mon Oct 09 1989 14:51 | 8 |
| Well, opening day went somewhat as described in .0, except substitute
mergansers for mallards...:^P <======= me saying "yecchh"
5 shots, 2 ducks, which ain't too bad for the first day out...
Looking forward to Inland season opener...
Mark.
|
496.5 | No more "gamey" taste! | BTOVT::RIVERS_D | | Mon Oct 09 1989 15:31 | 8 |
|
Mark,
I hear if you soak Mergansers in kerosene, it makes them taste better
8*}
p.s. nice personal_name
|
496.6 | opening day | DECXPS::RIZZO | | Thu Oct 12 1989 19:02 | 1 |
| amen to that brother
|
496.7 | | HAZEL::LEFEBVRE | I'd rather be hunting | Mon Oct 16 1989 11:27 | 4 |
| The black and mallard drake I threw in the freezer this weekend
will make me forget all about those mergansers.
Mark.
|
496.8 | Two incidents to share | HAZEL::LEFEBVRE | I'd rather be hunting | Mon Oct 16 1989 16:08 | 48 |
| A couple of interesting stories to tell about this weekend's
waterfowling activities.
First of all, we were setup about 30 minutes early on Saturday,
with about 25 duck decoys (swimmers and feeders) and 6 magnum geese.
About 5 minutes before legal shooting began, two guys go paddling
by in a canoe, one wearing a blaze orange hat. They wave, we wave
back.
Anyway, they proceed to paddle just beyond our spread and start
throwing decoys out in the water. Not only were they in our shooting
field (30 yards max), but they were tossing decoys in the water
right in front of our spread! All this while ducks are flying in
and bailing out when they see these two clowns throwing decoys.
I hollered to them that I thought that they were close and could
they please move to another area. Mind you, I was fuming at this
point as we were missing a lot of action because of them. Well,
to make a long story short, they moved, but we didn't see much action
after that. I managed to drop a black about 9:00 that was apparently
looking for a flock to join.
Boy, the loonies are out there.
The second story involves my first run-in with The Man (Game Wardens)
in 5 years of hunting in NH. Evidently, we had inadvertantly accessed
our hunting area illegally (private road). This was strictly an
oversight on my part as the sign at the top of the access road
indictated that it was private. The area is okay to hunt in; we
simply have to put the canoes in from another spot.
The gameys were extremely courteous and professional. They check
out our guns, ammo, licenses, stamps, signatures and made sure we
had no lead on us. They basically let us stay there, but made my
buddy move his truck.
WARNING: if you have plans to go grouse or pheasant hunting before
or after your duck hunt, make DAMN SURE that you keep the lead shot
in the truck. If you have as much as 1 shell in your vest or on
your person, you WILL BE cited for using illegal ammunition. The
game warden was adamant about this.
Again, these guys were very courteous and it made the whole incident
(which he agreed was an honest mistake) a very quick and painless
experience. They even played with the dog.
Mark.
|
496.9 | | CLUSTA::STORM | | Tue Oct 17 1989 15:48 | 19 |
| Mark, congrats on a nice opening day.
We went goose hunting yesterday for opening day of the Mass Central
zone, but saw mostly ducks. I got a mallard and a pintail. First
pintail I've ever seen in this area.
I've been checked twice by the game wardens so far this season. Once
in NH and yesterday in Mass by the "state Environmental Police" - an
interesting title. They were all very nice.
The steel shot issue is a problem for mixed bag hunting. I don't mind
it sitting over decoys, but I do a lot of pheasant hunting and duck
jump-shooting in the same area. The NH warden said they would probably
cut a little slack there if we weren't over decoys. I'm not sure it's
worth the chance, but I would hate to start shooting pheasant with
steel.
Mark,
|
496.10 | what if... | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Tue Oct 17 1989 16:01 | 11 |
|
I have a question concerning the mix shooting (steel vs lead).
I believe this would be illegal but would like to check.
Say I am out partridge/pheasant/rabbit hunting, in a place that does
not normally hold ducks. I have all lead shot. If a duck/goose flies
by, can I shoot it??
--Bob
|
496.11 | | CLUSTA::STORM | | Tue Oct 17 1989 16:11 | 14 |
| Bob, shooting that duck or goose would clearly be illegal.
I don't mind shooting ducks or geese only when I have steel shot in
the gun, it's when I switch types of hunting without returning to the
truck first. One good example is a trip I usually take a couple of
times each fall. We float a small river in my canoe and jump-shoot
ducks on the way. At the end of the float we pull the canoe and
hunt grouse on the way back to the truck. Unfortunately, I don't
see anyway they could make this legal without leaving loopholes that
people would take advantage of. Guess I will be shooting some
pheasants and grouse with steel shot.
mark,
|
496.12 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | The trigger doesn't pull the finger | Tue Oct 17 1989 18:11 | 4 |
| Why does it bother you to shoot pheasant and grouse with steel shot? Is it
just because lead is more effective?
The Doctah
|
496.13 | steel is effective... | BTOVT::REMILLARD_K | | Tue Oct 17 1989 18:41 | 13 |
|
re .12
I'm running into this same situation in Vermont...and the only problem
I see with shooting steel at grouse, squirrel, etc, is the availability
of steel shot in the smaller pellet sizes, #5,#6...also the cost. I
can still reload a 1 3/8 oz. load of 7 1/2's for 1/2 the cost of a box
of steel. From what I've seen, steel shot is very effective. In fact
I pounded a goose this weekend at 75 yards (not typical range) with T,
hit it with 4 pellets, 1 in the head and 3 in the side...dropped like a
rock.
Kevin
|
496.14 | | HAZEL::LEFEBVRE | I'd rather be hunting | Tue Oct 17 1989 19:06 | 8 |
| I agree with steel being very effective in taking a bird down.
All the ducks I've shot so far this year were taken within 40 yards,
and all went down like a bag of rocks. After cleaning out the birds,
I've noticed that the pellets went through the entire breast area.
The black I shot this past weekend had a broken neck where a pellet
hit.
Mark.
|
496.15 | | CLUSTA::STORM | | Tue Oct 17 1989 20:27 | 9 |
| I don't have any complaints about the effectiveness of steel, the ducks
and geese I've shot have been clean kills.
My complaints are cost, this is made worst because I still have a
large supply of lead loads I want to use up; and eating the birds.
I am more paranoid about chomping down on a steel pellet.
Mark
|
496.16 | other problems arise | BTOVT::RIVERS_D | | Wed Oct 18 1989 10:31 | 29 |
|
I'm starting to worry about using steel shot. Not because it isn't
effective, I had no problem hitting ducks last fall.
My problem is this.......On opening day last wednesday, we saw quite
a few ducks. I could not hit the broad side of a barn. Couldn't
figure it out. I was hitting 'em fine last year. Then I had a shell
jam in the chamber on eject. I got it out and looked at it and the
crimp was blown off. These were leftover shells from last year. When
I got home, I cleaned a mallard (which I had hit but my partner ended
up having to finish off) and confirmed what I had suspected. The
pellets were covered with rust. I was probably shooting rusty slugs!
Everything I read and heard said that you would have to DROP the shells
in the water to get them to rust. These shells had never been exposed
to that situation. I firmly believe that the summer's humidity made
these shells rust.
Ended up just buying new shells, and will trash my leftovers. Makes me
wonder about the stuff you buy though. Maybe they should package them
in sealed containers with silica-gel or something. You never know how
long they've been sitting on the shelf. I noticed that there are date
codes and/or lot numbers on the shell boxes. I'm definitely going to
look for the latest stuff I can find.
Anyone else shot any rust lately?
Dave
|
496.17 | to undercoat or not... | BTOVT::REMILLARD_K | | Wed Oct 18 1989 11:31 | 17 |
|
re .16
I would like to see the results of a pattern test at 30 yards with
those shells. I do believe that rust can be a problem, just don't
know to what degree. Do the pellets separate upon ignition of the
powder? Or are you shooting a pattern full of holes? Are the crimps
breaking because the hulls are made of cheap plastic? I for one can
atest to the fact that Federal steel hulls are the cheapest things
around. Lets set up a piece of cardboard at 30 yards and do a little
test...
Being the guy who had to take care of that duck that Dave hit, I say he
was shooting behind it....but you know how duck hunters are with their
excuses... ;^)
Kevin
|
496.18 | A wiseguy, eh? | BTOVT::RIVERS_D | | Wed Oct 18 1989 12:55 | 13 |
|
Re: .17
Ofcourse I shot behind it! It was going straight away! How do you
lead a duck that is going straight away?!
You are a good shot, Kevin.....I just wish you hadn't gone to that
"STEVENS SCHOOL of MODESTY"
;-) gotcha
|
496.19 | Steel needed near water only? | CARTUN::TREMELLING | Making tomorrow yesterday, today! | Wed Oct 18 1989 16:43 | 3 |
| I was under the impression that lead was O.K. for waterfowl, as long as
you're not near water (like flying by the woods). Yes?
|
496.20 | | WILLEE::MANLEY | | Wed Oct 18 1989 18:59 | 10 |
| RE: .19
No! In Mass. you must use steel for waterfowl everywhere. I bet
I know what your thinking......"WHAT DO I DO WITH THIS STOCK PILE
OF LEAD NUMBER 2s AND 4s?".......me too. My brother and I have
about 40 lbs. of the stuff that hasn't been re-loaded yet. Its not
the best for skeet, but thats about all I can think of to use it
on.
|
496.21 | Food for thought... | DISCVR::FERRARO | | Thu Oct 19 1989 00:02 | 7 |
| re: 20
How about using the leftover lead shot for bullets.
Melt it down to ingots with your favorite alloy or whatever.
|
496.22 | One more day !!!!!! | DNEAST::STEVENS_JIM | | Thu Oct 25 1990 12:53 | 9 |
| AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
CAN'T WAY ANY LONGER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My neck is so swollen I can't talk !!!!
|
496.23 | | XCUSME::NEWSHAM | I'm the NRA | Thu Oct 25 1990 14:54 | 7 |
| Jim,
I know the feeling. I won't be able to head up to Vermont
until the 15th and I've been packed since last week.
Red
|