T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
246.1 | How many? | BPOV02::J_AMBERSON | | Thu Oct 13 1988 12:41 | 6 |
| How many do you want? I should be able to get you quite a few if
things work out. Let me know how many to save. We usually breast
out the birds, so I can give you the whole carcass. Do the scouts
mind doing the rest?
Jeff
|
246.2 | a thigh man myself | BTO::REMILLARD_K | | Thu Oct 13 1988 15:11 | 11 |
| re .1
Jeff,
I see you breast out your birds...what do you do with the legs and
thighs? If you haven't tried them, I'm sure you must have, I think
they're the tastiest portion of the whole goose. I haven't tried
cutting the leg/thigh portion from the carcass, but I bet it wouldn't
be that difficult. Just a thought.
Kevin
|
246.3 | | BPOV04::J_AMBERSON | | Thu Oct 13 1988 15:56 | 10 |
| Kevin,
To be honest, the reason I breast them is cause it's quick and
easy. The amount of meat you gain by cleaning them in a "conventional"
manner isn't worth the added time and effort to me. While were
on the subject, what do you guys use for steel on geese? Im planning
on using BB and 1's. What do ya think? Can't wait for Monday
morning!!
Jeff
|
246.4 | | LILAC::MKPROJ | REAGAN::ZORE | Thu Oct 13 1988 16:07 | 8 |
| Back to .0, it's a bit late now but if you can find a lake where the geese
are staying in the summer, that would help a lot towards youir goal next
June. They shed their feather in the early summer. Here in Merrimack, NH,
the geese shed their featethers by the ton. Makes for a nice walk around
the fire pond picking them up. Plenty of big ones too.
Rich
|
246.5 | | CLUSTA::STORM | | Thu Oct 13 1988 23:02 | 7 |
| Jeff, you must have shot a few geese on the coast last year with
steel. How did the BB's and 1's work? Any preference?
I'm planning to start with 3" 1's; but haven't tested them yet.
Mark,
|
246.6 | 30yds or less | BPOV04::J_AMBERSON | | Fri Oct 14 1988 11:13 | 7 |
| The birds that I have shot with steel were all shot with BB's.
We normally hunt over decoys, and at the distances that we take
the birds, I didn't really notice a big differance in killing power.
I am interested in other peoples opinions as we will be using steel
statewide this year.
Jeff
|
246.7 | Canada goose, Canada geese | CARLSN::STUART | | Mon Oct 17 1988 15:14 | 11 |
|
Not being critical here but would like to point out that there
is no such animal as canadian goose, they are Canada geese or
Canada goose in the singular. This by the way is one of the most
common mistakes made by the professional "sports" writers and
anti groups.
regards,
dick
|
246.8 | | CLUSTA::STORM | | Mon Oct 17 1988 20:09 | 12 |
| I'm happy to report that the steel #1's worked this morning. The
goose I took was probably 35-40 yards out and it dropped pretty
good. There was one problem. Apparently those first shots warped
my gun barrel... The next geese I shot at were much closer, but kept
flying after I shot! :-)
That was my first goose after many unsuccessful attempts! Thanks,
Jeff, for your helpful advice. That was more excitement hunting
than I think I have ever had before. It was GREAT!
Mark,
|
246.9 | Home by 7:45 | BPOV04::J_AMBERSON | | Tue Oct 18 1988 11:26 | 22 |
| O.K. you guys how did you do opening day? We had good news and
bad news. First the good news. We got to our "spot" late (6:20)
and nobody else was there. In the dark we could hear the ducks
milling around and generally having a good time. Finally 7:00 rolled
around and the fun began. The first shot was on a single that was
coming in, and my partner rolled it. At the shot all hell broke
loose, there were ducks EVERYWHERE. We managed to drop a pair quickly.
We had left the dog in the truck, so I went back and got him and
gave him the three birds as blinds. We had left him there because
the area we were hunting is real hard to sneak into and we figured
the least noise the better. Any way after he retrieved the three
birds, we sat for about 5 minutes before dropping a fourth. It
was a long retrieve as the duck wasn't hit real well and sailed.
Skeet marked it well and made the retrieve. Now the bad news. When
he returned with the bird he was bleeding. He cut his pad. 5
stitches. We were done for the day. As I was tapeing up his paw
6 geese came in. Couldn't shoot cause we didn't have any way to
retrieve them. Should be ready for the second season.
What did you guys think of steel shot? My feeling is you either
hit them or you don't. I couldn't see a big difference.
Jeff (who will be stuck hunting fields for awhile)
|
246.10 | Had a fun day! | HELIX::COTHRAN | | Tue Oct 18 1988 13:31 | 32 |
| Sorry to hear about your dog Jeff. Any idea what he/she
was cut on?
Took yesterday off. Had a good mix throughout the day.
We, my partner and I, finished the morning about 8:30
with four, 2 mallards, 2 woodies. After a couple more
pecan rolls, a cup of coffee, and watching a few singles
go into the marsh, we headed out to jump'em. Put a pair
up and dropped one, could find him though. Looked like a
good hit, but when we finally got over to where he went
down, no duck. We never saw him move after he went down.
I HATE loosing ducks...don't have a dog.
At about 10:00 we headed out to do some fishing. Picked up
about a half dozen bass, a few pickerel, and a couple crappie.
A nice mix for the day. After lunch we dressed the blind up
a bit more.
Steel shot. We used 2's. Three of the four that dropped in
front of us folded up nicely. The fourth tried diving but
after it's second try never moved again. Longest shot was
going away at probable 40-45 yds, she folded up. My opinion
of the 2's on ducks is that they knocked'em down pretty hard.
Next time out I think I'll try something smaller, to see if
I notice a difference. (Any comments on a smaller size shot
for ducks or, are 2's fine).
Nothing in the late afternoon/evening, too tired. Home at 5:15pm
Bryan
|
246.11 | | BPOV04::J_AMBERSON | | Tue Oct 18 1988 13:40 | 13 |
| I used steel 4's yesterday. No problem. My theory is that the
ammo manufactures have improved the ballistics fo there loads.
When steel first came out the patterns were real poor. Folks
got turned off by it cause they had big holes in there patterns.
Supposedly this problem has been fixed with the help of improved
wads and other "fixes". Any ideas out there?
We finished with a drake mallard, a hen, a black, and a drake woody.
A truely mixed bag. No idea what the dog got cut on, could have
been anything, rock, glass, whatever. He was walking around like
he had been on quite the bender last night. Wobbling all over the
place. He's got his sea legs back today.
Jeff
|
246.12 | a different view... | BTO::REMILLARD_K | | Tue Oct 18 1988 14:58 | 41 |
|
I'm using primarily steel #3's, 3" magnums. Things started going
fairly well with the stuff, seemed to be doing better than I would
with lead, my percetanges were way up. I think I'm in a slump lately
though. The last 3 times out I've shot 1 1/2 boxes to drop 2 ducks
cleanly, have sent a few with a few less feathers on their way (don't
know how those ducks will fair in the long run...probably swamp
fertilizer...it's pretty sad, I'm certainly not happy about it).
Talking with other hunters one group dropped 21 birds only to loose
9 of them, that's not good.
I disagree with Jeff on this, I think there are an awful lot of
near fatal hits with steel that we don't know about. Of course
this is strictly from my observations. I have noticed that every
bird that I've killed cleanly has either been hit in the head/neck
or blasted in the body (I don't mean 3 or 4 pellets-more like gapping
holes through the chest). With lead I cleaned several birds that
only had very few (3 or 4) pellets in the chest that dropped out
of the sky like they were hit with a Bazooka. With steel I'm seeing
birds that drop are birds that are hit dead on, with a lot of the
meat being wasted to blood clots or gapping holes. We have had
some cripples due to steel, but luckily the dog has stayed on every
one and gotten them all. But the point I'd like to make is that
these cripples were shot up pretty bad, a hen mallard had at least
8-10 pellet holes in her body, that bird put my dog on a 10 minute
retrieve only to die 15 minutes after being in the boat. What dropped
this bird and other cripples is broken wings, I estimate we've plugged
as many or more than we've dropped only to have them die in the
swamp. To me it's disgusting and next year I'm going to have to
justify getting out in the boat in the U.S., I believe I can still
hunt with lead in Canada if that's the case my days of hunting in
the U.S. are numbered.
I know what they say about practicing, and I've done that, I increased
my clay pigeon shooting from 50 birds to 350 this year, it hasn't
made a difference. Perhaps this is not enough? I claim it's a
heck of a lot more than the average hunter whose out there shooting
up the swamp with steel shot.
Kevin who_hates_to_be_the_direct_cause_of_wasted_game
|
246.13 | another 02 cents worth | BPOV04::J_AMBERSON | | Tue Oct 18 1988 16:00 | 23 |
| Kevin,
We were also using 3"magnums. As I said earlier, I haven't noticed
a big difference in lead vs. steel. Three of the four birds shot
yesterday were dead before they hit the water. The fourth was dead
by the time the dog got to it.
I too have a problem with guys loosing "9 out of 21" birds.
Something is definitely wrong. At what range were these guys shooting?
Were they using a dog? What chokes were they using? What size
shot? They need to change something, dependent on the answers to
the above questions.
You mentioned that you estimate that you have "plugged as many
or more than we've dropped only to have them die in the swamp".
Can I suggest that you ask your selves the questions I asked above? The
birds we were shooting at have been at relatively close distances.
The vast majority dropped cleanly.
A good friend of mine runs a comercial goose guiding outfit. He
has been using steel off and on for a year. This guy shoots somewhere
around 100 geese a year. His thoughts on the subject are that if
you shoot at reasonable ranges, with the right load, and can hit
what your aiming at, then you'll kill geese.
Jeff
|
246.14 | Sorry, eh? | HAMSTR::SOUTHWORTH | | Tue Oct 18 1988 16:26 | 5 |
| Sorry for not making the distinction. Does that also mean that
Labatt's is not a canadian beer but a Canada beer? :^)
Ray
|
246.15 | A good opener | DELNI::G_FISHER | | Tue Oct 18 1988 16:35 | 14 |
| We did well. I shot steel #2 in a 2 3/4 mag. They did just fine.
Seemed like I had to shorten my lead (tighter patterns?). I would
guess the average shot at 35 yards.
I took a pair of drake woodies and a drake greenwing teal. Teal
were everywhere. I'd never seen much of them before. I think the
fog helped us out holding the birds down longer.
We were retrieving my teal when 12 geese set on my goose decoys.
No shots.
Figures...
Guy
|
246.16 | | BPOV02::PERRY | | Tue Oct 18 1988 16:41 | 15 |
|
I haven't used steel for a few years now. After listening
to Jeff and Kevin I really agree with both of them. Yes
they have made improvements with the steel shot ballistics(sp?),
as when I used it, it was not yet known that improved cylinder
was a good selection for steel shot, and most duck hunters used
full chokes back then. Still most kills were somewhere around
30yrds. Ducks shot beyond this distance back then were usually
wounded or maimed. With lead shot, 40 to 50 yard shots were
not uncommon and provided clean kills. Steel shot lacks the density
of lead and can't compare with the kind of knock down power that
the lead had to offer. Just my opinion !
pat.
|
246.17 | A Great opening day! | 24MAKO::BROPHY | | Tue Oct 18 1988 18:22 | 17 |
| We had a great opener ourselves arrived at our blindes about 15
minutes later than planned but were set up and ready to go by
6:30. We managaned to fill both our bags by 9:30. 3 drake mallards,
2 drake woodies, and one hen green wing teal.
For shot we were using #4 2-3/4" shells, open choked shotguns over
decoys. All but 2 birds were clean kills and they were both dead
by the time we had them in the boat. average distance was 25 to
30 yards. This was our second year using steel as the coastal zone
was steel only last year. The key with steel is to wait until
the birds are at least over your marker decoy, the days of 50 or
60 yard shots are gone. It is now time to learn to adjust and use
what we have.
Good luck the rest of the season!
Mike
|
246.18 | I hate to loose a bird | HELIX::COTHRAN | | Tue Oct 18 1988 18:51 | 37 |
|
I, by no means consider myself an expert or for that matter
overly knowledgeable regarding the steel vs lead controversy.
Yesterday was the first time I've shot with steel, and therefore
is the only time I can compare any lead vs steel issues, for myself
anyway. Maybe it was because we used 2's, but man did 3 of
those 4 birds fold. Last year we probably had only four total
that folded as the three did yesterday. Yeah there were a few
gaping holes in a couple of the breasts. But, as far as I'm
concerned, you know there going to be there anyway. And, I'm going
to get just as many bites out of a breast with 4 holes from #2 shot
as I would from a breast with 6 or more holes from #4 shot.
I'm going to wait the year out, try 4's next time out, and see
what happens. At the end of the year though, if yesterday was
any indication, I don't think I'll notice to much of a difference
between steel and lead, if any at all. All I've got to do is shoot
like I did yesterday.
As far as loosing birds, I think we all try for clean kills. Of the
ducks my partner and I shoot, we loose at most 3-4 birds a season. 3 of
those four birds are lost in the marsh, the other has taken a dive.
My partner and I are very familiar with where we hunt, and we know how
and where the birds will fly depending on where they come in from.
We talk to each other. If either of us feel that a hit bird is
going to drop any place where we may not be able to retrieve it,
(i.e. not in the cove) we tell each other to "let em go." If
we judge the shot to be to far, we'll let em go. We would
probably double our bag a year if we took more shots, but we
would probable tripple our count on lost birds. I'd say the vast
majority of our shots are taken inside of 40 yds. It's great
fun to blast away, and watch feathers fly but for me, it's more
pleasurable to try and coax em in over the decoys, and put em on the
dinner table.
Bryan
|
246.19 | No luck here | CSC32::WATERS | The Agony of Delete | Tue Oct 18 1988 19:17 | 9 |
| Our, Dave() and I, opening day was the pits. Get out to our water
hole and it's bone dry. Ducks flying way off in the distance is
the closest we got. Shot parrie dogs instead. :-)
Looking for a new place to play. :-(
In Colorado, this year Teal are not legal to shoot. :-(
Mark
|
246.20 | | BOMBE::BONIN | | Tue Oct 18 1988 19:49 | 16 |
| Without pointing the finger at .12, we hunters have been
inclined to accuse steel shot when poor shooting skills, or,
more often, the inability to judge effective range are to
blame. We all missed birds with lead. We all crippled birds
with lead. And when we killed with lead we didn't play
medical examiner with the carcass. The point is, when we shot
lead we didn't examine the numbers and killing power as
closely as we are with steel. Therefore, I don't believe any
of us can make accurate comparisons. In fact, you can only
test loads under controlled conditions.
Re 12: Kevin, since this is the second time you've mentioned
letting birds slowly die in your boat (notes 246.12 and 21.9),
I have to ask, why don't you dispatch your cripples?
Doug
|
246.21 | I disagree (mostly) | BTO::RIVERS_D | | Wed Oct 19 1988 11:07 | 46 |
| Re: .20
>>> We all missed birds with lead.
Absolutely!
>>> We all crippled birds with lead.
Again, I agree. But it doesn't take a PhD to figure out
whether or not you are getting more or less cripples in
any given year. My experiences have been similar to
Kevin's. Hunting with lead, it was very obvious that alot
of the clean kills were caused by the force of the impact.
The pellets would stop in the birds and expend all of their
energy at that point, killing the duck. With steel, I have
seen that many (majority) of the pellets are entering AND
EXITING the bird, not expending their energy and not killing
the bird by impact. This is (I feel) why the birds are
being crippled.
>>> When we shot lead we didn't examine the numbers and killing
power as closely as we are with steel.
Speak for yourself, Doug ;-) I've always made it a habit
to examine my birds as I cleaned them. This way I know
how well I was shooting, was I hitting vital organs, how
new loads were patterning on the birds, etc. This inform-
ation is vital to the success of my hunts.
What's wrong with this picture(?): I shoot a duck. It goes
down hard, but the duck is still alive. It takes 15 minutes
for the dog to get to it because the duck makes a series of
dives, etc. Upon arriving back to the blind, the duck must
be dispatched. Eventhough it is messed up pretty bad from the
shot, it hadn't died. When cleaning the bird, I find that
one whole side of the breast is mutilated and is wasted. Why
didn't this duck die on impact? I've been known to be a little
forgetful at times, but I would have remembered if something
like this had happened while I was shooting lead. It hasn't.
Steel, well, that's another story.
Dave
p.s. I'm not a big fan of lead poisoning either. There's got
to be an answer somewhere.
|
246.22 | A little more info on steel... | TARKIN::AHO | Uncle Mike | Wed Oct 19 1988 11:35 | 18 |
|
Just an interesting "side" note on Steel shot. I was reading
in "Wing & Shot" magazine that it might be advantageous to use
copper plated steel, as "regular" steel if it gets wet or condenses
the shot can rust and "Clump" together providing bad patterning.
Just a little FYI for everyone...
~Mike~
BTW No geese by me taken on opening day but JUST SEEING the AMOUNTS
we saw was worth it!!
|
246.23 | It's only just begun | BTO::RIVERS_D | | Wed Oct 19 1988 13:26 | 13 |
| Hey Mike,
There's alot more where those came from. A lady on the local
news reported seeing approximately 7000 geese (counted 146
flocks) heading south as she was sailing on Lake Champlain
the other day. Seems like the population has been growing
by leaps and bounds the last few years. I wouldn't be surprised
to see goose hunting as THE migratory bird sport of the future.
Dave
p.s. thanks for the tip on copper clad steel. Makes sense.
Anyone seen this stuff on the shelf? Whats the cost?
|
246.24 | "ONE MAN BAND" | TPVAX2::DESROSIERS | | Wed Oct 19 1988 13:35 | 17 |
| i have been looking at the information on steel shots. i have a
question on the effects it has on the older 12 gauge shotguns. i
own two shotguns one is a mossemberg which is 10 years old and it
has a c-select choke on it. my question is can i use steel shots
with the barrel i have or do i have to make some modifications to
the barrel? the other shotgun i have is a 30 year old ithaca (sp)
with a full choke barrel. same question as above.
opening day for me was terrible at 6:30 am i had about 30 to 50
ducks fly by within shooting range and at 6:45 we had about 5 ducks
in the decoys and they left right before legal shooting. i made up
some ground on the remainder of the week i ended up with six ducks
by saturday.
any help you guys can give me on the shotguns i have would be
grateful. i think N.H. will be going to all steel by 1989 or 1990
thanks
|
246.25 | some answers | BTO::RIVERS_D | | Wed Oct 19 1988 14:03 | 21 |
| re: .24
It is NOT recommended to shoot steel shot through any gun that
has a full choke, last I heard. The shot has to compress quite
a bit to get through a full choke. Steel, being a harder metal
than lead, does not compress very much. The studies I've seen
said that you can end up with a visible bulge in your barrel
behind the choke constriction. This supposedly does not affect
the performance of the gun (?) but it definately is not preferred.
As far as the Mossberg, I understand the mechanics of this choke
system and, although I haven't seen any reports on them, I would
think that you could do damage the "fingers" inside the choke.
Mossberg is recommending you buy a Accu-steel choke system, which
in your case would mean a new barrel. I've been using my older
Accu-choke with absolutely no problems. I'm not willing to buy
the Accu-steel choke tubes at $16.50 a pop, yet.
Hope this helps,
Dave
|
246.26 | Hope this isn't too graphic. | BTO::REMILLARD_K | | Wed Oct 19 1988 15:11 | 59 |
|
re .20 and others
How do you suggest I dispatch my cripples? I've been duck hunting
for 12 years, quite avidly I may add, and haven't found a sure fire
way yet. Sometimes I try and break the neck...have you ever seen
a cripple survive a broken neck? I've seen several of them. Sometimes
I smash their skulls...a little crude maybe...have you ever seen
a duck survive a smashed skull with brain material hanging out?
I have...and I don't mean nerves and twitching I mean breathing.
Sometimes I drown them...especially if it's a bird of high quality
that I may have mounted. The point I was trying to make is the
birds go down...no question about it, and lots of them go down dead,
but those birds that get marginally hit I've seen live a long time.
Very hard to dispatch these birds. I felt quite bad last year when
I brought my wife hunting with me (first time she had hunted with
me when I used steel shot) and she had to witness me attempt several
times to dispatch a cripple...it's not a pretty sight.
As far as shooting range goes, most birds are within 30 yds. I
guess I lack confidence with steel and that probably has an effect
as well. The stuff is really inconsistent...or I am inconsistent,
probably me...or elements that affect shooting change (wind etc.).
Last night for example I shot at 3 birds, 2 dropped dead, the 3rd
I didn't touch. One greenhead was at no more than 20 yards, the
other must have been 40 yards. The one at 20 put the dog on a good
retrieve, the one at 40 was DOA. The bird that was farther away
had at least 15 pellet holes in the upper breast and neck and the
closer duck had about 6 holes in it all along one side of the breast.
All of these pellets exited the bird on the other side, when I
cleaned the other bird several pellets fell out of the chest cavity.
I must have counted 6 just beneath the breast bone. So maybe I'm
shooting at them too close? 15 or more pellets in a mallard at
40 yards is a hell of a lot of shot, especially #3's. That is one
tight pattern for a 6" area. Any comments?
I have always examined my kills quite close, have always been
interested in anatomy etc. so it's not unusual for me to go into
detail, I hope it wasn't a bit too graphic.
I'd also like to say Jeff has a good point about hitting or missing,
theoretically it's true your chances of a clean kill or clean miss
is higher with steel, looking at it purely from a shot string
standpoint. The string is much smaller with steel. I'm sure what's
happening with me is that I'm most likely shooting over my birds
at the closer ranges and hitting them with the fringe of a very
tight pattern. The stuff has lots of surprises it is a lot different
than lead don't be lead (no pun intended) to believe the 2 are equal.
I was quite surprised to see a flairing greenhead at 40 yards crumple
with one shot last night...hopefully there will be a few more examples
of that in the next few days.
Good Hunting.
Kevin
Kevin
|
246.27 | One sure fire way to dispatch cripples | MANANA::HUSTON | | Wed Oct 19 1988 15:59 | 5 |
|
re .26, The only sure fire way I know of dispatching cripples, quickly,
is to cut off the head, crude but it works every time.
--Bob
|
246.28 | The main squeeze. | BPOV04::J_AMBERSON | | Wed Oct 19 1988 16:05 | 15 |
| Kevin,
Here is how I kill crippled ducks. I grab them from the back
so that my thumb is in what would be one arm pit (wing pit?) and
my fingers in the other. Then squeeze. It takes about 30 seconds
for the duck to die. I'm not sure how it kills them but it works
real well. I learned this at field trials with ducks and pheasants.
The guy that showed me said that it collapses there lungs. I haven't
tried it on geese as you would have to have hands the size of Andre
the Giant. Geese get there neck broken or there head smacked agains
a rock. I agree that some ducks seem to live forever, but most
of the time I think it is just nerves. I did notice that 99% of
the shot is travelling through the birds rather the nending up inside
them.
Jeff
|
246.29 | | BOMBE::BONIN | | Wed Oct 19 1988 17:09 | 13 |
|
I use a method similar to Jeff's. I place my thumb just below
and between the breasts. Then I press in and upward toward
the head to collapse the lungs. Prior to learning this
method, I decapitated birds that didn't readily succumb to
other methods.
I'm still not sastified that I'm using the best method and
I've always been on the lookout for this topic in any
literature on waterfowling. Surprisingly, it's never
discussed.
Doug
|
246.30 | | TWOBOS::LAFOSSE | | Thu Oct 20 1988 11:22 | 10 |
| What are you guys doing about steel shot used in guns with choke
tubes??? All the literature I've read said steel shot not recommended.
does this mean that the field grade browning O/U i'm gonna buy can't
be used in the field???
Fra
catch 22 or what!!!
|
246.31 | no problems yet | BTO::RIVERS_D | | Thu Oct 20 1988 13:25 | 11 |
| Fra,
I've been using steel shot through choke tubes this season, with
no problems. I've mostly used Improved cylinder tube. I've inserted
them hand tight and been able to remove them by hand after each
hunt. I did throw my full choke tube in my gun (to do a couple
of patterns) and fired 2 shots. Almost didn't get it out after.
Mossberg's Accu-steel tubes look like they make sense (threaded
barrel extensions) but I haven't seen the need.
Dave
|
246.32 | ckoke tubes = steel | BTO::REMILLARD_K | | Thu Oct 20 1988 14:05 | 21 |
|
re .30
It really doesn't matter what type of gun you're going to be using,
if you put in a full choke tube you can bet you'll see some problems
over time. With steel full choke doesn't make sense anyhow, the
stuff patterns incredibly tight. All major gun manufacturers are
making their own recommendations, if I remeber right Browning suggests
using invectors of no tighter than modified, with shot size no larger
than T. When you go to buy it just check their literature, I'm
sure they give their recommendations/guarantees.
I've been using my Winchester pump with the modified winchoke tube
for 2 years now, absolutely no problems. I have seen sparks coming
out of the end of the barrel on occasion though, maybe once or twice.
Kevin
|
246.33 | What model was that? | DELNI::G_FISHER | | Thu Oct 20 1988 14:24 | 8 |
| re: -1
Interesting, I didn't know Winchester had a flamethrower, in a pump
model.
(just kidding)
Guy
|
246.34 | | SALEM::PAPPALARDO | | Thu Oct 20 1988 15:47 | 24 |
| All the write ups that I have seen on the subject of using steel
shot in current and older models is to use no more than a modified
choke. Anything more than this will cause a "Cosmetic" bulge in
the barrel right in front of the choke area. Something I noticed
throughout this entire note was that no has mentioned any difference
between 2 3/4 vs 3" mag. Everything i've seen says when comparing
these 2 in lead shot there is a difference, but as far as steel
goes there isn't a significant difference anymore. That is why if
you look at most manufactures catalogs in the shotgun sections you
will see in the fine print mention of 3 1/2" magnum available upon
marketing of the ammo. I also believe that mossberg is about the
only one with this gun avaible right now. I am considering also
in buying an O/U like Paul L. and I don't know if you notced Paul
the mention of the 3 1/2 in the Browning catalog. Has anyone else
seen anything about this "NEW" shell?
Guy
P.S. Also being a dealer in my travels to the
distributors I picked up a brouchre from a company
called Reloading Specialties, it is called "Making
Sense of Steel Shot" if anyone would like a copy
send me mail and i'll get it out to you.
|
246.35 | there was mention of the 3 1/2 earlier | VELVET::GATH | | Thu Oct 20 1988 17:00 | 22 |
| there is a note somewhere on the very topic.
It is being introduced by federal and was anounced in the
spring at the 1988 shot show at ( i beleive ) Alanta Georga.
At any rate Mossburg had a head start and was already designing
and building a new pump shotgun to take the new Federal
shell.
Since that time there has been some writing about it
in the product reviews of various magizines.
I have seen any and I am not sure if it is on the market
yet?
Many other gun manufactures are going to alter the exsisting guns
to accomidate this shell as soon as it is reallity.
At any rate guy there is a note either here or in the firearms notes
file. try dir/author=gath
Bear
|
246.36 | | SALEM::PAPPALARDO | | Thu Oct 20 1988 17:48 | 7 |
| re.35 Thanks Bear.
I did what you said #111 in this file talks about it, and #1534
in the firearms also has info. There is either very little info
released about this or most of us have missed this upcoming issue.
Guy
|
246.37 | FPS=??? | BTO::REMILLARD_K | | Thu Oct 20 1988 19:03 | 18 |
|
Guy,
The only difference that I can see, from reading about it-not from
experience, is about 100 fps (going by memory but it's something
like that). The 3" mags are slower, bringing their ballistics closer
to my lead 2 3/4" magnum reloads. That's the only reason I went
with them. Of course the obvious is that there is 1/8 oz. of shot
more in the 3". Maybe the fps thing really doesn't matter either,
but psychologically it helps.
Doug and Jeff,
thanks for the technique on dispatching cripples, I will give it
a try. Actually I have used that before, with limited success,
but it's been awhile...
Kevin
|
246.38 | Another fun morning | HELIX::COTHRAN | | Fri Oct 21 1988 13:55 | 69 |
| Don't know about anyone else, but I'm having fun. We didn't
go out at all this week for a bunch of reasons, but decided
last night that we would this morning. Sounds like a KOLD
rain tomorrow. I hate KOLD ^&(^'n rains.
Went out this morning. Wanted to see the difference
between sunrise on Monday (with the fog and all), and this
morning with the shooting stars (saw three).
The ducks, Teal and Woodies started coming in about 6:35.
At 6:40 we had 5 teals in front of us 30-35yds, and three in
the decoys to our left, with a pair of mallards up against the
grass infront to our right about 40 yds out. We heard more
skiing in, but never saw where they landed. About 6:45 a
pair of woodies came in and set between the 5 teal and 2 mallards.
One had tea with the teal, and the other swam over to join the
mallards. Thought it was strange that they split like this (???).
The three teal that were in our decoys were now out front with
the rest. I just knew that in a second they all would take off.
My partner and I were &*^%'n bricks. The ducks in the marsh
started quacking away. Nothing else came in, Nothing went out
of the marsh.
It was great. All we could see of the mallards were their
white breast and orange legs. The teal began to chase each other
out in front of use. The woodie (drake) by the mallards
moved to a grass patch closer to us. It's hard sittin and
waiting and watching. We loaded out guns. Christ is a pump
loud when your trying to be quiet. We decided that none of the
ducks looked nervous, so we waited. I looked at my watch, 7:04.
Unless something else came in in the next couple minutes that
looked good, we decided that at 7:06 we'd jump'em. We also
decided on the mallards and the drake woodie; a guy in the office
where my partner works puts out $10 for a drake woodie.
At 7:06. we stood up. NOthing! (Guess we did a better job
with the blind than we thought Steve whispers to me). YO!
I yell. We figured the ducks would take off out over the cove
as they were pretty much back up against the high grass and
brush that separates the cove from the marsh. I was on the
woodie, (Steve wanted the ten bucks, but he wanted me to take it).
Steve had the mallards. Wrong! the woodie took off toward us
and headed toward the opening of the marsh banking to our
right. The mallards went out over the cove. Steve and I were
crossing each other. Just as I was ready to pull up, or (duck)
Steve stepped back. The woodie went down with the second shot. I
swung around for the mallard, Steve was on him (we kinda switched
places). He shot, I shot, he shot the drake mallard scored a 9.3 as
he hit the water. In all, I'd say at least 12, maybe 15 ducks took
off out of cove.
Nothing else came in. As Steve gets back into the blind, after
picking up the ducks a single comes in, my gun jams. 7:13 (I
guess) Steve says listen, hear that. NO! Should I put the 2's
in? Go ahead, I don't care, I don't hear anything anyway. He
unloads and starts putt'n 2's in. Damn, here they come. You
ready, cuz I can't fix this in time. No can't get the last one
in. They're setting!! Steve, Steve, Steve! Just as these 8
geese start to set Steve gets up. I looked at my watch, 7:15.
Well, we set out to pick up the decoys at 7:20, with a drake
woodie, a drake mallard, and a story to ride each other about
the rest of season, and probably into next year.
Home at 7:50.
Bryan (whose going to play tomorrow by ear)
|
246.39 | espn program | VLS3TW::LAFOSSE | | Fri Oct 21 1988 14:08 | 7 |
| WATCHED A GOOD SHOW LAST NIGHT ON ESPN, 7:00'ISH???
On waterfowling, had some good footage, live shooting, bird
identification, and the dog was the nads!!! anyone catch it.
Fra
|
246.40 | Yup | BTO::RIVERS_D | | Fri Oct 21 1988 15:24 | 14 |
| Fra,
The show you saw was called "Sportsman Series". It is a half hour
show but you can buy or rent the tape. Most of the tapes run about
an hour. I've got the one one duck & goose hunting and it's real
good. They showed half of it last night. This show also airs on
saturday morning (8:30 ?). There are also tapes on deer hunting,
quail hunting, dove hunting, predator hunting, etc.
The last weekend before the end of the first split :*(
Come on snow!
Dave
|
246.41 | DUCK FEVER!! | NEBVAX::PAPPALARDO | CLEVER PHARSE. | Fri Oct 21 1988 16:54 | 12 |
|
RE:: #38
PLEASE ! Don't write story's like that!! So early in the day.
I can't take it! Digital Who,What, Where??
I gota leave early now and go duck hunting.
Its your fault!!
Rick.. Digital, Hunting, Digital,Hunting????????????
|
246.42 | Quick kill for cripples | CRISTA::DUKELOW | | Mon Oct 24 1988 18:44 | 10 |
| (Quick method of killing)
One sure method of finishing off crippled ducks or geese that wasn"t
mentioned in earlier discussion. Grab the bird around the middle of
the neck and swing bird in a fast circular motion keeping your hand
relatively in one place. This snaps the bird's neck and kills almost
instantly. I have yet to see any bird survive past 5 seconds using
this method. This works on any gamebird for that matter.
Keith
|
246.43 | Open season on decoys | TSE::LEFEBVRE | I never met a deer I didn't like | Mon Oct 24 1988 18:59 | 39 |
| I've seen it all now....
Sunday, while hunting Great Bay in New Hampshire, my partner and
I were sitting in a blind near a railroad trestle that crossed a
section of the bay. From our position, we could see the entire
flyway from the bay, as well as the tidal flats behind us.
We had laid out about 15 decoys the previous night to hopefully
draw some puddle ducks that we could stalk on our back from the
blind later Sunday morning.
From our vantage point in the blind, we could make out a man, followed
by two young boys (presumably his sons), sitting in the high grass
overlooking the decoys. My buddy and I then witnessed one of the finest
decoy stalks we've ever seen.
This clown (I hesitate to call him a hunter), motioned for his sons
to stay put, and he proceeded to crawl on his belly to the edge
of a grassy knoll that bordered the puddle that held the decoys.
I estimated him to be 20 feet from the nearest decoy.
At this time, my partner stood up and hollered to the guy about
the decoys when the clown stands up and unloads into one of the
magnums in the puddle. His two sons run up to him, anticipating
a fine gander who had been so ethically shot while sitting in a
puddle. The expression on their face when they realized that Daddy-poo
had just blasted the bejeezus out of a K-Mart special was worth
the price of the decoy.
When we approached the guy, he hemmed and hawed about "a couple
of woodies" that were swimming in the puddle. Not wanting to make
a big scene in front of the kids, we decided not to hassle the guy
too much, as I'm sure he was simply dying inside.
I'm still bustin' a gut over this one.
Be careful, they're out there!
Mark.
|
246.44 | | LILAC::MKPROJ | REAGAN::ZORE | Mon Oct 24 1988 19:31 | 14 |
| RE:.42
Twirling birds by the head to break their neck. I saw a 220lb. man twirl a
chicken by the neck this way once during a survival exercise we were giving
for some college ROTC students. He twirled and twirled and twirled. When
he let go the chicken got up and ran. That chicken was one pissed off
chicken I'll tell you. He recaught it and even tried to rip it's head off
by stretching it's neck. Chicken's eyes rolled back and it's tongue gapped
out and everything. When he let go the chicken got up and ran. That was
one tough chicken. We finally dispatched it with an M16 round to the head.
Just in time too, I saw a gleam in that chicken's eyes that said that if
it weren't taken care of soon we were all gonna be in a heap of trouble.
That was one pissed off chicken...
|
246.45 | We've got some of those "hunters" down here too! | DELNI::G_FISHER | | Mon Oct 24 1988 19:43 | 14 |
| And then there were the "duck hunters" I saw Friday afternoon. As
I approached my normal spot via canoe, there they sat on the far
bank, with their international orange hats on! They had no boat.
I laughed to myself and figured they were far enough away to be
no real threat. At my approach a teal left the cove, circled out
over the main body of the river and headed down stream. Two of them
emptied their guns at a duck that had to be (conservatively) 80
yards away. I counted more than 3 shots each, so I doubt they had
plugs in their guns. I don't know what they would have done if they
had hit the dammed duck, swim for it I suppose. Yeah, right.
Sigh...
Guy
|
246.47 | DO AS YOU TEACH | NEBVAX::PAPPALARDO | CLEVER PHARSE. | Tue Oct 25 1988 17:31 | 18 |
|
This one will make you all SICK!!
I'm sitting in the boat hidden in the tall grass watching the sky
and me dekes when suddenly from around the bend comes this boat
with the outboard at high thottle. Theres this guy standing in the
bow with his shot-gun on his shoulder pointing at my decoys while
I,m about 20yds directly behind them. I'm like holy-Sh** hit the
deck and come about,right Well just about. I was so pissed i stood
up and yelled at this guy who just about fell from his boat, as
he passed me by I reconized him,"Oh my GOD he's the local N.R.A.
Instructor. What an A**H***. Needles to say I paid this clown a
vist. Just so happened he had a Hunter Safty Class that night,
I waited til break ask to speak to him out-side and KICKED HIS A**
IN. He no longer is an instructor,But unfortunetly He still hunts.
My knuckles were sore and I acted like a kid, But IT felt GOOD!
Rick.....
|
246.48 | Special Canada Goose Season, Last Winter | CLUSTA::VIRGIL | | Wed Oct 26 1988 13:10 | 23 |
|
I spoke with someone at the Westboro office about the extended
goose season that was conducted last winter here in MA.
A few interesting things:
- over 3500 permits were given out
- over 3000 geese were taken
- 65% of the diaries were returned
I was surprised at the number that was returned. I expected a better
return since you needed to return the diaries in order to get a
permit the following year to hunt the extened season.
The hot spots included:
- Martha's Vineyard
- Nantuckect Island
- The Cape
- Newburyport, Parker River, Plum Island
Michael
|
246.49 | 3 1/2" mags | TWOBOS::LAFOSSE | | Wed Oct 26 1988 16:36 | 14 |
| Guy, i went back last night and skimmed through the browning catalogue,
and came across the 3 1/2" magnums you mentioned... what it looks
like is that Browning will put out a 3 1/2" production model as
soon as a manufacturer put out the shells.... sooooo if you put
on your Federal hat, would you start up production on 3 1/2 mag
loadings, when theres no one out there making the guns to chamber
them in...
or is there any other gun manufacturers currently chambering them,
I havn't heard... could be way off base here.
Fra
|
246.50 | At least 2 manufacturers have them now | VICKI::DODIER | | Wed Oct 26 1988 17:21 | 6 |
246.51 | The Necker... | TARKIN::AHO | I'm the NRA,ATA,MATA,NSSA,MSSA,SR&PAM & GOAL | Thu Dec 29 1988 11:41 | 13 |
|
I'm digressing a bit here, but back around .30 or so there
was discussion about dispatching cripples. Has anyone tried the
"Necker" which is advertised in some of the DU magazines?? I
believe it's out of Texas somwhere and is similar to a pair of
large pliers. Any info would be appreciated...
Thanks,
~Mike~
|
246.52 | | CLUSTA::STORM | | Thu Jan 05 1989 17:09 | 19 |
| SInce much of this note discussed the steel shot controversy, I
thought I would add my $.02 worth. I didn't say much originally,
but I've been using steel more in the Mass Coastal zone the past
3 weeks. I took 7 ducks, most of the them blacks and lost one.
I shot 3 inch #2s and the ducks all dropped straight down. None
were badly shot up and none were going anywhere.
I'm convinced the biggest problem is people shooting out of range.
On opening day we went to the Parker River Wildlife Area. You
are supposed to fill out a form on your way out saying what to got
and what you crippled and lost. It was slightly more ducks lost
than recovered! That is terrible! I watch other hunters lose some
cripples, and they were taking shots way out of range. I hate to
admit it, but looking back, I should have avoided it and not taken
what I now realize was too long a shot.
Mark,
|
246.53 | A day like you read about! | GIAMEM::J_AMBERSON | | Tue Dec 19 1989 13:06 | 33 |
| Anyone else been goose hunting? Yesterday we had what I have
to considure the best goose hunting day of my life. We had a total
of 5 hunters in the field. Three of these guys had never shot a
goose before, but had hunted other game. We were hunting a field
that I finally got permission to hunt after trying for four years!
Persistance pays off, as does being polite. We put out a spread
of 36 shells and full bodies. We were all set at dawn when the
first flight came over. They looked us over but refused to come
in. My first thought was that some of the "rookies" were looking
up at the birds instead of keeping there faces hidden. The second
and third flights refused to decoy also. At this point I was getting
frustrated and went out into the spread to see if I could figure
what was wrong. Everyone seemed well camo'd, so we figured mayby
the spread was wrong. I decided to open it up some and flare the
end away from us. By doing this we risked having the birds decoy
to far out, but we needed to change something. The next flight
was a group of just three birds. They came right down the pike
and all hit the deck! Three shots and three birds. Ye Ha! it worked!
From then on it was unbelievable. We ended up with fifteen birds
by 9:15. We dropped six out of one flight. At one point I was
fixing a deke that had been bombed by a falling goose when two
birds decided to come in. They aproached the first time with feet
down and I dropped one, grabbed him and layed down. Started calling
and the lone bird turned came around to land and was dropped by another
guy in our party! Truely unbelievable! We had birds trying to
land while we were picking up the dekes. By the time we had
everything packed up and ready to go, there were over 400 birds in the
field feeding. We tried to tell the new guys that this was unusual
but I have a feeling that there now ruined for life. Needless to
say I'm going back later in the week.
Jeff
|
246.54 | Parker River Refuge | USCTR1::DRUM | | Wed Jan 05 1994 12:26 | 10 |
| My neighbor showed me an article (New England Game & Fish?) on hunting
the Parker River Refuge in Newbury/Rowley for waterfowl. Has anyone
out there had success in hunting this refuge? From what I remember
from the article there were three areas mentioned. One area had access
only by boat. One area had access from land or boat. One area
(Rowley) had only walk-in access.
Regards,
|
246.55 | Any waterfowlers left out there? | HANNAH::MORRIS | | Thu Sep 05 1996 17:45 | 16 |
| <Sounds of thick layers of dust being blown away>
Hey, there! Any New Englanders out taking Canada Geese this fall? My
neighbor and I went out the day after opening day, 04SEP, and had the
luck to have a small flight move directly over us. My neighbor and I
each took one and then scurried off to our respective jobs. Its a nice
way to start the day.
I use a Mossberg 500 slide action with 3" #2 Steel.
We just breasted out the birds; and a few notes back (over 8 yrs ago),
a fellow noter mentioned keeping the leg/thigh meat as well. I feel a
bit guilty at not having made full use of the birds, and would be
interested in further info/opinions regarding the dressing and
preparing of the game.
|
246.56 | Want Geese Come to New Jersey Too Many! | KYOSS1::LUIZZA | | Thu Sep 05 1996 23:25 | 26 |
|
WANT GOOSE! New Jersey's got them. There are so many here that after
the Division of Fish Game and Wildlife finally justified that we have
too many RESIDENT geese we started the goose season this past monday.
5 birds a day! These things are everywhere every corporate pond, catch
basin, and golf course is over run with the darn things.It's bad when
prople have to worry about the goose droppings in the parking lots and
tracking them into the buildings.
ps. best goose recipe as related to me by a friend:
Take one goose cleaned and ready to cook
put on 8" wide piece of pine board in oven,
cook at 350 till done,
take out of oven,
scrape bird off board into garbage,
cut up pine board and eat it,
it will taste better.
Most likely from someone who didn't know how to prepare the bird. Real
suggestions on how to put it on the table and enjoy it would be
welcome.
/Irv
p.s. Gone Bear Huntng to Maine be back in a week.
|
246.57 | one recipe | LUDWIG::BING | | Fri Sep 06 1996 11:24 | 12 |
|
My recipe:
Cut breast meat off bone and save legs. Marinate all meat in
soy sauce/garlic mix (to taste, I like lots of garlic!)
Broil like you would a steak, all the while basting with soy sauce/
garlic/butter mix. Thats it. The legs will cook quicker than the
breast meat so watch it. If you like steak med/rare cook your goose
that way too. This also works with ducks.
Walt
|
246.58 | Maybe a hickory board, instead? | HANNAH::MORRIS | | Fri Sep 06 1996 13:05 | 15 |
| Hmmm...
I think I prefer Walt's recipe to Irv's, as pine board usually gives me
gas.
My usual method of preparing duck was to thinly slice the breast meat
and stir fry it with bell pepper and garlic. Not too strong to distract
from the natural flavor, and mellowing enough to remove any gamey-ness
that may have snuck in.
BTW, the day limit here is 5 birds also. They're quite plentiful all
about the place, including, every once in a while, the parking lot here at
MRO. I wonder if security would mind if I.....no, probably not.
-Jeff
|